Aguilera, Marion, Yagoubi, Radouane El, Espesser, Robert & Astésano, Corine (2014) Event-Related Potential investigation of Initial Accent processing in French, in Campbell, Nick, Gibbon, Dafydd & Hirst, Daniel (eds.), Social and Linguistic Prosody: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dublin: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), 383–387.Google Scholar

Alkire, Ti & Rosen, Carol (2010) Romance Languages: A Historical Introduction, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonetti, Pierre & Rossi, Mario (1970) Précis de phonétique italienne: synchronie et dialchronie, Aix-en-Provence: La Pensée Universitaire.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Lilias E. & Ward, Ida C. (1931) Handbook of English Intonation (2nd edn.), Cambridge: W. Heffer.Google Scholar

Astésano, Corine, Besson, Mireille & Alter, Kai (2004) Brain potentials during semantic and prosodic processing in French, Cognitive Brain Research (18) 2004, 172–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Austin, John Langshaw (1962) How to Do Things with Words, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Avanzi, Mathieu (2012) L’interface prosodie/syntaxe en français, Brussels: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avanzi, Mathieu & Martin, Philippe (2007) L’intonème conclusif: une fin de phrase en soi? Cahiers de linguistique française 28, 247–258.Google Scholar

Avanzi, Mathieu, Lacheret-Dujour, Anne & Victorri, Bernard (2008) ANALOR: a tool for semi-automatic annotation of French prosodic structure, in Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008: Fourth International Conference on Speech Prosody, Campinas, Brazil, May 6–9, 119–122.Google Scholar

Avanzi, Mathieu, Obin, Nicolas, Lacheret, Anne & Victorri, Bernard (2011). Toward a continuous modeling of French prosodic structure: using acoustic features to predict prominence location and prominence degree, in Proceedings of Interspeech, Florence, August, 2033–2036.Google Scholar

Avanzi, Mathieu, Rousier-Vercruyssen, Lucie, Schwab, Sandra, Gonzalez, Sylvia & Fossard, Marian, et al. (2013) C-PROM-Task: a new annotated dataset for the study of French speech prosody, in Proceedings TRASP 2013: Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, August 30, 27–30.Google Scholar

Avesani, Cinzia (1995) ToBIt: un sistema di trascrizione per l’intonazione italiana, in Atti delle 5e Giornate di Studio del Gruppo di Fonetica Sperimentale (A.I.A.), Povo (TN), Italy, 85–98.Google Scholar

Badiou, Alain (1969) Le concept de modèle: introduction à une épistémologie matérialiste des mathématiques, Paris: Maspéro.Google Scholar

Bally, Charles (1944) Linguistique générale et linguistique française, Berne: Francke.Google Scholar

Baumann, Stefan, Grice, Martine & Benzmüller, Ralf (2001) GToBI: a phonological system for the transcription of German intonation, in Puppel, S. & Demenko, G. (eds.), Prosody 2000: Speech Recognition and Synthesis, Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University, 21–28.Google Scholar

Beckman, Mary E. & Elam, Gayle Ayers (1997) Guidelines for ToBI Labelling (Version 3, March 1997), The Ohio State University Research Foundation, www.ling.ohio-state.edu/research/phonetics/E_ToBI/.Google Scholar

Beckman, Mary & Jun, Sun-Ah (1996) K-ToBI (Korean ToBI) labelling convention, (Version 2), Ms., Ohio State University and UCLA, www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/jun/sunah.htm.Google Scholar

Beckman, Mary E. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1986) Intonational structure in Japanese and English, Phonology Yearbook 3, 255–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckman, Mary E., Díaz-Campos, Manuel, Mcgory, Julia Tevis & Morgan, Terrell A. (2002) Intonation across Spanish, in the Tones and Break Indices framework, Probus 14, 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckman, Mary E., Hirschberg, Julia & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie (2005) The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Oxford University Press, 9–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berrendonner, Alain (1990) Pour une macro-syntaxe, Travaux de linguistique 21, 25–36.Google Scholar

Berrendonner, Alain (2003) Grammaire de l’écrit vs. grammaire de l’oral: le jeu des composantes micro et macro-syntaxiques, in Rabatel, A. (ed.), Interactions orales en contexte didactique: mieux(se) comprendre pour mieux (se) parler et pour mieux (s’) apprendre, Lyon: PUL, 249–264.Google Scholar

Beyssade, Claire, Delais-Roussarie, Élisabeth & Marandin, Jean-Marie (2007) The prosody of interrogatives in French, Cahiers de linguistique française 28, 163–175.Google Scholar

Blanche-Benveniste, Claire (1990) Le français parlé-études grammaticales, Éditors du CNRS, ParisGoogle Scholar

Blanche-Benveniste, Claire (2000) Approches de la langue parlée en français, Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar

Blanche-Benveniste, Claire (2003) La naissance des syntagmes dans les hésitations et répétitions du parler, in Araoui, J. L. (ed.), Le sens et la mesure: hommages à Benoît de Cornulier, Paris: Honoré Champion, 40–55.Google Scholar

Blanche-Benveniste, Claire (2007) Corpus de langue parlée et description grammaticale de la langue, Langage et société 121–122(3), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blanche-Benveniste, Claire & Martin, Philippe (2011) Structuration prosodique, dernière réorganisation avant énonciation, Langue française 170, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blanche-Benveniste, Claire, Valli, André, Mota, Maria Antonia, Simone, Raffaele, Bonvino, Elisabetta & de Vivar, Isabel Uzcanga (1997) EuRom4: metodo di insegnamento simultaneo delle lingue romanze, Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar

Bocci, Giuliano (2013) The Syntax-Prosody Interface, Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight L. (1961) Contrastive accent and contrastive stress, Language 37, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight L. (1972) Accent is predictable (if you’re a mind-reader), Language 48(3), 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonami, Olivier & Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth (2006) Metrical phonology in HPSG, in Müller, Stephan (ed.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Varna, Bulgaria, July 2006, Stanford: CLSI Online Publications, 39–59.Google Scholar

Bonvino, Elisabetta, Caddéo, Sandrine, Serra, Eulalia Vilaginés & Pippa, Salvador (2011) EuRom5, Milan: Ulrico Hoepli.Google Scholar

Boucher, Victor, Gilbert, Annie & Martin, Philippe (forthcoming) Prosodic words and brain waves.Google Scholar

Boulakia, Georges (1985) Ambigüité et intonation, in Fuchs, C. (ed.), Aspects de l’ambigüité et de la paraphrase dans les langues naturelles, Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Bruce, Gösta (1977) Swedish word accents in sentence perspective, Travaux de l’Institut de Linguistique de Lund, 12. Gleerup: Lund University Press.Google Scholar

Brunot, Ferdinand (1911–1914) Archives de la parole, Gallica, http://gallica.bnf.fr/html/enregistrements-sonores/archives-de-la-parole-ferdinand-brunot-1911–1914.Google Scholar

Cei, Erica & Hayes, Bruce (2013) Italian Stress Study, http://italianstressstudy.blogspot.fr/.Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace (1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view, Linguistic Inquiry, 25–55.Google Scholar

Chen, Matthew (1970) Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment, Phonetica 22(3), 129–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Zen-Yong, Cowell, Patricia E., Varley, Rosemary & Wang, Yi-Ching (2009) A cross-language study of verbal and visuospatial working memory span, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 31(4), 385–391, DOI: 10.1080/13803390802195195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chitoran, Ioana (2002) The Phonology of Romanian: A Constraint-Based Approach, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chitoran, Ioana, Ciobanu, Alina Maria, Dinu, Liviu P. & Niculae, Vlad (2014) Using a Machine Learning Model to assess the complexity of stress systems, in Campbell, Nick, Gibbon, Dafydd and Hirst, Daniel (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Speech Prosody, Tongji University Press, Shanghai, 331–336.Google Scholar

Contini, Michel, Lai, Jean-Pierre, Romano, Antonio, Roullet, Stefania, de Castro Moutinho, Lurdes, et al. (2002) Un projet d’atlas multimédia prosodique de l’espace roman, in Speech Prosody 2002: Proceedings of the First International Conference of Speech Prosody (Aix-en-Provence, April, 11–13, 2002), Aubenas d’Ardèche: Lienhart, 227–231.Google Scholar

Cooper, William & Sorensen, John (1981) Fundamental Frequency in Sentence Production, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

C-ORAL-BRASIL (2012) Reference Corpus for Informal Spoken Brazilian Portuguese, in Caseli, Helena, Villavicencio, Aline, Teixeira, António & Perdigão, Fernando (eds.), Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference, PROPOR 2012, Coimbra, Portugal, April 17-20, Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 7243, Springer, 362–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

C-ORAL-ROM (2001) Corpus de référence pour les langues romanes orale, www.elda.org/en/proj/coral/fr/coralrom.html.Google Scholar

C-ORAL-ROM (2005) Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages, Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 15, ed. Cresti, Emanuela & Moneglia, Massimo, Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CFPP (2000) Corpus du Français Parlé Parisien http://ed268.univ-paris3.fr/syled/ressources/Corpus-Parole-Paris-PIII/.Google Scholar

Cresti, Emanuela (2000) Corpus di italiano parlato, Florence: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar

Cresti, Emanuela, Moneglia, Massimo & Martin, Philippe (2002) L’intonation des illocutions naturelles représentatives: analyse et validation perceptive, in Macro-syntaxe et pragmatique: l’analyse linguistique de l’oral, Lablita: Università di Firenze, 173–192.Google Scholar

Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie & Martin, Philippe (2010) Les parenthèses: étude macrosyntaxique et prosodique sur corpus, in Béguelin, Marie-José, Avanzi, Mathieu & Corminboeuf, Gilles (eds.), La parataxe, Vol. II: Structures, marquages et exploitations discursives, Berne: Peter Lang, 307–339.Google Scholar

Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie, Deulofeu, Henri-José & Martin, Philippe (2008) Pour une syntaxe sans ellipse, in Pitavy, Jean-Christophe & Bigot, Michèle (eds.), Ellipse et effacement: du schème de phrase aux règles discursives, Publications de l’Université de Saint-Etienne, 227–235.Google Scholar

Delais-Roussarie, Elizabeth (2000) Vers une nouvelle approche de la structure prosodique, Langue Française 126(May), 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delais-Roussarie, Elizabeth (2009) La prosodie des incidentes en français, Cahiers de Grammaire 30, 129–138.Google Scholar

Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Post, Brechtje, Avanzi, Mathieu, Buthke, Carolin, Di Cristo, Albert, et al. (2015) Intonational phonology of French: developing a ToBI system for French, in Frota, Sónia & Prieto, Pilar (eds.), Intonational Variation in Romance, Oxford University Press, pp. 63–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delattre, Pierre (1966) Les dix intonations de base du français, French Review 40, 1–14.Google Scholar

Dell, François (1984) L’accentuation dans les phrases en français, in Dell, F., Hirst, D. & Vergnaud, J. R. (eds.), Formes sonores du langage, Paris: Hermann, 65–122.Google Scholar

Dell, François (2004) On recent claims about stress and tone in Mandarin, Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 33(1), 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delmonte, Rodolfo (1981) L’accento di parola nella prosodia dell’enunciato dell’italiano standard, Studi di grammatica Italiana 10, 351–394.Google Scholar

Deulofeu, Henri-José (2003) L’approche macrosyntaxique en syntaxe: un nouveau modèle de rasoir d’Occam contre les notions inutiles, Scolia 16, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deulofeu, Henri-José (2006) Pour une linguistique du rattachement, in Apothéloz, Denis, Combettes, Bernard & Neveu, Franck (eds.), Actes du colloque international de Nancy (7–9 juin 2006), Bern/Berlin: Peter Lang, 229–250.Google Scholar

Di Cristo, Albert (1998) Intonation in French, in Hirst, D. J. & Di Cristo, A. (eds.), Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages, Cambridge University Press, 195–218.Google Scholar

Di Cristo, Albert (2013) La prosodie de la parole, Brussels: De Boeck – Solal.Google Scholar

Di Cristo, Albert & Rossi, Mario (1977) Propositions pour un modèle d’analyse de l’intonation, Actes des 8èmes Journées d’Étude sur la Parole (Aix-en-Provence), 1, 323–329.Google Scholar

D’Imperio, Mariapaola (2002) Italian intonation: an overview and some questions, Probus 14, 37–69.Google Scholar

D’Imperio, Mariapaola, Elordieta, Gorka, Frota, Sónia, Prieto, Pilar & Vigário, Marina (2005) Intonational phrasing in Romance: the role of syntactic and prosodic structure, in Frota, S., Vigário, M. & Freitas, M. J. (eds.), Prosodies, Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 59–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doelling, Keith B., Arnal, Luc H., Ghitza, Oded & Poeppel, David (2014) Acoustic landmarks drive delta-theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing, NeuroImage 85(761). DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duez, Daniele (1997) Acoustic markers of political power, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, November(6), 641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunning, Brian (2010) Speed Reading, Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., Oct 26, 2010. Accessed online, Dec. 12, 2013, http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4229/.Google Scholar

Eckman, Paul (1999) Basic emotions, in Dalgleish, Tim & Power, Michael J. (eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, New York: Wiley & Sons, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Émerard, Françoise (1977) Synthèse par diphones et traitement de la prosodie, Doctoral thesis (Doctorat de 3ème cycle), Université de Grenoble III, France.Google Scholar

EuRom4 (1991–1997) Projet européen Lingua (CEE) I Institut National de la Langue Française (INALF), under the direction of Claire Blanche-Benveniste (Université de Provence) with Università Terza di Roma, Universidad de Salamanca, and Universidade da Lisbõa.Google Scholar

Feldhausen, Ingo (2010) Sentencial Form and Prosodic Structure of Catalan, Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fónagy, Ivan (1979) L’accent en français: accent probabilitaire, in L’accent en français contemporain, Studia Phonetica, 15, Paris: Didier, 123–233.Google Scholar

Fónagy, Ivan (2003) Fonctions de l’intonation: essai de synthèse, Flambeau 29, 1–20.Google Scholar

Fónagy, Ivan & Fónagy, Judith (1983) L’intonation et l’organisation du discours, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 78, 161–209.Google Scholar

Fónagy, Ivan & Magdics, Klara (1960) Speed of utterances in phrases of different lengths, Language and Speech 3, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fónagy, Ivan & Magdics, Klara (1963) Emotional patterns in intonation and music, Zeitschrift für Phonetik 16, 293–326.Google Scholar

Fox, Anthony (2000) Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frei, Henri (1929/2011) La grammaire des fautes, Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar

Friederici, Angela D. (2002) Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(2), 78–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frota, Sónia (2009) The Prosodic Phonology of European Portuguese, www.fl.ul.pt//laboratoriofonetica/personal/sfrota/.Google Scholar

Frota, Sónia & Prieto, Pilar (2015) Intonation in Romance, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frota, Sónia, Cruz, Marisa, Svartman, Flaviane, Vigário, Marina, Collischonn, Gisela, et al. (2013) Labelling intonational variation across varieties of European and Brazilian Portuguese, PaPI 2011, Talk presented at the workshop on Romance ToBI, in PaPI, Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Catherine (1996) Les ambiguïtés du français, Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar

Gachet, Frédéric & Avanzi, Mathieu (2008) la prosodie des parenthèses en français spontané, Verbum 30(1), 53–84.Google Scholar

Garde, Paul (1968) L’accent, Paris: PUF; 2nd edn. 2013, Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar

Ghitza, Oded (2012) On the role of theta-driven syllabic parsing in decoding speech: intelligibility of speech with a manipulated modulation spectrum, Front. Psychol. 3:238. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ghitza, Oded (2013b) The theta syllable: a unit of speech information defined by ortical function, Front. Psychol. 4, Article138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghitza, Oded, Giraud, Anne-Lise & Poeppel, David (2013) Neuronal oscillations and speech perception: critical-band temporal envelopes are the essence, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6, www.frontiersin.org, 6, Article 340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, Annie (2012) Le chunking perceptif de la parole: sur la nature du groupement temporel et son effet sur la mémoire immédiate, Doctoral thesis, Université de Montréal (March 2011).Google Scholar

Gilbert, Annie & Boucher, Victor (2007) What do listeners attend to in hearing prosodic structures? Investigating the human speech-parser using short-term recall, in van Hamme, H. & van Son, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2007), Antwerp, Belgium, 430–433.Google Scholar

Jules, Gilléron & Édmont, Édmond (1902–1910) Atlas linguistique de la France, 9 vols., Paris: Champion, Paris.Google Scholar

Giraud, Anne-Lise & Poeppel, David (2012) Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles, Nature neuroscience E-pub, DOI:10.1038/nn.3063, www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v15/n4/abs/nn.3063.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godement, Rémi & Martin, Philippe (2010) Suffixes complexes: quand c’est fini ça recommence …, Actes des Xèmes Journées d’Étude sur la Parole, Mons, 185–188.Google Scholar

Goldman, Jean-Philippe (2011) EasyAlign: an automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat, in Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Florence, August 27–31, 3233–3236.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, John (1976) Autosegmental phonology, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Foreign Literatures and Linguistics.Google Scholar

Grammont, Maurice (1933) Traité de phonétique, Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar

Grevisse, Maurice ([1936]2011) Le bon usage (15th edn.), Paris: Duculot/De Boeck.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos (2004) The Phonology of Tone and Intonation, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos (2005) Transcription of Dutch intonation. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Oxford University Press, 118–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1987) An Essay on Stress, Cambrige, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

’t Hart, Johan (1976) Discriminability of the size of pitch movements in speech, IPO Progress Report 9, 56–63.Google Scholar

’t Hart, Johan, Collier, René & Cohen, Antonie (1990) A Perceptual Study of Intonation: An Experimental-Phonetic Approach to Speech Melody, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henry, Molly & Obleser, Jonas (2012) Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA (PNAS), www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/11/…/1213390109.Google Scholar

Hirst, Daniel (2005) Form and function in the representation of speech prosody, in Hirose, K., Hirst, D. J. & Sagisaka, J. (eds.), Quantitative Prosody Modeling for Natural Speech Description and Generation (= special issue of Speech Communication 46 (3–4)), 334–347.Google Scholar

Hirst, Daniel & Espesser, Robert (1993) Automatic modelling of fundamental frequency using a quadratic spline function, Travaux de l’Institut de Phonétique d’Aix 15, 71–85.Google Scholar

Hualde, José I. (2003) El modelo métrico y autosegmental, in Prieto, P. (ed.), Teorías de la entonación, Barcelona: Ariel, 155–184.Google Scholar

Hualde, José I. (2010) Secondary stress and stress clash in Spanish, in Ortega-Llebaria, Marta (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 11–19, www.lingref.com/cpp/lasp/4/index.html.Google Scholar

Jones, Daniel (1909) Intonation Curves, Leipzig/Berlin: Teubner.Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) (2005) Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah (2012) Prosodic typology revisited: adding macro-rhythm, in Ma, Qiuwu, Ding, Hongwei & Hirst, Daniel (eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2012: Sixth International Conference on Speech Prosody, Tongji University Press, 535–538.Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah & Fougeron, Cécile (2002) The realizations of the Accentual Phrase in French intonation, Probus 14, 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karcevski, Serge (2000) Inédits et introuvables, Textes rassemblés et établis par Irina et Gilles Fougeron, Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

Lacheret-Dujour, Anne (2003) La prosodie des circonstants, Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

Lacheret-Dujour, Anne & Beaugendre, Frédéric (1999) La prosodie du français, Paris: CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar

Lacheret-Dujour, Anne & Vittori, Bernard (2002) La période intonative comme unité d’analyse pour l’étude du français parlé: modélisation prosodique et enjeux linguistiques, in Charolles, M., Le Goffic, P. & Morel, M. A. (eds.), Verbum n°1–2 : Y-a-t-il une syntaxe au-delà de la phrase? Presses universitaires de Nancy, 55–72.Google Scholar

Ladd, Robert D. (1996) Intonational Phonology, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ladd, Robert D. (2008) Intonational Phonology (2nd edn.), Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lanchantin, Pierre, Morris, Andrew C., Rodet, Xavier & Veaux, Christian (2008) Automatic phoneme segmentation with relaxed textual constraints, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 08), Marrakech: European Language Resources Association, www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2008/.Google Scholar

Leben, William (1971) The morphophonemics of tone in Hausa, in Kim, C.-W. and Stahlke, H. (eds.), Papers in African Linguistics, Edmonton, Alberta: Linguistic Research, Inc., 201–218.Google Scholar

Lehiste, Ilse (1979) Suprasegmentals, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lehka, Irina & Le Gac, David (2004) Étude d’un marqueur prosodique de l’accent de banlieue, Actes des XXIIIème Journées d’Etudes sur la Parole, April 2004, Fès, Morocco, www.afcp-arole.org/doc/Archives_JEP/2004_XXVe_JEP_Fes/actes/jep2004/Lehka-LeGac.pdf.Google Scholar

Léon, Monique (1964) Exercices systématiques de prononciation française, fascicule 2, Rythme et intonation, Paris: Hachette et Larousse.Google Scholar

Léon, Pierre (1993) Précis de phonostylistique: parole et expressivité, coll. “Fac Linguistique,” Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar

Léon, Pierre (2005) Phonétisme et prononciations du français (5th edn.), Paris: Armand-Colin.Google Scholar

Léon, Pierre & Martin, Philippe (1969) Prolégomènes à l’étude des structures intonatives, Montréal: Didier.Google Scholar

Li, X., Hagoort, Peter & Yang, Yufang (2008). Event-related potential evidence on the influence of accentuation in spoken discourse comprehension, Chinese Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(5), 906–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liberman, Alvin M. & Mattingly, Ignatius G. (1985) The motor theory of speech perception revised, Cognition 21(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liberman, Mark & Prince, Alan (1977) On stress and linguistic rhythm, Linguistic Inquiry 8, 249–336.Google Scholar

Linne, Per (2005) The Written Language Bias in Linguistics, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lonchamp, François (1998) Prédire l’intonation des phrases affirmatives: facteurs rythmiques et syntaxiques, Verbum 17(1), 37–45.Google Scholar

Makuuchi, Michirou, Bahlmann, Jörg, Anwander, Alfred & Friederici, Angela D. (2009) Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(20), 8362–8367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marshall Unger, James (2003) Ideogram: Chinese Characters and the Myth of Disembodied Meaning, University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe (1973) Les problèmes de l’intonation: recherches et méthodes, Langue française 19 (Sept. 1973), 4–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Philippe (1975) Analyse phonologique de la phrase française, Linguistics, 146 (Feb.), 35–68.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe (1987) Prosodic and rhythmic structures in French, Linguistics, 25(5), 925–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Philippe (1989) Automatic assignment of lexical stress in Italian, Proc. Eurospeech 89, Paris, Sept. 27–29, 1989, 222–225.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2002) Intonation et syntaxe dans les langues romanes, in Macro-syntaxe et pragmatique: l’analyse linguistique de l’oral, Lablita, Università di Firenze, 193–220.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2006) Modelli di analisi e sistemi di etichettatura prosodica, AISV 2005, Analisi Prosodica, teorie, modelli e sistemi di annotazione, ed. Crocco, Claudia, Fivela, B. Gili & Savy, R., Padova: EDK editore, 43–56.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2008) Phonétique acoustique: introduction à l’analyse acoustique de la parole. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2009) Intonation du français, Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2011) Ponctuation et structure prosodique, Langue Française, 172, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2012a) The Autosegmental-Metrical Prosodic Structure: not fit for French?, in Ma, Qiuwu, Ding, Hongwei & Hirst, Daniel (eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2012: Sixth International Conference on Speech Prosody, Tongji University Press, 131–134.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2012b) La structure prosodique dynamique: rature et insertion de texte dans l’oral spontané, in Caddéo, S., Roubaud, M.-N., Rouquier, M. & Sabio, F. (eds.), Penser les langues avec Claire Blanche-Benveniste, Presses universitaires de Provence, coll. Langues et langages, 117–125.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2012c) Les contours de continuation majeure dans l’océan Indien, in Simon, A.-C. (ed.), La variation prosodique régionale en français, Brussels: De Boeck-Duculot, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2013a) Iconicity of melodic contours in French, in Hancil, S. and Hirst, D. (eds.), Prosody and Iconicity, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 179–190.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2013b) Contraintes phonologiques de l’intonation de la phrase réinterprétées à la lumière des recherches récentes en neurophysiologie, La Linguistique 1, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2013c) Contours mélodiques de continuation majeure à La Réunion, à Maurice et aux Seychelles, in Ledegen, Gudrun (ed.), La variation du français dans les espaces créolophones et francophones, Paris: L’Harmattan, 31–47.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2014a) Emotions and prosodic structure: who’s in charge? in Baider, Fabienne & Cislaru, Georgeta (eds.), Linguistic Approaches to Emotions in Context, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Philippe (2014b) Spontaneous speech corpus data validates prosodic constraints, in Campbell, Gibbon & Hirst, (eds.), Social and Linguistic Prosody: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dublin: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), 525–529.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe (forthcoming) Phrase autonome et intonation autonome.Google Scholar

Martinet, André (1960) Éléments de linguistique générale, Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Meigret, Louis (1550) Le tretté de la grammére françoéze, Paris: C. Wechel, http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k507854/f1.image.Google Scholar

Mertens, Piet (1987) L’intonation du français, de la description linguistique à la reconnaissance automatique, Doctoral thesis, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar

Mertens, Piet (1993) Intonational grouping, boundaries, and syntactic structure in French, in House, D. & Touati, P. (eds.), Proc. ESCA Workshop on Prosody, September 27–29, 1993, Lund (S) Working Papers 41, Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics, 156–159.Google Scholar

Mertens, Piet (2004) Un outil pour la transcription de la prosodie dans les corpus oraux, Traitement Automatique des langues 45(2), 109–130.Google Scholar

Mertens, Piet (2008) Syntaxe, prosodie et structure informationnelle: une approche prédictive pour l’analyse de l’intonation dans le discours, Travaux de Linguistique 56(1), 87–124.Google Scholar

Michelas, Amandine & D’Imperio, Mariapaola (2010) Durational cues and prosodic phrasing in French: evidence for the intermediate phrase, in Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010: Fifth International Conference on Speech Prosody, Chicago, May 11–14, 2010, http://speechprosody2010.illinois.edu/program.php.Google Scholar

Miller, George A. (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review 63(2), 81–97.Google ScholarPubMed

Mittmann, Maryualê Malvessi, Raso, Tommaso & Mello, Heliana (2009) The C-ORAL-BRASIL Corpus: Methodological Basis for the Treatment of Spontaneous Speech, Seventh Brazilian Symposium in Information and Human Language Technology (STIL 2009), Sao Carlos, Brazil, September 8–11, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morel, Mary-Annick & Danon-Boileau, Laurent (1998) Grammaire de l’intonation: l’exemple du français oral, Paris-Gap: Bibliothèque de Faits de Langues, Ophrys.Google Scholar

Mouret, François, Abeillé, Anne, Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Marandin, Jean-Marie & Yoo, Hiyon (2008) Aspects prosodiques des constructions coordonnées en français, in Actes des XXVIIème Journées d’Études sur la Parole (JEP-TALN 2008), Avignon, June 2008.Google Scholar

Nemni, Monique (1980) l’identification de l’incise par l’intonation, in Léon, Pierre & Rossi, Mario (eds.), Problèmes de prosodie, Studia phonetica No. 18, 103–111.Google Scholar

Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene (1986, 2007) Prosodic Phonology, Dordrecht: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Nowak, Paul (2012) Speed Reading Tips: 5 Ways to Minimize Subvocalization, www.irisreading.com/speed-reading/speed-reading-tips-5-ways-to-minimize-subvocalization/.Google Scholar

Obrig, Hellmuth, Rossi, Simone, Telkemeyer, Silke & Watenburger, Isabell (2010) From acoustic segmentation to language processing: evidence from optical imaging, Frontiers in Neuroenergetics 2(13), 1–12.Google ScholarPubMed

Ochs, Elinor (1979) Transcription as theory, in Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (eds.), Developmental Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, 43–71.Google Scholar

Palmer, Caroline & Holleran, Susan (1994) Harmonic, melodic, and frequency height influences in the perception of multivoiced music, Perception & Psychophysics 56(3), 301–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Palmer, Harold H. & Blandford, F. G. (1924) A Grammar of Spoken English on a Strictly Phonetic Basis, Cambridge: Heffer & Sons.Google Scholar

Pasdeloup, Valérie (2004) Le rythme n’est pas élastique: étude préliminaire de l’influence du débit de parole sur la structuration temporelle, Actes des XXIIIème Journées d’Etudes sur la Parole, April 2004, Fès, Morocco, www.afcp-parole.org/doc/Archives_JEP/2004_XXVe_JEP_Fes/actes/jep2004/Pasdeloup.pdf.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1980) The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/16065.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Beckman, Mary E. (1988) Japanese Tone Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. (1945) The Intonation of American English, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Publications, Linguistics.Google Scholar

Poiré, François (2006) La perception des proéminences et le codage prosodique, in Bulletin No. 6, Prosodie du français contemporain: l’autre versant de PFC, ed. Simon, Anne Catherine, Caelen-Haumont, Geneviève & Pagliano, Claudine, CNRS & Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail, 69–80.Google Scholar

Posner, Rebecca (1996) The Romance Languages, Cambridge Language Survey, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Post, Brechtje (1999) Restructured phonologic phrases in French: evidence from clash resolution, Linguistics 37(1), 41–63.Google Scholar

Post, Brechtje (2000) Tonal and Phrasal Structures in French Intonation, The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar

Praat (2013) www.praat.org.Google Scholar

Prieto, Luis, J. (1975) Pertinence et pratique: essai de sémiologie, Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Prieto, Pilar (2014) The intonational phonology of Catalan, in Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.), Prosodic Typology 2, Oxford University Press, 43–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prieto, Pilar, Borràs-Comes, Joan, Crespo-Sendra, Verònica, Roseano, Paolo, Sichel-Bazin, Rafèu & del Mar Vanrell, Maria (2007) The phonetics and phonology of intonational phrasing in romance, in Prieto, Pilar, Mascaró, Joan & Solé, Maria-Josep (eds.), Segmental and Prosodic Issues in Romance Phonology, ICREA & Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prieto, Pilar, Aguilar, Lourdes, Mascaró, Ignasi, Torres-Tamarit, Francesc & del Mar Vanrell, Maria (2009) L’etiquetatge prosòdic Cat_ToBI, Estudios de Fonética Experimental 18, 287–309.Google Scholar

Prince, Alan (1983) Relating to the grid, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 19–100.Google Scholar

Profili, Olga (1987) L’accent et sa prévisibilité, Rapport Syntalit/Italien, CENT Lannion.Google Scholar

Profili, Olga & Martin, Philippe (1987) Antonio mangia la zuppa inglese, in Proceedings XIth ICPhS: The Eleventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Tallinn: Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR.Google Scholar

Raso, Tommaso & Mello, Heliana R. (2012) The C-ORAL-BRASIL I: Reference Corpus for Informal Spoken Brazilian Portuguese, in Caseli, Helena, Villavicencio, Aline, Teixeira, António, Perdigão, Fernando (eds.), Computational Processing of the Portugese Language: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference, PROPOR 2012, Coimbra, Portugal, April 17–20, Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence, v. 7243, Springer, pp. 362–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raso, Tommaso & Mello, Heliana (eds.) (2012) C-ORAL-BRASIL I, Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar

Raphael, Laurence J., Dorman, Michael F., Freeman, Frances & Tobin, Charles (1975) Vowel and nasal duration as cues to voicing in word-final stop consonants: spectrographic and perceptual studies, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18(3), 389–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roca, Iggy (1999) Stress in Romance languages, in van der Hulst, Harry (ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 659–811.Google Scholar

Rosen, Jody (2008) Researchers play tune recorded before Edison, New York Times, March 27, 2008. Available at http://graphics8.nytimes.com/audiosrc/arts/1860v2.mp3. Original file at www.firstsounds.org/sounds/1860-Scott-Au-Clair-de-la-Lune.mp3.Google Scholar

Rossi, Mario (1971) Le seuil de glissando ou seuil de perception des variations tonales pour la parole, Phonetica 23, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rossi, Mario (1972) Le seuil différentiel de durée, in Valdman, A. (ed.), Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics to the Memory of Pierre Delattre, Paris-La Haye: Mouton, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rossi, Mario (1978) Interaction of intensity glides and frequency glissandos, Language and Speech 21(4), 384–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rossi, Mario (1979) Le français, langue sans accent? in Fonagy, I. & Léon, P. (eds.), L’Accent en français contemporain, Studia Phonetica 15, Didier, Montréal, 14–53.Google Scholar

Rossi, Mario (1983) Les accents des Français, ed. Léon, Pierre, Carton, Fernand, Rossi, Mario & Autesserre, Denis, Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar

Rossi, Mario (1999) L’intonation, le système du français, description et modélisation, Collection l’Essentiel français, Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar

Rossi, Mario, Di Cristo, Albert, Martin, Philippe & Nishinuma, Yukihiro (1981) L’intonation: de l’acoustique à la sémantique, Collection Études Linguistiques, Vol. 25, Paris: Klincksieck Paris.Google Scholar

Rousselot, Jean-Pierre (L’Abbé) (1901–1908) Principes de phonétique expérimentale, Vol. II, Paris-Leipzig: Welter.Google Scholar

Sandri, S. & Vivalda, Enrico (1981) Automatic stress assignment for Italian text-to-speech synthesis, CSLT Rapporti Tecnici 8(3), 213–216.Google Scholar

Sauleau, Paul (2010) Physiologie des émotions et de la motivation, Polycopié cours du Pr Sauleau. Université de Rennes 1.Google Scholar

Scarano, Antonietta (2003) Les contructions en syntaxe segmentée: syntaxe, macro-syntaxe, et articulation de l’information, in Scarano, Antonietta (ed.), Macro-syntaxe et pragmatique: L’analyse linguistique de l’oral, Rome: Bulzoni, 183–203.Google Scholar

Seargent, R. L. & Harris, J. D. (1962) Sensitivity to non-directional frequency modulation, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34(10), 1625–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1978) On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure, in Fretheim, T. (ed.), Nordic Prosody, Vol. II, Trondheim: TAPIR, 111–140.Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1986) Derived domains in sentence phonology, Phonology Yearbook 3, 371–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (2005) Comments on intonational phrasing in English, in Frota, S., Vigario, M. & Freitas, J. (eds.), Prosodies: Selected Papers from the Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia Conference, 2003, Phonetics and Phonology Series, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 11–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sereno, Sara & Rayner, Keith (2003) Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials, Trends in Cognitive Science 7(11), 489–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simon, Anne-Catherine, Avanzi, Mathieu, Goldman, Jean-Philippe (2008) La détection des proéminences syllabiques: un aller-retour entre l’annotation manuelle et le traitement automatique, in Durand, J., Habert, B. & Laks, B. (eds.), Actes du CMLF 2008: 1er Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, 2008, Paris, 1685–1698. DOI: 10.1051/cmlf08256.Google Scholar

Solé Sabater, Maria-Josep (1991) Stress and Rhythm in English, Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 4, 145–62.Google Scholar

Sosa, Juan-Manuel (1999) La entonación del español, Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar

Steinhauer, Karsten, Alter, Kai & Friedrici, Angela D. (1999) Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing, Nature Neuroscience 2(2), 191–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Teston, Bernard (2004) L’œuvre d’Étienne-Jules Marey et sa contribution à l’émergence de la phonétique dans les sciences du langage, Travaux Interdisciplinaires du Laboratoire Parole et Langage 23, 237–266.Google Scholar

ToBI (1999) www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~tobi/.Google Scholar

Trager, George & Smith, Henry (1951) An Outline of English Structure, Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers 3, Norman, OK: Battenburg Press.Google Scholar

Transcriber (2014) http:// trans.sourceforge.net.Google Scholar

Ungurean, Catalin, Burileanu, Dragos & Dervis, Aurelian (2009) A statistical approach to lexical stress assignment for TTS synthesis, International Journal of Speech Technology 12(2/3), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vaissière, Jacqueline (1975) Caractérisation des variations de la fréquence du fondamental dans les phrases du français, in VIèmes Journées d’Etude sur la Parole, Toulouse, 39–50.Google Scholar

Vercherand, Géraldine, Kim, In-Young & Yoo, Hi-Yon (2011) Whispering French and Korean: a comparative study, Linguistic Research 23(2), 81–95.Google Scholar

Viana, Céu & Frota, Sonia et al. (2007) Towards a P_ToBI, http://labfon.letras.ulisboa.pt/SonseMelodias/P-ToBI/P-ToBI.htm.Google Scholar

Von Essen, Otto (1956) Grundzuge der hochdeutschen satzintonation, Ratingen-Dusseldorf: A. Henn Verlag.Google Scholar

Wang, Suiping, Mo, Deyuan, Xiang, Ming, Xu, Ruiping & Chen, Hsuan-Chih (2012) The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in reading Chinese: evidence from ERP’s, Language and Cognitive Processes, iFirst, 1–20.Google Scholar

Watanabe, Satosi (1969) Knowing and Guessing: A Quantitative Study of Inference and Information, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Wightman, Colin W. (2002) ToBI or not ToBI? in Bel, B. & Marlien, I. (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence: SProSig, 25–29.Google Scholar

WinPitch (2013) www.winpitch.com.Google Scholar

Wioland, François (1985) Les structures syllabiques du français, Paris: Slatkine-Champion.Google Scholar

Xu, Yi and Wang, Maolin (2009) Organizing syllables into groups: evidence from F₀ and duration patterns in Mandarin, Journal of Phonetics 37(4), 502–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yuan, Jiahong & Liberman, Mark (2008) Speaker identification on the SCOTUS corpus, Proceedings of Acoustics 2008, 5687–5690.Google Scholar