Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T17:18:57.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Emphatic and reflexive -self: expectations, viewpoint, and subjectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2009

Dieter Stein
Affiliation:
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Susan Wright
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

In this chapter I examine the semantics/pragmatics of the pronominal -self forms in English (himself, herself, themselves etc.; collectively referred to hereafter as -self). I describe two distinct kinds of meanings associated with -self, namely emphatic and reflexive -self, and show that each of these is associated with a closely related configuration involving a ‘viewpoint’. I then consider the viewpoint uses of -self in terms of the semantic parameter of subjectivity, in the sense of Langacker (1990), and relate it to other current notions of subjectivity.

In the following analysis, crucial reference is made to the notion of referential accessibility, a discourse concept developed by Ariel (1988, 1990) and very similar to the theoretical framework elaborated by Givón (1983) under the name ‘topic continuity’. Accessibility can be denned as the degree of ease with which a discourse referent can be identified or ‘picked out’ mentally via the use of a given referring element (with ‘referring’ understood in a broad sense including mental conceptions of any degree of specificity or definiteness). The fundamental claim of Accessibility Theory is that ‘referring expressions are no more than guidelines for retrievals’ (Ariel 1988:68), and thus the inherent semantics of each type of expression is the very processing procedure by which the referent is accessed. Referring expressions fall along a cline of degree of accessibility, from low accessibility signals like full, elaborated noun phrases, to high accessibility markers like pronouns and zero anaphora. The linguistic element of concern in this chapter, -self, is, as we will see, a marker of high accessibility.

Type
Chapter
Information
Subjectivity and Subjectivisation
Linguistic Perspectives
, pp. 55 - 82
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×