Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of tables and figures
- List of abbreviations
- Notes on contributors
- One Transnational social work: opportunities and challenges of a global profession
- Part One Setting the transnational context
- Part Two Practitioner perspectives
- Part Three Employer/stakeholder views
- Part Four Policy challenges, professional responses
- Index
Fourteen - Recognising transnational social workers in Australia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of tables and figures
- List of abbreviations
- Notes on contributors
- One Transnational social work: opportunities and challenges of a global profession
- Part One Setting the transnational context
- Part Two Practitioner perspectives
- Part Three Employer/stakeholder views
- Part Four Policy challenges, professional responses
- Index
Summary
Introduction
The migrant is the political figure of our time. (Nail, 2015, p 235)
This chapter explores the Australian approach to the recognition of transnational social workers migrating to Australia. Prior research into transnational social work has: questioned the portability of values, skills and knowledge across cultural contexts (McDonald et al, 2003; Walsh et al, 2010; Pullen-Sansfaçon et al, 2012); explored the experiences of migrant social workers’ adaptation to destination country practices (Kornbeck, 2004; Hussein et al, 2010; Bartley et al, 2011; Beddoe et al, 2012; Sims, 2012; Harrison, 2013; Beddoe and Fouché, 2014; Hussein, 2014); and also noted the ethical implications of social workers migrating from countries that need their services (IFSW, 2012), and the obligations of destination countries to migrant social workers (McDonald et al, 2003; Walsh et al, 2010; Pullen-Sansfaçon et al, 2012; Fouché et al, 2016). As the opening quote from Nail suggests, these themes all touch on the political, and they inform the background to a critical analysis of current processes of professional recognition in Australia. Empirical research has recently begun to explore the complexity of recognition processes as a significant variable in the migration experiences of social workers in Canada (Fang, 2012; Brown et al, 2015) and New Zealand (Fouché et al, 2014a, 2014b). In the Australian case, there is a lack of scholarship and data illustrating the migration patterns of social workers, the absence of which relates to Australian social work's ambiguous professional status.
While the occupation of ‘social worker’ comprehends a broad range of practices across myriad contexts, one characteristic of social work that clearly transcends national boundaries is the espoused self-concept of the profession as ethical. This is expressed through codes and standards of practice to which practitioners are expected to adhere across fields of practice, framed both nationally and internationally. Comparing national codes of ethics of social work practice, Banks (2012, p 111) identified common orienting ethical principles across nations: ‘respect for persons, respect for and promotion of the autonomy of service users, promotion of human welfare, social justice and professional integrity’ – a commonality she attributes to the influence of the International Federation of Social Work (IFSW).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Transnational Social WorkOpportunities and Challenges of a Global Profession, pp. 223 - 240Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2018