Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T04:34:06.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Fertiliser price

from Marketing and price reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Ross Gregory Garnaut
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Ma Guonan
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

Between one-third and one-half of the increase in world grain production is attributed to the increased use of fertiliser in recent decades. In China, as elsewhere, agricultural development is closely related to the increase in the application of fertiliser. China's large population and limited arable land causes increases in the supply of agricultural products to depend on increasing yields, and gives fertiliser an important role in expanding supply. The price of fertiliser is a key variable affecting fertilisation use and agricultural yields, also having an important influence on farmers' incomes.

China's fertiliser price system

Before economic reform, China's chemical fertiliser prices were determined in the planned economy. Central government plans for agriculture were passed down to local governments. All agricultural products, except those that were retained as inputs into agricultural production or for peasants' consumption, were purchased by the government at fixed prices. At the same time, most materials needed in agricultural production, such as fertiliser, pesticides, diesel and high quality seeds and stock, were provided to peasants by the government at fixed prices through designated commercial networks.

In the 1950s the state transferred most of the surplus value created in agriculture, to industry, to provide capital for industrialisation. This was effected through the state purchasing agricultural products at lower prices than would have been available in a free market, and selling industrial products to the peasants at artificially high prices. This represented a hidden income redistribution.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×