Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-03T02:26:26.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - In the beginning was the world

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Jens Bartelson
Affiliation:
Lunds Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

Summarizing the main trends in medieval philosophy, Maurice De Wulf once argued that medieval philosophers were driven by a ‘wish to correct the defects arising from the plurality of the states, by a unifying theory, the universal community of men’. Yet he was quick to caution the modern reader that ‘it seems superfl uous to point out that the humanitas universitas of the thirteenth century did not constitute a society of nations in the modern sense of the term’. But what kind of entity was envisaged by medieval writers? In this chapter, I shall try to provide a partial answer to this question, as well as describe how such an imagined community of all mankind was replaced by early modern notions of a world composed of different peoples. In order to account for this transition, I shall try to situate these conceptions of community in the cosmological contexts within which they were articulated. As I would like to suggest in this chapter, the medieval cosmology that had confined a united mankind to an orbis terrarium was replaced by a new worldview according to which a divided mankind was dispersed onto the dry surface of a rotunditate absoluta. In the next chapter, I shall try to show how this latter conception became crucial to subsequent attempts to explain and justify the existence of particular communities within a wider political and legal framework of nations and empires.

While some existing accounts have emphasized the importance of changing cosmological beliefs when explaining the emergence of sovereign states, none of them have bothered to systematically relate the contemporary conceptions of community to the cosmological context within which they were articulated.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×