Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T02:32:59.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Not 100% sure? The ‘public’ understanding of risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

David J. Bennett
Affiliation:
St Edmund's College, Cambridge
Richard C. Jennings
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

All knowledge is provisional, subject to revision in the light of new information. Knowledge is probabilistic. Some beliefs might be assigned infinitesimal probabilities – creationism and intelligent design perhaps – but all probabilities must be treated as revisable in the light of new evidence. Where knowledge (belief) relates to potential future harms or benefits, as it usually does in situations where science communication is seen as problematic or contentious, the issue can be framed as one of risk communication.

What is risk?

There are many ways in which one can categorize problems of risk and its management. Typing the single word ‘risk’ into Google produces hundreds of millions of hits. One need sample only a small fraction in order to discover unnecessary and often acrimonious arguments caused by people using the same word to refer to different things and shouting past each other. Figure 6.1 proffers a typology that has proved helpful in clearing away some unnecessary arguments.

Type
Chapter
Information
Successful Science Communication
Telling It Like It Is
, pp. 90 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

www.john-adams.co.uk
2002
Simon, Jenkinshttp://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/simonjenkinshttp://www.badscience.net/
Adams, J.Thompson, M. 2002 Taking Account of Societal Concerns about Risk: Framing the ProblemHealth and Safety Executive, Research Report 035http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr035.pdfGoogle Scholar
House of Lords Select Committee on GM Crops 1998 http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199899/ldselect/ldeucom/11/8060312.htm
Medawar, P. 1967 Art of the SolubleLondonHeinemann Young BooksGoogle Scholar
Ridley, M. 2010 http://www.wired.co.uk/wired-magazine/archive/2010/02/start/matt-ridley-genetic-modification?page=all

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×