Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T19:38:23.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Kenneth F. Greene
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Why Dominant Parties Lose
Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective
, pp. 311 - 332
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul, John, Aldrich, and David, Rohde (1994) Change and Continuity in the 1992 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Adams, James (1999) “Policy Divergence in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial VotingPublic Choice 100: 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James, Samuel, Merrill III, and Bernard, Grofman (2005) A Unified Theory of Party Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilar, Zinser (1995) Vamos a ganar! La pugna de Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas por el poder. Mexico City: Oceano.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John (1983) “A Downsian Spatial Model with Party ActivismAmerican Political Science Review 77, 4: 974–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John (1993) “Rational Choice and TurnoutAmerican Journal of Political Science 37, 1: 246–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John (1995) Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John and William, Bianco (1992) “A Game-Theoretic Model of Party Affiliation of Candidates and Office HoldersMathematical and Computer Modeling 16, 8–9: 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Stephen, Spear (1988) “An Overlapping Generations Model of Electoral CompetitionJournal of Public Economics 37, 3: 359–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael and Jonathan, Nagler (1998) “When Politics and Model Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 42, 1 (June): 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, Maria Helena (1985) State and Opposition in Military Brazil. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry (1970) “Bases of Support for Mexico's Dominant PartyAmerican Political Science Review 64, 1: 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arian, Alan and Samuel, Barnes (1974) “The Dominant Party System: A Neglected Model of Democratic StabilityJournal of Politics 36, 3 (August): 592–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ArredondoRamírez, Pablo Ramírez, Pablo, Gilberto, Fregoso Peralta, and Raúl Trejo, Delabre (1991) Así se calló el sistema: Comunicación y elecciones en 1988. Guadalajara: University of Guadalajara.Google Scholar
Arrellano, David and Juan Pablo Guerrero (2000) “Stalled Administrative Reform of the Mexican State” in Schneider, B. and Heredia, B. (eds.) Reinventing Leviathan: The Political Economy of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries. Miami: North-South Center Press.Google Scholar
Arriola, Carlos (1988) Los empresarios y el estado, 1970–1982. Mexico City: Porrúa.Google Scholar
Arriola, Carlos (1994) Ensayos sobre el PAN. Mexico: Porrúa.Google Scholar
Aspe, Pedro (1993) Economic Transformation the Mexican Way. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, John (1988) Governing Mexico: The Statecraft of Crisis Management. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Jeffrey and Roderick, Kiewiet (1989) “Explaining Patterns of Candidate Competition in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 33, 4: 997–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Samuel and Roy, Pierce (1971) “Public Opinion and Political Preference in France and ItalyMidwest Journal of Political Science 15, 4: 643–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry (1986) “Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical TestAmerican Journal of Political Science 30, 4 (November): 709–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartra, Roger (1987) La jaula de la melancolía: identidad y metamorfosis del mexicano. Mexico: Grijalbo.Google Scholar
Bartra, Roger (1989) “Changes in Political Culture: The Crisis of Nationalism” in Cornelius, W., Gentleman, J., and Smith, P. (eds.) Mexico's Alternative Political Futures. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Basañez, Miguel (1983) La lucha por la hegemonía en México, 1968–1980. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Basañez, Miguel (1996) El pulso de los sexenios: 20 años de crisis en México. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Beck, Thorsten, George, Clarke, Alberto, Groff, Philip, Keefer, and Patrick, Walsh (2001) “New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political InstitutionsWorld Bank Economic Review 15 (February): 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berton, Peter (2000) “Japanese Communist Party: The ‘Lovable’ Party” in Hrebenar, R.Japan's New Party System. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy and Steven, Coate (1997) “An Economic Model of Representative DemocracyQuarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1: 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, Jean (1972) Comparing Political Systems. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles (1998) Political Parties, Growth and Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles (2003) Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles and Susan, Stokes (2003) “Endogenous DemocratizationWorld Politics 55, 4 (July): 517–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adriana, Borjas Benavente (2003) Partido de la Revolución Democrática: Estructura, organización interna y desempeño público, 1989–2003. Mexico City: Gernika.Google Scholar
Bortolotti, Bernardo (2005) “Italy's Privatization Process and its Implications for China” Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Paper No. 118, Milan, Italy.
Bouton, Lawrence and Mariusz, Sumlinski (2000) “Trends in Private Investment in Developing Countries” International Finance Corporation Paper 41. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, Frank (1956) Mexico: An Experiment in One-Party Democracy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, Frank (1964) The Making of Modern Mexico. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Brody, David and Benjamin, Page (1972) “Comment: The Assessment of Policy VotingAmerican Political Science Review 66, 2 (June): 450–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooker, Paul (2000) Non-Democratic Regimes: Theory, Government and Politics. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Jason (2005) “Ruling Parties and Durable Authoritarianism” Working Paper No. 23, Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law, Stanford University.
Bruhn, Kathleen (1996) “Social Spending and Political Support: The ‘Lessons’ of the National Solidarity Program in MexicoComparative Politics 28, 2: 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen (1997) Taking on Goliath: The Emergence of a New Left Party and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen (2000) “The Importance of Being Cuauhtémoc: The 2000 Presidential Campaign of the PRD.” University of California, Santa Barbara, mimeo.
Bruhn, Kathleen (2001) “Party Ideological Placement and the Left-Right Cleavage: A Reassessment from the South.” University of California, Santa Barbara, mimeo.
Bruhn, Kathleen (2004) “The Making of the Mexican President 2000: Parties, Candidates, and Campaign Strategy” in Domínguez, J. and Lawson, C. (eds.) Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen and Kenneth, F. Greene (2007) “Elite Polarization Meets Mass Moderation in Mexico's 2006 ElectionsPS: Political Science and Politics 40, 1 (January): 33–37.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giovanni and Luciano Segreto (1996) “Finanza e industria in Italia, 1963–1995” in Barbagallo, F. (ed.) L'Italia nella crisi mondiale: L'ultimo ventennio. Storia dell'Italia repubblicana Vol. 3, No. 1. Economia e società. Turin, Italy: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Buendía, Jorge (2004) “The Changing Mexican Voter, 1991–2000” in Middlebrook, K. (ed.) Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, John, Ferejohn, and Morris, Fiorina (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, Kent (1988) Crisis and Compensation: Public Policy and Political Stability in Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic (1995) Political Recruitment across Two Centuries: Mexico, 1884–1991. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic (2003) Politics in Mexico. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, John (1989) “Democracy and Bureaucracy in Japan” in Ishida, T. and Krauss, E. (eds.) Democracy in Japan. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John and Mathew, Shugart (1995) “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral FormulasElectoral Studies 14, 4: 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas (2002) “The End of the Transition ParadigmJournal of Democracy 13, 1: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Barry (1985) Mexican Communism, 1968–1983: Eurocommunism in the Americas?La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Carr, Barry (1992) Marxism and Communism in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Case, William (2001) “Malaysia's Resilient PseudodemocracyJournal of Democracy 12, 1: 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañeda, Jorge (2000) Perpetuating Power: How Mexican Presidents Were Chosen.New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis and Peter, Mair (1984) “Left-Right Political Scales: Some Expert JudgmentsEuropean Journal of Political Research 12, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centeno, Miguel (1994) Democracy within Reason: Technocratic Revolution in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Chand, Vikram (2001) Mexico's Political Awakening. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan (2004) Why Ethnic Parties Succeed. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, James (1948) “Is Our Two-Party System Natural?” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 259: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhry, Kiren (1997) The Price of Wealth: Economies and Institutions in the Middle East. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Tun-jen (2001) “One-Party Hegemony and Democratic Transition: Comparing Mexico, Taiwan and Turkey.” Paper prepared for presentation at Conference on The Rise of the DPP and PAN in Taiwan and Mexico, Duke University, January 26–27.
Chhibber, Pradeep (2001) Democracy without Associations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis (1991) Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis (2000) Rational Lives: Norms and Values in Politics and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Ray (2000) Ending the LDP Hegemony: Party Cooperation in Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Chu, Yun-han (2001) “The Legacy of One-Party Hegemony in Taiwan” in Diamond, L. and Gunther, R. (eds.) Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, Huat Beng (2001) “Defeat of the KMT: Implications for One-Party Quasi-Democratic Regimes in Southeast Asia” in Alagappa, M. (ed.) Taiwan's Presidential Politics: Democratization and Cross-Strait Relations in the Twenty-First Century. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Clark, Peter and James, Wilson (1961) “Incentive Systems: A Theory of OrganizationsAdministrative Studies Quarterly 6: 129–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cline, Howard (1962) Mexico: Revolution to Evolution, 1940–1960. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James (1960) “The Politics of Sub-Saharan Africa” in Almond, G. and Coleman, J. (eds.) The Politics of Developing Areas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth and David, Collier (1991) Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth (1992) The Contradictory Alliance: State-Labor Relations and Regime Change in Mexico. Berkeley: International and Area Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston and Stanley, Feldman (1989) “Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference ProcessesAmerican Journal of Political Science 33, 4 (November): 912–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne (1975) Politics and the Migrant Poor in Mexico City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne (2004) “Mobilized Voting in the 2000 Elections: The Changing Efficacy of Vote Buying and Coercion in Mexican Electoral Politics” in Domínguez, J. and Lawson, C. (eds.) Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne and Ann, Craig (1991) The Mexican Political System in Transition. Monograph 35, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Cotton, James (1997) “East Asian Democracy: Progress and Limits” in Diamond, L., Plattner, M., Chu, Y., and Tien, H. (eds.) Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Coulon, Christian (1990) “Senegal: The Development and Fragility of Semi-democracy” in Diamond, L., Linz, J., and Lipset, S. M. (eds.) Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Cover, Albert and Bruce, Brumberg (1982) “Baby Books and Ballots: The Impact of Congressional Mail on Constituent OpinionAmerican Political Science Review 76, 2: 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary (1987) “The Uncovered Set and the CoreAmerican Journal of Political Science 31, 2: 408–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary (1990) “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral SystemsAmerican Journal of Political Science 34, 4 (November): 903–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary (1996) “Is the Single Nontransferable Vote Superproportional: Evidence from Japan and TaiwanAmerican Journal of Political Science 40, 3 (August): 740–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary (1997) Making Votes Count. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespo, Jos (1996) Votar en los estados: Análisis comparado de las legislaciones electorales estatales en México. Mexico City: Fundación Friedrich Naumann.Google Scholar
Cross, John (1998) Informal Politics: Street Vendors and the State in Mexico City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Harold (1996) Government and Society in Malaysia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
CuéllarVázquez, Angélica Vázquez, Angélica (1993) La noche es de ustedes, el amanecer es nuestro: Asamblea de Barrios y Superbarrio Gómez en la Ciudad de México. Mexico City: National Autonomous University of Mexico.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald (1971) Election Campaigning, Japanese Style. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald (1988) The Japanese Way of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald (1999) The Japanese Logic of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert (1992) “Why Free Markets Are Not EnoughJournal of Democracy 3, 3 (July): 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Otto, Melvin, Hinich, and Peter, Ordeshook (1970) “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral ProcessAmerican Political Science Review 64: 426–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
André, Palma, Gap-Seon, Hong, and Jean-Francoise, Thisse (1990) “Equilibria in Multi-Party Competition under UncertaintySocial Choice and Welfare 7: 247–259.Google Scholar
della, Porta and Alberto, Vannucci (1999) Corrupt Exchanges: Actors, Resources, and Mechanisms of Political Corruption. New York: Aldine and Gruyter.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella and Alberto Vannucci (2000) “Corruption and Political Financing in Italy” Transparency International Workshop on Corruption and Political Financing. http://www.transparency.org/working_papers/country/italy_paper.html
Deininger, Klaus and Lyn, Squire (1996) “A New Data Set Measuring Income InequalityWorld Bank Economic Review 10, 3: 565–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
di Palma, Giuseppe (1980) “The Available State: Problems of Reform” in Lange, P. and Tarrow, S. (eds.) Italy in Transition. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry (2001) “Anatomy of an Electoral Earthquake: How the KMT Lost and the DPP Won the 2000 Presidential Election” in Alagappa, M. (ed.) Taiwan's Presidential Politics. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry (2002) “Thinking about Hybrid RegimesJournal of Democracy 13, 2 (April): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaw, Aminata and Mamadou Diouf (1998) “The Senegalese Opposition and its Quest for Power” in Olukoshi, A. (ed.) The Politics of Opposition in Contemporary Africa. Stockholm: Uppsala.Google Scholar
Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto (1997) “Asignación política de recursos en el federalismo mexicano: Incentivos y restriccionesPerfiles Latinoamericanos 6, 10: 35–74.Google Scholar
Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Federico Estévez, Beatriz Magaloni (2001) “A Portfolio Diversification Model of Electoral Investment: Competition and Policy Choice in Mexico's PRONASOL, 1989–1994” American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, August 30–September 2.
Dillon, Samuel (2000) “Mexico's Ruling Party Accused of Diverting Public MoneyNew York Times, March 27, 2000: A6.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge and James, McCann (1996) Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dow, Jay and James, Endersby (2004) “Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting ResearchElectoral Studies 23: 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dresser, Denise (1991) Neopopulist Solutions to Neoliberal Problems: Mexico's National Solidarity Program. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Translated by Barbara and Robert North. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ebenstein, William (1945) “Public Administration in MexicoPublic Administration Review 5, 2 (Spring): 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Susan (1977) The Poverty of Revolution: The State and the Urban Poor in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel and Luis Roniger (1981) “The Study of Patron-Client Relations and Recent Developments in Sociological Theory” in Eisenstadt, S. N. and René Lémarchand, (eds.), Political clientelism, Patronage, and Development. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd (1999) “Electoral Justice in Mexico: From Oxymoron to Legal Norm in Less Than a Decade,” Third International Congress on Electoral Law, National Autonomous University of Mexico, UNAM-IIJ, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd (2004) Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enelow, James and Melvin, Hinich (1982) “Nonspatial Candidate Characteristics and Electoral CompetitionJournal of Politics 44: 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Leon (1986) Political Parties in the American Mold. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G⊘sta (1985) Politics against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G⊘sta (1990) “Single-Party Dominance in Sweden: The Saga of Social Democracy” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Eyton, Laurence (2002) “Taiwan opposition shoots itself in the footAsia Times, June 29. http://www.atimes.com/china/DF29Ad01.html.Google Scholar
Farneti, Paolo (1985) The Italian Party System, 1945–1980. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Feddersen, Timothy, Itai, Sened, and Stephen, Wright (1990) “Rational Voting and Candidate Entry under Plurality RuleAmerican Journal of Political Science 34, 4: 1005–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féher, Ferenc, Agnes, Heller, and Gyorgy, Markus (1983) Dictatorship over Needs. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ferdinand, Peter (1998) “Party Funding and Political Corruption in East Asia: The Cases of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan” in Austin, R. and Tjernström, M. (eds.) Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Fields, Karl (1998) “KMT, Inc. Party Capitalism in a Developmental State” JPRI Working Paper No. 47 (June).
Fiorina, Morris (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Bernhard, Egbert, Gerken, and Ulrich, Hiemenz (1982) Growth, Employment, and Trade in an Industrializing Economy: A Quantitative Analysis of Mexican Development Policies. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Fish, Steven (1995) Democracy from Scratch: Opposition and Regime in the New Russian Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgibbon, Russell (1951) “Measurement of Latin-American Political Phenomena: A Statistical ExperimentAmerican Political Science Review 45, 2 (June): 517–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio (1989) The Chilean Political Process. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Garrido, Luis Javier (1987) “Un partido sin militantes” in Loaeza, S. and Segovia, R. (eds.) La vida política mexicana en la crisis. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara (1994) Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara (1999a) “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara (1999b) “Authoritarian Breakdown: Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument” American Political Science Association, Atlanta, September 2–5.
Geddes, Barbara (2003) Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander (1962) Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Givens, Terri (2005) Voting Radical Right in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam (2000) “Political Patronage, Bureaucracy and Corruption in Postwar Italy.” Working Paper without number. Russell Sage Foundation.
Golden, Miriam (2004) “International Economic Sources of Regime Change: How European Integration Undermined Italy's Postwar Party SystemComparative Political Studies 37, 10 (December): 1238–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, Edmund (1991) Money Politics in the Barisan Nasional. Kuala Lumpur: Forum.Google Scholar
Gomez, Edmund (1994) Political Business: Corporate Involvement in Malaysian Political Parties. Cairns: James Cook University Press.Google Scholar
Gomez, Edmund (2002) “Political Business in Malaysia: Party Factionalism, Corporate Development, and Economic Crisis” in Gomez, E. (ed.) Political Business in Asia. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, Leopoldo and John, Bailey (1990) “La transición política y los dilemas del PRIForo Internacional 31, 1: 57–87.Google Scholar
González, Casanova (1965) La democracia en México. Mexico City: Era.Google Scholar
Goodliffe, Jay (2001) “The Effect of War Chests on Challenger Entry in U.S. House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 45, 4: 830–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald and Jonathan, Krasno (1988) “Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 32, 4: 884–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph and Kenneth, Shepsle (1987) “The Effects of Electoral Rewards in Multiparty Competition with EntryAmerican Political Science Review 81: 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F. (1997) “Complejidad, cohesión y longevidad en un movimiento urbano popular: La Asamblea de Barrios de la Ciudad de México” in Zermeño, S. (ed.) Movimientos sociales e identidades colectivas en México. Mexico City: UNAM-IIS.Google Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F. (2002a) “Opposition Party Strategy and Spatial Competition in Dominant Party Regimes: A Theory and the Case of MexicoComparative Political Studies 35, 7 (September): 755–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F. (2002b) Defeating Dominance: Opposition Party Building and Democratization in Mexico. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F. (2008) “Dominant Party Strategy and Democratization” American Journal of Political Science (forthcoming).
Greene, Kenneth F., Joseph Klesner, and Chappell Lawson (2004) “How to Win a Mexican Election (Legally): Campaign Effects in a New Democracy” Latin American Studies Association, Las Vegas, Nevada, October 7–9.
Grindle, Merilee (1977) Bureaucrats, Politicians, and Peasants in Mexico: A Case Study in Public Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim (2001) “A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence AdvantageAmerican Journal of Political Science 45, 4 (October): 862–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna (2002) Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guillermoprieto, Alma (1994) The Heart that Bleeds: Latin America Now. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano (1994) “The Implosion of Clientelistic Italy in the 1990s” Working Paper No. 94/12, European University Institute, Florence, Italy.
Haber, Paul (1997) “¡Vamos por la dignidad de Durango! Un estudio del poder sociopolítico” in Zermeño, S. (ed.) Movimientos sociales e identidades colectivas en México. Mexico City: UNAM-IIS.Google Scholar
Haber, Paul (2006) Power from Experience: Urban Popular Movements in Late Twentieth-Century Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Robert, Kaufman (1995) The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis (1955) The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought Since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael (1987) Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hellman, Judith Adler (1983) Mexico in Crisis. 2nd ed. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
Judith Adler, Hellman (1994) “Mexican Popular Movements, Clientelism, and the Process of Democratization.” Latin American Perspectives 21, 2: 124–142.Google Scholar
Hellman, Stephen (1975) “Generational Differences in the Bureaucratic Elite of Italian Communist Provincial FederationsCanadian Journal of Political Science 1: 82–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, David (1987) “Italy: Parties and Government under Pressure” in Ware, A. (ed.) Political Parties. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hinich, Melvin and Michael, Munger (1997) Analytical Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Declines of Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holm, John (1987) “Elections in Botswana: Institutionalization of a New System of Legitimacy” in Hayward, F. M. (ed.) Elections in Independent Africa. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc and Phillip, Roessler (2006) “Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian RegimesAmerican Journal of Political Science 50, 2 (April): 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrebenar, Ronald (2000) Japan's New Party System. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng, Dean, Lacy, and Emerson, Niou (1998) “Retrospective and prospective voting in a one-party-dominant democracy: Taiwan's 1996 presidential electionPublic Choice 97: 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Teh-fu and Ching-shin Yu (1999) “Developing a Party System and Democratic Consolidation” in Tsang, S. and Tien, H. (eds.) Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Simon (2001) Altering Party Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel (1970) “Social and Institutional Dynamics of One-Party Systems” in Huntington, S. and Moore, C. (eds.) Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Dominant Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel and Clement Moore (1970) “Conclusion: Authoritarianism, Democracy, and One-Party Politics” in Huntington, S. and Moore, C. (eds.) Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Dominant Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (1990) “The Political Economy of Conservative Resurgence under Recession: Public Policies and Political Support in Japan, 1977–1983” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, John (1999) “Electoral Competition with Endogenous Activists” American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, September 2–5.
Jacobson, Gary (1980) Money in Congressional Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary and Samuel, Kernell (1981) Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kenneth (1965) “Ideological Correlates of Right Wing Political Alienation in MexicoAmerican Political Science Review 59, 3 (September): 656–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kenneth (1978) Mexican Democracy: A Critical View. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Johnston, Richard, André, Blais, Henry, Brady, and Jean, Crête (1992) Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark and Scott, Mainwaring (2003) “The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: An Empirical Measure and an Application to the AmericasParty Politics 9 (March): 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jowitt, Kenneth (1992) New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis (1996) The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry (1986) “Imposing Consent? Electoralism vs. Democratization in El Salvador” in Drake, P. and Silva, E. (eds.) Elections in Latin America. La Jolla: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry and Philippe, Schmitter (1991) “What Democracy Is … And Is NotJournal of Democracy 2 (Summer): 75–89.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard and Peter, Mair (1995) “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel PartyParty Politics 1, 1: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Purcell (1973) “Decision-Making in an Authoritarian Regime: Theoretical Implications from a Mexican Case Study” in World Politics 26, 1 (October): 28–54.Google Scholar
Kessler, Timothy (1999) Global Capital and National Politics: Reforming Mexico's Financial System. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1964a) Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1964b) Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1966) The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Robert, Keohane, and Sidney, Verba (1994) Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Michael, Tomz, and Jason, Wittenberg (2000) “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and PresentationAmerican Journal of Political Science 44, 2 (April): 347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto (1966) “The Transformation of West European Party Systems” in LaPalambara, J. and Weiner, M. (eds.) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1989a) The Logics of Party Formation: Ecological Politics in Belgium and West Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1989b) “The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity RevisitedPolitical Studies 37, 3: 400–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1990) Beyond the European Left: Ideology and Political Action in the Belgian Ecology Parties. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (2000) “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic PolitiesComparative Political Studies 33, 6/7 (August/September): 845–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and Steve, Wilkinson (eds.) (2007) Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesner, Joseph (1994) “Realignment or Dealignment? Consequences of Economic Crisis and Restructuring for the Mexican Party System” in Cook, M., Middlebrook, K., and Molinar, J. (eds.) Politics of Economic Restructuring: State–Society Relations and Regime Change in Mexico. La Jolla: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph (1997) “Electoral Reform in Mexico's Hegemonic Party System: Perpetuation of Privilege or Democratic Advance?” American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, August 28–31.
Kollman, Kenneth, John, Miller, and Scott, Page (1992) “Adaptive Parties in Spatial ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review 86, 4: 929–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostoris, Fiorella (1993) Italy: The Sheltered Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krauze, Enrique (1997) Mexico, Biography of Power: A History of Modern Mexico, 1810–1996, Translated by Hank Heifetz. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Kuo, Chengtian (2000) “New Financial Politics in Taiwan, Thailand, and Malaysia,” Department of Political Science, National Chengchi University, http://www.la.utexas.edu_research/cgots/ accessed 9/2305.
Kuran, Timur (1991) “Now out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989World Politics 44 (October): 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Markku and Rein, Taagapera (1979) “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West EuropeComparative Political Studies 12: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, Joy (2001) “Why Rules Matter: Changes in Candidate Selection in Mexico's PRI, 1988–2000Journal of Latin American Studies 33: 485–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPalombara, Joseph (1964) Interest Groups in Italian Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael and Norman, Schofield (1990) Multiparty Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell (2002) Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell (2004) “Television Coverage, Vote Choice, and the 2000 Campaign” in Domínguez, J. and Lawson, C. (eds.) Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice (2003) “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and ConsequencesAnnual Review of Political Science 6: 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levite, Ariel and Sydney, Tarrow (1983) “The Legitimation of Excluded Parties in Dominant Party Systems: A Comparison of Israel and ItalyComparative Politics 15, 3 (April): 295–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven (2003) Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Lucan, Way (2002) “The Rise of Competitive AuthoritarianismJournal of Democracy 13, 2: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Lucan Way (2006) “Competitive Authoritarianism: The Origins and Evolution of Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War.” Unpublished manuscript of chapters 1 and 2, Harvard University and University of Toronto.
Levitt, Steven and Catherine, Wolfram (1997) “Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. HouseLegislative Studies Quarterly 22: 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark (1996) The Cooperator's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark (1998) The Rebel's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Oliver (2000) “Lien wants KMT assets put in trustTaipei Times, January 3: A1.Google Scholar
Lin, Tse-min, James, Enelow, and Han, Dorussen (1999) “Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic VotingPublic Choice 98: 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Tse-min (2007) “The ‘Minumum-Sum Point’ as a Solution Concept in Spatial Voting” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association meeting, Chicago IL, April 12–15.
Linz, Juan and Arturo, Valenzuela (eds.) (1994) The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin (ed.) (1998) Democracy in Europe and the Americas. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Stein Rokkan (1967) “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction” in Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (eds.) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross–National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lipson, Leslie (1953) “The Two–Party System in British PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review 47: 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, I-chou (1999) “The Development of the Opposition” in Tsang, S. and Tien, H. (eds.) Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loaeza, Soledad (1999) El Partido Acción Nacional, la larga marcha, 1939–1994: Oposición leal y partido de protesta. Mexico City: Fonda de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Locke, Richard (1995) Remaking the Italian Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Londregan, John and Tom Romer (1993) “Polarization, Incumbency and the Personal Vote” in Barnett, W., Hinich, M. and Schofield, N. (eds.) Political Economy: Institutions, Competition and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lujambio, Alonso (2000) El poder compartido: Un ensayo sobre la democratización mexicana. Mexico City: Oceano.Google Scholar
Lujambio, Alonso (2001) “Dinero y democratización: El financiamiento y la fiscalización de los partidos políticos en la transición mexicana a la democracia, 1988–2000.” International Seminar on Money and Electoral Competition: Challenges for Democracy, Federal Elections Institute, Mexico City, June 5–8.
Lustig, Nora (1992) Mexico: the Remaking of an Economy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Mabry, Donald (1973) Mexico's Acción Nacional: A Catholic Alternative to Revolution. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Dag (2004) Downsizing the State: Privatization and the Limits of Neoliberal Reform in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz (1996) “Dominancia de partido y dilemas duvergerianos en las elecciones federales de 1994Política y Gobierno 3, 2: 281–326.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz (1997) The Dynamics Of Dominant Party Decline: The Mexican Transition To Multipartyism. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, Duke University.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz (2006) Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz and Alejandro Poiré (2004a) “The Issues, the Vote, and the Mandate for Change” in Domínguez, J. and Lawson, C. (eds.) Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz and Alejandro Poiré (2004b) “Strategic Coordination in the 2004 Mexican Presidential Race” in Domínguez, J. and Lawson, C. (eds.) Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Magar, Eric and Juan Molinar Horcasitas (1995) “Medios de comunicación y democracia” in Alcocer, J. (ed.) Elecciones, diálogo y reforma en México, 1994, Volume 2. Mexico City: Nuevo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott (1999) Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter and Biezen, Ingrid (2001) “Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980–2000Party Politics 7, 1: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manikas, Peter and Laura, Thornton (2003) Political Parties in Asia: Promoting Reform and Combating Corruption in Eight Countries. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute.Google Scholar
MartínezValle, Adolfo Valle, Adolfo (1995) El Partido Acción Nacional: Una historia política, 1939–1976. Unpublished B.A. thesis, Department of Political Science, Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico (ITAM), Mexico City.Google Scholar
Martínez, Verdugo (1985) Historia del comunismo en México. Mexico City: Grijalbo.Google Scholar
Martínez, Omar (2002) “Datos duros sobre monitoreos de coberturas electorales” http://www.cem.itesm.mx/dacs/buendia/rmc/rmc63/omartinez.html, accessed 10/10/02.
May, John (1973) “Opinion Structures and Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear DisparityPolitical Studies 21: 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, James and Chappell, Lawson. 2003. “An Electorate Adrift? Public Opinion and the Quality of Democracy in MexicoLatin American Research Review 38, 3 (October): 60–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Ronald (1971) Party Systems and Elections in Latin America. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard (1986) “Covering, Dominance, and Institution–Free Properties of Social ChoiceAmerican Journal of Political Science 30, 2: 283–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Means, Gordon Paul (1996) “Soft Authoritarianism in Malaysia and SingaporeJournal of Democracy 7, 4 (October): 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meguid, Bonnie (2005) “Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party SuccessAmerican Political Science Review 99, 3 (August): 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merino, Mauricio (1996) “De la lealtad individual a la responsabilidad públicaRevista de Administración Pública 91: 5–18.Google Scholar
Mershon, Carol and Gianfranco, Pasquino (eds.) (1995) Italian Politics: Ending the First Republic. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin (1986) “Political Liberalization in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Mexico” in Donnell, G. O', Schmitter, P., and Whitehead, L. (eds.). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin (1995) The Paradox of Revolution: Labor, The State, and Authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren and Donald, Stokes (1963) “Constituency influence in CongressAmerican Political Science Review 57 (March): 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren and Kent, Jennings (1986) Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Yemile (1998) “The Costs of Electoral Success: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico” in Serrano, M. (ed.). Governing Mexico: Political Parties and Elections. London: Institute of Latin American Studies.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Yemile (2003) From Martyrdom to Power: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico. Notre, Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MoctezumaBarragán, Esteban Barragán, Esteban and Andrés, Roemer (2001) A New Public Management in Mexico. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry (1980) The Organization of Interests: Incentives and the Internal Dynamics of Political Interest Groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Juan, Molinar Horcasitas (1991) El tiempo de la legitimidad. Mexico City: Cal y Arena.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan (2001) “Las elecciones de 1997 en México: Evaluación del sistema de partidos y la reforma electoral en materia de regulación financiera.” Conference on Political Parties and Elections, Federal Elections Institute (IFE), Mexico City. http://www.trife.gob.mx/wcongreso/molinarc.html.
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan and Jeffrey Weldon (1994) “Electoral Determinants and Consequences of National Solidarity” in Cornelius, W., Craig, A., and Fox, J. (eds.) Transforming State–Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro (1999) “Ideología y voto: Dimensiones de competencia política en México en los noventaPolítica y Gobierno 6, 1: 45–81.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro (2003) El votante mexicano: Democracia, actitudes políticas y conducta electoral. Mexico City: Fonda de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Munro-Kua, Anne (1996) Authoritarian Populism in Malaysia. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muramatsu, Michio and Ellis Krauss (1990) “The Dominant Party and Social Coalitions in Japan” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Needler, Martin (1971) Politics and Society in Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Niou, Emerson and Peter, Ordeshook (1992) “A Game Theoretic Analysis of the Republic of China's Emerging Electoral SystemInternational Political Science Review 13, 1: 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe, Schmitter (1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1971) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olukoshi, Adebayo (1998) “Introduction” in A. Adebayo (ed.) The Politics of Opposition in Contemporary Africa. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Andrés (1996) Bordering on Chaos: Guerrillas, Stockbrokers, Politicians, and Mexico's Road to Prosperity. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Pardo, Ortiz, , Francisco and Ortiz Pinchetti, Francisco (2000) “La meta: 20 millones de votosProceso 1215 (February 13): 12–24.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Francisco (2002) Comprender a la gente: Por qué ganó Fox. Mexico City: Nuevo Siglo.Google Scholar
Osborne, Martin and Al, Slivinski (1996) “A Model of Political Competition with Citizen–CandidatesQuarterly Journal of Economics 111, 1: 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osei-Hwedie, Bertha (2001) “The Political Opposition in Botswana: The Politics of Factionalism and FragmentationTransformation 45: 57–77.Google Scholar
Otake, Hideo (1990) “Defense Controversies and One–Party Dominance: The Opposition in Japan and West Germany” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One–Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, Leon (1976) The Mexican Political System, 2d ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas (1984) “Spatial Equilibrium with EntryReview of Economic Studies 51, 1: 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. (1990) “Introduction. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. (1998) Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pignatelli, Andrea (1985) “Italy: The Development of a Late Developing State” in Rose, R. (ed.) Public Employment in Western Nations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poiré, Alejandro (1999) “Retrospective Voting, Partisanship, and Loyalty in Presidential Elections: 1994” in Domínguez, J. and Poiré, A. (eds.) Toward Mexico's Democratization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pomper, Gerald (1992) Passions and Interests: Political Party Concepts of American Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Prescott, Edward and Michael, Visscher (1977) “Sequential Location among Firms with ForesightBell Journal of Economics 8: 378–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Julia and Samuel, Dillon (2004) Opening Mexico. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Prud'homme, Jean-Francois (1997) “El PRD: Su vida interna y sus elecciones estratégicas.” Working Paper No. 39. División de Estudios Políticos, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), Mexico City.
Przeworski, Adam and John, Sprague (1986) Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Michael, Alvarez, José, Cheibub, and Fernando, Limongi (2000) Democracy and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert (1971) “Studying Elite Political Culture: The Case of ‘Ideology’American Political Science Review 65, 3 (September): 651–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert (1975) “The Italian Communist Politician” in Blackmer, D. and Tarrow, S. (eds.) Communism in Italy and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rahim, Lily (2001) “The Political Agenda Underpinning Economic Policy Formulation in Singapore's Authoritarian Developmental State” in Johannen, U. and Gomez, J. (eds.) Democratic Transitions in Asia. Singapore: Select Publishing.Google Scholar
Ramanadham, V. V. (ed.) (1995) Privatization and Equity. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez Saiz, Juan Manuel (1986) El movimiento urbano popular en México. Mexico, D.F.: Siglo Veintiuno.
Reed, Steven and Ethan, Scheiner (2003) “Electoral Incentives and Policy Preferences: Mixed Motives Behind Party Defections in JapanBritish Journal of Political Science 33: 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RevelesVásquez, Francisco Vásquez, Francisco (1996) El proceso de institucionalización organizativa del Partido Acción Nacional, 1984–1995. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Faculty of Political Science, National Autonomous University of Mexico.Google Scholar
Reyna, José Luis and Richard, Weinert (eds.) (1977) Authoritarianism in Mexico. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Inter-American Politics Series.Google Scholar
Richardson, Bradley (1997) Japanese Democracy: Power, Coordination, and Performance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Bradley (2001) “Japan's ‘1955 System’ and Beyond” in Diamond, L. and Gunther, R. (eds.) Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rigger, Shelley (2001a) From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Rigger, Shelley (2001b) “The Democratic Progressive Party in 2000: Obstacles and OpportunitiesChina Quarterly 168: 944–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William (1976) “The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger's LawComparative Politics 9, 1: 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William (1983) “Political Theory and the Art of Heresthetics” in Finifter, A. (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Rimanelli, Marco (1999) Comparative Democratization and Peaceful Change in Single-Party-Dominant Countries. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Rivera, Ríos, Miguel, Angel (1986) Crisis y reorganización del capitalismo mexicano, 1960–1985. Mexico City: Ediciones Era.Google Scholar
Rocha, Menocal (2001) “Do Old Habits Die Hard? A Statistical Exploration of the Politicization of Progresa, Mexico's Latest Federal Poverty-Alleviation Programme, under the Zedillo AdministrationJournal of Latin American Studies 33, 51: 513–558.Google Scholar
Octavio, Rodríguez Araujo and Carlos, Sirvent (2005) Instituciones electorales y partidos polítocs en México. Mexico City: Jorale.Google Scholar
Roeder, Philip (2001) “Ethnolinguistic Fractionalization (ELF) Indices, 1961 and 1985.” http//:weber.ucsd.edu\~proeder\elf.htm, accessed December 10, 2003.
Rogozinski, Jacques (1993) La privatización de empresas paraestatales. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Rohde, David (1979) “Risk-bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of the United States House of RepresentativesAmerican Journal of Political Science 23 (February), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steve, Roy, Behr, and Edward, Lazarus (1984) Third Parties in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael (2001) “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?” World Politics 53, 3 (April): 325–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldierna, Georgina (1999) “Dar prioridad al frente nacional progresista, pide López ObradorLa Jornada, (January 18): 3.Google Scholar
Salinas, Carlos (1994) “Sexto Informe de Gobierno, Anexo Estadístico” Mexico City: Poder Ejecutivo Federal.
Samuels, David (2002) “Presidentialized Parties: The Separation of Power and Party Organization and BehaviorComparative Political Studies 35, 4 (May): 461–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, Marco Aurelio (1999) PRD, la elite en crisis: Problemas organizativos, indeterminación ideológica y deficiencias programáticas. Mexico City: Plaza y Valdés.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Steven (1981) Agrarian Populism and the Mexican State. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni (1968) “The Sociology of Parties: A Critical Review” in Stammer, O. (ed.) Party Systems, Party Organizations, and the Politics of New Masses. Berlin: Institute for Political Science, Free University of Berlin.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1942) Party Government. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas (2002) “The Menu of ManipulationJournal of Democracy 13, 2 (April): 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas (2005) “From Electoral Authoritarianism to Democratic Consolidation” in Crandall, R., Paz, G., and Roett, R. (eds.) Mexico's Democracy at Work. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan (2006) Democracy without Competition: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Jacob (1997) Shadow Shoguns: The Rise and Fall of Japan's Political Machine. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph (1966) Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph (1991) Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Karl (1970) Communism in Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph (1947) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Scott, Robert (1964) Mexican Government in Transition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Semo, Enrique (2003) La búsqueda, 1. La izquierda mexicana en los albores del siglo XⅪ. Mexico City: Oceano.Google Scholar
Shadlen, Ken (2004) Democratization without Representation: The Politics of Small Industry in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Shalev, Michael (1990) “The Political Economy of Labor-Party Dominance and Decline in Israel” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin (1977a) “Patronage and its Opponents: A Theory and Some European Cases,” Cornell University Western Societies Program Occasional Paper No. 8.
Shefter, Martin (1977b) “Party and Patronage: Germany, England, and ItalyPolitics and Society 7: 403–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shefter, Martin (1994) Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shirk, David (2005) Mexico's New Politics: The PAN and Democratic Change. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Shvetsova, Olga (1995) Design of Political Institutions in Divided Societies. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Singh, Hari (2000) “Opposition Politics and the 1999 Malaysian ElectionsTrends in Malaysia: Election Assessment 1 (January): 33–38.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda and Margaret, Somers (1980) “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial InquiryComparative Studies in Society and History 22: 174–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Benjamin (2005) “Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party RuleWorld Politics 57 (April): 421–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Peter H. (1979) Labyrinths of Power: Political Recruitment in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter H. (1989) “The 1988 Presidential Succession in Historical Perspective” in Cornelius, W., Gentleman, J., and Smith, P. (eds.) Mexico's Alternative Political Futures. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Snyder, James (1994) “Safe Seats, Marginal Seats, and Party Platforms: The Logic of Platform DifferentiationEconomics and Politics 6: 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Richard (2001) Politics after Neoliberalism: Reregulation in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solinger, Debra (2001) “Ending One-Party Dominance: Korea, Taiwan, MexicoJournal of Democracy 12, 1: 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spotts, Frederic and Theodor, Wieser (1986) Italy: A Difficult Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan (2001) Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan (2007) “Political Clientelism” in Boix, C. and Stokes, S. (ed.) Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Walter, Sandy, Maisel, and Cherie, Maestas (2004) “Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent DeterrenceAmerican Journal of Political Science 48, 3 (July): 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagapera, Rein and Matthew, Shugart (1991) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (1967) Peasant Communism in Southern Italy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (1990) “Maintaining Hegemony in Italy: ‘The Softer they Rise, the Slower they Fall!’” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sydney (1994) Power in Movement. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teh, Yik Koon (2002) “Money Politics in MalaysiaJournal of Contemporary Asia 32, 3: 338–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tien, Hung-mao (1997) “Taiwan's Transformation” in Diamond, L., Plattner, M., Chu, Y., and Tien, H. (eds.) Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tien, Hung-mao and Tun-jen Cheng (1999) “Crafting Democratic Institutions” in Tsang, S. and Tien, H. (eds.) Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King (2001) “CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results” http://gking.harvard.edu/clarify/
Trejo, Guillermo and Claudio Jones (1998) “Political Dilemmas of Welfare Reform: Poverty and Inequality in Mexico” in Purcell, S. and Rubio, L. (eds.), Mexico under Zedillo. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Trejo Delabre, Raúl (2000) “Procesos electorales y medios de comunicación” Federal Elections Institute, Mexico City. http://www.raultrejo.tripod.com/ensayosmedios/ProcesoselectoralesymediosIFEmayo00ppt, accessed 12/7/05.
Tsebelis, George (1990) Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert (1961) “Towards a Comparative Politics of Movement-RegimesAmerican Political Science Review 55, 2 (June): 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Robert (1965) “The Dictator and TotalitarianismWorld Politics 17, 4: 555–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, Gordon (1971) “The Paradox of RevolutionPublic Choice 11 (Fall): 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolas, Walle (2002) “Africa's Range of RegimesJournal of Democracy 13, 2 (April): 66–80.Google Scholar
Van de Walle, Nicolas (2006) “Tipping Games: When Do Opposition Parties Coalesce?” in Schedler, A. (ed.) Electoral Authoritarianism. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Nicolas, Walle and Kimberly, Butler (1999) “Political Parties and Party Systems in Africa's Illiberal DemocraciesCambridge Review of International Affairs 12, 1: 14–28.Google Scholar
Ware, Alan (1996) Political Parties and Party Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Carolyn (1998) “Getting out the Vote with Patronage and Threat: The French and Italian Christian Democratic Parties, 1945–1958Journal of Interdisciplinary History 28, 4: 553–582.Google Scholar
Weiner, Robert (2003) Anti-competition in ‘Competitive’ Party Systems. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey (2004) “Changing Patterns of Executive-Legislative Relations in Mexico” in J. Middlebrook (ed.) Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London.
White, James (1970) The Sokagakkai and Mass Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittman, Donald (1983) “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative TheoriesAmerican Political Science Review 77, 1: 142–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodall, Brian (1996) Japan under Construction: Corruption, Politics, and Public Works. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
World Bank, World Development Report 2000–2001. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Xu, Dianqing (1997) “The KMT Party's Enterprises in TaiwanModern Asian Studies 31, 2: 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John (1998) “Politicians as Prize Fighters: Electoral Selection and Incumbency Advantage” in Geer, J. (ed.) Politicians and Party Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zarembo, Alan (2001) “Truth and ConsequencesNewsweek International (December 10): 40.Google Scholar
Zermeño, Sergio (1982) “De Echeverría a de la Madrid: Las clases altas y el estado mexicano en la batalla por la hegemonía. Washington, DC: Wilson Center, Working Paper 118.
Zolberg, Aristide (1966) Creating Political Order: The Party-States of West Africa. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan (1979) The Politics of Faction: Christian Democratic Rule in Italy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Abramson, Paul, John, Aldrich, and David, Rohde (1994) Change and Continuity in the 1992 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Adams, James (1999) “Policy Divergence in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial VotingPublic Choice 100: 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James, Samuel, Merrill III, and Bernard, Grofman (2005) A Unified Theory of Party Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilar, Zinser (1995) Vamos a ganar! La pugna de Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas por el poder. Mexico City: Oceano.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John (1983) “A Downsian Spatial Model with Party ActivismAmerican Political Science Review 77, 4: 974–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John (1993) “Rational Choice and TurnoutAmerican Journal of Political Science 37, 1: 246–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John (1995) Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John and William, Bianco (1992) “A Game-Theoretic Model of Party Affiliation of Candidates and Office HoldersMathematical and Computer Modeling 16, 8–9: 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Stephen, Spear (1988) “An Overlapping Generations Model of Electoral CompetitionJournal of Public Economics 37, 3: 359–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael and Jonathan, Nagler (1998) “When Politics and Model Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 42, 1 (June): 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, Maria Helena (1985) State and Opposition in Military Brazil. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry (1970) “Bases of Support for Mexico's Dominant PartyAmerican Political Science Review 64, 1: 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arian, Alan and Samuel, Barnes (1974) “The Dominant Party System: A Neglected Model of Democratic StabilityJournal of Politics 36, 3 (August): 592–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ArredondoRamírez, Pablo Ramírez, Pablo, Gilberto, Fregoso Peralta, and Raúl Trejo, Delabre (1991) Así se calló el sistema: Comunicación y elecciones en 1988. Guadalajara: University of Guadalajara.Google Scholar
Arrellano, David and Juan Pablo Guerrero (2000) “Stalled Administrative Reform of the Mexican State” in Schneider, B. and Heredia, B. (eds.) Reinventing Leviathan: The Political Economy of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries. Miami: North-South Center Press.Google Scholar
Arriola, Carlos (1988) Los empresarios y el estado, 1970–1982. Mexico City: Porrúa.Google Scholar
Arriola, Carlos (1994) Ensayos sobre el PAN. Mexico: Porrúa.Google Scholar
Aspe, Pedro (1993) Economic Transformation the Mexican Way. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, John (1988) Governing Mexico: The Statecraft of Crisis Management. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Jeffrey and Roderick, Kiewiet (1989) “Explaining Patterns of Candidate Competition in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 33, 4: 997–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Samuel and Roy, Pierce (1971) “Public Opinion and Political Preference in France and ItalyMidwest Journal of Political Science 15, 4: 643–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry (1986) “Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical TestAmerican Journal of Political Science 30, 4 (November): 709–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartra, Roger (1987) La jaula de la melancolía: identidad y metamorfosis del mexicano. Mexico: Grijalbo.Google Scholar
Bartra, Roger (1989) “Changes in Political Culture: The Crisis of Nationalism” in Cornelius, W., Gentleman, J., and Smith, P. (eds.) Mexico's Alternative Political Futures. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Basañez, Miguel (1983) La lucha por la hegemonía en México, 1968–1980. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Basañez, Miguel (1996) El pulso de los sexenios: 20 años de crisis en México. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Beck, Thorsten, George, Clarke, Alberto, Groff, Philip, Keefer, and Patrick, Walsh (2001) “New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political InstitutionsWorld Bank Economic Review 15 (February): 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berton, Peter (2000) “Japanese Communist Party: The ‘Lovable’ Party” in Hrebenar, R.Japan's New Party System. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy and Steven, Coate (1997) “An Economic Model of Representative DemocracyQuarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1: 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, Jean (1972) Comparing Political Systems. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles (1998) Political Parties, Growth and Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles (2003) Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles and Susan, Stokes (2003) “Endogenous DemocratizationWorld Politics 55, 4 (July): 517–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adriana, Borjas Benavente (2003) Partido de la Revolución Democrática: Estructura, organización interna y desempeño público, 1989–2003. Mexico City: Gernika.Google Scholar
Bortolotti, Bernardo (2005) “Italy's Privatization Process and its Implications for China” Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Paper No. 118, Milan, Italy.
Bouton, Lawrence and Mariusz, Sumlinski (2000) “Trends in Private Investment in Developing Countries” International Finance Corporation Paper 41. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, Frank (1956) Mexico: An Experiment in One-Party Democracy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, Frank (1964) The Making of Modern Mexico. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Brody, David and Benjamin, Page (1972) “Comment: The Assessment of Policy VotingAmerican Political Science Review 66, 2 (June): 450–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooker, Paul (2000) Non-Democratic Regimes: Theory, Government and Politics. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Jason (2005) “Ruling Parties and Durable Authoritarianism” Working Paper No. 23, Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law, Stanford University.
Bruhn, Kathleen (1996) “Social Spending and Political Support: The ‘Lessons’ of the National Solidarity Program in MexicoComparative Politics 28, 2: 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen (1997) Taking on Goliath: The Emergence of a New Left Party and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen (2000) “The Importance of Being Cuauhtémoc: The 2000 Presidential Campaign of the PRD.” University of California, Santa Barbara, mimeo.
Bruhn, Kathleen (2001) “Party Ideological Placement and the Left-Right Cleavage: A Reassessment from the South.” University of California, Santa Barbara, mimeo.
Bruhn, Kathleen (2004) “The Making of the Mexican President 2000: Parties, Candidates, and Campaign Strategy” in Domínguez, J. and Lawson, C. (eds.) Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen and Kenneth, F. Greene (2007) “Elite Polarization Meets Mass Moderation in Mexico's 2006 ElectionsPS: Political Science and Politics 40, 1 (January): 33–37.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giovanni and Luciano Segreto (1996) “Finanza e industria in Italia, 1963–1995” in Barbagallo, F. (ed.) L'Italia nella crisi mondiale: L'ultimo ventennio. Storia dell'Italia repubblicana Vol. 3, No. 1. Economia e società. Turin, Italy: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Buendía, Jorge (2004) “The Changing Mexican Voter, 1991–2000” in Middlebrook, K. (ed.) Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, John, Ferejohn, and Morris, Fiorina (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, Kent (1988) Crisis and Compensation: Public Policy and Political Stability in Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic (1995) Political Recruitment across Two Centuries: Mexico, 1884–1991. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic (2003) Politics in Mexico. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, John (1989) “Democracy and Bureaucracy in Japan” in Ishida, T. and Krauss, E. (eds.) Democracy in Japan. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John and Mathew, Shugart (1995) “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral FormulasElectoral Studies 14, 4: 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas (2002) “The End of the Transition ParadigmJournal of Democracy 13, 1: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Barry (1985) Mexican Communism, 1968–1983: Eurocommunism in the Americas?La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Carr, Barry (1992) Marxism and Communism in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Case, William (2001) “Malaysia's Resilient PseudodemocracyJournal of Democracy 12, 1: 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañeda, Jorge (2000) Perpetuating Power: How Mexican Presidents Were Chosen.New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis and Peter, Mair (1984) “Left-Right Political Scales: Some Expert JudgmentsEuropean Journal of Political Research 12, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centeno, Miguel (1994) Democracy within Reason: Technocratic Revolution in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Chand, Vikram (2001) Mexico's Political Awakening. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan (2004) Why Ethnic Parties Succeed. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, James (1948) “Is Our Two-Party System Natural?” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 259: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhry, Kiren (1997) The Price of Wealth: Economies and Institutions in the Middle East. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Tun-jen (2001) “One-Party Hegemony and Democratic Transition: Comparing Mexico, Taiwan and Turkey.” Paper prepared for presentation at Conference on The Rise of the DPP and PAN in Taiwan and Mexico, Duke University, January 26–27.
Chhibber, Pradeep (2001) Democracy without Associations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis (1991) Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis (2000) Rational Lives: Norms and Values in Politics and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Ray (2000) Ending the LDP Hegemony: Party Cooperation in Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Chu, Yun-han (2001) “The Legacy of One-Party Hegemony in Taiwan” in Diamond, L. and Gunther, R. (eds.) Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, Huat Beng (2001) “Defeat of the KMT: Implications for One-Party Quasi-Democratic Regimes in Southeast Asia” in Alagappa, M. (ed.) Taiwan's Presidential Politics: Democratization and Cross-Strait Relations in the Twenty-First Century. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Clark, Peter and James, Wilson (1961) “Incentive Systems: A Theory of OrganizationsAdministrative Studies Quarterly 6: 129–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cline, Howard (1962) Mexico: Revolution to Evolution, 1940–1960. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James (1960) “The Politics of Sub-Saharan Africa” in Almond, G. and Coleman, J. (eds.) The Politics of Developing Areas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth and David, Collier (1991) Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth (1992) The Contradictory Alliance: State-Labor Relations and Regime Change in Mexico. Berkeley: International and Area Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston and Stanley, Feldman (1989) “Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference ProcessesAmerican Journal of Political Science 33, 4 (November): 912–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne (1975) Politics and the Migrant Poor in Mexico City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne (2004) “Mobilized Voting in the 2000 Elections: The Changing Efficacy of Vote Buying and Coercion in Mexican Electoral Politics” in Domínguez, J. and Lawson, C. (eds.) Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne and Ann, Craig (1991) The Mexican Political System in Transition. Monograph 35, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Cotton, James (1997) “East Asian Democracy: Progress and Limits” in Diamond, L., Plattner, M., Chu, Y., and Tien, H. (eds.) Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Coulon, Christian (1990) “Senegal: The Development and Fragility of Semi-democracy” in Diamond, L., Linz, J., and Lipset, S. M. (eds.) Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Cover, Albert and Bruce, Brumberg (1982) “Baby Books and Ballots: The Impact of Congressional Mail on Constituent OpinionAmerican Political Science Review 76, 2: 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary (1987) “The Uncovered Set and the CoreAmerican Journal of Political Science 31, 2: 408–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary (1990) “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral SystemsAmerican Journal of Political Science 34, 4 (November): 903–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary (1996) “Is the Single Nontransferable Vote Superproportional: Evidence from Japan and TaiwanAmerican Journal of Political Science 40, 3 (August): 740–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary (1997) Making Votes Count. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespo, Jos (1996) Votar en los estados: Análisis comparado de las legislaciones electorales estatales en México. Mexico City: Fundación Friedrich Naumann.Google Scholar
Cross, John (1998) Informal Politics: Street Vendors and the State in Mexico City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Harold (1996) Government and Society in Malaysia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
CuéllarVázquez, Angélica Vázquez, Angélica (1993) La noche es de ustedes, el amanecer es nuestro: Asamblea de Barrios y Superbarrio Gómez en la Ciudad de México. Mexico City: National Autonomous University of Mexico.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald (1971) Election Campaigning, Japanese Style. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald (1988) The Japanese Way of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald (1999) The Japanese Logic of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert (1992) “Why Free Markets Are Not EnoughJournal of Democracy 3, 3 (July): 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Otto, Melvin, Hinich, and Peter, Ordeshook (1970) “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral ProcessAmerican Political Science Review 64: 426–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
André, Palma, Gap-Seon, Hong, and Jean-Francoise, Thisse (1990) “Equilibria in Multi-Party Competition under UncertaintySocial Choice and Welfare 7: 247–259.Google Scholar
della, Porta and Alberto, Vannucci (1999) Corrupt Exchanges: Actors, Resources, and Mechanisms of Political Corruption. New York: Aldine and Gruyter.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella and Alberto Vannucci (2000) “Corruption and Political Financing in Italy” Transparency International Workshop on Corruption and Political Financing. http://www.transparency.org/working_papers/country/italy_paper.html
Deininger, Klaus and Lyn, Squire (1996) “A New Data Set Measuring Income InequalityWorld Bank Economic Review 10, 3: 565–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
di Palma, Giuseppe (1980) “The Available State: Problems of Reform” in Lange, P. and Tarrow, S. (eds.) Italy in Transition. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry (2001) “Anatomy of an Electoral Earthquake: How the KMT Lost and the DPP Won the 2000 Presidential Election” in Alagappa, M. (ed.) Taiwan's Presidential Politics. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry (2002) “Thinking about Hybrid RegimesJournal of Democracy 13, 2 (April): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaw, Aminata and Mamadou Diouf (1998) “The Senegalese Opposition and its Quest for Power” in Olukoshi, A. (ed.) The Politics of Opposition in Contemporary Africa. Stockholm: Uppsala.Google Scholar
Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto (1997) “Asignación política de recursos en el federalismo mexicano: Incentivos y restriccionesPerfiles Latinoamericanos 6, 10: 35–74.Google Scholar
Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Federico Estévez, Beatriz Magaloni (2001) “A Portfolio Diversification Model of Electoral Investment: Competition and Policy Choice in Mexico's PRONASOL, 1989–1994” American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, August 30–September 2.
Dillon, Samuel (2000) “Mexico's Ruling Party Accused of Diverting Public MoneyNew York Times, March 27, 2000: A6.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge and James, McCann (1996) Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dow, Jay and James, Endersby (2004) “Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting ResearchElectoral Studies 23: 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dresser, Denise (1991) Neopopulist Solutions to Neoliberal Problems: Mexico's National Solidarity Program. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Translated by Barbara and Robert North. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ebenstein, William (1945) “Public Administration in MexicoPublic Administration Review 5, 2 (Spring): 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Susan (1977) The Poverty of Revolution: The State and the Urban Poor in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel and Luis Roniger (1981) “The Study of Patron-Client Relations and Recent Developments in Sociological Theory” in Eisenstadt, S. N. and René Lémarchand, (eds.), Political clientelism, Patronage, and Development. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd (1999) “Electoral Justice in Mexico: From Oxymoron to Legal Norm in Less Than a Decade,” Third International Congress on Electoral Law, National Autonomous University of Mexico, UNAM-IIJ, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd (2004) Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enelow, James and Melvin, Hinich (1982) “Nonspatial Candidate Characteristics and Electoral CompetitionJournal of Politics 44: 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Leon (1986) Political Parties in the American Mold. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G⊘sta (1985) Politics against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G⊘sta (1990) “Single-Party Dominance in Sweden: The Saga of Social Democracy” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Eyton, Laurence (2002) “Taiwan opposition shoots itself in the footAsia Times, June 29. http://www.atimes.com/china/DF29Ad01.html.Google Scholar
Farneti, Paolo (1985) The Italian Party System, 1945–1980. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Feddersen, Timothy, Itai, Sened, and Stephen, Wright (1990) “Rational Voting and Candidate Entry under Plurality RuleAmerican Journal of Political Science 34, 4: 1005–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féher, Ferenc, Agnes, Heller, and Gyorgy, Markus (1983) Dictatorship over Needs. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ferdinand, Peter (1998) “Party Funding and Political Corruption in East Asia: The Cases of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan” in Austin, R. and Tjernström, M. (eds.) Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Fields, Karl (1998) “KMT, Inc. Party Capitalism in a Developmental State” JPRI Working Paper No. 47 (June).
Fiorina, Morris (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Bernhard, Egbert, Gerken, and Ulrich, Hiemenz (1982) Growth, Employment, and Trade in an Industrializing Economy: A Quantitative Analysis of Mexican Development Policies. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Fish, Steven (1995) Democracy from Scratch: Opposition and Regime in the New Russian Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgibbon, Russell (1951) “Measurement of Latin-American Political Phenomena: A Statistical ExperimentAmerican Political Science Review 45, 2 (June): 517–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio (1989) The Chilean Political Process. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Garrido, Luis Javier (1987) “Un partido sin militantes” in Loaeza, S. and Segovia, R. (eds.) La vida política mexicana en la crisis. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara (1994) Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara (1999a) “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara (1999b) “Authoritarian Breakdown: Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument” American Political Science Association, Atlanta, September 2–5.
Geddes, Barbara (2003) Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander (1962) Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Givens, Terri (2005) Voting Radical Right in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam (2000) “Political Patronage, Bureaucracy and Corruption in Postwar Italy.” Working Paper without number. Russell Sage Foundation.
Golden, Miriam (2004) “International Economic Sources of Regime Change: How European Integration Undermined Italy's Postwar Party SystemComparative Political Studies 37, 10 (December): 1238–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, Edmund (1991) Money Politics in the Barisan Nasional. Kuala Lumpur: Forum.Google Scholar
Gomez, Edmund (1994) Political Business: Corporate Involvement in Malaysian Political Parties. Cairns: James Cook University Press.Google Scholar
Gomez, Edmund (2002) “Political Business in Malaysia: Party Factionalism, Corporate Development, and Economic Crisis” in Gomez, E. (ed.) Political Business in Asia. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, Leopoldo and John, Bailey (1990) “La transición política y los dilemas del PRIForo Internacional 31, 1: 57–87.Google Scholar
González, Casanova (1965) La democracia en México. Mexico City: Era.Google Scholar
Goodliffe, Jay (2001) “The Effect of War Chests on Challenger Entry in U.S. House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 45, 4: 830–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald and Jonathan, Krasno (1988) “Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 32, 4: 884–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph and Kenneth, Shepsle (1987) “The Effects of Electoral Rewards in Multiparty Competition with EntryAmerican Political Science Review 81: 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F. (1997) “Complejidad, cohesión y longevidad en un movimiento urbano popular: La Asamblea de Barrios de la Ciudad de México” in Zermeño, S. (ed.) Movimientos sociales e identidades colectivas en México. Mexico City: UNAM-IIS.Google Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F. (2002a) “Opposition Party Strategy and Spatial Competition in Dominant Party Regimes: A Theory and the Case of MexicoComparative Political Studies 35, 7 (September): 755–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F. (2002b) Defeating Dominance: Opposition Party Building and Democratization in Mexico. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F. (2008) “Dominant Party Strategy and Democratization” American Journal of Political Science (forthcoming).
Greene, Kenneth F., Joseph Klesner, and Chappell Lawson (2004) “How to Win a Mexican Election (Legally): Campaign Effects in a New Democracy” Latin American Studies Association, Las Vegas, Nevada, October 7–9.
Grindle, Merilee (1977) Bureaucrats, Politicians, and Peasants in Mexico: A Case Study in Public Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim (2001) “A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence AdvantageAmerican Journal of Political Science 45, 4 (October): 862–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna (2002) Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guillermoprieto, Alma (1994) The Heart that Bleeds: Latin America Now. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano (1994) “The Implosion of Clientelistic Italy in the 1990s” Working Paper No. 94/12, European University Institute, Florence, Italy.
Haber, Paul (1997) “¡Vamos por la dignidad de Durango! Un estudio del poder sociopolítico” in Zermeño, S. (ed.) Movimientos sociales e identidades colectivas en México. Mexico City: UNAM-IIS.Google Scholar
Haber, Paul (2006) Power from Experience: Urban Popular Movements in Late Twentieth-Century Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Robert, Kaufman (1995) The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis (1955) The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought Since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael (1987) Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hellman, Judith Adler (1983) Mexico in Crisis. 2nd ed. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
Judith Adler, Hellman (1994) “Mexican Popular Movements, Clientelism, and the Process of Democratization.” Latin American Perspectives 21, 2: 124–142.Google Scholar
Hellman, Stephen (1975) “Generational Differences in the Bureaucratic Elite of Italian Communist Provincial FederationsCanadian Journal of Political Science 1: 82–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, David (1987) “Italy: Parties and Government under Pressure” in Ware, A. (ed.) Political Parties. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hinich, Melvin and Michael, Munger (1997) Analytical Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Declines of Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holm, John (1987) “Elections in Botswana: Institutionalization of a New System of Legitimacy” in Hayward, F. M. (ed.) Elections in Independent Africa. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc and Phillip, Roessler (2006) “Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian RegimesAmerican Journal of Political Science 50, 2 (April): 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrebenar, Ronald (2000) Japan's New Party System. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng, Dean, Lacy, and Emerson, Niou (1998) “Retrospective and prospective voting in a one-party-dominant democracy: Taiwan's 1996 presidential electionPublic Choice 97: 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Teh-fu and Ching-shin Yu (1999) “Developing a Party System and Democratic Consolidation” in Tsang, S. and Tien, H. (eds.) Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Simon (2001) Altering Party Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel (1970) “Social and Institutional Dynamics of One-Party Systems” in Huntington, S. and Moore, C. (eds.) Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Dominant Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel and Clement Moore (1970) “Conclusion: Authoritarianism, Democracy, and One-Party Politics” in Huntington, S. and Moore, C. (eds.) Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Dominant Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (1990) “The Political Economy of Conservative Resurgence under Recession: Public Policies and Political Support in Japan, 1977–1983” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, John (1999) “Electoral Competition with Endogenous Activists” American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, September 2–5.
Jacobson, Gary (1980) Money in Congressional Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary and Samuel, Kernell (1981) Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kenneth (1965) “Ideological Correlates of Right Wing Political Alienation in MexicoAmerican Political Science Review 59, 3 (September): 656–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kenneth (1978) Mexican Democracy: A Critical View. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Johnston, Richard, André, Blais, Henry, Brady, and Jean, Crête (1992) Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark and Scott, Mainwaring (2003) “The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: An Empirical Measure and an Application to the AmericasParty Politics 9 (March): 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jowitt, Kenneth (1992) New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis (1996) The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry (1986) “Imposing Consent? Electoralism vs. Democratization in El Salvador” in Drake, P. and Silva, E. (eds.) Elections in Latin America. La Jolla: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry and Philippe, Schmitter (1991) “What Democracy Is … And Is NotJournal of Democracy 2 (Summer): 75–89.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard and Peter, Mair (1995) “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel PartyParty Politics 1, 1: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Purcell (1973) “Decision-Making in an Authoritarian Regime: Theoretical Implications from a Mexican Case Study” in World Politics 26, 1 (October): 28–54.Google Scholar
Kessler, Timothy (1999) Global Capital and National Politics: Reforming Mexico's Financial System. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1964a) Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1964b) Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1966) The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Robert, Keohane, and Sidney, Verba (1994) Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Michael, Tomz, and Jason, Wittenberg (2000) “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and PresentationAmerican Journal of Political Science 44, 2 (April): 347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto (1966) “The Transformation of West European Party Systems” in LaPalambara, J. and Weiner, M. (eds.) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1989a) The Logics of Party Formation: Ecological Politics in Belgium and West Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1989b) “The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity RevisitedPolitical Studies 37, 3: 400–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1990) Beyond the European Left: Ideology and Political Action in the Belgian Ecology Parties. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (2000) “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic PolitiesComparative Political Studies 33, 6/7 (August/September): 845–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and Steve, Wilkinson (eds.) (2007) Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesner, Joseph (1994) “Realignment or Dealignment? Consequences of Economic Crisis and Restructuring for the Mexican Party System” in Cook, M., Middlebrook, K., and Molinar, J. (eds.) Politics of Economic Restructuring: State–Society Relations and Regime Change in Mexico. La Jolla: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph (1997) “Electoral Reform in Mexico's Hegemonic Party System: Perpetuation of Privilege or Democratic Advance?” American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, August 28–31.
Kollman, Kenneth, John, Miller, and Scott, Page (1992) “Adaptive Parties in Spatial ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review 86, 4: 929–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostoris, Fiorella (1993) Italy: The Sheltered Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krauze, Enrique (1997) Mexico, Biography of Power: A History of Modern Mexico, 1810–1996, Translated by Hank Heifetz. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Kuo, Chengtian (2000) “New Financial Politics in Taiwan, Thailand, and Malaysia,” Department of Political Science, National Chengchi University, http://www.la.utexas.edu_research/cgots/ accessed 9/2305.
Kuran, Timur (1991) “Now out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989World Politics 44 (October): 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Markku and Rein, Taagapera (1979) “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West EuropeComparative Political Studies 12: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, Joy (2001) “Why Rules Matter: Changes in Candidate Selection in Mexico's PRI, 1988–2000Journal of Latin American Studies 33: 485–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPalombara, Joseph (1964) Interest Groups in Italian Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael and Norman, Schofield (1990) Multiparty Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell (2002) Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell (2004) “Television Coverage, Vote Choice, and the 2000 Campaign” in Domínguez, J. and Lawson, C. (eds.) Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice (2003) “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and ConsequencesAnnual Review of Political Science 6: 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levite, Ariel and Sydney, Tarrow (1983) “The Legitimation of Excluded Parties in Dominant Party Systems: A Comparison of Israel and ItalyComparative Politics 15, 3 (April): 295–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven (2003) Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Lucan, Way (2002) “The Rise of Competitive AuthoritarianismJournal of Democracy 13, 2: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Lucan Way (2006) “Competitive Authoritarianism: The Origins and Evolution of Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War.” Unpublished manuscript of chapters 1 and 2, Harvard University and University of Toronto.
Levitt, Steven and Catherine, Wolfram (1997) “Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. HouseLegislative Studies Quarterly 22: 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark (1996) The Cooperator's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark (1998) The Rebel's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Oliver (2000) “Lien wants KMT assets put in trustTaipei Times, January 3: A1.Google Scholar
Lin, Tse-min, James, Enelow, and Han, Dorussen (1999) “Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic VotingPublic Choice 98: 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Tse-min (2007) “The ‘Minumum-Sum Point’ as a Solution Concept in Spatial Voting” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association meeting, Chicago IL, April 12–15.
Linz, Juan and Arturo, Valenzuela (eds.) (1994) The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin (ed.) (1998) Democracy in Europe and the Americas. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Stein Rokkan (1967) “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction” in Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (eds.) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross–National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lipson, Leslie (1953) “The Two–Party System in British PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review 47: 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, I-chou (1999) “The Development of the Opposition” in Tsang, S. and Tien, H. (eds.) Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loaeza, Soledad (1999) El Partido Acción Nacional, la larga marcha, 1939–1994: Oposición leal y partido de protesta. Mexico City: Fonda de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Locke, Richard (1995) Remaking the Italian Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Londregan, John and Tom Romer (1993) “Polarization, Incumbency and the Personal Vote” in Barnett, W., Hinich, M. and Schofield, N. (eds.) Political Economy: Institutions, Competition and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lujambio, Alonso (2000) El poder compartido: Un ensayo sobre la democratización mexicana. Mexico City: Oceano.Google Scholar
Lujambio, Alonso (2001) “Dinero y democratización: El financiamiento y la fiscalización de los partidos políticos en la transición mexicana a la democracia, 1988–2000.” International Seminar on Money and Electoral Competition: Challenges for Democracy, Federal Elections Institute, Mexico City, June 5–8.
Lustig, Nora (1992) Mexico: the Remaking of an Economy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Mabry, Donald (1973) Mexico's Acción Nacional: A Catholic Alternative to Revolution. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Dag (2004) Downsizing the State: Privatization and the Limits of Neoliberal Reform in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz (1996) “Dominancia de partido y dilemas duvergerianos en las elecciones federales de 1994Política y Gobierno 3, 2: 281–326.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz (1997) The Dynamics Of Dominant Party Decline: The Mexican Transition To Multipartyism. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, Duke University.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz (2006) Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz and Alejandro Poiré (2004a) “The Issues, the Vote, and the Mandate for Change” in Domínguez, J. and Lawson, C. (eds.) Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz and Alejandro Poiré (2004b) “Strategic Coordination in the 2004 Mexican Presidential Race” in Domínguez, J. and Lawson, C. (eds.) Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Magar, Eric and Juan Molinar Horcasitas (1995) “Medios de comunicación y democracia” in Alcocer, J. (ed.) Elecciones, diálogo y reforma en México, 1994, Volume 2. Mexico City: Nuevo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott (1999) Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter and Biezen, Ingrid (2001) “Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980–2000Party Politics 7, 1: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manikas, Peter and Laura, Thornton (2003) Political Parties in Asia: Promoting Reform and Combating Corruption in Eight Countries. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute.Google Scholar
MartínezValle, Adolfo Valle, Adolfo (1995) El Partido Acción Nacional: Una historia política, 1939–1976. Unpublished B.A. thesis, Department of Political Science, Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico (ITAM), Mexico City.Google Scholar
Martínez, Verdugo (1985) Historia del comunismo en México. Mexico City: Grijalbo.Google Scholar
Martínez, Omar (2002) “Datos duros sobre monitoreos de coberturas electorales” http://www.cem.itesm.mx/dacs/buendia/rmc/rmc63/omartinez.html, accessed 10/10/02.
May, John (1973) “Opinion Structures and Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear DisparityPolitical Studies 21: 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, James and Chappell, Lawson. 2003. “An Electorate Adrift? Public Opinion and the Quality of Democracy in MexicoLatin American Research Review 38, 3 (October): 60–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Ronald (1971) Party Systems and Elections in Latin America. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard (1986) “Covering, Dominance, and Institution–Free Properties of Social ChoiceAmerican Journal of Political Science 30, 2: 283–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Means, Gordon Paul (1996) “Soft Authoritarianism in Malaysia and SingaporeJournal of Democracy 7, 4 (October): 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meguid, Bonnie (2005) “Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party SuccessAmerican Political Science Review 99, 3 (August): 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merino, Mauricio (1996) “De la lealtad individual a la responsabilidad públicaRevista de Administración Pública 91: 5–18.Google Scholar
Mershon, Carol and Gianfranco, Pasquino (eds.) (1995) Italian Politics: Ending the First Republic. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin (1986) “Political Liberalization in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Mexico” in Donnell, G. O', Schmitter, P., and Whitehead, L. (eds.). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin (1995) The Paradox of Revolution: Labor, The State, and Authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren and Donald, Stokes (1963) “Constituency influence in CongressAmerican Political Science Review 57 (March): 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren and Kent, Jennings (1986) Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Yemile (1998) “The Costs of Electoral Success: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico” in Serrano, M. (ed.). Governing Mexico: Political Parties and Elections. London: Institute of Latin American Studies.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Yemile (2003) From Martyrdom to Power: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico. Notre, Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MoctezumaBarragán, Esteban Barragán, Esteban and Andrés, Roemer (2001) A New Public Management in Mexico. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry (1980) The Organization of Interests: Incentives and the Internal Dynamics of Political Interest Groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Juan, Molinar Horcasitas (1991) El tiempo de la legitimidad. Mexico City: Cal y Arena.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan (2001) “Las elecciones de 1997 en México: Evaluación del sistema de partidos y la reforma electoral en materia de regulación financiera.” Conference on Political Parties and Elections, Federal Elections Institute (IFE), Mexico City. http://www.trife.gob.mx/wcongreso/molinarc.html.
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan and Jeffrey Weldon (1994) “Electoral Determinants and Consequences of National Solidarity” in Cornelius, W., Craig, A., and Fox, J. (eds.) Transforming State–Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro (1999) “Ideología y voto: Dimensiones de competencia política en México en los noventaPolítica y Gobierno 6, 1: 45–81.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro (2003) El votante mexicano: Democracia, actitudes políticas y conducta electoral. Mexico City: Fonda de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Munro-Kua, Anne (1996) Authoritarian Populism in Malaysia. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muramatsu, Michio and Ellis Krauss (1990) “The Dominant Party and Social Coalitions in Japan” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Needler, Martin (1971) Politics and Society in Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Niou, Emerson and Peter, Ordeshook (1992) “A Game Theoretic Analysis of the Republic of China's Emerging Electoral SystemInternational Political Science Review 13, 1: 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe, Schmitter (1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1971) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olukoshi, Adebayo (1998) “Introduction” in A. Adebayo (ed.) The Politics of Opposition in Contemporary Africa. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Andrés (1996) Bordering on Chaos: Guerrillas, Stockbrokers, Politicians, and Mexico's Road to Prosperity. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Pardo, Ortiz, , Francisco and Ortiz Pinchetti, Francisco (2000) “La meta: 20 millones de votosProceso 1215 (February 13): 12–24.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Francisco (2002) Comprender a la gente: Por qué ganó Fox. Mexico City: Nuevo Siglo.Google Scholar
Osborne, Martin and Al, Slivinski (1996) “A Model of Political Competition with Citizen–CandidatesQuarterly Journal of Economics 111, 1: 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osei-Hwedie, Bertha (2001) “The Political Opposition in Botswana: The Politics of Factionalism and FragmentationTransformation 45: 57–77.Google Scholar
Otake, Hideo (1990) “Defense Controversies and One–Party Dominance: The Opposition in Japan and West Germany” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One–Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, Leon (1976) The Mexican Political System, 2d ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas (1984) “Spatial Equilibrium with EntryReview of Economic Studies 51, 1: 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. (1990) “Introduction. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. (1998) Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pignatelli, Andrea (1985) “Italy: The Development of a Late Developing State” in Rose, R. (ed.) Public Employment in Western Nations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poiré, Alejandro (1999) “Retrospective Voting, Partisanship, and Loyalty in Presidential Elections: 1994” in Domínguez, J. and Poiré, A. (eds.) Toward Mexico's Democratization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pomper, Gerald (1992) Passions and Interests: Political Party Concepts of American Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Prescott, Edward and Michael, Visscher (1977) “Sequential Location among Firms with ForesightBell Journal of Economics 8: 378–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Julia and Samuel, Dillon (2004) Opening Mexico. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Prud'homme, Jean-Francois (1997) “El PRD: Su vida interna y sus elecciones estratégicas.” Working Paper No. 39. División de Estudios Políticos, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), Mexico City.
Przeworski, Adam and John, Sprague (1986) Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Michael, Alvarez, José, Cheibub, and Fernando, Limongi (2000) Democracy and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert (1971) “Studying Elite Political Culture: The Case of ‘Ideology’American Political Science Review 65, 3 (September): 651–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert (1975) “The Italian Communist Politician” in Blackmer, D. and Tarrow, S. (eds.) Communism in Italy and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rahim, Lily (2001) “The Political Agenda Underpinning Economic Policy Formulation in Singapore's Authoritarian Developmental State” in Johannen, U. and Gomez, J. (eds.) Democratic Transitions in Asia. Singapore: Select Publishing.Google Scholar
Ramanadham, V. V. (ed.) (1995) Privatization and Equity. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez Saiz, Juan Manuel (1986) El movimiento urbano popular en México. Mexico, D.F.: Siglo Veintiuno.
Reed, Steven and Ethan, Scheiner (2003) “Electoral Incentives and Policy Preferences: Mixed Motives Behind Party Defections in JapanBritish Journal of Political Science 33: 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RevelesVásquez, Francisco Vásquez, Francisco (1996) El proceso de institucionalización organizativa del Partido Acción Nacional, 1984–1995. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Faculty of Political Science, National Autonomous University of Mexico.Google Scholar
Reyna, José Luis and Richard, Weinert (eds.) (1977) Authoritarianism in Mexico. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Inter-American Politics Series.Google Scholar
Richardson, Bradley (1997) Japanese Democracy: Power, Coordination, and Performance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Bradley (2001) “Japan's ‘1955 System’ and Beyond” in Diamond, L. and Gunther, R. (eds.) Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rigger, Shelley (2001a) From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Rigger, Shelley (2001b) “The Democratic Progressive Party in 2000: Obstacles and OpportunitiesChina Quarterly 168: 944–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William (1976) “The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger's LawComparative Politics 9, 1: 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William (1983) “Political Theory and the Art of Heresthetics” in Finifter, A. (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Rimanelli, Marco (1999) Comparative Democratization and Peaceful Change in Single-Party-Dominant Countries. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Rivera, Ríos, Miguel, Angel (1986) Crisis y reorganización del capitalismo mexicano, 1960–1985. Mexico City: Ediciones Era.Google Scholar
Rocha, Menocal (2001) “Do Old Habits Die Hard? A Statistical Exploration of the Politicization of Progresa, Mexico's Latest Federal Poverty-Alleviation Programme, under the Zedillo AdministrationJournal of Latin American Studies 33, 51: 513–558.Google Scholar
Octavio, Rodríguez Araujo and Carlos, Sirvent (2005) Instituciones electorales y partidos polítocs en México. Mexico City: Jorale.Google Scholar
Roeder, Philip (2001) “Ethnolinguistic Fractionalization (ELF) Indices, 1961 and 1985.” http//:weber.ucsd.edu\~proeder\elf.htm, accessed December 10, 2003.
Rogozinski, Jacques (1993) La privatización de empresas paraestatales. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Rohde, David (1979) “Risk-bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of the United States House of RepresentativesAmerican Journal of Political Science 23 (February), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steve, Roy, Behr, and Edward, Lazarus (1984) Third Parties in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael (2001) “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?” World Politics 53, 3 (April): 325–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldierna, Georgina (1999) “Dar prioridad al frente nacional progresista, pide López ObradorLa Jornada, (January 18): 3.Google Scholar
Salinas, Carlos (1994) “Sexto Informe de Gobierno, Anexo Estadístico” Mexico City: Poder Ejecutivo Federal.
Samuels, David (2002) “Presidentialized Parties: The Separation of Power and Party Organization and BehaviorComparative Political Studies 35, 4 (May): 461–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, Marco Aurelio (1999) PRD, la elite en crisis: Problemas organizativos, indeterminación ideológica y deficiencias programáticas. Mexico City: Plaza y Valdés.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Steven (1981) Agrarian Populism and the Mexican State. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni (1968) “The Sociology of Parties: A Critical Review” in Stammer, O. (ed.) Party Systems, Party Organizations, and the Politics of New Masses. Berlin: Institute for Political Science, Free University of Berlin.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1942) Party Government. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas (2002) “The Menu of ManipulationJournal of Democracy 13, 2 (April): 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas (2005) “From Electoral Authoritarianism to Democratic Consolidation” in Crandall, R., Paz, G., and Roett, R. (eds.) Mexico's Democracy at Work. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan (2006) Democracy without Competition: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Jacob (1997) Shadow Shoguns: The Rise and Fall of Japan's Political Machine. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph (1966) Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph (1991) Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Karl (1970) Communism in Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph (1947) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Scott, Robert (1964) Mexican Government in Transition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Semo, Enrique (2003) La búsqueda, 1. La izquierda mexicana en los albores del siglo XⅪ. Mexico City: Oceano.Google Scholar
Shadlen, Ken (2004) Democratization without Representation: The Politics of Small Industry in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Shalev, Michael (1990) “The Political Economy of Labor-Party Dominance and Decline in Israel” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin (1977a) “Patronage and its Opponents: A Theory and Some European Cases,” Cornell University Western Societies Program Occasional Paper No. 8.
Shefter, Martin (1977b) “Party and Patronage: Germany, England, and ItalyPolitics and Society 7: 403–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shefter, Martin (1994) Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shirk, David (2005) Mexico's New Politics: The PAN and Democratic Change. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Shvetsova, Olga (1995) Design of Political Institutions in Divided Societies. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Singh, Hari (2000) “Opposition Politics and the 1999 Malaysian ElectionsTrends in Malaysia: Election Assessment 1 (January): 33–38.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda and Margaret, Somers (1980) “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial InquiryComparative Studies in Society and History 22: 174–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Benjamin (2005) “Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party RuleWorld Politics 57 (April): 421–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Peter H. (1979) Labyrinths of Power: Political Recruitment in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter H. (1989) “The 1988 Presidential Succession in Historical Perspective” in Cornelius, W., Gentleman, J., and Smith, P. (eds.) Mexico's Alternative Political Futures. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Snyder, James (1994) “Safe Seats, Marginal Seats, and Party Platforms: The Logic of Platform DifferentiationEconomics and Politics 6: 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Richard (2001) Politics after Neoliberalism: Reregulation in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solinger, Debra (2001) “Ending One-Party Dominance: Korea, Taiwan, MexicoJournal of Democracy 12, 1: 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spotts, Frederic and Theodor, Wieser (1986) Italy: A Difficult Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan (2001) Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan (2007) “Political Clientelism” in Boix, C. and Stokes, S. (ed.) Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Walter, Sandy, Maisel, and Cherie, Maestas (2004) “Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent DeterrenceAmerican Journal of Political Science 48, 3 (July): 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagapera, Rein and Matthew, Shugart (1991) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (1967) Peasant Communism in Southern Italy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (1990) “Maintaining Hegemony in Italy: ‘The Softer they Rise, the Slower they Fall!’” in Pempel, T. J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sydney (1994) Power in Movement. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teh, Yik Koon (2002) “Money Politics in MalaysiaJournal of Contemporary Asia 32, 3: 338–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tien, Hung-mao (1997) “Taiwan's Transformation” in Diamond, L., Plattner, M., Chu, Y., and Tien, H. (eds.) Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tien, Hung-mao and Tun-jen Cheng (1999) “Crafting Democratic Institutions” in Tsang, S. and Tien, H. (eds.) Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King (2001) “CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results” http://gking.harvard.edu/clarify/
Trejo, Guillermo and Claudio Jones (1998) “Political Dilemmas of Welfare Reform: Poverty and Inequality in Mexico” in Purcell, S. and Rubio, L. (eds.), Mexico under Zedillo. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Trejo Delabre, Raúl (2000) “Procesos electorales y medios de comunicación” Federal Elections Institute, Mexico City. http://www.raultrejo.tripod.com/ensayosmedios/ProcesoselectoralesymediosIFEmayo00ppt, accessed 12/7/05.
Tsebelis, George (1990) Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert (1961) “Towards a Comparative Politics of Movement-RegimesAmerican Political Science Review 55, 2 (June): 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Robert (1965) “The Dictator and TotalitarianismWorld Politics 17, 4: 555–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, Gordon (1971) “The Paradox of RevolutionPublic Choice 11 (Fall): 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolas, Walle (2002) “Africa's Range of RegimesJournal of Democracy 13, 2 (April): 66–80.Google Scholar
Van de Walle, Nicolas (2006) “Tipping Games: When Do Opposition Parties Coalesce?” in Schedler, A. (ed.) Electoral Authoritarianism. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Nicolas, Walle and Kimberly, Butler (1999) “Political Parties and Party Systems in Africa's Illiberal DemocraciesCambridge Review of International Affairs 12, 1: 14–28.Google Scholar
Ware, Alan (1996) Political Parties and Party Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Carolyn (1998) “Getting out the Vote with Patronage and Threat: The French and Italian Christian Democratic Parties, 1945–1958Journal of Interdisciplinary History 28, 4: 553–582.Google Scholar
Weiner, Robert (2003) Anti-competition in ‘Competitive’ Party Systems. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey (2004) “Changing Patterns of Executive-Legislative Relations in Mexico” in J. Middlebrook (ed.) Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London.
White, James (1970) The Sokagakkai and Mass Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittman, Donald (1983) “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative TheoriesAmerican Political Science Review 77, 1: 142–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodall, Brian (1996) Japan under Construction: Corruption, Politics, and Public Works. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
World Bank, World Development Report 2000–2001. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Xu, Dianqing (1997) “The KMT Party's Enterprises in TaiwanModern Asian Studies 31, 2: 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John (1998) “Politicians as Prize Fighters: Electoral Selection and Incumbency Advantage” in Geer, J. (ed.) Politicians and Party Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zarembo, Alan (2001) “Truth and ConsequencesNewsweek International (December 10): 40.Google Scholar
Zermeño, Sergio (1982) “De Echeverría a de la Madrid: Las clases altas y el estado mexicano en la batalla por la hegemonía. Washington, DC: Wilson Center, Working Paper 118.
Zolberg, Aristide (1966) Creating Political Order: The Party-States of West Africa. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan (1979) The Politics of Faction: Christian Democratic Rule in Italy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Kenneth F. Greene, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: Why Dominant Parties Lose
  • Online publication: 27 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509803.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Kenneth F. Greene, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: Why Dominant Parties Lose
  • Online publication: 27 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509803.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Kenneth F. Greene, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: Why Dominant Parties Lose
  • Online publication: 27 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509803.010
Available formats
×