Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T08:40:30.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

Conclusion

Get access

Summary

By 1858, one year before the publication of Darwin's Origin of Species, the world of British life research had already considerably changed from that of the early 1840s. A young London life researcher in the 1840s was taught to some extent to see an organism as an aggregate of elements – bones, nervous ganglia, segments or physiological compartments. Higher organisms' elements were more integrated than lower organisms' elements. In turn we can see nine explanatory principles emerging from these points and reinforcing each other.

1. vivisection. Certain living organisms survived bilateral sectioning while others died immediately, because those organisms surviving such work were aggregations of simpler quasi-independent elements that did not require each other to survive. Each element thus acted as a separate compartment. A lower organism's survivability could even be explained by seeing it as an aggregate of quasi-individuals.

2. homologizing. Homologies between different individuals (general homology) allowed researchers like Owen to imaginatively liken them to homologies within individuals (serial homology). Analysis:synthesis gave the ability for a person to jump levels of organization in this way, because it was possible to depict the relationship of part to whole: whether an entity was a part or a whole depended only on one's perspective.

3. the physiological division of labour. Point 1 noted that animals able to survive extensive vivisection were simpler creatures with less specialized systems which repeated in each element. Conversely those animals dying quickly during vivisection were more complex, with more specialized and often localized physiological systems that could produce more life. Although they were more vulnerable, this specialization meant that these animals could produce more life energy.

4. a hierarchy of general physiological systems. These higher animals also possessed several levels of physiological systems. Their vivisection revealed that some of their physiological systems depended on others, making these supporting systems ‘foundational’ ones. While the removal or destruction of certain body parts (such as the medulla oblongata) immediately caused the death of the entire animal, the removal or destruction of other parts caused only certain functions to be lost.

Type
Chapter
Information
Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences
Shared Assumptions, 1820–58
, pp. 161 - 168
Publisher: Pickering & Chatto
First published in: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • James Elwick
  • Book: Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 December 2014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • James Elwick
  • Book: Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 December 2014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • James Elwick
  • Book: Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 December 2014
Available formats
×