Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Note on transliteration
- Note on Biblical translations
- Note on the Babylonian Talmud
- List of Abbreviations
- 1 The Talmudic argument
- 2 The literary form of the Babylonian Talmud
- 3 Berērah: retrospective specification
- 4 Yeúsh she-lo mi-da‘at: unconscious abandonment of property
- 5 Rubba: probability
- 6 Davar she-lo ba le-'olam: conveyance of a thing not yet in existence
- 7 Kol she-eyno be-zeh aḥar zeh afilu be-vat aḥat eyno: whatever cannot be established in a consecutive sequence cannot be established even in a simultaneous sequence
- 8 Yesh ḥoresh telem eḥad: a single act of ploughing can result in a number of penalties
- 9 Simanin de-oraita o de-rabbanan: whether reliance on distinguishing marks for the purpose of identification is Biblical or Rabbinic
- 10 Devarim she-be-lev eynam devarim: mental reservations in contracts are disregarded
- 11 Ḥazakah: presumptive state
- 12 Gadol kevod ha-beriot: the law and regard for human dignity
- 13 Hazmanah milta: whether the designation of an object for a particular use is effective
- 14 Mitzvat ‘aseh she-ha-zeman geramah: positive precepts dependent on time from which women are exempt
- 15 Heyzek she-eyno nikar: indiscernible damage to property
- 16 Kinyan ḥatzer: acquisition by means of a domain
- 17 Palginan be-dibbura: admission of part of a testimony even though another part of the same testimony is rejected
- 18 Tadir u-mekuddash: which takes precedence: the more constant or the more sacred?
- 19 Palga nizka: the nature of the payment of half-damages to which the owner of a goring ox is liable
- 20 Patur mi-diney adam ve-ḥayyav be-diney shamayim: cases where there is liability in the eyes of God even though the human courts cannot enforce payment
- 21 Maḥal ‘al kevodo kevodo maḥul: renunciation of honour by one to whom it is due
- 22 Conclusions
- Glossary
- Bibliography
13 - Hazmanah milta: whether the designation of an object for a particular use is effective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 January 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Note on transliteration
- Note on Biblical translations
- Note on the Babylonian Talmud
- List of Abbreviations
- 1 The Talmudic argument
- 2 The literary form of the Babylonian Talmud
- 3 Berērah: retrospective specification
- 4 Yeúsh she-lo mi-da‘at: unconscious abandonment of property
- 5 Rubba: probability
- 6 Davar she-lo ba le-'olam: conveyance of a thing not yet in existence
- 7 Kol she-eyno be-zeh aḥar zeh afilu be-vat aḥat eyno: whatever cannot be established in a consecutive sequence cannot be established even in a simultaneous sequence
- 8 Yesh ḥoresh telem eḥad: a single act of ploughing can result in a number of penalties
- 9 Simanin de-oraita o de-rabbanan: whether reliance on distinguishing marks for the purpose of identification is Biblical or Rabbinic
- 10 Devarim she-be-lev eynam devarim: mental reservations in contracts are disregarded
- 11 Ḥazakah: presumptive state
- 12 Gadol kevod ha-beriot: the law and regard for human dignity
- 13 Hazmanah milta: whether the designation of an object for a particular use is effective
- 14 Mitzvat ‘aseh she-ha-zeman geramah: positive precepts dependent on time from which women are exempt
- 15 Heyzek she-eyno nikar: indiscernible damage to property
- 16 Kinyan ḥatzer: acquisition by means of a domain
- 17 Palginan be-dibbura: admission of part of a testimony even though another part of the same testimony is rejected
- 18 Tadir u-mekuddash: which takes precedence: the more constant or the more sacred?
- 19 Palga nizka: the nature of the payment of half-damages to which the owner of a goring ox is liable
- 20 Patur mi-diney adam ve-ḥayyav be-diney shamayim: cases where there is liability in the eyes of God even though the human courts cannot enforce payment
- 21 Maḥal ‘al kevodo kevodo maḥul: renunciation of honour by one to whom it is due
- 22 Conclusions
- Glossary
- Bibliography
Summary
The sugya is Sanhedrin 47b–48b. Hazmanah means ‘to set aside’, ‘to designate’. The basic question considered is whether an object that acquires a certain status in law when used for a particular purpose acquires that status even when it has only been designated for that purpose. The example given is the weaving of a garment (a shroud) for a corpse. It is forbidden to enjoy any benefit from a corpse, its grave or its shroud. Abbaye holds that the mere designation for the purpose suffices to render the garment forbidden – hazmanah milta hi, lit. ‘hazmanah is a thing’, i.e. it has substance so that the garment is forbidden as if it had actually been used. Rava holds that mere designation is insufficient to render the garment forbidden - hazmanah lav milta hi, lit. ‘hazmanah is not a thing’, i.e. has no substance, is ineffective, and the garment is not forbidden until it has actually been used as a shroud.
The sugya begins with the debate between Abbaye and Rava: ‘It has been stated: If one weaves a garment for a corpse: Abbaye said: It is forbidden. But Rava said: It is permitted. Abbaye said it is forbidden; hazmanah is effective. But Rava said it is permitted; hazmanah is ineffective.’
The term itmar, ‘It has been stated’, the usual Talmudic term to introduce a debate between Amoraim is obviously an editorial device. From the fact that ‘Abbaye said… But Rava said’ is repeated, it would seem to be equally certain that the explanation of Abbaye and Rava's views on whether hazmanah is effective or ineffective is not Abbaye and Rava's own but it similarly editorial. […]
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Talmudic ArgumentA Study in Talmudic Reasoning and Methodology, pp. 122 - 132Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1984