Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T15:28:50.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2010

George O. Liber
Affiliation:
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Get access

Summary

During the 1920s and early 1930s the Communist Party in the Soviet Union attempted to implement three goals concurrently. The first was to maintain the political monopoly it had won at the end of the civil war. The second was to legitimize its power monopoly where resistance to the Bolsheviks was greatest during the revolution and civil war: in the countryside and in the non-Russian borderlands of the former tsarist empire. The third was to create a socialist economy and establish a modern industrial society in a backward, predominantly agricultural country.

In theory, these three goals were complementary. By establishing industrial centers in the non-Russian republics, the Soviet leadership believed that, with economic development, the indigenous populations would be modernized, would be proletarianized, would acquire a working-class consciousness, and would accept the Soviet order as legitimate. Legal, social, political, and economic equality would shift the focus of the non-Russians from their national identities to an international working-class identity. In the long run, the non-Russians would become Sovietized. In the short run, the Bolsheviks hoped to legitimize their urban-based revolution in a predominantly agricultural, multi-national state by modernizing within a framework of multiple languages and identities.

In the early 1920s the party assumed that order and legitimacy were compatible during industrialization. If judged only by economic indicators, the Soviet modernization effort of the late 1920s and 1930s was an impressive achievement. But the interaction between industrialization and korenizatsiia did not fully integrate the non-Russians to the Soviet order. Over the long run, industrialization did not equalize the economic and social disparities among the non-Russians or between them and the Russians.

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • George O. Liber, University of Alabama, Birmingham
  • Book: Soviet Nationality Policy, Urban Growth, and Identity Change in the Ukrainian SSR 1923–1934
  • Online publication: 03 February 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511562914.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • George O. Liber, University of Alabama, Birmingham
  • Book: Soviet Nationality Policy, Urban Growth, and Identity Change in the Ukrainian SSR 1923–1934
  • Online publication: 03 February 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511562914.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • George O. Liber, University of Alabama, Birmingham
  • Book: Soviet Nationality Policy, Urban Growth, and Identity Change in the Ukrainian SSR 1923–1934
  • Online publication: 03 February 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511562914.013
Available formats
×