Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgments
- Part I About strategic rivalries
- 1 An introduction to strategic rivalries
- 2 Defining and identifying strategic rivalries in world politics
- 3 Describing strategic rivalries
- Part II The dangers of strategic rivalries: Crisis behavior and escalation
- Part III Playing to type: Spatial and positional issues in strategic rivalries
- Part IV Filling in some steps to war
- Part V Strategic rivalries and conflict
- References
- Index
3 - Describing strategic rivalries
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgments
- Part I About strategic rivalries
- 1 An introduction to strategic rivalries
- 2 Defining and identifying strategic rivalries in world politics
- 3 Describing strategic rivalries
- Part II The dangers of strategic rivalries: Crisis behavior and escalation
- Part III Playing to type: Spatial and positional issues in strategic rivalries
- Part IV Filling in some steps to war
- Part V Strategic rivalries and conflict
- References
- Index
Summary
The beginnings of new millennia suggest, accurately or otherwise, openings and opportunities for new forms of behavior. We enter the twenty-first century with several recent and dramatic legacies in interstate conflict. The Soviet-American Cold War ended. Russia and China managed to de-escalate their feud at almost the same time and, of course, not coincidentally. Southern Africa fairly quickly changed from a highly conflictual and potentially explosive region to one characterized by unusually pacific interaction. Several components of the conflicts linking Israel and its immediate neighbors have been defused at least temporarily and work continues intermittently on reducing the remaining conflict issues. In South America, the ABC powers seem more interested currently in economic integration than in maintaining their traditional rivalries. Argentina and Britain seem most unlikely to fight again over the Falklands and even Ecuador and Peru have devised a formula for de-escalating their long-running conflict.
At the same time, though, the Indo-Pakistani feud refuses to go away. The United States, China, and Russia often seem on the verge of resuming one or more of their former rivalries. China and Taiwan continue to exchange missiles and declarations of independence. North and South Korea persist in maintaining their hostile divided status. The boundaries of Iraq remain potentially elastic, with a number of implications for its rivals. Turkey and Greece remain at loggerheads, although their hostility may also be waning.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Strategic Rivalries in World PoliticsPosition, Space and Conflict Escalation, pp. 73 - 98Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
- 1
- Cited by