In 1988, on the 80th anniversary of his birth, there was a conference in Tel Aviv in memory of Lev Davidovich Landau. I announced at the beginning of my own talk—“My Life with Landau”—that I was going to break new ground as a scientific expositor, by following the practice of humanists and reading from a manuscript that I had prepared in advance.

To my surprise Rudolf Peierls, who was sitting in the front row, shook his head emphatically. Professor Peierls disapproves, I told the audience. “Yes,” he said, “this is not a good way for a physicist to give a talk.” “Well,” I said, “it's better than what most physicists do now, reading their talk from plastic sheets while projecting it on a screen.” He looked at me with that sweet half-smile of his and said “That is also a bad way to give a talk.”

In preparing this lecture I reread Bird of Passage, Peierls’ 1985 memoirs [1]. There I discovered that these views, like everything else I ever heard from him, were not casually put forth. They were based on experience and reflection. He says (p. 256):

Nevertheless, as in Tel Aviv in 1988, so in Santa Barbara in 1997, fully mindful of the fitting-in problem, I will try to follow a written draft without trying to reproduce the text verbatim. Today it will be easier because, most regrettably, Peierls is not here with us to explain exactly what is wrong with this approach.