Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)Google Scholar

Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of 20 March 1883, as revised and amended (Paris Convention, PC)Google Scholar

Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland [GG] [Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany], 23 May 1949, BGBl III 100–1 as amended, English translation available at www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (GG)Google Scholar

Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch [BGB] [Civil Code], 18 August 1896, RGBl at 195, as amended, English translation available on www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (BGB)Google Scholar

Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb [UWG] [Act against Unfair Competition], 3 March 2010, BGBl I at 254 with amendments, English translation available at www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_uwg/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (UWG)Google Scholar

Handelsgesetzbuch [HGB] [Commercial Code], 5 May 1897, BGBl III at 4100–1, as amended (HGB)Google Scholar

Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen [GWB] [Act against Restraints of Competition], 26 August 1998, BGBl I 1750, 3245 as amended, English translation available at www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gwb/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (GWB)Google Scholar

Gewerbeordnung [GewO] [Act on Trade], 21 June 1896, BGBl I 202 as amended (GewO)Google Scholar

Gesetz über Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte [UrhG] [Copyright Act], 9 September 1965, BGBl I 1273 as amended, English translation available at www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_urhg/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (UrhG)Google Scholar

Patentgesetz [PatG] [Patent Act], 5 May 1936, BGBl 1981 I 1 as amended, English translation available at www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_patg/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (PatG)Google Scholar

Gesetz über Arbeitnehmererfindungen [ArbnErfG] [Act on Employee Inventions], 25 July 1957, BGBl I 2521 as amended (ArbnErfG)Google Scholar

Gesetz über den rechtlichen Schutz von Design [DesignG] [Design Act] 12 March 2004, BGBl I 122 as amended (DesignG)Google Scholar

Strafgesetzbuch [StGB] [Criminal Act] 15 May 1871, BGBl I 3322 as amended, English translation available at www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (StGB)Google Scholar

Zivilprozessordnung [ZPO] [Civil Procedure Statute], 12 September 1950, BGBl at 455, as amended, English translation available on www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_zpo/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (ZPO)Google Scholar

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, consolidated version [2012] OJ C 326 (TFEU)Google Scholar

Commission Regulation (EU) No 316/2014 of 21 March 2014 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of technology transfer agreements [2014] OJ L 93/17 (TTBER)Google Scholar

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1217/2010 of 14 December 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) TFEU to certain categories of research and development agreements [2010] OJ L355/36 (RDBER)Google Scholar

Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases [1996] OJ L77/20 (Database Directive)Google Scholar

Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights [2004] OJ L 157 (Enforcement Directive)Google Scholar

Statement 2005/295/EC by the Commission concerning Article 2 of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the enforcement of intellectual property rights [2005] OJ L 94/37Google Scholar

Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure [2016] OJ L 157 (Trade Secrets Directive, TSD)Google Scholar

Commission, ‘Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Accompanying the document proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure’ COM (2013) 813 final, SWD(2013) 472 final, SWD(2013) 493 final, SWD(2013) 471 final http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013SC0471&from=EN accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Final compromise text of the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure, Document 15382/1/15 REV 1 http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15382-2015-REV-1/en/pdf accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

European Convention on Human Rights of 4 November 1950Google Scholar

Resolution 571 (1974) on the protection of manufacturing and commercial secrets, adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe on 3 July 1974, http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/AdoptedText/ta74/ERES571.htm accessed 6 March 2015, on file with the authorGoogle Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 26 czerwca 1974r. Kodeks Pracy, Dz U 1974 nr 24 poz 141, with amendments (Polish Labour Code)Google Scholar

Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)Google Scholar

Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of 20 March 1883, as revised and amended (Paris Convention, PC)Google Scholar

Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland [GG] [Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany], 23 May 1949, BGBl III 100–1 as amended, English translation available at www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (GG)Google Scholar

Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch [BGB] [Civil Code], 18 August 1896, RGBl at 195, as amended, English translation available on www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (BGB)Google Scholar

Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb [UWG] [Act against Unfair Competition], 3 March 2010, BGBl I at 254 with amendments, English translation available at www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_uwg/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (UWG)Google Scholar

Handelsgesetzbuch [HGB] [Commercial Code], 5 May 1897, BGBl III at 4100–1, as amended (HGB)Google Scholar

Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen [GWB] [Act against Restraints of Competition], 26 August 1998, BGBl I 1750, 3245 as amended, English translation available at www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gwb/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (GWB)Google Scholar

Gewerbeordnung [GewO] [Act on Trade], 21 June 1896, BGBl I 202 as amended (GewO)Google Scholar

Gesetz über Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte [UrhG] [Copyright Act], 9 September 1965, BGBl I 1273 as amended, English translation available at www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_urhg/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (UrhG)Google Scholar

Patentgesetz [PatG] [Patent Act], 5 May 1936, BGBl 1981 I 1 as amended, English translation available at www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_patg/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (PatG)Google Scholar

Gesetz über Arbeitnehmererfindungen [ArbnErfG] [Act on Employee Inventions], 25 July 1957, BGBl I 2521 as amended (ArbnErfG)Google Scholar

Gesetz über den rechtlichen Schutz von Design [DesignG] [Design Act] 12 March 2004, BGBl I 122 as amended (DesignG)Google Scholar

Strafgesetzbuch [StGB] [Criminal Act] 15 May 1871, BGBl I 3322 as amended, English translation available at www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (StGB)Google Scholar

Zivilprozessordnung [ZPO] [Civil Procedure Statute], 12 September 1950, BGBl at 455, as amended, English translation available on www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_zpo/index.html accessed 1 June 2017 (ZPO)Google Scholar

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, consolidated version [2012] OJ C 326 (TFEU)Google Scholar

Commission Regulation (EU) No 316/2014 of 21 March 2014 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of technology transfer agreements [2014] OJ L 93/17 (TTBER)Google Scholar

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1217/2010 of 14 December 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) TFEU to certain categories of research and development agreements [2010] OJ L355/36 (RDBER)Google Scholar

Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases [1996] OJ L77/20 (Database Directive)Google Scholar

Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights [2004] OJ L 157 (Enforcement Directive)Google Scholar

Statement 2005/295/EC by the Commission concerning Article 2 of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the enforcement of intellectual property rights [2005] OJ L 94/37Google Scholar

Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure [2016] OJ L 157 (Trade Secrets Directive, TSD)Google Scholar

Commission, ‘Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Accompanying the document proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure’ COM (2013) 813 final, SWD(2013) 472 final, SWD(2013) 493 final, SWD(2013) 471 final http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013SC0471&from=EN accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Final compromise text of the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure, Document 15382/1/15 REV 1 http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15382-2015-REV-1/en/pdf accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

European Convention on Human Rights of 4 November 1950Google Scholar

Resolution 571 (1974) on the protection of manufacturing and commercial secrets, adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe on 3 July 1974, http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/AdoptedText/ta74/ERES571.htm accessed 6 March 2015, on file with the authorGoogle Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 26 czerwca 1974r. Kodeks Pracy, Dz U 1974 nr 24 poz 141, with amendments (Polish Labour Code)Google Scholar

Al Minor & Assocs v Martin 881 NE 2d 850 (Supr Ct Ohio 2008)Google Scholar

American Airlines Inc v Imhof 620 F Supp 2d 574 (SDNY 2009)Google Scholar

AMP Inc v Fleischhacker 823 F 2d 1199 (7th Cir 1987)Google Scholar

Ashland Mgt Inc v Altair Invs NA LLC 59 A D 3d 97 (1st Dep’t 2008)Google Scholar

Aspect Software Inc v Barnett, 787 F Supp 2d 118 (D Mass 2011)Google Scholar

Avery Dennison Corp v Kitsonas 118 F Supp 2d 848 (SD Ohio 2000)Google Scholar

Basicomputer Corp v Scott 973 F 2d 507 (6th Cir 1992)Google Scholar

BDO Seidman v Hirshberg 690 NYS 2d 854 (NY Ct App 1999)Google Scholar

Bed Mart Inc v Kelley 45 P 3d 1219 (Ariz App 2002)Google Scholar

Bimbo Bakeries USA Inc v Botticella 613 F3d 102 (3d Cir 2010)Google Scholar

Bonito Boats v Thunder Craft Boats 489 US 141 (US Supr Ct 1989)Google Scholar

Bryceland v Northey 772 P 2d 36 (Arizona Ct App 1989)Google Scholar

By-Buk Co v Printed Cellophane Tape Co 163 Cal App 2d 157(Cal 1958)Google Scholar

Cherne Indus Inc v Grounds & Assocs Inc 278 NW 2d 81 (Supr Ct Minn 1979)Google Scholar

Com-Co Insurance Agency Inc v Service Insurance Agency Inc 748 NE 2d 298, 301 – 302 (Ill App 2001)Google Scholar

Comprehensive Technologies Int v Software Artisans Inc 3 F 3d 730 (4th Cir 1993)Google Scholar

Continental Group Inc v Kinsley 422 F Supp 838 (D Conn 1976)Google Scholar

CVD Inc v Raytheon Co 769 F2d 842 (1st Cir 1985)Google Scholar

Dynamics Research Corp v Analytic Sciences Corp 400 NE 2d 1274 (Mass CA 1980)Google Scholar

Eagle Group v Pullen 58 P 3d 292 (Wash App 2002)Google Scholar

EarthWeb Inc v Schlack 71 F Supp 2d 299 (SDNY 1999)Google Scholar

eBay Inc v MercExchange LLC 547 US 388 (US Supr Ct 2006)Google Scholar

Ed Nowogroski Insurance Inc v Michael Rucker et al 137 Wash 2d 427 (Washington Supr Ct 1999)Google Scholar

Edwards v Arthur Andersen LLP 81 Cal Rptr 3d 282 (Cal Sup Ct 2008)Google Scholar

EI DuPont de Nemours & Co v Christopher 431 F 2d 1012 (5th Cir 1970)Google Scholar

EI DuPont de Nemours and Co v American Potash & Chemical Corp 220 A 2d 428 (Del Ch 1964)Google Scholar

EI DuPont de Nemours Powder Co v Masland 244 US 100 ( US Supr Ct 1917)Google Scholar

Electronic Data Systems Corp v Heinemann 268 Ga 755 (Ga 1997)Google Scholar

Faiveley Transport Malmo Ab v WABTEC Corporation 559 F 3d 110 (2nd Cir 2009)Google Scholar

Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Service Co, 499 US 340 (US Supr Ct 1991)Google Scholar

Fenner Precision Inc v Mearthane Products Corp Case No 12-CV-6610 CJS (WDNY 2013)Google Scholar

Fleming Sales Company Inc v Joseph W Bailey 611 F Supp 507 (Ill Distr Ct 1985)Google Scholar

Foodcomm Int v Barry 328 F3d 300 (7th Cir 2003)Google Scholar

Franke v Wiltschek 209 F 2d 439 (CA2 NY 1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garber Bros Inc v Evlek 122 F Supp 2d 375 (EDNY 2000)Google Scholar

Grant v Carotek 737 F 2d 410 (4th Cir 1984)Google Scholar

Henry Hope X-Ray Products Inc v Marrion Carrel Inc 674 F 2d 1336 (9th Cir 1982)Google Scholar

Heyden Chemical Corp v Burrell & Neidig 2 64 A 2d 465 (NJ Super 1949)Google Scholar

Horner Intl Co v McKoy Case No COA 13–964 (North Carolina Ct App 2014)Google Scholar

IBM v Papermaster 2008 WL 4974508 (SDNY 2008)Google Scholar

Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v National Distillers and Chemical Corp 342 F 2d 737 (CA 2nd Circuit 1965)Google Scholar

In re Innovative Construction Systems Inc 793 F2d 875 (7th Cir 1986)Google Scholar

Jostens Inc v National Computer Systems Inc 318 NW 2d 691 (Supr Ct Minn 1982)Google Scholar

K-2 Ski Company v Head Ski Co Inc 506 f 2d 471 (9th Cir 1974)Google Scholar

Kewanee Oil Co v Bicron Corp 416 US 470 (US Supr Ct 1974)Google Scholar

Kilbarr Corp v Bus Sys Inc 679 F Supp 422 (DNJ 1988)Google Scholar

Kodekey Electronics Inc v The Mechanex Corp 486 F2d 449 (10th Cir 1973)Google Scholar

Liautaud v Liautaud 221 F 3d 981 (7th Cir 2000)Google Scholar

Litigation Management Inc v Bourgeois 2011 WL 2270553 (Ohio Ct App 2011)Google Scholar

Lucent Technologies Inc v Gateway Inc 580 F3d 1301 (Fed Cir 2009)Google Scholar

Mangren Research & Dev Corp v National Chem Co 87 F 3d 937 (7th Cir 1996)Google Scholar

Modern Environments Inc v Stinnett 561 S E 2d 694 (Va Sup Ct 2002)Google Scholar

Motorola Inc v Computer Displays International Inc 739 F 2d 1149 (7th Cir 1984)Google Scholar

Muggill v Reuben H Donnelley Corp 62 Cal 2d 239 (Supr Ct California 1965)Google Scholar

Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co v Brass 625 NW 2d 648 (Wis App 2001)Google Scholar

Outsource International Inc v Barton 192 F3d 662 (7th Cir 1999)Google Scholar

Panduit Corp v Stahlin Bros 575 F2d 1152 (6th Cir 1978)Google Scholar

Pappan Enters v Hardee’s Food Sys 143 F3d 800, 803 (3rd Cir 1998)Google Scholar

Paramanandam v Herrmann 827 NE 2d 1173 (Ind CA 2005)Google Scholar

PepsiCo Inc v Redmond 54 F 3d 1262 (7th Cir 1995)Google Scholar

Precision Plating & Metal Finishing Inc v Martin-Marietta Corp 435 F 2d 1262 (5th Cir 1970)Google Scholar

Professional Real Estate Investors Inc v Columbia Pictures Industries Inc 508 US 49 (US Supr Ct 1993)Google Scholar

Reed Roberts Assocs v Strauman 40 NY 2d 303 (Ct App 1976)Google Scholar

Republic Aviation Corp v Schenk 152 USPQ 830 (NY Sup Ct 1967)Google Scholar

Roboserve Ltd v Tom’s Foods Inc 940 F 2d 1441 (11th Cir 1991)Google Scholar

Ruckelshaus v Monsanto 467 US 986 (US Supr Ct 1984)Google Scholar

Sabatino Bianco v Globus Medical No 2:2012cv00147 – Document 45 (E D Tex 2012)Google Scholar

Sabatino Bianco v Globus Medical WL 2980740 (E D Tex 2014)Google Scholar

SI Handling Systems v Heisley 753 F 2d 1244 (3rd Cir 1985)Google Scholar

Silicon Image Inc v Analogix Semiconductor Inc No C-07-00635 JCS (not reported in F Sup 2d) 2008 WL 166950 (ND Cal 2008)Google Scholar

Silvaco Data Systems v Intel Corp 109 Cal Rptr 3d 27 (Cal App 2010)Google Scholar

Standard Register Co v Cleaver 30 F Supp 2d 1084, 1095 (7th Cir ND Ind 1998)Google Scholar

Structural Dynamics Research Corp v Engineering Mechanics Research Corp 401 F Supp 1102 (ED Mich 1975)Google Scholar

United States v First National City Bank 379 US 378 (Supr Ct 1965)Google Scholar

University Computing Co v Lykes-Youngstown Corp 504 F 2d 518 (5th Cir 1974)Google Scholar

Winston Research Corp v Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company 350 F 2d 134 (9th Cir 1965)Google Scholar

World Wide Prosthetic Supply Inc v Mikulsky 631 NW 2d 253 (Wis App 2001)Google Scholar

Case T-201/04 Microsoft v Commission [2007] ECR II-03601Google Scholar

Case C-126/97 Eco Swiss China Time Ltd and Benetton International NV [1999] ECR I-3079Google Scholar

Case C-22/98 Jean Claude Becu [1999] ECRI-5665Google Scholar

Case C-415/93 Bosman [1995] ECR I-04921Google Scholar

Joined Cases C-267/91 and C-268/91 Keck and Mithouard [1993] ECR I-06097Google Scholar

Case 27/76 United Brands Company and United Brands Continentaal BV v Commission of the European Communities [1978] ECR 1978 00207Google Scholar

Case T-111/96 ITT Promedia v Commission [1998] ECR II-02937Google Scholar

Joined Cases T-191, T 212 – 214/98 Atlantic Container Line and Others v Commission [2003] ECR-II-3275Google Scholar

Case C-5/08 Infopaq [2009] ECR I-06569Google Scholar

Case C-393/09 BSA [2010] ECR I-13971Google Scholar

Combined cases C-403/08 and C-429/08 Murphy [2011] I-09083Google Scholar

Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v ZTE [2015] ECLI:EU:C:2015:477Google Scholar

Case C-367/15 Stowarzyszenie ‘Oławska Telewizja Kablowa’ v Stowarzyszenie Filmowców Polskich [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2016:900, Opinion of AG SharpstonGoogle Scholar

Case C-367/15 Stowarzyszenie ‘Oławska Telewizja Kablowa’ v Stowarzyszenie Filmowców Polskich [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:36Google Scholar

Reuter/BASF (Case IV/28.996) Commission Decision 76/743/EEC [1976] OJ L254/40Google Scholar

Al Minor & Assocs v Martin 881 NE 2d 850 (Supr Ct Ohio 2008)Google Scholar

American Airlines Inc v Imhof 620 F Supp 2d 574 (SDNY 2009)Google Scholar

AMP Inc v Fleischhacker 823 F 2d 1199 (7th Cir 1987)Google Scholar

Ashland Mgt Inc v Altair Invs NA LLC 59 A D 3d 97 (1st Dep’t 2008)Google Scholar

Aspect Software Inc v Barnett, 787 F Supp 2d 118 (D Mass 2011)Google Scholar

Avery Dennison Corp v Kitsonas 118 F Supp 2d 848 (SD Ohio 2000)Google Scholar

Basicomputer Corp v Scott 973 F 2d 507 (6th Cir 1992)Google Scholar

BDO Seidman v Hirshberg 690 NYS 2d 854 (NY Ct App 1999)Google Scholar

Bed Mart Inc v Kelley 45 P 3d 1219 (Ariz App 2002)Google Scholar

Bimbo Bakeries USA Inc v Botticella 613 F3d 102 (3d Cir 2010)Google Scholar

Bonito Boats v Thunder Craft Boats 489 US 141 (US Supr Ct 1989)Google Scholar

Bryceland v Northey 772 P 2d 36 (Arizona Ct App 1989)Google Scholar

By-Buk Co v Printed Cellophane Tape Co 163 Cal App 2d 157(Cal 1958)Google Scholar

Cherne Indus Inc v Grounds & Assocs Inc 278 NW 2d 81 (Supr Ct Minn 1979)Google Scholar

Com-Co Insurance Agency Inc v Service Insurance Agency Inc 748 NE 2d 298, 301 – 302 (Ill App 2001)Google Scholar

Comprehensive Technologies Int v Software Artisans Inc 3 F 3d 730 (4th Cir 1993)Google Scholar

Continental Group Inc v Kinsley 422 F Supp 838 (D Conn 1976)Google Scholar

CVD Inc v Raytheon Co 769 F2d 842 (1st Cir 1985)Google Scholar

Dynamics Research Corp v Analytic Sciences Corp 400 NE 2d 1274 (Mass CA 1980)Google Scholar

Eagle Group v Pullen 58 P 3d 292 (Wash App 2002)Google Scholar

EarthWeb Inc v Schlack 71 F Supp 2d 299 (SDNY 1999)Google Scholar

eBay Inc v MercExchange LLC 547 US 388 (US Supr Ct 2006)Google Scholar

Ed Nowogroski Insurance Inc v Michael Rucker et al 137 Wash 2d 427 (Washington Supr Ct 1999)Google Scholar

Edwards v Arthur Andersen LLP 81 Cal Rptr 3d 282 (Cal Sup Ct 2008)Google Scholar

EI DuPont de Nemours & Co v Christopher 431 F 2d 1012 (5th Cir 1970)Google Scholar

EI DuPont de Nemours and Co v American Potash & Chemical Corp 220 A 2d 428 (Del Ch 1964)Google Scholar

EI DuPont de Nemours Powder Co v Masland 244 US 100 ( US Supr Ct 1917)Google Scholar

Electronic Data Systems Corp v Heinemann 268 Ga 755 (Ga 1997)Google Scholar

Faiveley Transport Malmo Ab v WABTEC Corporation 559 F 3d 110 (2nd Cir 2009)Google Scholar

Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Service Co, 499 US 340 (US Supr Ct 1991)Google Scholar

Fenner Precision Inc v Mearthane Products Corp Case No 12-CV-6610 CJS (WDNY 2013)Google Scholar

Fleming Sales Company Inc v Joseph W Bailey 611 F Supp 507 (Ill Distr Ct 1985)Google Scholar

Foodcomm Int v Barry 328 F3d 300 (7th Cir 2003)Google Scholar

Franke v Wiltschek 209 F 2d 439 (CA2 NY 1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garber Bros Inc v Evlek 122 F Supp 2d 375 (EDNY 2000)Google Scholar

Grant v Carotek 737 F 2d 410 (4th Cir 1984)Google Scholar

Henry Hope X-Ray Products Inc v Marrion Carrel Inc 674 F 2d 1336 (9th Cir 1982)Google Scholar

Heyden Chemical Corp v Burrell & Neidig 2 64 A 2d 465 (NJ Super 1949)Google Scholar

Horner Intl Co v McKoy Case No COA 13–964 (North Carolina Ct App 2014)Google Scholar

IBM v Papermaster 2008 WL 4974508 (SDNY 2008)Google Scholar

Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v National Distillers and Chemical Corp 342 F 2d 737 (CA 2nd Circuit 1965)Google Scholar

In re Innovative Construction Systems Inc 793 F2d 875 (7th Cir 1986)Google Scholar

Jostens Inc v National Computer Systems Inc 318 NW 2d 691 (Supr Ct Minn 1982)Google Scholar

K-2 Ski Company v Head Ski Co Inc 506 f 2d 471 (9th Cir 1974)Google Scholar

Kewanee Oil Co v Bicron Corp 416 US 470 (US Supr Ct 1974)Google Scholar

Kilbarr Corp v Bus Sys Inc 679 F Supp 422 (DNJ 1988)Google Scholar

Kodekey Electronics Inc v The Mechanex Corp 486 F2d 449 (10th Cir 1973)Google Scholar

Liautaud v Liautaud 221 F 3d 981 (7th Cir 2000)Google Scholar

Litigation Management Inc v Bourgeois 2011 WL 2270553 (Ohio Ct App 2011)Google Scholar

Lucent Technologies Inc v Gateway Inc 580 F3d 1301 (Fed Cir 2009)Google Scholar

Mangren Research & Dev Corp v National Chem Co 87 F 3d 937 (7th Cir 1996)Google Scholar

Modern Environments Inc v Stinnett 561 S E 2d 694 (Va Sup Ct 2002)Google Scholar

Motorola Inc v Computer Displays International Inc 739 F 2d 1149 (7th Cir 1984)Google Scholar

Muggill v Reuben H Donnelley Corp 62 Cal 2d 239 (Supr Ct California 1965)Google Scholar

Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co v Brass 625 NW 2d 648 (Wis App 2001)Google Scholar

Outsource International Inc v Barton 192 F3d 662 (7th Cir 1999)Google Scholar

Panduit Corp v Stahlin Bros 575 F2d 1152 (6th Cir 1978)Google Scholar

Pappan Enters v Hardee’s Food Sys 143 F3d 800, 803 (3rd Cir 1998)Google Scholar

Paramanandam v Herrmann 827 NE 2d 1173 (Ind CA 2005)Google Scholar

PepsiCo Inc v Redmond 54 F 3d 1262 (7th Cir 1995)Google Scholar

Precision Plating & Metal Finishing Inc v Martin-Marietta Corp 435 F 2d 1262 (5th Cir 1970)Google Scholar

Professional Real Estate Investors Inc v Columbia Pictures Industries Inc 508 US 49 (US Supr Ct 1993)Google Scholar

Reed Roberts Assocs v Strauman 40 NY 2d 303 (Ct App 1976)Google Scholar

Republic Aviation Corp v Schenk 152 USPQ 830 (NY Sup Ct 1967)Google Scholar

Roboserve Ltd v Tom’s Foods Inc 940 F 2d 1441 (11th Cir 1991)Google Scholar

Ruckelshaus v Monsanto 467 US 986 (US Supr Ct 1984)Google Scholar

Sabatino Bianco v Globus Medical No 2:2012cv00147 – Document 45 (E D Tex 2012)Google Scholar

Sabatino Bianco v Globus Medical WL 2980740 (E D Tex 2014)Google Scholar

SI Handling Systems v Heisley 753 F 2d 1244 (3rd Cir 1985)Google Scholar

Silicon Image Inc v Analogix Semiconductor Inc No C-07-00635 JCS (not reported in F Sup 2d) 2008 WL 166950 (ND Cal 2008)Google Scholar

Silvaco Data Systems v Intel Corp 109 Cal Rptr 3d 27 (Cal App 2010)Google Scholar

Standard Register Co v Cleaver 30 F Supp 2d 1084, 1095 (7th Cir ND Ind 1998)Google Scholar

Structural Dynamics Research Corp v Engineering Mechanics Research Corp 401 F Supp 1102 (ED Mich 1975)Google Scholar

United States v First National City Bank 379 US 378 (Supr Ct 1965)Google Scholar

University Computing Co v Lykes-Youngstown Corp 504 F 2d 518 (5th Cir 1974)Google Scholar

Winston Research Corp v Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company 350 F 2d 134 (9th Cir 1965)Google Scholar

World Wide Prosthetic Supply Inc v Mikulsky 631 NW 2d 253 (Wis App 2001)Google Scholar

Case T-201/04 Microsoft v Commission [2007] ECR II-03601Google Scholar

Case C-126/97 Eco Swiss China Time Ltd and Benetton International NV [1999] ECR I-3079Google Scholar

Case C-22/98 Jean Claude Becu [1999] ECRI-5665Google Scholar

Case C-415/93 Bosman [1995] ECR I-04921Google Scholar

Joined Cases C-267/91 and C-268/91 Keck and Mithouard [1993] ECR I-06097Google Scholar

Case 27/76 United Brands Company and United Brands Continentaal BV v Commission of the European Communities [1978] ECR 1978 00207Google Scholar

Case T-111/96 ITT Promedia v Commission [1998] ECR II-02937Google Scholar

Joined Cases T-191, T 212 – 214/98 Atlantic Container Line and Others v Commission [2003] ECR-II-3275Google Scholar

Case C-5/08 Infopaq [2009] ECR I-06569Google Scholar

Case C-393/09 BSA [2010] ECR I-13971Google Scholar

Combined cases C-403/08 and C-429/08 Murphy [2011] I-09083Google Scholar

Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v ZTE [2015] ECLI:EU:C:2015:477Google Scholar

Case C-367/15 Stowarzyszenie ‘Oławska Telewizja Kablowa’ v Stowarzyszenie Filmowców Polskich [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2016:900, Opinion of AG SharpstonGoogle Scholar

Case C-367/15 Stowarzyszenie ‘Oławska Telewizja Kablowa’ v Stowarzyszenie Filmowców Polskich [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:36Google Scholar

Reuter/BASF (Case IV/28.996) Commission Decision 76/743/EEC [1976] OJ L254/40Google Scholar

–, Münchner Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch (6th edn, CH Beck 2012)Google Scholar

Altman, L and Pollack, M, Callmann on Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies (4th edn, Clark Boardman Callaghan 2012)Google Scholar

Ann, C, Loschelder, M and Grosch, M, Praxishandbuch Know-how-Schutz (1st edn, Carl Heymanns Verlag 2010)Google Scholar

Aplin, T and others, Gurry on Breach of Confidence: The Protection of Confidential Information (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Basedow, J (ed), Private Enforcement of EC Competition Law (Kluwer Law International 2007)Google Scholar

Bauer, J-H and Diller, M, Wettbewerbsverbote (7th edn, CH Beck 2015)Google Scholar

Bechtold, R and Bosch, W, Kartellgesetz. Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen. Kommentar (8th edn, CH Beck 2015)Google Scholar

Beebe, B and others, Trademarks, Unfair Competition, and Business Torts (2nd edn, Wolters Kluwer 2016)Google Scholar

Belliston, CJ, Patent Rights and Patent Infringement Remedies: Working toward a Unified Theory (Department of Economics, The University of Utah, UMI Dissertation Services 2004)Google Scholar

Bently, L and Sherman, B, Intellectual Property Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, C and others, Einstweiliger Rechtsschutz im Zivilrecht (Erich Schmidt Verlag 2006)Google Scholar

Busche, J, Stoll, P-T and Wiebe, A, TRIPs. Internationales und europäisches Recht des geistigen Eigentums. Kommentar (2nd edn, Carl Heymanns Verlag 2013)Google Scholar

Coleman, A, The Legal Protection of Trade Secrets (Sweet&Maxwell 1992)Google Scholar

Cornish, W and others, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th edn, Sweet&Maxwell 2013)Google Scholar

Correa, CM, Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. A Commentary on the TRIPS Agreement (Oxford University Press 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Correa, CM and Yusuf, AA (eds), Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPS Agreement (3rd edn, Wolters Kluwer 2016)Google Scholar

Darbyshire, P, Darbyshire on the English Legal System (10th edn, Sweet&Maxwell 2011)Google Scholar

de Werra, J (ed), La protection des secrets d’affaires. The Protection of Trade Secrets (Schulthess 2013)Google Scholar

Dreier, T and Schulze, G, Urheberrechtsgesetz (5th edn, CH Beck 2015)Google Scholar

Dreyer, G, Kotthoff, J, Meckel, A and Zeisberg, H-J, Urheberrecht (3rd edn, C F Müller 2013)Google Scholar

Dreyfuss, RC and Strandburg, KJ (eds), The Law and Theory of Trade Secrecy: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar 2011)Google Scholar

Estlund, CL and Wachter, ML (eds), Research Handbook on the Economics of Labor and Employment Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fabry, B and Trimborn, M, Arbeitnehmererfindungsrecht im internationalen Vergleich (1st edn, Carl Heymanns Verlag 2007)Google Scholar

Garner, BA (ed), Black’s Law Dictionary (9th edn, Thomson Reuters 2009)Google Scholar

Gassmann, O and Bader, MA, Patentmanagement. Innovationen erfolgreich nützen und schützen (3rd edn, Springer 2011)Google Scholar

Geiger, Ch (ed), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property (Edward Elgar 2015)Google Scholar

Gervais, D, The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis (4th edn, Sweet&Maxwell 2012)Google Scholar

Glick, MA, Reymann, LA and Hoffman, R, Intellectual Property Damages: Guidelines and Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2003)Google Scholar

Götting, H-P and Nordemann, A, UWG Handkommentar (3rd edn, Nomos 2016)Google Scholar

Goulding, P, Employee competition. Covenants, Confidentiality and Garden Leave (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2016)Google Scholar

Harte-Bavendamm, H and Henning-Bodewig, F, Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (UWG) (4th edn, CH Beck 2016)Google Scholar

Hengstler, AJ, Die Geheimhaltungsvereinbarung (Non-Disclosure Agreement) (Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft Frankfurt am Main 2011)Google Scholar

Hodkinson, K and Wasik, M, Industrial Espionage Protection and Remedies (Longman Intelligence Reports, Longman Group UK Ltd 1986)Google Scholar

Hull, J, Commercial Secrecy: Law and Practice (Sweet&Maxwell 1998)Google Scholar

Huston, JP, The Law of Trade Secret Litigation Under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Juris Publishing 2016)Google Scholar

Jager, M, Trade Secrets Law (Thomson Reuters 2015)Google Scholar

Kalbfus, BH, Know-how-Schutz in Deutschland zwischen Strafrecht und Zivilrecht – welcher Reformbedarf besteht? (Carl Heymanns Verlag 2011)Google Scholar

Kamerling, A and Goodwill, C, Restrictive Covenants under Common and Competition Law (Sweet&Maxwell 2010)Google Scholar

Keller, E, Plassmann, C and von Falck, A (eds), Festschrift für Winfried Tilmann (Carl Heymanns Verlag 2003)Google Scholar

Köhler, H and Bornkamm, J, Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (35th edn, CH Beck 2017)Google Scholar

Kurz, P, Vertraulichkeitsvereinbarungen (3rd edn, Carl Heymanns Verlag 2013)Google Scholar

Landes, WA and Posner, RA, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2003)Google Scholar

Lawson, FH and Teff, H, Remedies of English Law (2nd edn, London Butterworths 1980)Google Scholar

Loewenheim, U and Raiser, T (eds), Festschrift für Fritz Traub zum 65. Geburtstag (Deutscher Fachverlag 1994)Google Scholar

Malbon, J, Lawson, C and Davison, M, The WTO Agreement on Trade–Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (Edward Elgar 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maunz, T and Dürig, G, Grundgesetz-Kommentar (69th edn, CH Beck 2013)Google Scholar

Mehigan, S and Griffiths, D, Restraint of Trade and Business Secrets (3rd edn, Sweet&Maxwell 1996)Google Scholar

Mestmäcker, E-J and Schweitzer, H, Europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht (3rd edn, CH Beck 2014)Google Scholar

Milgrim, RM and Bensen, EE, Milgrim on Trade Secrets (102nd edn, Lexis Nexis 2013)Google Scholar

Ohly, A and Sosnitza, O, UWG. Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (7th edn, CH Beck 2016)Google Scholar

Peel, E, The Law of Contract (13th edn, Sweet&Maxwell 2011)Google Scholar

Pendergrast, M, For God, Country & Coca-Cola: The Definitive History of the Great American Soft Drink and the Company That Makes It (3rd edn, Basis Books 2013)Google Scholar

Peterson, GR, Trade Secret Protection in an Information Age (Glasser Legal Works 1997)Google Scholar

Pires de Carvalho, N, The TRIPS Regime of Antitrust and Undisclosed Information (Kluwer Law International 2008)Google Scholar

Pittard, M, Monotti, AL and Duns, J (eds), Business Innovation and the Law. Perspectives from Intellectual Property, Labour, Competition and Corporate Law (Edward Elgar 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pooley, J, Trade Secrets (6th edn, Law Journal Press 2002)Google Scholar

Poth, H, Die Grenzen des Arbeitsrechts aus kartellrechtlicher Sicht (Peter Lang 1990)Google Scholar

Prinz zu Waldeck und Pyrmont, W, Adelman, MJ, Brauneis, R, Drexl, J and Nack, R (eds), Patents and Technological Progress in a Globalized World. Liber Amicorum Joseph Straus (Springer 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinto, D W, Singer, S H and McCauley, C A Trade Secrets: Law and Practice (Lexis Nexis 2016)Google Scholar

Ribeiro, R, Damages and Other Remedies for Breach of Commercial Contracts (Thorogood 2005)Google Scholar

Schlötter, R, Der Schutz von Betriebs- und Geschäftsgeheimnissen und die Abwerbung von Arbeitnehmern (Carl Heymanns Verlag 1997)Google Scholar

Schramm, C, Der Patentverletzungsprozess (7th edn, Carl Heymanns Verlag 2013)Google Scholar

Schumpeter, JA, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (5th edn, Routledge reprinted 1996)Google Scholar

Schweyer, F, Die rechtliche Bewertung des Reverse Engineering in Deutschland und den USA (Mohr Siebeck 2012)Google Scholar

Sigmund, PE (ed), The Selected Political Writings of John Locke (W W Norton & Company 2005)Google Scholar

Snyder, DW and Almeling, DS, Keeping Secrets: A Practical Introduction to Trade Secret Law and Strategy (1st edn, Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Spry, ICF, The Principles of Equitable Remedies (4th edn, Sweet&Maxwell 1990)Google Scholar

Stanley, P, The Law of Confidentiality: A Restatement (Hart Publishing 2008)Google Scholar

Surblytė, G, The Refusal to Disclose Trade Secrets and Abuse of Market Dominance - Microsoft and Beyond (Stämpfli Publishers Ltd Berne 2011)Google Scholar

Taeger, J, Softwareschutz durch Geheimnisschutz (Lüneburg, 1991)Google Scholar

Toulson, RG and Phipps, CM, Confidentiality (3rd edn, Sweet&Maxwell, 2012)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, Resource Book on TRIPS and Development (Cambridge University Press 2005)Google Scholar

van Caenegem, W, Trade Secrets and Intellectual Property. Breach of Confidence, Misappropriation and Unfair Competition (1st edn, Kluwer Law International 2014)Google Scholar

Westermann, I, Handbuch Know-How Schutz (CH Beck 2007)Google Scholar

Wheeler, J, Essentials of the English Legal System (2nd edn, Pearson Longman 2006)Google Scholar

Aplin, T, ‘Right to Property and Trade Secrets’ in Geiger, Christophe (ed), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property (Edward Elgar 2015) 421Google Scholar

Bone, RG, ‘Trade Secrecy, Innovation and the Requirement of Reasonable Secrecy Precautions’ in Dreyfuss, Rochelle C and Strandburg, Katherine J (eds), The Law and Theory of Trade Secrecy: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar 2011) 48Google Scholar

Dessemontet, F, ‘Protection of Trade Secrets and Confidential Information’ in Correa, Carlos M and Yusuf, Abdulqawi A (eds), Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPS Agreement (3rd edn, Wolters Kluwer 2016) 339Google Scholar

Doepner, U, ‘Anmerkungen zum wettbewerbsrechtlichen Geheimnisschutz im Zivilprozess’ in Keller, Erhard, Plassmann, Clemens and von Falck, Andreas (eds), Festschrift für Winfried Tilmann (Carl Heymanns Verlag 2003) 112Google Scholar

Fezer, K-H, ‘Der Zivilrechtliche Geheimnisschutz im Wettbewerbsrecht’ in Loewenheim, Ulrich and Raiser, Thomas (eds), Festschrift für Fritz Traub zum 65. Geburtstag (Deutscher Fachverlag 1994) 81Google Scholar

First, H, ‘Trade Secrets and Antitrust Law’ in Dreyfuss, Rochelle C and Strandburg, Katherine J (eds), The Law and Theory of Trade Secrecy: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar 2011) 333Google Scholar

Ghidini, G and Falce, V, ‘Trade Secrets as Intellectual Property Rights: a Disgraceful Upgrading – Notes on an Italian “Reform”’ in Dreyfuss, Rochelle C and Strandburg, Katherine J (eds), The Law and Theory of Trade Secrecy: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar 2011) 140Google Scholar

Hyde, A, ‘Intellectual Property Justifications for Restricting Employee Mobility: A Critical Appraisal in Light of Economic Evidence’ in Estlund, Cynthia L and Wachter, Michael L (eds), Research Handbook on the Economics of Labor and Employment Law (Edward Elgar 2012) 369Google Scholar

Kesan, JP and Hayes, CM, ‘The Law and Policy of Non-Compete Clauses in the United States and Their Implications’ in Pittard, Marilyn, Monotti, Ann L and Duns, John (eds), Business Innovation and the Law. Perspectives from Intellectual Property, Labour, Competition and Corporate Law (Edward Elgar 2013) 381Google Scholar

Locke, J, ‘The Second Treatise of Government. An Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent, and End of Civil Government’ in Sigmund, Paul E (ed), The Selected Political Writings of John Locke (W W Norton & Company 2005) 28Google Scholar

Madison, MJ, ‘Open Secrets’ in Dreyfuss, Rochelle C and Strandburg, Katherine J (eds), The Law and Theory of Trade Secrecy: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar 2011) 241Google Scholar

Ohly, A, ‘Harmonising the Protection of Trade Secrets: Challenges and Perspectives’ in de Werra, Jacques (ed), La protection des secrets d’affaires. The Protection of Trade Secrets (Schulthess 2013) 39Google Scholar

Ohly, A, ‘Reverse Engineering: Unfair Competition or Catalyst for Innovation?’ in zu Waldeck und Pyrmont, Wolrad Prinz, Adelman, Martin J, Brauneis, Robert, Drexl, Josef and Nack, Ralph (eds), Patents and Technological Progress in a Globalized World. Liber Amicorum Joseph Straus (Springer 2009) 535CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reichman, JH, ‘How Trade Secrecy Law Generates a Natural Semicommons of Innovative Know-How’ in Dreyfuss, Rochelle C and Strandburg, Katherine J (eds), The Law and Theory of Trade Secrecy: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar 2011) 193Google Scholar

Risch, M, ‘Trade Secret Law and Information Development Incentives’ in Dreyfuss, Rochelle C and Strandburg, Katherine J (eds), The Law and Theory of Trade Secrecy: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar 2011) 160Google Scholar

Turner, S, ‘The Protection of Trade Secrets: the Legal Framework in the EU’ in de Werra, Jacques (ed), La protection des secrets d’affaires. The Protection of Trade Secrets (Schulthess 2013) 95Google Scholar

–, ‘Post-Termination Restrictive Covenants’ (2008) IDS Emp L Brief 853, 12–18Google Scholar

Abramowicz, M and Duffy, JF, ‘Intellectual Property for Market Experimentation’ (2008) 83 NYU L Rev 337Google Scholar

Almeling, DS, Snyder, DW, Sapoznikow, M, McCollum, WE and Weader, J, ‘A Statistical Analysis of Trade Secret Litigation in Federal Courts’ (2010) 45(2) Gonz L Rev 291Google Scholar

Ann, C, ‘Know-how – Stiefkind des Geistigen Eigentums?’ (2007) GRUR 39Google Scholar

Aplin, T, ‘Commercial confidences after the Human Rights Act’ (2007) 29(10) EIPR 411Google Scholar

Aplin, T, ‘A Critical Evaluation of the Proposed EU Trade Secrets Directive’ (2014) 4 IPQ 257Google Scholar

Arundel, A, ‘The Relative Effectiveness of Patents and Secrecy for Appropriation’ (2001) 30 Research Policy 611CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asendorf, CD, ‘Wettbewerbs- und Patentstreitsachen vor Arbeitsgerichten? Die sachliche Zuständigkeit bei der Verletzung von Betriebsgeheimnissen durch Arbeitnehmer’ (1990) GRUR 229Google Scholar

Batteson, A, ‘Gaining Confidence in the Law of Confidence’ (2006) 1(11) JIPLP 714Google Scholar

Berryhill, JW, ‘Trade Secret Litigation: Injunctions and other Equitable Remedies’ (1977) 48 Univ Colo L R 189Google Scholar

Bishara, ND, ‘Covenants Not to Compete in a Knowledge Economy: Balancing Innovation from Employee Mobility against Legal Protection for Human Capital Investment’ (2006) 27 Berk J Emp & Lab L 287Google Scholar

Blok, P, ‘A Harmonized Approach to Prohibitory Injunctions: Reconsidering Article 12 of the Enforcement Directive’ (2016) 11(1) JIPLP 56Google Scholar

Bone, RG, ‘A New Look at Trade Secret Law: Doctrine in Search of Justification’ (1998) 86 Cal L Rev 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bone, RG, ‘The (Still) Shaky Foundations of Trade Secret Law’ (2014) 92 Tex L R 1803Google Scholar

Brammsen, J, ‘Der Arbeitnehmerbegriff. Versuch einer einheitlichen Neubestimmung’ (2010) RdA 267Google Scholar

Bronckers, M and McNelis, N, ‘Is the EU Obliged to Improve the Protection of Trade Secrets? An Inquiry into TRIPS, the European Convention on Human Rights and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 34(10) EIPR 673Google Scholar

Chally, JR, ‘The Law of Trade Secrets: Toward a More Efficient Approach’ (2004) 57 V and L Rev 1269Google Scholar

Clarke, L, ‘Breach of Confidence and the Employment Relationship’ (2002) 31(4) ILJ 353Google Scholar

Clarke, L, ‘Repudiation of Contract and Breach of Confidence: General Billposting v Atkinson Revisited’ (2003) 32 ILJ 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, L, ‘Remedial Responses to Breach of Confidence: The Question of Damages’ (2005) 24 CJQ 316Google Scholar

Closius, PJ and Schaffer, HM, ‘Involuntary Nonservitude: The Current Judicial Enforcement of Employee Covenants Not to Compete – a Proposal for Reform’ (1984) 57 S Cal L Rev 531Google Scholar

Coulthard, A, ‘Garden Leave, The Right to Work and Restraints of Trade’ (2009) 22 Aust J Lab L 87Google Scholar

Cran, D and Joseph, P, ‘Breach of Confidence Claim against Ex-employees and Consultants’ (2011) 6(10) JIPLP 688Google Scholar

Cundiff, VA, ‘Reasonable Measures to Protect Trade Secrets in a Digital Environment’ (2009) 49(3) IDEA 359Google Scholar

de Werra, J, ‘How to Protect Trade Secrets in High Tech Sports? An Intellectual Property Analysis Based on the Experiences in the America’s Cup and in the Formula One Championship’ (2010) 32(4) EIPR 155Google Scholar

Demuth, D, ‘Neue Maβstäbe für einstweilige Verfügungsverfahren in Wettbewerbssachen’ (2011) GRUR 404Google Scholar

Denninger, E, ‘Die Zweitanmelderproblematik im Arzneimittelrecht’ (1984) GRUR 627Google Scholar

Dobash, TJ, ‘Trade Secret Theft & Employer Vicarious Liability in Hagen v. Burmeister & Associates, Inc.’ (2002–2003) 29 Wm Mitchell L Rev 375Google Scholar

Drexl, J, ‘Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law. IMS Health and Trinko – Antitrust Placebo for Consumers Instead of Sound Economics in Refusal-to-Deal Cases’ (2004) IIC 788Google Scholar

Eady, D, ‘Injunctions and the Protection of Privacy’ (2010) 29 CJQ 411Google Scholar

Ellington, P, ‘Obligations of Confidentiality – English law’ (1991) 1 IBLJ 141Google Scholar

Enders, T, ‘Know How Schutz als Teil des geistigen Eigentums’ (2012) GRUR 25Google Scholar

Feldman, MJ, ‘Towards a Clearer Standard of Protectable Information: Trade Secrets and the Employment Relationship’ (1994) 9 HTLJ 151Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J and Firth, A, ‘Is Art. 13 of the Enforcement Directive a Redundancy Notice for the Account of Profits Remedy in the UK?’ (2014) GRUR Int 881Google Scholar

Freiherr von Maltzahn, F, ‘Wettbewerbsrechtliche Probleme beim Arbeitsplatzwechsel’ (1981) GRUR 788Google Scholar

Friedman, DD, Landes, WM and Posner, RA, ‘Some Economics of Trade Secret Law’ (1991) 5(1) J Econ Pers 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friesen, LS, ‘Distinguishing between an Employee’s General Knowledge and Trade Secrets’ (1994) 23 Colo Law 2123Google Scholar

Garrison, MJ and Wendt, JT, ‘The Evolving Law of Employee Non-Compete Agreements: Recent Trends and an Alternative Policy Approach’ (2008) 45 Am Bus L J 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gärtner, A, ‘Zum Richtlinienentwurf über den Schutz von Geschäftsgeheimnissen’ (2014) NZG 650Google Scholar

Gaugenrieder, E and Unger-Hellmich, D, ‘Know-How Schutz – gehen mit dem Mitarbeiter auch die Unternehmensgeheimnisse?’ (2011) WRP 1364Google Scholar

Gaul, D, ‘Die nachvertragliche Geheimhaltungspflicht eines ausgeschiedenen Arbeitnehmers’ (1988) NZA 225Google Scholar

Gaul, D, ‘Erfindungen eines gekündigten Arbeitnehmers’ (1979) GRUR 750Google Scholar

Glick, MA, Bush, D and Hafen, JQ, ‘The Law and Economics of Post-Employment Covenants: A Unified Framework’ (2002) 11 Geo Mason L Rev 357Google Scholar

Grassie, G, ‘Trade Secrets: The New EU Enforcement Regime’ (2014) 9(8) JIPLP 677Google Scholar

Grunewald, R, ‘Fern der Quelle – Geheimnisschutz und Outsourcing’ (2007) WRP 1307Google Scholar

Guthrie, P, ‘Employee’s Duty, in Absence of Express Contract, Not to Disclose or Use in the New Employment Special Skills or Techniques Acquired in Earlier Employment’ 30 ALR 3d 631Google Scholar

Holzapfel, H, ‘Zum einstweiligen Rechtsschutz im Wettbewerbs- und Patentrecht’ (2003) GRUR 287Google Scholar

Honeyball, S and Pearce, D, ‘Contract, Employment and the Contract of Employment’ (2006) 35(1) ILJ 30Google Scholar

Hull, J, ‘Speed Seal Products v Paddington: Retraining Use of Information in the Public Domain’ (1986) 8(8) EIPR 249Google Scholar

Hull, J, ‘Trade Secret Licensing: The Art of the Possible’ (2009) 4(3) JIPLP 203Google Scholar

Hull, J, ‘Making Preparations to Compete – A Note on Helmet Systems v Tunnard’ (2009) 31(12) EIPR 623Google Scholar

Hull, J and Abbott, S, ‘Property Rights in Secrets – Douglas v Hello! In the Court of Appeal’ (2005) 27(10) EIPR 379Google Scholar

Hussinger, K, ‘Is Silence Golden? Patents Versus Secrecy at the Firm Level’ (2006) 15(8) Econ Innov New Techn 735CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyde, A, ‘Should Non-Competes be Enforced?’ (2010) 33 Regulation 6Google Scholar

Johnson, CN, ‘Assessing Damages for Misappropriation of Trade Secrets’ (1998) 27 Colo Law 71Google Scholar

Kalbfus, B, ‘Die neuere Rechtsprechung des BGH zum Schutz von Betriebs- und Geschäftsgeheimnissen’ (2013) WRP 584Google Scholar

Kalbfus, B and Harte-Bavendamm, H, ‘Protokoll der Sitzung des Fachausschusses für Wettbewerbs- und Markenrecht zum Richtlinienvorschlag über den Schutz von Geschäftsgeheimnissen’ (2014) GRUR 453Google Scholar

Kalbfus, B, ‘Die EU-Geschäftsgeheimnis-Richtlinie. Welcher Umsetzungsbedarf besteht in Deutschland?’ (2016) GRUR 1009Google Scholar

Khan, AN, ‘Former Employee’s Duty of Secrecy’ (1988) 9(6) Company Lawyer 130Google Scholar

Kiethe, K and Hohmann, O, ‘Der strafrechtliche Schutz von Geschäfts- und Betriebsgeheimnissen’ (2006) NStZ 185Google Scholar

Kitch, EW, ‘The Law and Economics of Rights in Valuable Information’ (1980) 9 (4) JLS, The Law and Economics of Privacy 683Google Scholar

Kitch, EW, ‘The Expansion of Trade Secrecy Protection and the Mobility of Management Employees: a New Problem for the Law’ (1996) 47 S C L Rev 659Google Scholar

Koenig, C and Steiner, U, ‘Die Vereinbarkeit nachvertraglicher Wettbewerbsverbote mit der Arbeitnehmerfreizügigkeit des EG-Vertrags’ (2002) NJW 3583Google Scholar

Körner, E, ‘Die Aufwertung der Schadensberechnung nach der Lizenzanalogie bei Verletzung gewerblicher Schutzrechte durch die Rechtsprechung zum „Verletzervorteil“und zu den „aufgelaufenen Zinsen”’ (1983) GRUR 611Google Scholar

Körner, E, ‘Befristete und unbefristete Unterlassungstitel bei Wettbewerbsverstöβen’ (1985) GRUR 909Google Scholar

Kraßer, R, ‘Grundlagen des Zivilrechtlichen Schutzes von Geschäfts- und Betriebsgeheimnissen sowie von Know-How’ (1977) GRUR 177Google Scholar

Kunz, J, ‘Betriebs- und Geschäftsgeheimnisse und Wettbewerbsverbot während der Dauer und nach Beendigung des Anstellungsverhältnisses’ (1993) DB 2482Google Scholar

Leistensnider, RE, ‘Trade Secret Misappropriation: What is the Proper Length of an Injunction after Public Disclosure?’ (1987) 51 Alb L Rev 271Google Scholar

Lemley, MA, ‘The Surprising Virtues of Treating Trade Secrets as IP Rights’ (2008) 61 Stanf L R 311Google Scholar

Lemley, MA, ‘The Myth of the Sole Inventor’ (2012) 110 MILR 709Google Scholar

Lettl, T, ‘Die Beeinträchtigung des Eigentums nach §1004(I)(1) BGB’ (2005) JuS 871Google Scholar

Leyendecker, BE, ‘Grundfälle zur Vollstreckungsabwehrklage’ (2010) JA 631Google Scholar

Mansfield, E, ‘How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?’ (1985) 34 J Ind Econ 217Google Scholar

Maume, P, ‘Know-how-Schutz – Abschied vom Geheimhaltungswillen?’ (2008) WRP 1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, MA, ‘Geschäfts- und Betriebsgeheimnis oder Geheimniskrämerei?’ (2011) GRUR 884Google Scholar

McGuire, M-R, Joachim, B, Künzel, J and Weber, N, ‘Der Schutz von Geschäftsgeheimnissen durch Rechte des Geistigen Eigentums und durch das Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs (Q215)’ (2010) GRUR Int 829Google Scholar

McGuire, M-R, ‘Know-how: Stiefkind, Störenfried oder Sorgenkind? Lücken und Regelungsalternativen vor dem Hintergrund des RL-Vorschlags’ (2015) GRUR 424Google Scholar

McGuire, M-R, ‘Der Schutz von Know-how im System des Immaterialgüterrechts. Perspektiven für die Umsetzung der Richtlinie über Geschäftsgeheimnisse’ (2016) GRUR 1000Google Scholar

Menke, J-M, ‘Gestaltung nachvertraglicher Wettbewerbsverbote mit GmbH-Geschäftsführern. Verzicht statt Karenzentschädigung’ (2009) NJW 636Google Scholar

Merges, RP, ‘The Law and Economics of Employee Inventions’ (1999) 13(1) Harv J L Techn 1Google Scholar

Mes, P, ‘Arbeitsplatzwechsel und Geheimnisschutz’ (1979) GRUR 584Google Scholar

Middlemiss, S, ‘The Psychological Contract and Implied Contractual Terms: Synchronous or Asynchronous Models?’ (2011) 53(1) Int JLM 32Google Scholar

Miller, K, ‘Implied Duties of Confidentiality in the Contract of Employment’ (1986) 102 LQR 359Google Scholar

Milligan, RB and Sieve, CE, ‘Adequately Identifying Trade Secrets in California Trade Secret Misappropriation Litigation’ (2009) 4(10) JIPLP 703Google Scholar

Molkenbur, J, ‘Pflicht zur Geheimniswahrung nach Ende des Arbeitsverhältnisses?’ (1990) BB 1196Google Scholar

Motolenich-Salas, K, ‘Trade Secret Misappropriation, Possession of Confidential Information, and Preliminary Injunctions’ (2008) 3(7) JIPLP 440Google Scholar

Nastelski, K, ‘Der Schutz des Betriebsgeheimnisses’ (1957) GRUR 1Google Scholar

Nisar, S, ‘Pre-filing Disclosure of an Invention is Found to be in Breach of Equitable Doctrine of Confidence’ (2012) 7(7) JIPLP 485Google Scholar

Oehlrich, M, ‘Know-how und Tacit Knowledge als vernachlässigte Vertragsbestandteile bei Lizenzverträgen’ (2010) GRUR 33Google Scholar

Ohly, A, ‘Der Geheimnisschutz im deutschen Recht: heutiger Stand und Perspektiven’ (2014) GRUR 1Google Scholar

Ohly, A, ‘“Patenttrolle”oder: Der patentrechtliche Unterlassungsanspruch unter Verhältnismäßigkeitsvorbehalt? – Aktuelle Entwicklungen im US-Patentrecht und ihre Bedeutung für das deutsche und europäische Patentsystem’ (2008) GRUR Int 787Google Scholar

Parker, N, ‘The Secret Recipe: Key Ingredients of Agreements to Protect Confidential Information’ (2011) 6(4) JIPLP 223Google Scholar

Porter, WG II and Griffaton, M, ‘Identifying and Protecting Employers’ Interests in Trade Secrets and Proprietary Information’ (2001) 68 Def Couns J 439Google Scholar

Rauer, N, ‘Richtlinienentwurf: Europaweit einheitlicher Schutz von Geschäftsgeheimnissen’ (2014) GRUR-Prax 2Google Scholar

Redeker, SS, Pres, S and Gittinger, C, ‘Die Entwürfe zur Know-how-Richtlinie, deren Konsequenzen für das innerbetriebliche Vertragsmanagement (Teil 1)’ (2015) WRP 681Google Scholar

Reetz, A, Pecnard, C, Fruscalzo, R, van der Velden, R and Marfé, M, ‘Die Befugnisse der nationalen Gerichte unter dem EPÜ und des Einheitlichen Patentgerichts (EPG) nach Art. 63 (1) EPGÜ zum Erlass von Unterlassungsverfügungen – eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung’ (2015) GRUR Int 210Google Scholar

Reimann, T, ‘Einige Überlegungen zur Offenkundigkeit im Rahmen von §§17 ff. UWG und von §3 PatG’ (1998) GRUR 298Google Scholar

Reinhard, B and Kliemt, T, ‘Die Durchsetzung arbeitsrechtlicher Ansprüche im Eilverfahren’ (2005) NZA 545Google Scholar

Retzer, K, ‘Wiederlegung der ”Dringlichkeitsvermutung“durch Interessenabwägung?’ (2009) GRUR 329Google Scholar

Reuter, WJ, ‘Wettbewerbsrechtliche Ansprüche bei Konflikten zwischen Arbeitgebern und Arbeitnehmern – Terra Incognita?’ (2008) NJW 3538Google Scholar

Reynolds, L and Watts, J, ‘A New Approach to Interlocutory Injunctions?’ (1996) 2(2) CTLR 66Google Scholar

Richards-Bray, B, ‘Intellectual Property Law: Employment Law – Contract Law’ (2007) 12(1) Cov L J 76Google Scholar

Richters, S and Wodtke, C, ‘Schutz von Betriebsgeheimnissen aus Unternehmenssicht “Verhinderung von Know-how Abfluss durch eigene Mitarbeiter”’ (2003) NZA-RR 281Google Scholar

Risch, M, ‘Why Do We Have Trade Secrets?’ (2007) 11 Marq IP L Rev 1Google Scholar

Rowe, EA, ‘When Trade Secrets Become Shackles: Fairness and the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine’ (2005) 7 Tul J Tech & Intell Prop 167Google Scholar

Rowe, EA, ‘Introducing a Takedown for Trade Secrets on the Internet’ (2007) 5 WLR 1041Google Scholar

Rützel, S, ‘Illegale Unternehmensgeheimnisse?’ (1995) GRUR 557Google Scholar

Salger, C and Breitfeld, A, ‘Regelungen zum Schutz von betrieblichen Know-how – die Sicherung von Geschäfts- und Betriebsgeheimnissen’ (2005) BB 154Google Scholar

Sander, C, ‘Schutz nicht offenbarter betrieblicher Informationen nach der Beendigung des Arbeitsverhältnisses im deutschen und amerikanischen Recht’ (2013) GRUR-Int 217Google Scholar

Schmidt-Hern, K, ‘Kundenliste muss im Geheimnisschutz-Prozess eindeutig beschrieben werden’ (2011) GRUR-Prax 154Google Scholar

Siems, MM, ‘Die Logik des Schutzes von Betriebsgeheimnissen’ (2007) WRP 1146Google Scholar

Sołtysiński, SJ, ‘Are Trade Secrets Property?’ (1986) IIC 331Google Scholar

Sousa e Silva, N, ‘What Exactly is a Trade Secret under the Proposed Directive?’ (2014) 9(11) JIPLP 923Google Scholar

Stewart, A, ‘Confidential Information and Departing Employees: The Employer’s Options’ (1989) 11(3) EIPR 88Google Scholar

Stone, KVW, ‘The New Psychological Contract: Implications of the Changing Workplace for Labor and Employment Law’ (2001) 48 UCLA L Rev 519Google Scholar

Stone, KVW, ‘Knowledge at Work: Disputes over Ownership of Human Capital in the Changing Workplace’ (2001–2002) 34 Conn L Rev 721Google Scholar

Stone, KVW, ‘Human Capital and Employee Mobility: A Rejoinder’ (2002) 34 CTLR 1233Google Scholar

Tetzner, V, ‘Der Verletzerzuschlag bei der Lizenzanalogie’ (2009) GRUR 6Google Scholar

Tönnies, JG, ‘Erfindungen – ein Kollektivgut oder die Gedanken sind frei’ (2013) GRUR 796Google Scholar

Turner, B and Purvis, I, ‘More Chicken Pieces’ (1989) 11(1) EIPR 3Google Scholar

Unikel, R, ‘Bridging the “Trade Secret” Gap: Protecting “Confidential Information” Not Rising to the Level of Trade Secrets’ (1998) 29 Loy U Chi LJ 841Google Scholar

Volp, F, ‘Änderung der Rechts- oder Sachlage bei Unterlassungstitel’ (1984) GRUR 486Google Scholar

von Ungern-Sternberg, J, ‘Einwirkung der Durchsetzungsrichtlinie auf das deutsche Schadensersatzrecht’ (2009) GRUR 460Google Scholar

Waas, B, ‘Überlegungen zur Fortentwicklung des deutschen Arbeitsrechts. Diskussion im Inland, Anstöße aus dem Ausland’ (2007) RdA 76Google Scholar

Weiss, GE, ‘Biting the Hand that Stops Feeding: How to Protect Trade Secrets from Misappropriation by Laid Off Employees’ (2001) 661 PLI/Lit 469Google Scholar

Wennakoski, AA, ‘Trade Secrets under Review: A Comparative Analysis of the Protection of Trade Secrets in the EU and in the US’ (2016) 38(3) EIPR 154Google Scholar

Wertheimer, F, ‘Bezahlte Karenz oder entschädigungslose Wettbewerbsenthaltung des ausgeschiedenen Arbeitnehmers?’ (1999) BB 1600Google Scholar

Wilf, S, ‘Trade Secret, Property and Social Relations’ (2002) 34 Conn L Rev 787Google Scholar

Winterstein, H-P, ‘Nachvertragliches Wettbewerbsverbot und Karenzentschädigung’ (1989) NJW 1463Google Scholar

Wolff, HA, ‘Der verfassungsrechtliche Schutz der Betriebs- und Geschäftsgeheimnisse’ (1997) NJW 98Google Scholar

Beckerman-Rodau, A, ‘The Choice between Patent Protection and Trade Secret Protection: A Legal and Business Decision’ (2002) http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=704644&download=yes accessed 3 March 2016, on file with the authorGoogle Scholar

Bessen, J and Nuvolari, A, ‘Knowledge-Sharing Among Inventors: Some Historical Perspectives’ (2011) Boston University School of Law Working Paper No 11–51 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1944201 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Bishara, ND and Orozco, D, ‘Using the Resource-Based Theory to Determine Covenant not to Compete Legitimacy’ (2011) Ross School of Business Working Paper No 1157 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1900873## accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Bishara, ND, ‘Fifty Ways to Leave Your Employer: Relative Enforcement of Covenants Not to Compete, Trends and Implications for Employee Mobility Policy’ (2011) 13(3) University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law 751 http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jbl/vol13/iss3/5 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Cohen, WM, Nelson, RR and Walsh, JP ‘Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why US Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)’ (2000) NBER Working Paper Series Working Paper No 7552 www.nber.org/papers/w7552.pdf accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Epstein, RA, ‘Trade Secrets as Private Property: Their Constitutional Protection’ (2003) John M Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No 190 (2d Series) http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=421340 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Fisk, CL, ‘“An Ingenious Man Enabled by Contract”: Entrepreneurship and the Rise of Contract’ (2007) Duke Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper 157 http://ssrn.com/abstract=983739 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Lerner, J, ‘Using Litigation to Understand Trade Secrets: A Preliminary Exploration’ (2006) Harvard Business School Working Papers http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=922520 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Lichtman, D, ‘How the Law Responds to Self-Help’ (2004) John M Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No 232 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=629287 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Lobel, O, ‘Intellectual Property and Restrictive Covenants’ (2008) Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper 08-059 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1226463 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Marx, M, Singh, J and Fleming, L, ‘Regional Disadvantage? Non-Compete Agreements and Brain Drain’ (2010) http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1654719 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Moffat, VR, ‘The Wrong Tool for the Job: The IP Problem with Non-Competition Agreements’ (2010) University of Denver Sturm College of Law Legal Research Paper Series Working Paper No 10–10 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1577271 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Png, IPL and Samila, S, ‘Trade Secrets Law and Mobility: Evidence from “Inevitable Disclosure”’ (2015) http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1986775 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Reder, MEK and O’Brien, CN, ‘Managing the Risk of Trade Secret Loss Due to Job Mobility in an Innovation Economy with the Theory of Inevitable Disclosure’ (2012) 12 Journal of High Technology Law http://ssrn.com/abstract=2014051 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Risch, MV, ‘Comments on Trade Secrets Sharing in High Velocity Labor Markets’ (2008) http://ssrn.com/abstract=1269039 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Samila, S and Sorenson, O, ‘Non-Compete Covenants: Incentives to Innovate or Impediments to Growth’ (2010) http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1411172 accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Searle, N and Reid, GC, ‘Firm Size and Trade Secret Intensity: Evidence from the Economic Espionage Act’ (2012) Scottish Institute for Research in Economics Discussion Paper http://repo.sire.ac.uk/bitstream/10943/372/1/SIRE-DP-2012_60.pdf accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Warren, M and Pedowitz, A, ‘Social Media, Trade Secrets, and Yes, the Sky is Falling’ (2011) www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/labor_law/meetings/2011/tech/a_03.authcheckdam.pdf accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

Report on Trade Secrets for the European Commission, Hogan Lovells International LLP, Study on Trade Secrets and Parasitic Copying (Look-alikes) MARKT/2010/20/D http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/iprenforcement/docs/parasitic/Study_Parasitic_copying_en.pdf accessed 1 June 2017 (Hogan Lovells Report)Google Scholar

Study on Trade Secrets and Confidential Business Information in the Internal Market, Baker & McKenzie – Milan MARKT/2011/128/D http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/iprenforcement/docs/trade-secrets/130711_final-study_en.pdf accessed 1 June 2017 (Baker&McKenzie Study)Google Scholar

Stellungnahme des Max-Planck-Instituts für Innovation und Wettbewerb vom 3 Juni 2014 zum Vorschlag der Europäischen Kommission für eine Richtlinie über den Schutz vertraulichen Know-hows und vertraulicher Geschäftsinformationen (Geschäftsgeheimnisse) vor rechtswidrigem Erwerb sowie rechtswidriger Nutzung und Offenlegung vom 28.11.2013, COM (2013) 813 final www.ip.mpg.de/fileadmin/ipmpg/content/stellungnahmen/stellungnahme-geschaeftsgeheimnisse_2014-05-12_final_7.pdf accessed 1 June 2017 (MPI Position Paper)Google Scholar

ICC Comments on Proposal for EU Trade Secrets Directive, Paper 450/1083 DYE/cle – 20 March 2014 www.icc-deutschland.de/fileadmin/icc/ICC_2012/ICC_Comments_on_Proposal_for_EU_Trade_Secrets_Directive.pdf accessed 3 March 2016, on file with the authorGoogle Scholar

Russel Beck, Year in Review (2015) Trade Secrets 5–8 http://wk-kliblogs-test.elasticbeanstalk.com/patent/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2016/02/Year-in-Review-2015_Trade-Secrets.pdf accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics www.bls.gov/opub/regional_reports/200908_silicon_valley_high_tech.htm accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

‘Texas Adopts the Uniform Trade Secrets Act’ (Trading Secrets, 3 May 2013) www.tradesecretslaw.com/2013/05/articles/trade-secrets/texas-adopts-the-uniform-trade-secrets-act/ accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

‘The Cinderella of IP (or not)’ (The IP Kat, 18 December 2012) http://ipkitten.blogspot.de/2012/12/the-cinderella-of-ip-or-not.html accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

‘Why Europe Must Reform its Trade Secrets Rules’ (Managing Intellectual Property, 10 February 2015) www.managingip.com/Blog/3426227/Guest-blog-Why-Europe-must-reform-its-trade-secrets-rules.html accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

‘New York Federal Court Denies Injunction to Enforce Restrictive Covenants Against Terminated Employee’ (Trading Secrets, 13 February 2013) www.tradesecretslaw.com/2013/02/articles/noncompete-enforceability/new-york-federal-court-denies-injunction-to-enforce-restrictive-covenants-against-terminated-employee/ accessed 1 June 2017Google Scholar

‘Jorda on: Trade Secrets are not Trade Secrets’ (Jorda on Trade Secrets 18 October 2007) http://blogs.law.unh.edu/tradesecrets/2007/10/jorda-on-trade-secrets-are-not.html accessed 1 June 2017.Google Scholar