Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T02:13:38.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Many Grammatical Cases Were There in Proto-Germanic? Interpreting the Old English Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Marek Majer
Affiliation:
University of Łódź
Get access

Summary

Introduction

How many cases were there in Proto-Germanic (PG)? This question may most probably never be answered with certainty, as our knowledge of the language relies solely on linguistic reconstruction. However, it seems that we should be able to say relatively much about Proto-Germanic, as the comparative grammar of its daughter languages, the various Germanic dialects, has been studied extremely thoroughly in the course of the development of historical linguistics. Therefore, despite the fact that the question is not crucial, in this paper, I will attempt to establish the most probable answer.

The notion of Proto-Germanic is by no means unambiguous; in fact, the term may be used in reference to any stage of linguistic development later than Proto-Indo-European (PIE) and earlier than the rise of the distinct Germanic dialects. As regards the case system, it is quite certain that numerous processes must have taken place during this lengthy period. The aim is, therefore, to determine the number of grammatical cases in the final stage of the development of Proto-Germanic, i.e., the latest reconstructable stage from which all the attested Germanic languages may be derived. This implies that if a particular value of the category of case is not found in any of the attested dialects and no indications exist that it may have been part of the case system in the proto–language, it is assumed that it was not.

The Germanic case system: evidence from outside Old English

The attested Germanic dialects immediately point to the existence of at least six cases in PG: nominative ([N]), vocative ([V]), accusative ([AC]), genitive ([G]), dative ([D]), and instrumental ([I]) (Krahe 1942: 7, Bammesberger 1990: 12).

Type
Chapter
Information
Young Linguists in Dialogue
The First Conference
, pp. 43 - 50
Publisher: Jagiellonian University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×