Alberts, M J, Brass, L M, Perry, A, Webb, D, Dawson, D V. Evaluation times for patients with in-hospital strokes. Stroke. 1993; 24:1817–22.Google Scholar

Emiru, T, Adil, M M, Suri, M F, Qureshi, A I. Thrombolytic treatment for in-hospital ischemic strokes in United States. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. 2014; 7:28–34.Google ScholarPubMed

Kelley, R E, Kovacs, A G. Mechanism of in-hospital cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 1986; 17:430–3.Google Scholar

Barnwell, S L, Clark, W M, Nguyen, T T, et al. Safety and efficacy of delayed intraarterial urokinase therapy with mechanical clot disruption for thromboembolic stroke. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1994; 15:1817–22.Google Scholar

Bavinzski, G, Killer, M, Ferraz-Leite, H, et al. Endovascular therapy of idiopathic cavernous aneurysms over 11 years. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1998; 19:559–65.Google Scholar

Belan, A, Vesela, M, Vanek, I, Weiss, K, Peregrin, J H. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of fibromuscular dysplasia of the internal carotid artery. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. 1982; 5:79–81.Google Scholar

Benati, A. Interventional neuroradiology for the treatment of inaccessible arterio-venous malformations. Acta Neurochirurgica. 1992; 118:76–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, M M, Butler, P, Gibbs, J, Swash, M, Waterston, J. Feasibility of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for carotid artery stenosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 1990; 53:238–43.Google Scholar

Casasco, A E, Aymard, A, Gobin, Y P, et al. Selective endovascular treatment of 71 intracranial aneurysms with platinum coils. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1993; 79:3–10.Google Scholar

Cognard, C, Weill, A, Castaings, L, Rey, A, Moret, J. Intracranial berry aneurysms: Angiographic and clinical results after endovascular treatment. Radiology. 1998; 206:499–510.Google Scholar

Crawley, F, Clifton, A, Buckenham, T, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic cerebral ischemia and microembolic signals detected during carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty. Stroke. 1997; 28:2460–4.Google Scholar

Crawley, F, Clifton, A, Markus, H, Brown, M M. Delayed improvement in carotid artery diameter after carotid angioplasty. Stroke. 1997; 28:574–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Criado, F J, Wellons, E, Clark, N S. Evolving indications for and early results of carotid artery stenting. American Journal of Surgery. 1997; 174:111–14.Google Scholar

Cronqvist, M, Pierot, L, Boulin, A, et al. Local intraarterial fibrinolysis of thromboemboli occurring during endovascular treatment of intracerebral aneurysm: A comparison of anatomic results and clinical outcome. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1998; 19:157–65.Google ScholarPubMed

Debrun, G, Vinuela, F, Fox, A, Drake, C G. Embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations with bucrylate. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1982; 56:615–27.Google Scholar

Debrun, G M, Aletich, V, Ausman, J I, Charbel, F, Dujovny, M. Embolization of the nidus of brain arteriovenous malformations with n-butyl cyanoacrylate. Neurosurgery. 1997; 40:112–20.Google Scholar

Debrun, G M, Aletich, V A, Kehrli, P, et al. Selection of cerebral aneurysms for treatment using Guglielmi detachable coils: The preliminary University of Illinois at Chicago experience. Neurosurgery. 1998; 43:1281–95.Google ScholarPubMed

Diethrich, E B, Ndiaye, M, Reid, D B. Stenting in the carotid artery: Initial experience in 110 patients. Journal of Endovascular Surgery. 1996; 3:42–62.Google Scholar

Dion, J E, Gates, P C, Fox, A J, Barnett, H J, Blom, R J. Clinical events following neuroangiography: A prospective study. Stroke. 1987; 18:997–1004.Google Scholar

Earnest, F T, Forbes, G, Sandok, B A, et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: Prospective assessment of risk. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1984; 142:247–53.Google Scholar

Endo, S, Kuwayama, N, Hirashima, Y, et al. Results of urgent thrombolysis in patients with major stroke and atherothrombotic occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1998; 19:1169–75.Google Scholar

Fournier, D, TerBrugge, K G, Willinsky, R, Lasjaunias, P, Montanera, W. Endovascular treatment of intracerebral arteriovenous malformations: Experience in 49 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1991; 75:228–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fox, A J, Pelz, D M, Lee, D H. Arteriovenous malformations of the brain: Recent results of endovascular therapy. Radiology. 1990; 177:51–7.Google Scholar

Freitag, G, Freitag, J, Koch, R D, Wagemann, W. Percutaneous angioplasty of carotid artery stenoses. Neuroradiology. 1986; 28:126–7.Google Scholar

Frey, J L, Greene, K A, Khayata, M H, et al. Intrathrombus administration of tissue plasminogen activator in acute cerebrovascular occlusion. Angiology. 1995; 46:649–56.Google Scholar

Gil-Peralta, A, Mayol, A, Marcos, J R, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the symptomatic atherosclerotic carotid arteries. Results, complications, and follow-up. Stroke. 1996; 27:2271–3.Google Scholar

Gobin, Y P, Laurent, A, Merienne, L, et al. Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations by embolization and radiosurgery. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1996; 85:19–28.Google Scholar

Graves, V B, Strother, C M, Duff, T A, Perl, J 2nd. Early treatment of ruptured aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: Effect on subsequent bleeding. Neurosurgery. 1995; 37:640–7.Google Scholar

Guglielmi, G, Vinuela, F, Duckwiler, G, et al. Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms by electrothrombosis using electrically detachable coils. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1992; 77:515–24.Google Scholar

Gurian, J H, Martin, N A, King, W A, et al. Neurosurgical management of cerebral aneurysms following unsuccessful or incomplete endovascular embolization. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1995; 83:843–53.Google Scholar

Guterman, L R, Budny, J L, Gibbons, K J, Hopkins, L N. Thrombolysis of the cervical internal carotid artery before balloon angioplasty and stent placement: Report of two cases. Neurosurgery. 1996; 38:620–3.Google Scholar

Heiserman, J E, Dean, B L, Hodak, J A, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1994; 15:1401–7.Google ScholarPubMed

Henry, M, Amor, M, Masson, I, et al. Angioplasty and stenting of the extracranial carotid arteries. Journal of Endovascular Surgery. 1998; 5:293–304.Google Scholar

Heras, M, Chesebro, J H, Penny, W J, et al. Importance of adequate heparin dosage in arterial angioplasty in a porcine model. Circulation. 1988; 78:654–60.Google Scholar

Higashida, R T, Halbach, V V, Barnwell, S L, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with preservation of the parent vessel: Results of percutaneous balloon embolization in 84 patients. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1990; 11:633–40.Google Scholar

Higashida, R T, Halbach, V V, Cahan, L D, Hieshima, G B, Konishi, Y. Detachable balloon embolization therapy of posterior circulation intracranial aneurysms. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1989; 71:512–19.Google Scholar

Higashida, R T, Halbach, V V, Dowd, C, et al. Endovascular detachable balloon embolization therapy of cavernous carotid artery aneurysms: Results in 87 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1990; 72:857–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Higashida, R T, Halbach, V V, Dowd, C F, Barnwell, S L, Hieshima, G B. Intracranial aneurysms: Interventional neurovascular treatment with detachable balloons – results in 215 cases. Radiology. 1991; 178:663–70.Google Scholar

Hodes, J E, Aymard, A, Gobin, Y P, et al. Endovascular occlusion of intracranial vessels for curative treatment of unclippable aneurysms: Report of 16 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1991; 75:694–701.Google Scholar

Huang, Z, Dai, Q, Suo, J, et al. Percutaneous endovascular embolization of intracerebral arteriovenous malformations. Experience in 72 cases. Chinese Medical Journal. 1995; 108:413–19.Google ScholarPubMed

Jordan, W D Jr., Schroeder, P T, Fisher, W S, McDowell, H A. A comparison of angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 1997; 11:2–8.Google Scholar

Jordan, W D Jr., Voellinger, D C, Doblar, D D, et al. Microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy. Cardiovascular Surgery. 1999; 7:33–8.Google Scholar

Kachel, R, Basche, S, Heerklotz, I, Grossmann, K, Endler, S. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of supra-aortic arteries especially the internal carotid artery. Neuroradiology. 1991; 33:191–4.Google Scholar

Kachel, R, Endert, G, Basche, S, Grossmann, K, Glaser, F H. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (dilatation) of carotid, vertebral, and innominate artery stenoses. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. 1987; 10:142–6.Google Scholar

Kearon, C, Hirsh, J. Management of anticoagulation before and after elective surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997; 336:1506–11.Google Scholar

Kesava, P, Graves, V, Salamat, S, Rappe, A. Intraarterial thrombolysis in a pig model: A preliminary note. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1997; 18:915–20.Google Scholar

Klein, G E, Szolar, D H, Leber, K A, Karaic, R, Hausegger, K A. Basilar tip aneurysm: Endovascular treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils – midterm results. Radiology. 1997; 205:191–6.Google Scholar

Klotzsch, C, Nahser, H C, Henkes, H, Kuhne, D, Berlit, P. Detection of microemboli distal to cerebral aneurysms before and after therapeutic embolization. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1998; 19:1315–18.Google Scholar

Koenigsberg, R A, Wysoki, M, Weiss, J, Faro, S H, Tsai, F Y. Risk of clot formation in femoral arterial sheaths maintained overnight for neuroangiographic procedures. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1999; 20:297–9.Google ScholarPubMed

Krupski, W C, Bass, A, Kelly, A B, Hanson, S R, Harker, L A. Reduction in thrombus formation by placement of endovascular stents at endarterectomy sites in baboon carotid arteries. Circulation. 1991; 84:1749–57.Google Scholar

Kuether, T A, Nesbit, G M, Barnwell, S L. Clinical and angiographic outcomes, with treatment data, for patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: A single-center experience. Neurosurgery. 1998; 43:1016–25.Google Scholar

Lagalla, G, Ceravolo, M G, Provinciali, L, et al. Transcranial Doppler sonographic monitoring during cerebral aneurysm embolization: A preliminary report. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1998; 19:1549–53.Google Scholar

Lam, J Y, Chesebro, J H, Steele, P M, et al. Deep arterial injury during experimental angioplasty: Relation to a positive indium-111-labeled platelet scintigram, quantitative platelet deposition and mural thrombosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1986; 8:1380–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Larson, J J, Tew, J M Jr., Tomsick, T A, van Loveren, H R. Treatment of aneurysms of the internal carotid artery by intravascular balloon occlusion: Long-term follow-up of 58 patients. Neurosurgery. 1995; 36:26–30.Google Scholar

Lincoff, A M, Tcheng, J E, Califf, R M, et al. Standard versus low-dose weight-adjusted heparin in patients treated with the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antibody fragment abciximab (c7E3 Fab) during percutaneous coronary revascularization. PROLOG investigators. American Journal of Cardiology. 1997; 79:286–91.Google Scholar

Lundqvist, C, Wikholm, G, Svendsen, P. Embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Part II – aspects of complications and late outcome. Neurosurgery. 1996; 39:460–7.Google ScholarPubMed

Malisch, T W, Guglielmi, G, Vinuela, F, et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with the Guglielmi detachable coil: Midterm clinical results in a consecutive series of 100 patients. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1997; 87:176–83.Google Scholar

Markus, H S, Clifton, A, Buckenham, T, Brown, M M. Carotid angioplasty. Detection of embolic signals during and after the procedure. Stroke. 1994; 25:2403–6.Google Scholar

Markus, H S, Clifton, A, Buckenham, T, Taylor, R, Brown, M M. Improvement in cerebral hemodynamics after carotid angioplasty. Stroke. 1996; 27:612–16.Google Scholar

Mathur, A, Roubin, G S, Gomez, C R, et al. Elective carotid artery stenting in the presence of contralateral occlusion. American Journal of Cardiology. 1998; 81:1315–17.Google Scholar

Mathur, A, Roubin, G S, Iyer, S S, et al. Predictors of stroke complicating carotid artery stenting. Circulation. 1998; 97:1239–45.Google Scholar

McDougall, C G, Halbach, V V, Dowd, C F, et al. Treatment of basilar tip aneurysms using electrolytically detachable coils. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1996; 84:393–9.Google Scholar

Mericle, R A, Lanzino, G, Wakhloo, A K, Guterman, L R, Hopkins, L N. Stenting and secondary coiling of intracranial internal carotid artery aneurysm: Technical case report. Neurosurgery. 1998; 43:1229–34.Google Scholar

Merland, J J, Rufenacht, D, Laurent, A, Guimaraens, L. Endovascular treatment with isobutyl cyano acrylate in patients with arteriovenous malformation of the brain. Indications, results and complications. Acta Radiologica. Supplementum. 1986; 369:621–2.Google Scholar

Moret, J, Pierot, L, Boulin, A, Castaings, L, Rey, A. Endovascular treatment of anterior communicating artery aneurysms using Guglielmi detachable coils. Neuroradiology. 1996; 38:800–5.Google Scholar

Munari, L M, Belloni, G, Perretti, A, et al. Carotid percutaneous angioplasty. Neurological Research. 1992; 14:156–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nakstad, P H, Nornes, H. Superselective angiography, embolisation and surgery in treatment of arteriovenous malformations of the brain. Neuroradiology. 1994; 36:410–13.Google Scholar

Nesbit, G M, Clark, W M, O’Neill, O R, Barnwell, S L. Intracranial intraarterial thrombolysis facilitated by microcatheter navigation through an occluded cervical internal carotid artery. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1996; 84:387–92.Google Scholar

Nichols, D A, Brown, R D Jr., Thielen, K R, et al. Endovascular treatment of ruptured posterior circulation aneurysms using electrolytically detachable coils. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1997; 87:374–80.Google Scholar

Pasqualin, A, Scienza, R, Cioffi, F, et al. Treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations with a combination of preoperative embolization and surgery. Neurosurgery. 1991; 29:358–68.Google Scholar

Pelz, D M, Lownie, S P, Fox, A J. Thromboembolic events associated with the treatment of cerebral aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1998; 19:1541–7.Google Scholar

Pierot, L, Boulin, A, Castaings, L, Rey, A, Moret, J. Selective occlusion of basilar artery aneurysms using controlled detachable coils: Report of 35 cases. Neurosurgery. 1996; 38:948–53.Google Scholar

Raschke, R A, Reilly, B M, Guidry, J R, Fontana, J R, Srinivas, S. The weight-based heparin dosing nomogram compared with a “standard care” nomogram. A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1993; 119:874–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Raymond, J, Roy, D. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1997; 41:1235–45.Google Scholar

Raymond, J, Roy, D, Bojanowski, M, Moumdjian, R, L’Esperance, G. Endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured and unruptured aneurysms of the basilar bifurcation. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1997; 86:211–19.Google Scholar

Raymond, J, Theron, J. Intracavernous aneurysms: Treatment by proximal balloon occlusion of the internal carotid artery. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1986; 7:1087–92.Google Scholar

Rich, L F, Weimar, V L, Squires, E L, Haraguchi, K H. Stimulation of corneal wound healing with mesodermal growth factor. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1979; 97:1326–30.Google Scholar

Roubin, G S, Yadav, S, Iyer, S S, Vitek, J. Carotid stent-supported angioplasty: A neurovascular intervention to prevent stroke. American Journal of Cardiology. 1996; 78:8–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rowe, J G, Byrne, J V, Molyneux, A, Rajagopalan, B. Haemodynamic consequences of embolizing aneurysms: A transcranial Doppler study. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 1995; 9:749–57.Google Scholar

Rowe, J G, Molyneux, A J, Byrne, J V, Renowden, S, Aziz, T Z. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A minimally invasive approach with advantages for elderly patients. Age and Ageing. 1996; 25:372–6.Google Scholar

Sawyer, P N, Stanczewski, B, Pomerance, A, Stoner, G, Srinivasan, S. Utility of anticoagulant drugs in vascular thrombosis: Electron microscopic and biophysical study. Surgery. 1973; 74:263–75.Google Scholar

Scarborough, R M, Rose, J W, Hsu, M A, et al. Barbourin. A GPIIB-IIIa-specific integrin antagonist from the venom of Sistrurus m. barbouri. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1991; 266:9359–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schatz, R A, Baim, D S, Leon, M, et al. Clinical experience with the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent. Initial results of a multicenter study. Circulation. 1991; 83:148–61.Google Scholar

Schlossman, D. Thrombogenic properties of vascular catheter materials in vivo. The differences between materials. Acta Radiologica: Diagnosis. 1973; 14:186–92.Google Scholar

Schomig, A, Neumann, F J, Kastrati, A, al. A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery stents. New England Journal of Medicine. 1996; 334:1084–9.Google Scholar

Schumacher, M, Horton, J A. Treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations with PVA. Results and analysis of complications. Neuroradiology. 1991; 33:101–5.Google Scholar

Segi, E, Sugimoto, Y, Yamasaki, A, et al. Patent ductus arteriosus and neonatal death in prostaglandin receptor EP4-deficient mice. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1998; 246:7–12.Google Scholar

Serbinenko, F A. Balloon catheterization and occlusion of major cerebral vessels. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1974; 41:125–45.Google Scholar

Serruys, P W, de Jaegere, P, Kiemeneij, F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent study group. New England Journal of Medicine. 1994; 331:489–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sharis, P J, Cannon, C P, Loscalzo, J. The antiplatelet effects of ticlopidine and clopidogrel. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1998; 129:394–405.Google Scholar

Smedema, J P, Saaiman, A. Carotid stent-assisted angioplasty. South African Medical Journal. 1997; 87 Suppl 1:C9–14.Google Scholar

Smith, D C, Smith, L L, Hasso, A N. Fibromuscular dysplasia of the internal carotid artery treated by operative transluminal balloon angioplasty. Radiology. 1985; 155:645–8.Google Scholar

Smyth, S S, Joneckis, C C, Parise, L V. Regulation of vascular integrins. Blood. 1993; 81:2827–43.Google Scholar

Sobel, M, McNeill, P M, Carlson, P L, et al. Heparin inhibition of von Willebrand factor-dependent platelet function in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1991; 87:1787–93.Google Scholar

Speidel, C M, Eisenberg, P R, Ruf, W, Edgington, T S, Abendschein, D R. Tissue factor mediates prolonged procoagulant activity on the luminal surface of balloon-injured aortas in rabbits. Circulation. 1995; 92:3323–30.Google Scholar

Spetzler, R F, Martin, N A, Carter, L P, et al. Surgical management of large AVM’s by staged embolization and operative excision. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1987; 67:17–28.Google Scholar

Stormorken, H. Effects of contrast media on the hemostatic and thrombotic mechanisms. Investigative Radiology. 1988; 23 Suppl 2:S318–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Taki, W, Nishi, S, Yamashita, K, et al. Selection and combination of various endovascular techniques in the treatment of giant aneurysms. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1992; 77:37–42.Google Scholar

Teitelbaum, G P, Lefkowitz, M A, Giannotta, S L. Carotid angioplasty and stenting in high-risk patients. Surgical Neurology. 1998; 50:300–11.Google Scholar

Theodotou, B C, Whaley, R, Mahaley, M S. Complications following transfemoral cerebral angiography for cerebral ischemia. Report of 159 angiograms and correlation with surgical risk. Surgical Neurology. 1987; 28:90–2.Google Scholar

Theron, J, Courtheoux, P, Alachkar, F, Bouvard, G, Maiza, D. New triple coaxial catheter system for carotid angioplasty with cerebral protection. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1990; 11:869–74.Google Scholar

Theron, J G, Payelle, G G, Coskun, O, Huet, H F, Guimaraens, L. Carotid artery stenosis: Treatment with protected balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology. 1996; 201:627–36.Google Scholar

Theroux, P. Antiplatelet therapy: Do the new platelet inhibitors add significantly to the clinical benefits of aspirin? American Heart Journal. 1997; 134:S62–70.Google Scholar

Theroux, P, Waters, D, Lam, J, Juneau, M, McCans, J. Reactivation of unstable angina after the discontinuation of heparin. New England Journal of Medicine. 1992; 327:141–5.Google Scholar

Thielen, K R, Nichols, D A, Fulgham, J R, Piepgras, D G. Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms following incomplete clipping. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1997; 87:184–9.Google Scholar

Topol, E J. Ultrathrombolysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1990; 15:922–4.Google Scholar

Topol, E J, Bonan, R, Jewitt, D, et al. Use of a direct antithrombin, hirulog, in place of heparin during coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993; 87:1622–9.Google Scholar

Touho, H. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of atherosclerotic disease of the anterior cerebral circulation and hemodynamic evaluation. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1995; 82:953–60.Google Scholar

Tournade, A, Courtheoux, P, Sengel, C, Ozgulle, S, Tajahmady, T. Saccular intracranial aneurysms: Endovascular treatment with mechanical detachable spiral coils. Radiology. 1997; 202:481–6.Google Scholar

Tsai, F Y, Matovich, V, Hieshima, G, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the carotid artery. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1986; 7:349–58.Google Scholar

Turpie, A G. Successors to heparin: New antithrombotic agents. American Heart Journal. 1997; 134:S71–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Van Belle, E, Tio, F O, Chen, D, et al. Passivation of metallic stents after arterial gene transfer of phVEGF165 inhibits thrombus formation and intimal thickening. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1997; 29:1371–9.Google Scholar

Vinuela, F, Dion, J E, Duckwiler, G, et al. Combined endovascular embolization and surgery in the management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Experience with 101 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1991; 75:856–64.Google Scholar

Vinuela, F, Duckwiler, G, Mawad, M. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: Perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1997; 86:475–82.Google Scholar

Vorchheimer, D A, Badimon, JJ, Fuster, V. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 1999; 281:1407–14.Google Scholar

Vozzi, C R, Rodriguez, A O, Paolantonio, D, Smith, J A, Wholey, M H. Extracranial carotid angioplasty and stenting. Initial results and short-term follow-up. Texas Heart Institute Journal. 1997; 24:167–72.Google Scholar

Waigand, J, Gross, C M, Uhlich, F, et al. Elective stenting of carotid artery stenosis in patients with severe coronary artery disease. European Heart Journal. 1998; 19:1365–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wallace, R C, Flom, R A, Khayata, M H, et al. The safety and effectiveness of brain arteriovenous malformation embolization using acrylic and particles: The experiences of a single institution. Neurosurgery. 1995; 37:606–15.Google Scholar

Wardlaw, J M, Warlow, C P, Counsell, C. Systematic review of evidence on thrombolytic therapy for acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1997; 350:607–14.Google Scholar

Warkentin, T E, Levine, M N, Hirsh, J, et al. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin. New England Journal of Medicine. 1995; 332:1330–5.Google Scholar

Weitz, J I. Low-molecular-weight heparins. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997; 337:688–98.Google Scholar

Weitz, J I, Hudoba, M, Massel, D, Maraganore, J, Hirsh, J. Clot-bound thrombin is protected from inhibition by heparin-antithrombin III but is susceptible to inactivation by antithrombin III-independent inhibitors. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1990; 86:385–91.Google Scholar

Wholey, M H, Wholey, M H, Jarmolowski, C R, et al. Endovascular stents for carotid artery occlusive disease. Journal of Endovascular Surgery. 1997; 4:326–38.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wikholm, G, Lundqvist, C, Svendsen, P. Embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Part I – technique, morphology, and complications. Neurosurgery. 1996; 39:448–57.Google ScholarPubMed

Wityk, R J, Pessin, M S, Kaplan, R F, Caplan, L R. Serial assessment of acute stroke using the NIH stroke scale. Stroke. 1994; 25:362–5.Google Scholar

Yadav, J S, Roubin, G S, King, P, Iyer, S, Vitek, J. Angioplasty and stenting for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Initial experience. Stroke. 1996; 27:2075–9.Google Scholar

Yakes, W F, Krauth, L, Ecklund, J, et al. Ethanol endovascular management of brain arteriovenous malformations: Initial results. Neurosurgery. 1997; 40:1145–52.Google Scholar

Yalamanchili, K, Rosenwasser, R H, Thomas, J E, et al. Frequency of cerebral vasospasm in patients treated with endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1998; 19:553–8.Google Scholar

CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet. 1996; 348:1329–39.Google Scholar

Ansara, A J, Shiltz, D L, Slavens, J B. Use of cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention: An old dog with new tricks? Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2012; 46:394–402.Google Scholar

Gotoh, F, Tohgi, H, Hirai, S, et al. Cilostazol stroke prevention study: A placebo-controlled double-blind trial for secondary prevention of cerebral infarction. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2000; 9:147–57.Google Scholar

Dinicolantonio, J J, Lavie, C J, Fares, H, et al. Meta-analysis of cilostazol versus aspirin for the secondary prevention of stroke. American Journal of Cardiology. 2013; 112:1230–4.Google Scholar

Kamal, A K, Naqvi, I, Husain, M R, Khealani, B A. Cilostazol versus aspirin for secondary prevention of vascular events after stroke of arterial origin. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011; CD008076.Google Scholar

Ikeda, Y. Antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol, a specific PPE3 inhibitor. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 1999; 82:435–8.Google Scholar

Jeng, J S, Sun, Y, Lee, J T, et al. The efficacy and safety of cilostazol in ischemic stroke patients with peripheral arterial disease (SPAD): Protocol of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. International Journal of Stroke. 2015; 10:123–7.Google Scholar

Lefkovits, J, Plow, E F, Topol, E J. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors in cardiovascular medicine. New England Journal of Medicine. 1995; 332:1553–9.Google Scholar

PRISM-PLUS study investigators. Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with tirofiban in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Platelet receptor inhibition in ischemic syndrome management in patients limited by unstable signs and symptoms (PRISM-PLUS). New England Journal of Medicine. 1998; 338:1488–97.Google Scholar

Ciccone, A, Motto, C, Abraha, I, Cozzolino, F, Santilli, I. Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014; 3:CD005208.Google Scholar

Adams, H P Jr., Effron, M B, Torner, J, et al. Emergency administration of abciximab for treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke: Results of an international phase III trial: Abciximab in emergency treatment of stroke trial (ABESTT-II). Stroke. 2008; 39:87–99.Google Scholar

Velat, G J, Burry, M V, Eskioglu, E, et al. The use of abciximab in the treatment of acute cerebral thromboembolic events during neuroendovascular procedures. Surgical Neurology. 2006; 65:352–8.Google Scholar

Siebler, M, Hennerici, M G, Schneider, D, et al. Safety of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke: The SATIS trial. Stroke. 2011; 42:2388–92.Google Scholar

Kellert, L, Hametner, C, Rohde, S, et al. Endovascular stroke therapy: Tirofiban is associated with risk of fatal intracerebral hemorrhage and poor outcome. Stroke. 2013; 44:1453–5.Google Scholar

Cannon, C P. Oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors – part I. Clinical Cardiology. 2003; 26:358–64.Google ScholarPubMed

Second, S I. Randomized trial of aspirin, sibrafiban, or both for secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2001; 103:1727–33.Google Scholar

Cannon, C P, McCabe, C H, Wilcox, R G, et al. Oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with orbofiban in patients with unstable coronary syndromes (OPUS-TIMI 16) trial. Circulation. 2000; 102:149–56.Google Scholar

O’Neill, W W, Serruys, P, Knudtson, M, et al. Long-term treatment with a platelet glycoprotein-receptor antagonist after percutaneous coronary revascularization. EXCITE trial investigators. Evaluation of oral xemilofiban in controlling thrombotic events. New England Journal of Medicine. 2000; 342:1316–24.Google Scholar

Mousa, S A, Khurana, S, Forsythe, M S. Comparative in vitro efficacy of different platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists on platelet-mediated clot strength induced by tissue factor with use of thromboelastography: Differentiation among glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2000; 20:1162–7.Google Scholar

The SYMPHONY investigators. Comparison of sibrafiban with aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes: A randomised trial. Sibrafiban versus aspirin to yield maximum protection from ischemic heart events post-acute coronary syndromes. Lancet. 2000; 355:337–45.Google Scholar

Chew, D P, Bhatt, D L, Sapp, S, Topol, E J. Increased mortality with oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists: A meta-analysis of phase III multicenter randomized trials. Circulation. 2001; 103:201–6.Google Scholar

Saw, J, Bajzer, C, Casserly, I P, et al. Evaluating the optimal activated clotting time during carotid artery stenting. American Journal of Cardiology. 2006; 97:1657–60.Google Scholar

Batchelor, W B, Mahaffey, K W, Berger, P B, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of enoxaparin after high-risk coronary stenting: The ATLAST trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2001; 38:1608–13.Google Scholar

Hassan, A E, Memon, M Z, Georgiadis, A L, et al. Safety and tolerability of high-intensity anticoagulation with bivalirudin during neuroendovascular procedures. Neurocritical Care. 2011; 15:96–100.Google Scholar

Zidar, J P. Rationale for low-molecular weight heparin in coronary stenting. American Heart Journal. 1997; 134:S81–87.Google Scholar

McDougall, C G, Johnston, S C, Gholkar, A, et al. Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: The MAPS (matrix and platinum science) trial. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2014; 35:935–42.Google Scholar

Molyneux, A J, Clarke, A, Sneade, M, et al. Cerecyte coil trial: Angiographic outcomes of a prospective randomized trial comparing endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms with either cerecyte or bare platinum coils. Stroke. 2012; 43:2544–50.Google Scholar

Coley, S, Sneade, M, Clarke, A, et al. Cerecyte coil trial: Procedural safety and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2012; 33:474–80.Google Scholar

Butteriss, D, Gholkar, A, Mitra, D, Birchall, D, Jayakrishnan, V. Single-center experience of cerecyte coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Initial experience and early follow-up results. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2008; 29:53–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kallmes, D F, Ding, Y H, Dai, D, et al. A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke. 2007; 38:2346–52.Google Scholar

Nelson, P K, Lylyk, P, Szikora, I, et al. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2011; 32:34–40.Google Scholar

De Vries, J, Boogaarts, J, Van Norden, A, Wakhloo, A K. New generation of flow diverter (surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke. 2013; 44:1567–77.Google Scholar

Darsaut, T E, Bing, F, Makoyeva, A, et al. Flow diversion to treat aneurysms: The free segment of stent. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery. 2013; 5:452–7.Google Scholar

Augsburger, L, Farhat, M, Reymond, P, et al. Effect of flow diverter porosity on intraaneurysmal blood flow. Klinische Neuroradiologie. 2009; 19:204–14.Google Scholar

Walcott, B P, Pisapia, J M, Nahed, B V, Kahle, K T, Ogilvy, C S. Early experience with flow diverting endoluminal stents for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2011; 18:891–4.Google Scholar

McAuliffe, W, Wycoco, V, Rice, H, et al. Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2012; 33:164–70.Google Scholar

Stabile, E, Salemme, L, Sorropago, G, et al. Proximal endovascular occlusion for carotid artery stenting: Results from a prospective registry of 1,300 patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010; 55:1661–7.Google Scholar

Ang, L, Mahmud, E. Monitoring oral antiplatelet therapy: Is it justified? Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease. 2008; 2:485–96.Google Scholar

Smith, J W, Steinhubl, S R, Lincoff, A M, et al. Rapid platelet-function assay: An automated and quantitative cartridge-based method. Circulation. 1999; 99:620–5.Google Scholar

Antman, E M, Wiviott, S D, Murphy, S A, et al. Early and late benefits of prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A triton-timi 38 (trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008; 51:2028–33.Google Scholar

Steinhubl, S R, Talley, J D, Braden, G A, et al. Point-of-care measured platelet inhibition correlates with a reduced risk of an adverse cardiac event after percutaneous coronary intervention: Results of the GOLD (AU-Assessing Ultegra) multicenter study. Circulation. 2001; 103:2572–8.Google Scholar

Helena Laboratories. 2015Google Scholar

Simon, D I, Liu, C B, Ganz, P, et al. A comparative study of light transmission aggregometry and automated bedside platelet function assays in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and receiving abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2001; 52:425–32.Google Scholar

Mukherjee, D, Chew, D P, Robbins, M, et al. Clinical application of procedural platelet monitoring during percutaneous coronary intervention among patients at increased bleeding risk. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. 2001; 11:151–4.Google Scholar

Pandya, D J, Fitzsimmons, B F, Wolfe, T J, et al. Measurement of antiplatelet inhibition during neurointerventional procedures: The effect of antithrombotic duration and loading dose. Journal of Neuroimaging. 2010; 20:64–9.Google Scholar

Lee, D H, Arat, A, Morsi, H, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy monitoring for neurointerventional procedures using a point-of-care platelet function test: A single-center experience. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2008; 29:1389–94.Google Scholar

Hill, M D, Martin, R H, Mikulis, D, et al. Safety and efficacy of NA-1 in patients with iatrogenic stroke after endovascular aneurysm repair (ENACT): A phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. Neurology. 2012; 11:942–50.Google Scholar

Qureshi, A I, Luft, A R, Sharma, M, et al. Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: Part II – clinical aspects and recommendations. Neurosurgery. 2000; 46:1360–75.Google Scholar

Qureshi, A I, Janardhan, V, Memon, M Z, et al. Initial experience in establishing an academic neuroendovascular service: Program building, procedural types, and outcomes. Journal of Neuroimaging. 2009; 19:72–9.Google Scholar

Silver, F L, Mackey, A, Clark, W M, et al. Safety of stenting and endarterectomy by symptomatic status in the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial (CREST). Stroke. 2011; 42:675–80.Google Scholar

Bonati, L H, Jongen, L M, Haller, S, et al. New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: A substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Lancet. Neurology. 2010; 9:353–62.Google Scholar

Economopoulos, K P, Sergentanis, T N, Tsivgoulis, G, Mariolis, A D, Stefanadis, C. Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: A comprehensive meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes. Stroke. 2011; 42:687–92.Google Scholar

Halliday, A, Mansfield, A, Marro, J, et al. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: Randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 363:1491–502.Google Scholar

Rothwell, P M, Eliasziw, M, Gutnikov, S A, et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet. 2003; 361:107–16.Google Scholar

Yadav, J S, Wholey, M H, Kuntz, R E, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004; 351:1493–501.Google Scholar

Mas, J L, Chatellier, G, Beyssen, B, EVA-35 Investigators. Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: Clinical alert from the Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) Trial. Stroke. 2004; 35:e18–20.Google Scholar

Matsumura, J S, Gray, W, Chaturvedi, S, et al. Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) Trial. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2012; 55:968–76.Google Scholar

Myla, S, Bacharach, J M, Ansel, G M, et al. Carotid artery stenting in high surgical risk patients using the fibernet embolic protection system: The EPIC trial results. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2010; 75:817–22.Google Scholar

Higashida, R T, Popma, J J, Apruzzese, P, Zimetbaum, P; MAVErIC I and II Investigators. Evaluation of the Medtronic exponent self-expanding carotid stent system with the Medtronic guardwire temporary occlusion and aspiration system in the treatment of carotid stenosis: Combined from the MAVErIC (Medtronic AVE self-expanding carotid stent system with distal protection in the treatment of carotid stenosis) I and MAVErIC II trials. Stroke. 2010; 41:e102–9.Google Scholar

Ansel, G M, Hopkins, L N, Jaff, M R, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the INVATEC MO.MA proximal cerebral protection device during carotid artery stenting: Results from the ARMOUR pivotal trial. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2010; 76:1–8.Google Scholar

Ohki, T, Parodi, J, Veith, F J, et al. Efficacy of a proximal occlusion catheter with reversal of flow in the prevention of embolic events during carotid artery stenting: An experimental analysis. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2001; 33:504–9.Google Scholar

Harada, K, Kakumoto, K, Morioka, J, Saito, T, Fukuyama, K. Combination of flow reversal and distal filter for cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2014; 28:651–8.Google Scholar

Cano, M N, Kambara, A M, de Cano, S J, et al. Randomized comparison of distal and proximal cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting. Cardiovascular Interventions. 2013; 6:1203–9.Google Scholar

Stabile, E, Sannino, A, Schiattarella, G G, et al. Cerebral embolic lesions detected with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging following carotid artery stenting: A meta-analysis of 8 studies comparing filter cerebral protection and proximal balloon occlusion. Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014; 7:1177–83.Google Scholar

Bersin, R M, Stabile, E, Ansel, G M, et al. A meta-analysis of proximal occlusion device outcomes in carotid artery stenting. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012; 80:1072–8.Google Scholar

Dalainas, I, Nano, G, Bianchi, P, et al. Dual antiplatelet regime versus acetyl-acetic acid for carotid artery stenting. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. 2006; 29:519–21.Google Scholar

McKevitt, F M, Randall, M S, Cleveland, T J, et al. The benefits of combined anti-platelet treatment in carotid artery stenting. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2005; 29:522–7.Google Scholar

Van Der Heyden, J, Van Werkum, J, Hackeng, C M, et al. High versus standard clopidogrel loading in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting prior to cardiac surgery to assess the number of microemboli detected with transcranial Doppler: Results of the randomized IMPACT trial. Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. 2013; 54:337–47.Google Scholar

Nakagawa, I, Wada, T, Park, H S, et al. Platelet inhibition by adjunctive cilostazol suppresses the frequency of cerebral ischemic lesions after carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2014; 59:761–7.Google Scholar

Zahn, R, Ischinger, T, Hochadel, M, et al. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists during carotid artery stenting: Results from the Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK). Clinical Research in Cardiology. 2007; 96:730–7.Google Scholar

Hofmann, R, Kerschner, K, Steinwender, C, et al. Abciximab bolus injection does not reduce cerebral ischemic complications of elective carotid artery stenting: A randomized study. Stroke. 2002; 33:725–7.Google Scholar

Qureshi, A I, Suri, M F, Ali, Z, et al. Carotid angioplasty and stent placement: A prospective analysis of perioperative complications and impact of intravenously administered abciximab. Neurosurgery. 2002; 50:466–73.Google Scholar

Walcott, B P, Gerrard, J L, Nogueira, R G, et al. Microsurgical retrieval of an endovascular microcatheter trapped during onyx embolization of a cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery. 2011; 3:77–9.Google Scholar

Huk, W, Becker, H. [Complication after embolization of an AVM with onyx]. Klinische Neuroradiologie. 2009; 19:145–52.Google Scholar

Chimowitz, M I, Lynn, M J, Derdeyn, C P, et al. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011; 365:993–1003.Google Scholar

Siddiq, F, Chaudhry, S A, Khatri, R, et al. Rate of postprocedural stroke and death in SAMMPRIS trial-eligible patients treated with intracranial angioplasty and/or stent placement in practice. Neurosurgery. 2012; 71:68–73.Google Scholar

Qureshi, A I, Abou-Chebl, A, Jovin, T G. Qualification requirements for performing neurointerventional procedures: A report of the Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. Journal of Neuroimaging. 2008; 18:433–47.Google Scholar

Moniz, E. L’encéphalographie artérielle, son importance dans la localisation des tumeurs cérébrales. Revue Neurologique. 1927; 2:63.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, T J, Kallmes, D F. Diagnostic cerebral angiography: Archaic and complication-prone or here to stay for another 80 years? American Journal of Roentgenology. 2008; 190:1435–7.Google Scholar

Kallmes, D F, Layton, K, Marx, W F, Tong, F. Death by nondiagnosis: why emergent CT angiography should not be done for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2007; 28:1837–8.Google Scholar

Dion, J E, Gates, P C, Fox, A J, Barnett, H J, Blom, R J. Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke. 1987; 18:997–1004.Google Scholar

Warnock, N G, Gandhi, M R, Bergvall, U, Powell, T. Complications of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in patients investigated for cerebral vascular disease. British Journal of Radiology. 1993; 66:855–8.Google Scholar

Earnest, F T, Forbes, G, Sandok, B A, et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1984; 142:247–53.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, T J, Huston, J 3rd, Mandrekar, J N, et al. of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2007; 243:812–19.Google Scholar

Olivecrona, H. Complications of cerebral angiography. Neuroradiology. 1977; 14:175–81.Google Scholar

Thiex, R, Norbash, A M, Frerichs, K U. et al. The safety of dedicated-team catheter-based diagnostic cerebral angiography in the era of advanced noninvasive imaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2010; 31:230–4.Google Scholar

Willinsky, R A, Taylor, S M, TerBrugge, K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology. 2003; 227:522–8.Google Scholar

Baum, S, Stein, G N, Kuroda, K K. Complications of “no arteriography”. Radiology. 1966; 86:835–8.Google Scholar

Dawkins, A A, Evans, A L, Wattam, J, et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures. Neuroradiology. 2007; 49:753–9.Google Scholar

Mani, R L, Eisenberg, R L. Complications of catheter cerebral arteriography: analysis of 5,000 procedures. III. Assessment of arteries injected, contrast medium used, duration of procedure, and age of patient. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1978; 131:871–4.Google Scholar

Mani, R L, Eisenberg, R L. Complications of catheter cerebral arteriography: analysis of 5,000 procedures. II. Relation of complication rates to clinical and arteriographic diagnoses. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1978; 131:867–9.Google Scholar

Mani, R L, Eisenberg, R L, McDonald, E J Jr., Pollock, J A, Mani, J R. Complications of catheter cerebral arteriography: analysis of 5,000 procedures. I. Criteria and incidence. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1978; 131:861–5.Google Scholar

Waugh, J R, Sacharias, N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology. 1992; 182:243–6.Google Scholar

Pohler, E, Gunther, H, Diekmann, M, Eggeling, T. Outpatient coronary angiography–safety and feasibility. Cardiology. 1994; 84:305–9.Google Scholar

Cloft, H J, Joseph, G J, Dion, J E. Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 1999; 30:317–20.Google Scholar

Heiserman, J E, Dean, B L, Hodak, J A, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1994; 15:1401–7.Google Scholar

Dagirmanjian, A, Davis, D A, Rothfus, W E, Deeb, Z L, Goldberg, A L. Silent cerebral microemboli occurring during carotid angiography: frequency as determined with Doppler sonography. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1993; 161:1037–40.Google Scholar

Markus, H, Loh, A, Israel, D, et al. Microscopic air embolism during cerebral angiography and strategies for its avoidance. Lancet. 1993; 341:784–7.Google Scholar

Gerraty, R P, Bowser, D N, Infeld, B, Mitchell, P J, Davis, S M. Microemboli during carotid angiography. Association with stroke risk factors or subsequent magnetic resonance imaging changes? Stroke. 1996; 27:1543–7.Google Scholar

Mamourian, A, Drayer, B P. Clinically silent infarcts shown by MR after cerebral angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1990; 11:1084.Google Scholar

Bendszus, M, Koltzenburg, M, Burger, R, et al. Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet. 1999; 354:1594–7.Google Scholar

Chuah, K C, Stuckey, S L, Berman, I G. Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography: detection with diffusion-weighted imaging. Australasian Radiology. 2004; 48:133–8.Google Scholar

Hahnel, S, Bender, J, Jansen, O, et al. [Clinically silent cerebral embolisms after cerebral catheter angiography]. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 2001; 173:300–5.Google Scholar

Kato, K, Tomura, N, Takahashi, S, Sakuma, I, Watarai, J. Ischemic lesions related to cerebral angiography: Evaluation by diffusion weighted MR imaging. Neuroradiology. 2003; 45:39–43.Google Scholar

Krings, T, Willmes, K, Becker, R, et al. Silent microemboli related to diagnostic cerebral angiography: a matter of operator’s experience and patient’s disease. Neuroradiology. 2006; 48:387–93.Google Scholar

Bendszus, M, Koltzenburg, M, Bartsch, A J, et al. Heparin and air filters reduce embolic events caused by intra-arterial cerebral angiography: a prospective, randomized trial. Circulation. 2004; 110:2210–15.Google Scholar

Bendszus, M, Stoll, G. Silent cerebral ischaemia: hidden fingerprints of invasive medical procedures. Lancet Neurology. 2006; 5:364–72.Google Scholar

Bendszus, M, Reents, W, Franke, D, et al. Brain damage after coronary artery bypass grafting. Archives of Neurology. 2002; 59:1090–5.Google Scholar

Knipp, S C, Matatko, N, Wilhelm, H, et al. Evaluation of brain injury after coronary artery bypass grafting. A prospective study using neuropsychological assessment and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2004; 25:791–800.Google Scholar

Lund, C, Nes, R B, Ugelstad, T P, et al. Cerebral emboli during left heart catheterization may cause acute brain injury. European Heart Journal. 2005; 26:1269–75.Google Scholar

Lund, C, Sundet, K, Tennoe, B, et al. Cerebral ischemic injury and cognitive impairment after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2005; 80:2126–31.Google Scholar

Restrepo, L, Wityk, R J, Grega, M A, et al. Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain before and after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Stroke. 2002; 33:2909–15.Google Scholar

Brockmann, C, Hoefer, T, Diepers, M, et al. Abciximab does not prevent ischemic lesions related to cerebral angiography: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Cerebrovascular Disease. 2011; 31:353–7.Google Scholar

Wolfe, T J, Hussain, S I, Lynch, J R, Fitzsimmons, B F, Zaidat, O O. Pediatric cerebral angiography: analysis of utilization and findings. Pediatric Neurology. 2009; 40:98–101.Google Scholar

Burger, I M, Murphy, K J, Jordan, L C, Tamargo, R J, Gailloud, P. Safety of cerebral digital subtraction angiography in children: complication rate analysis in 241 consecutive diagnostic angiograms. Stroke. 2006; 37:2535–9.Google Scholar

Hoffman, C E, Santillan, A, Rotman, L, Gobin, Y P, Souweidane, M M. Complications of cerebral angiography in children younger than 3 years of age: clinical article. Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics. 2014; 13:414–19.Google Scholar

Gottesman, R F, McKhann, G, Hogue, C V. Neurological complications of cardiac surgery. Semin Neurol. 2008; 703–15.Google Scholar

Karalis, D G, Quinn, V, Victor, M F, et al. Risk of catheter-related emboli in patients with atherosclerotic debris in the thoracic aorta. Am Heart J. 1996; 131(6):1149–55.Google Scholar

Eggebrecht, H, Oldenburg, O, Dirsch, O et al. Potential embolization by atherosclerotic debris dislodged from aortic wall during cardiac catheterization: histological and clinical findings in 7,621 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000; 49(4):389–94.Google Scholar

Qureshi, A I, Luft, A R, Sharma, M, Guterman, L R, Hopkins, L N. Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: Part I – Pathophysiological and pharmacological features. Neurosurgery. 2000; 46(6):1344–59.Google Scholar

Hoffman, S J, Holmes, D R Jr, Rabinstein, A A, et al. Trends, predictors, and outcomes of cerebrovascular events related to percutaneous coronary intervention: A 16-year single-center experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4(4):415–22.Google Scholar

Lund, C, Nes, R B, Ugelstad, T P, et al. Cerebral emboli during left heart catheterization may cause acute brain injury. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26(13):1269–75.Google Scholar

Keeley, E C, Grines, C L. Scraping of aortic debris by coronary guiding catheters: A prospective evaluation of 1,000 cases. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32(7):1861–5.Google Scholar

Hilliard, A A, From, A M, Lennon, R J, et al. Percutaneous revascularization for stable coronary artery disease temporal trends and impact of drug-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3(2):172–9.Google Scholar

Dukkipati, S, O’Neill, W W, Harjai, K J, et al. Characteristics of cerebrovascular accidents after percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43(7):1161–7.Google Scholar

Aggarwal, A, Dai, D, Rumsfeld, J S, Klein, L W, Roe, M T. Incidence and predictors of stroke associated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2009; 104(3):349–53.Google Scholar

Hoffman, S J, Routledge, H C, Lennon, R J, et al. Procedural factors associated with percutaneous coronary intervention-related ischemic stroke. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5(2):200–6.Google Scholar

Cappato, R, Calkins, H, Chen, S A, et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3(1):32–8.Google Scholar

Maan, A, Shaikh, A Y, Mansour, M, Ruskin, J N, Heist, E K. Complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011; 10(2):76–83.Google Scholar

Haeusler, K G, Kirchhof, P, Endres, M. Left atrial catheter ablation and ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2012; 43(1):265–70.Google Scholar

Haeusler, K G, Koch, L, Herm, J, et al. 3 Tesla MRI-detected brain lesions after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: results of the MACPAF study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24(1):14–21.Google Scholar

Oral, H, Chugh, A, Ozaydin, M, et al. Risk of thromboembolic events after percutaneous left atrial radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2006; 114(8):759–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lemola, K, Desjardins, B, Sneider, M, et al. Effect of left atrial circumferential ablation for atrial fibrillation on left atrial transport function. Heart Rhythm. 2005; 2(9):923–8.Google Scholar

Di Biase, L, Burkhardt, J D, Mohanty, P, et al. Periprocedural stroke and management of major bleeding complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the impact of periprocedural therapeutic international normalized ratio. Circulation. 2010; 121(23):2550–6.Google Scholar

Rastegar, R, Harnick, D J, Weidemann, P, et al. Spontaneous echo contrast videodensity is flow-related and is dependent on the relative concentrations of fibrinogen and red blood cells. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41(4):603–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ren, J F, Marchlinski, F E, Callans, D J. Left atrial thrombus associated with ablation for atrial fibrillation: identification with intracardiac echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43(10):1861–7.Google Scholar

Ren, J F, Marchlinski, F E, Callans, D J, et al. Increased intensity of anticoagulation may reduce risk of thrombus during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures in patients with spontaneous echo contrast. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16(5):474–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Handke, M, Harloff, A, Olschewski, M, Hetzel, A, Geibel, A. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke in older patients. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(22):2262–8.Google Scholar

Furlan, A J, Reisman, M, Massaro, J, et al. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(11):991–9.Google Scholar

Carroll, J D, Saver, J L, Thaler, D E, et al. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(12):1092–100.Google Scholar

Meier, B, Kalesan, B, Mattle, H P, et al. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(12):1083–91.Google Scholar

Dowson, A, Mullen, M J, Peatfield, R, et al. Migraine Intervention with STARFlex Technology (MIST) trial: a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of patent foramen ovale closure with STARFlex septal repair implant to resolve refractory migraine headache. Circulation. 2008; 117(11):1397–404.Google Scholar

Khairy, P, O’Donnell, C P, Landzberg, M J. Transcatheter closure versus medical therapy of patent foramen ovale and presumed paradoxical thromboemboli: A systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 139(9):753–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ricotta, J J, Faggioli, G L, Castilone, A, Hassett, J M. Risk factors for stroke after cardiac surgery. J Vasc Surg. 1995; 21:359–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roach, G W, Kanchuger, M, Mora-Mangano, C, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335:1857–63.Google Scholar

Hogue, C W, Murphy, S F, Schechtman, K B, Davilla-Roman, V G. Risk factors for early or delayed stroke after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999; 100:642–7.Google Scholar

Almassi, G H, Sommers, T, Moritz, T E, et al. Stroke in cardiac surgical patients: determinants and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 68:391–8.Google Scholar

Tarakji, K G, Sabik, JF III, Bhudia, S K, Batzy, L H, Blackstone, E H. Temporal onset, risk factors, and outcomes associated with stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. JAMA. 2011; 305:381–90.Google Scholar

Selnes, O A, Gottesman, R F, Grega, M A, et al. Cognitive and neurologic outcomes after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366:250–7.Google Scholar

Raja, S G, Berg, G A. Impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on systemic inflammation: Current best available evidence. J Card Surg. 2007; 22:445–55.Google ScholarPubMed

Gottesman, R F, Sherman, P M, Grega, M A et al. Watershed strokes after cardiac surgery: diagnosis, etiology and outcome. Stroke. 2006; 37:2306–11.Google Scholar

Caplan, L R, Hennerici, M. Impaired clearance of emboli (washout) is an important link between hypoperfusion, embolism, and ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol. 1998; 55:1475–82.Google Scholar

Hedberg, M, Boivie, P, Engström, K G. Early and late stroke after coronary surgery: An analysis of risk factors and the impact of short-term and long-term survival. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011; 40:379–87.Google Scholar

McKhann, G M, Grega, M A, Borowicz, L M Jr, Baumgartner, W A, Selnes, O A. Stroke and encephalopathy after cardiac surgery. An update. Stroke. 2006; 37:562–71.Google Scholar

Karkouti, K, Djalani, G, Borger, M A, et al. Low hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with increased risk of perioperative stroke in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 80:1381–7.Google Scholar

Goto, T, Baba, T, Honma, K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings and postoperative neurologic dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 72:137–42.Google Scholar

Selnes, O A, Gottesman, R F, Grega, M A, et al. Cognitive and neurologic outcomes after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366:250–7.Google Scholar

Shroyer, A L, Grower, F L, Hattler, B, et al. On-pump vs. off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:1827–37.Google Scholar

Møller, C H, Perko, M J, Lund, J T, et al. No major differences in 30-day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump vs. on-pump coronary bypass surgery. The Best Bypass Surgery Trial. Circulation. 2010; 121:498–504.Google Scholar

Nishijama, K, Horiguchi, M, Shizuta, S, et al. Temporal pattern of strokes after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 87:1839–44.Google Scholar

Bouchard, D, Carrier, M, Demers, P, et al. Statins in combination with beta-blocker therapy reduces postoperative stroke after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 91:654–9.Google Scholar

Mangano, D T. Aspirin and mortality from coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1309–17.Google Scholar

Leon, M B, Smith, C R, Mack, M, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:1597–607.Google Scholar

Smith, C R, Leon, M B, Mack, M J, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364:2187–98.Google Scholar

Thomas, M, Schymik, G, Walther, T, et al. Thirty-day results of the SAPIEN aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) registry: A European registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve. Circulation. 2010; 122:62–9.Google Scholar

Walther, T, Kasimir, M T, Doss, M, et al. One-year interim follow-up of the TRAVERSE trial: the initial feasibility study for transapical aortic valve implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 39:532–7.Google Scholar

Svenson, L G, Dewey, T, Kapadia, S, et al. United States feasibility study of transcatheter insertion of a stented aortic valve by the left ventricular apex. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 86:46–55.Google Scholar

Piazza, N, Grube, E, Gerckens, U, et al. Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) CoreValve revalving system: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval. EuroIntervention. 2008; 4:242–9.Google Scholar

Petronio, A S, De Carlo, M, Bedogni, F, et al. Safety and efficacy of the subclavian approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve Revalving system. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3:359–66.Google Scholar

Zahn, R, Gerckens, U, Grube, E, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32:198–204.Google Scholar

Arnold, M, Schulz-Heise, S, Achenbach, S, et al. Embolic cerebral insults after transapical aortic valve implantation detected by magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Int. 2010; 3:1126–32.Google Scholar

Rodes-Cabau, J, Dumont, E, Boone, R H, et al. Cerebral embolism following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: comparison of transfemoral and transapical approaches. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57:18–28.Google Scholar

Kahlert, P, Al-Rashid, F, Döttger, P, et al. Cerebral embolization during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a transcranial Doppler study. Circulation. 2012; 126:1245–55.Google Scholar

Reinsfelt, B, Wetsrelind, A, Ioanes, D, et al. Transcranial Doppler microembolic signals and serum evidence of brain injury during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012; 56:240–7.Google Scholar

Vermeer, S E, Prins, N D, den Heijer, T, et al. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348:1215–22.Google Scholar

Ben-Dor, I, Pichard, A D, Satler, L F, et al. Complications and outcome of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in high-risk or inoperable patients. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010; 3:1150–6.Google Scholar

O’Brien, S M, Shahain, D M, Filardo, G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: Part 2-isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 88-S23-42.Google Scholar

Ferrari, E, Tozzi, P, Hurni, M, et al. Primary isolated aortic valve surgery in octogenarians. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 38:128–33.Google Scholar

Elbardissi, A W, Shekar, P, Couper, G S, Cohn, L H. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in octogenarian, high-risk, transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 141:328–35.Google Scholar

Leon, M B, Piazza, N, Nikolsky, E, et al. Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials. A consensus report from the valve academic research consortium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57:253–69.Google Scholar

Daneault, B, Kirtane, A J, Kodali, S K, et al. Stroke associated with surgical and transcatheter treatment of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58:2143–50.Google Scholar

Drews, T, Pasic, M, Bus, S, et al. Transcranial Doppler sound detection of cerebral microembolism during transapical aortic valve implantation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 59:237–42.Google Scholar

van der Linden, J, Casimir-Ahn, H. When do cerebral emboli appear during open heart operation? A Transcranial Doppler study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991; 51:237–41.Google Scholar

Guerrieri Wolf, L, Choudhary, B P, Abu-Omar, Y, Taggert, D P. Solid and gaseous cerebral microembolization after biologic and mechanical aortic valve replacement: investigation with multirange and multifrequency transcranial Doppler ultrasound. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008; 135:512–20.Google Scholar

Filsoufi, F, Rahmanian, P B, Castillo, J G, Bronster, D, Adams, D H. Incidence, imaging analysis, and early and late outcomes of stroke after cardiac valve operation. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 101:1472–8.Google Scholar

Sharony, R, Grossi, E A, Saunders, P C, et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients with impaired ventricular function. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 75:1808–14.Google Scholar

Ruel, M, Masters, R G, Rubens, F D, et al. Late incidence and determinants of stroke after aortic and mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 78:77–84.Google Scholar

Sundt, T M, Bailey, M S, Moon, M R, et al. Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of >80 years. Circulation. 2000; 102:III70–4.Google Scholar

Alexander, K P, Anstrom, K J, Muhlbaier, L H, et al. Outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients > or = 80 years: Results from the National Cardiovascular Network. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35:731–8.Google Scholar

Naylor, A R, Mehta, Z, Rothwell, P M, Bell, P R. Carotid artery disease and stroke during coronary artery bypass: a critical review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002; 23:283–94.Google Scholar

Li, Y, Walicki, D, Mathiesen, C, Jenny, D, et al. Strokes after cardiac surgery and relationship to carotid stenosis. Arch Neurol. 2009; 66:1091–6.Google Scholar

Naylor, A R. Does the risk of post-CABG stroke merit staged or synchronous reconstruction in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease? J Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 50:71–81.Google Scholar

Timaran, C H, Rosero, E B, Smith, S T, et al. Trends and outcomes of concurrent carotid revascularization and coronary bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 48:355–61.Google Scholar

Knipp, S C, Scherag, A, Beyersdorf, F, et al. for the CABACS study group. Randomized comparison of synchronous CABG and carotid endarterectomy vs. isolated CABG in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: The CABACS trial. Int J Stroke. 2012; 7:354–60.Google Scholar

Eastcott, H H G, Pickering, G W, Rob, C G. Reconstruction of internal carotid artery in a patient with intermittent attacks of hemiplegia. Lancet. 1954; ii:954.Google Scholar

North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325:445–53.Google Scholar

European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998; 351:1379–87.Google Scholar

Barnett, H J, Taylor, D W, Eliasziw, M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339:1415–25.Google Scholar

Executive Committee of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995; 273:1421–8.Google Scholar

Ferguson, G G, Eliasziw, M, Barr, H W, et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke. 1999; 30:1751–8.Google Scholar

Chaturvedi, S, Aggarwal, R, Murugappan, A. Results of carotid endarterectomy with prospective neurologist follow-up. Neurology. 2000; 26:55:769–72.Google Scholar

Spencer, M P. Transcranial Doppler monitoring and causes of stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1997; 28:685–91.Google Scholar

Huibers, A, Calvet, D, Kennedy, F, et al. Mechanism of procedural stroke following carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting within the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015; doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.05.017. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar

Sundt, T M. The ischemic tolerance of neural tissue and the need for monitoring and selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1983; 14:93–8.Google Scholar

Sharbrough, F M, Messik, J M, Sundt, T M. Correlation of continuous electroencephalograms with cerebral blood flow measurements during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1973; 4:674–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blackshear, W M, Di Carlo, V, Seifert, K B, Connar, R G. Advantages of continuous electroencephalographic monitoring during carotid surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1986; 27:146–53.Google Scholar

Cho, I, Smullens, S N, Streletz, L J, Fariello, R G. The value of intraoperative EEG monitoring during carotid endarterectomy. Ann Neurol. 1986; 20:508–12.Google Scholar

Blume, W T, Ferguson, G G, McNeil, D K. Significance of EEG changes at carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1986; 17:891–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCarthy, W J, Park, A E, Koushanpour, E, et al. Carotid endarterectomy. Lessons from intraoprative monitoring – a decade of experience. Ann Surg. 1996; 224:291–307.Google Scholar

Balotta, E, Daigau, G, Saladini, M, et al. Results of electroencephalographic monitoring during 369 consecutive carotid artery revascularizations. Eur Neurol. 1997; 37:43–7.Google Scholar

Kearse, L A, Brown, E N, McPeck, K. Somatosensory evoked potential sensitivity relative to electroencephalography for cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1992; 23:498–505.Google Scholar

Haupt, W F, Horsch, S. Evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery: A review of 994 cases. Neurology. 1992; 42:835–8.Google Scholar

Duncan, L A, Ruckley, C V, Wildsmith, J A W. Cerebral oximetry: a useful monitor during carotid artery surgery. Anesthesiology. 1995; 50:1041–5.Google Scholar

Samra, S K, Dorje, P, Zelenock, G B, Stanley, J C. Cerebral oximetry in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia. Stroke. 1996; 27:49–55.Google Scholar

Cherry, K J, Roland, C F, Hallett, J W, et al. Stump pressure, the contralateral carotid artery, and electroencephalographic changes. Am J Surg. 1991; 162:185–9.Google Scholar

Harada, R N, Comerota, A J, Good, G M, et al. Stump pressure, electroencephalographic changes, and the contralateral carotid artery: another look at selective shunting. Am J Surg. 1995; 170:148–53.Google Scholar

Benjamin, M E, Silva, M B, Watt, C, et al. Awake patient monitoring to determine the need for shunting during carotid endarterectomy. Surgery. 1993; 114:673–81.Google Scholar

Padayachee, T S, Bishop, C C R, Gosling, R G, et al. Monitoring middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity during carotid endarterectomy. Br J Surg. 1986; 73:98–100.Google Scholar

Steiger, H J, Schaffler, L, Boll, J, Liechti, S. Results of microsurgical carotid endarterectomy: a prospective study with transcranial Doppler and EEG monitoring, and selective shunting. Acta Neurochir. 1989; 100:31–8.Google Scholar

Spencer, M P, Thomas, G I, Nicholls, S C, Sauvage, L R. Detection of middle cerebral artery emboli during carotid endarterectomy using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Stroke. 1990; 21:415–23.Google Scholar

Ackerstaff, R G A, Janes, C, Moll, F L, et al. The significance of emboli detection by means of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1995; 21:415–23.Google Scholar

Canthelmo, N L, Babikian, V L, Samaraweera, R N, et al. Cerebral microembolism and ischemic changes associated with carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27:1024–31.Google Scholar

Arnold, M, Sturzenegger, M, Schaffler, L, Seiler, R. Continuous intraoperative monitoring of middle cerebral artery flow velocities and electroencephalography during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1997; 28:1345–50.Google Scholar

Spencer, M P. Transcranial Doppler monitoring and causes of stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1997; 28:685–91.Google Scholar

Jansen, C, Ramos, L M, van Heesewijk, J P, et al. Impact of microembolism and hemodynamic changes in the brain during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1994; 25:992–7.Google Scholar

Ackerstaff, R G, Moons, K G, van de Vlasakker, C J, et al. Association of intraoperative transcranial Doppler monitoring variables with stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 2000; 31:1817–23.Google Scholar

Babikian, V L, Canthelmo, N L. Cerebrovascular monitoring during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 2000; 31:1799–801.Google Scholar

Levy, C R, O’Malley, H M, Fell, G, et al. Transcranial Doppler detected cerebral microembolism following carotid endarterectomy. High intensity signal loads predict postoperative cerebral ischemia. Brain. 1997; 120:621–9.Google Scholar

Kaposzta, Z, Baskerville, P A, Madge, D, et al. L-arginine and S-nitrosoglutathione reduce embolization in humans. Circulation. 2001; 103:2371–5.Google Scholar

Chen, C I, Iguchi, Y, Garami, Z, et al. Analysis of emboli during carotid stenting with distal protection device. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006; 21(4):223–8.Google Scholar

Zhou, W, Hitchner, E, Gillis, K, et al. Prospective neurocognitive evaluation of patients undergoing carotid interventions. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 56:1571–8.Google Scholar

Garami, Z, Lumsden, A B. Intra-operative and peri-procedural TCD monitoring. In Alexandrov, A V (ed). Cerebrovascular Ultrasound in Stroke Prevention and Treatment (2nd edn). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishers. 2011.Google Scholar

Garami, Z, Charlton-Ouw, K M, Broadbent, K C, Lumsden, A B. A practical guide to transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid interventions. Part 1: basics and blood flow changes. Vascular Ultrasound Today. 2008; 13(1).Google Scholar

Gupta, N, Corriere, M A, Dodson, T F, et al. Incidence of microemboli to the brain is less with endarterectomy than with percutaneous revascularization with distal filters or flow reversal. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 53:316–22.Google Scholar

Pennekamp, C W, Moll, F L, De Borst, G J. Role of transcranial Doppler in cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 53:765–71.Google Scholar