Book contents
- Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
- Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction: Speech and Society in Comparative Perspective
- Part I Revisiting International Norms
- Part II Dewesternizing Tendencies
- Part III The West as Progenitor and Modifier of Concepts of Free Expression
- 10 Where Should Speech Be Free? Placing Liberal Theories of Free Speech in a Wider Context
- 11 The History, Philosophy, and Law of Free Expression in the United States: Implications for the Digital Age
- 12 The Evolution of a Russian Concept of Free Speech
- Part IV Technologies and Ideologies in Turbulent Times
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
10 - Where Should Speech Be Free? Placing Liberal Theories of Free Speech in a Wider Context
from Part III - The West as Progenitor and Modifier of Concepts of Free Expression
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 November 2017
Book contents
- Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
- Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction: Speech and Society in Comparative Perspective
- Part I Revisiting International Norms
- Part II Dewesternizing Tendencies
- Part III The West as Progenitor and Modifier of Concepts of Free Expression
- 10 Where Should Speech Be Free? Placing Liberal Theories of Free Speech in a Wider Context
- 11 The History, Philosophy, and Law of Free Expression in the United States: Implications for the Digital Age
- 12 The Evolution of a Russian Concept of Free Speech
- Part IV Technologies and Ideologies in Turbulent Times
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Speech and Society in Turbulent TimesFreedom of Expression in Comparative Perspective, pp. 171 - 191Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Baker, C. E. 1989. Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barendt, E. 2007. Freedom of Speech. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. 1789. “Draught of a new plan for the organisation of judicial establishment in France,” in Bowring, J. (ed.) 1843, The Works of Jeremy Bentham with an Outline of His Opinions on the Principal Subjects Discussed in His Works, Vol. 4. Edinburgh: W. Tait, pp. 285–406.Google Scholar
Blasi, V. 1977. “The checking value in First Amendment theory,” Law & Social Inquiry 2: 521–649.Google Scholar
Bollinger, L. C. 2010. Uninhibited, Robust, and Wide Open: A Free Press for a New Century. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandeis, L. D. 1914. Other People’s Money, and How the Bankers Use It. New York: Frederick A Stokes Company.Google Scholar
China.org.cn 2013. “Weibo: An eye on corruption,” March 11, 2013. Available at: www.china.org.cn/china/NPC_CPPCC_2013/2013-03/11/content_28201650.htm.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J. 2013. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, W. H. 2008. “The Fifth Estate emerging through the network of networks,” Prometheus 27: 1–15.Google Scholar
Hitchens, L. 2006. Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Jaconelli, J. 2002. Open Justice: A Critique of the Public Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, J. 1990. “Foundations and limits of freedom of the press,” in Lichtenberg, J. (ed.),Democracy and the Mass Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–35.Google Scholar
Meiklejohn, A. 1961. “The First Amendment is an absolute,” Supreme Court Review 1961 1961: 245–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, J. 1918. Areopagitica, with a Commentary by Sir Richard Jebb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nabi, Z. 2014. “Resistance censorship is futile,” First Monday 19: 11. Available at: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/5525/4155.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1991. “Free expression and personal identification,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 11: 303–24.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. 1972. “A theory of freedom of expression,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 1: 204–26.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. 1982. Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. 2005. “The exceptional First Amendment,” in Ignatieff, M. (ed.), American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 29–56.Google Scholar
Tong, J. 2011. Investigative Journalism in China: Journalism, Power, and Society. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Xinhua Agency 2013. “New media major outlet for exposing corruption,” June 25, 2013. Available at: http://en.people.cn/90882/8298919.html.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2000. “Watchdogs on party leashes? Contexts and implications of investigative journalism in post-Deng China,” Journalism Studies 1: 577–97.Google Scholar