Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Notes on the contributors
- Introduction
- PART 1 Cosmology and time's arrow
- PART 2 Quantum theory and time's arrow
- 3 Time's arrow and the quantum measurement problem
- 4 Time, decoherence, and ‘reversible’ measurements
- 5 Time flow, non-locality, and measurement in quantum mechanics
- 6 Stochastically branching spacetime topology
- PART 3 Thermodynamics and time's arrow
- PART 4 Time travel and time's arrow
- References
- Index
4 - Time, decoherence, and ‘reversible’ measurements
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 January 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Notes on the contributors
- Introduction
- PART 1 Cosmology and time's arrow
- PART 2 Quantum theory and time's arrow
- 3 Time's arrow and the quantum measurement problem
- 4 Time, decoherence, and ‘reversible’ measurements
- 5 Time flow, non-locality, and measurement in quantum mechanics
- 6 Stochastically branching spacetime topology
- PART 3 Thermodynamics and time's arrow
- PART 4 Time travel and time's arrow
- References
- Index
Summary
Introduction
In this chapter I attempt to review a few somewhat loosely connected themes, which figure in recent work by physicists on decoherence and irreversibility in quantum mechanics. The looseness is forced upon us by the subject – any proper discussion inevitably drags in questions about thermodynamic reversibility and the various arrows of time, about the foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum measurement, about the nature of quantum coherence, and about the relationship between quantum and classical mechanics. There are inevitably many gaps in our understanding of these questions, both for the physicist and for the philosopher. Some philosophers may feel that the subject is too immature to be interesting to them – that it is not yet ripe for philosophical analysis. Indeed I have recently heard the opinion expressed that quantum mechanics in its entirety was still not amenable to such analysis – that if the physicists could not yet understand it, there was no point in philosophers trying! I hope this feeling is not too widespread amongst philosophers of science – I suspect that it may arise in part because the philosophical community (along with a good part of the scientific community) is unaware of some important advances that have been made in the last decade in understanding the physics of quantum processes at the macroscopic level, as well as the relation between classical and quantum mechanics.
Much of the chapter is therefore unashamedly tutorial in nature; however, given the wide range of topics covered, I imagine that even physicists will find at least some of the material to be novel.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Time's Arrows TodayRecent Physical and Philosophical Work on the Direction of Time, pp. 107 - 154Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1995
- 3
- Cited by