Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T06:55:39.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Leadership research and the board of directors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Loizos Heracleous
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

There is a plethora of research on leadership and on boards of directors from a variety of theoretical perspectives. Unfortunately, research within each of these domains has proceeded independently of each other, which has prevented potentially fruitful cross-fertilization between them. This chapter explores the relevance and applicability of leadership research in enhancing our understanding of boards of directors' functioning and effectiveness. Secondly, it discusses methodological issues with respect to board research and indicates potentially fruitful further approaches.

It is suggested that the leadership research stream focused on traits and competencies is particularly promising for future research on boards, since it has been demonstrated that there are traits that can distinguish leaders from non-leaders or effective leaders from ineffective ones, as well as being relevant competencies to distinguish superior performers from average performers in particular jobs. Consistent with the organizational action view of strategic management, this chapter aims to gain a deeper understanding of the dominant coalition, and shares the methodological perspective of this view. It is proposed that a promising way forward in terms of methodology is to focus on gathering in-depth qualitative longitudinal data of actual board behaviors and processes, based on observation. This in-depth data inform quantitative research so as to enhance the operationalization of theoretical variables, and to help identify the key variables in the first place.

Type
Chapter
Information
Strategy and Organization
Realizing Strategic Management
, pp. 53 - 70
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avolio, B. J. and Yammarino, F. J., 1990. Operationalizing charismatic leadership using a levels-of-analysis framework, Leadership Quarterly, 1:193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, R. A., 1997. How can we train leaders if we do not know what leadership is?, Human Relations, 50: 343–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barling, J., Weber, T. and Kelloway, E. K., 1996. Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: a field experiment, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 827–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, B. M., 1990. Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research, Free Press: New York
Bass, B. M., 1995. Theory of transformational leadership redux, Leadership Quarterly, 6: 463–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, B. M. and Avolio, B. J., 1993. Transformational leadership: a response to critiques, in M. M. Chemers and R. Ayman (eds.), Leadership and Research: Perspectives and Directions, San Diego, CA: Academic Press: 49–80
Berman, F. E. and Miner, J. B., 1985. Motivation to manage at the top executive level: a test of the hierarchic role-motivation theory, Personnel Psychology, 38: 377–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R. R. and Mouton, J. S., 1964. The Managerial Grid, Houston: Gulf
Blank, W., Weitzel, J. R. and Green, S. G., 1990. A test of situational leadership theory, Personnel Psychology, 43: 579–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, T., Lykken, D. T., McGue, A., Segal, N. L. and Tellegen, A., 1990. Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota study of twins reared apart, Science, 250: 223–228CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyatzis, R. E., 1982. The Competent Manager, New York: Wiley
Boyle, M., 2001. The dirty half-dozen: America's worst boards, Fortune, May 14: 114–118Google Scholar
Bryman, A., 1993. Charismatic leadership in business organizations: some neglected issues, Leadership Quarterly, 4: 289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryman, A., 1996. Leadership in organizations, in S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. R. Nord (eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, Beverly Hills: Sage: 276–292
Bycio, P., Allen, J. S. and Hackett, R. D., 1995. Further assessments of Bass's (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership, Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 468–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockerill, T., Hunt, J. and Schroder, H., 1995. Managerial competencies: fact or fiction? Business Strategy Review, 6(3): 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conger, J. A. and Kanungo, R. N., 1987. Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings, Academy of Management Review, 12: 637–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombes, P. and Watson, M., 2000. Three surveys on corporate governance, McKinsey Quarterly, 4: 74–77Google Scholar
Daily, C. M. and Dalton, D. R., 1997. CEO and board chair roles held jointly or separately: much ado about nothing?, Academy of Management Executive, 11(3):11–20Google Scholar
Donaldson, G., 1995. A new tool for boards: the strategic audit, Harvard Business Review, July–August: 99–107
Dulewicz, V., MacMillan, K. and Herbert, P., 1995. Appraising and developing the effectiveness of boards and their directors, Journal of General Management, 20(3): 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist, 2002. Corporate governance: designed by committee, June 15: 69–71
Fernandez, C. F. and Vecchio, R. P., 1997. Situational leadership theory revisited: a test of an across-jobs perspective, Leadership Quarterly, 8: 67–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, F. E., 1992. Time-based measures of leadership experience and organizational performance: a review of research and a preliminary model, Leadership Quarterly, 3: 5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, F. E., 1993. The leadership situation and the black box in contingency theories, in M. M. Chemers and R. Ayman (eds.), Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions, San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D., 1996. Strategic Leadership – Top Executives and their Effects on Organizations, Minneapolis: West
Firstenberg, P. B. and Malkiel, B. G., 1994. The twenty-first century boardroom: who will be in charge?, Sloan Management Review, Fall: 27–35
Garratt, B., 1996. The Fish Rots from the Head, London: HarperCollins
Gibb, C. A., 1947. The principles and traits of leadership, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42: 267–284CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Das, Hari T., 1983. Qualitative research in organizational behavior, Journal of Management Studies, 20: 301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hater, J. J. and Bass, B. M., 1988. Superiors' evaluations and subordinates' perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 695–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heracleous, L., 1999. The board of directors as leaders of the organization, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7: 256–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heracleous, L., 2001. What is the impact of corporate governance on organizational performance?, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9: 165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jick, T. D., 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 601–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kets de Vries, M. F. R., 1994. The leadership mystique, Academy of Management Executive, 8(3): 73–92Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, S. A., and Locke, E. A., 1991. Leadership: do traits matter?, Academy of Management Executive, 5(2): 48–60Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, S. A., and Locke, E. A., 1996. Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 36–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, K. J. and House, R. J., 1995. On fire: charismatic leadership and levels of analysis, Leadership Quarterly, 6: 183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M. and Terborg, J. R., 1995. The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16: 319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhnert, K. W. and Lewis, P., 1987. Transactional and transformational leadership: a constructive/developmental analysis, Academy of Management Review, 12: 648–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, R. S., 1996. Building competency models: approaches for HR professionals, Human Resource Management, 35(1): 7–183.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, D. C., 1965. N-achievement and entrepreneurship: a longitudinal study, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1: 389–392CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, D. C., 1985. Human Motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman
Miller, K. I. and Monge, P. R., 1986. Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: a meta-analytic review, Academy of Management Journal, 29: 727–753Google Scholar
Miner, J. B., 1978. Twenty years of research on role motivation theory of managerial effectiveness, Personnel Psychology, 31: 739–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miner, J. B., 1986. Managerial role motivation training, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 1(1): 25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monks, R., 1999. What will be the impact of active shareholders? A practical recipe for constructive change, Long Range Planning, 32: 20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monks, R., 2001. Redesigning corporate governance structures and systems for the twenty first century, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9: 142–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niehoff, B. P., Enz, C. A. and Grover, R. A., 1990. The impact of top-management actions on employee attitudes and perceptions, Group & Organization Studies, 15: 337–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neal, D. and Thomas, H., 1996. Developing the strategic board, Long Range Planning, 29: 314–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, A. and Baker, J. C., 1987. Why won't directors rock the boat?, Harvard Business Review, November–December: 10–18
Peters, L. H., Hartke, D. D. and Pohlmann, J. T., 1985. Fiedler's contingency theory of leadership: an application of the meta-analysis procedures of Schmidt and Hunter, Psychological Bulletin, 97: 274–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Ahearne, M. and Bommer, W. H., 1995. Searching for a needle in a haystack: trying to identify the illusive moderators of leadership behaviors, Journal of Management, 21: 423–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rost, J. C., 1991. Leadership for the Twenty-First Century, New York: Praeger
Russ, F. A., McNeilly, K. M. and Comer, J. M., 1996. Leadership, decision making and performance of sales managers: a multi-level approach, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 16(3): 1–15Google Scholar
Salmon, W. J., 1993. Crisis prevention: how to gear up your board, Harvard Business Review, January–February: 68–75
Schein, E. H., 1988. Process Consultation, I, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Stogdill, R. M., 1948. Personal factors associated with leadership: a survey of the literature, Journal of Psychology, 25: 35–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stogdill, R. M., 1950. Leadership, membership and organization, Psychological Bulletin, 47: 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stogdill, R. M., 1974. Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research, New York: Free Press
Strube, M. J. and Garcia, J. E., 1981. A meta-analytic investigation of Fiedler's contingency model of leadership performance, Psychological Bulletin, 90: 307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Useem, M., Bowman, E. H., Myatt, J. and Irvine, C. W., 1993. US institutional investors look at corporate governance in the 1990s, European Management Journal, 11: 175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vecchio, R. P., 1990. Theoretical and empirical examination of cognitive resource theory, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whistler, T. L., 1984. Rules of the Game: Inside the Corporate Boardroom, Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin
Wofford, J. C. and Liska, L. Z., 1993. Path–goal theories of leadership: a meta-analysis, Journal of Management, 19: 858–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G., 1998. Leadership in Organizations (4th edn.), London: Prentice-Hall

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×