Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 Transition from Emigration to Immigration: Is it the Destiny of Modern European Countries?
- 2 Early Starters and Latecomers: Comparing Countries of Immigration and Immigration Regimes in Europe
- 3 ‘Old’ Immigration Countries in Europe: The Concept and Empirical Examples
- 4 Migration Transitions in an Era of Liquid Migration: Reflections on Fassmann and Reeger
- 5 Immigrants, Markets and Policies in Southern Europe: The Making of an Immigration Model?
- 6 The Southern European ‘Model of Immigration’: A Sceptical View
- 7 Framing the Iberian Model of Labour Migration: Employment Exploitation, De Facto Deregulation and Formal Compensation
- 8 Patterns of Immigration in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland: A Comparative Perspective
- 9 An Uncertain Future of Immigration in Europe: Insights from Expert-Based Stochastic Forecasts for Selected Countries
- 10 Comments on ‘An Uncertain Future of Immigration in Europe’ by Wiśniowski et al.
- 11 Migration Policy Matters: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Recommendations
- 12 The Evolving Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: Taking Stock and Thinking Ahead
- Europe, a Continent of Immigrants: A conclusion
- Contributors
- Other IMISCOE Titles
4 - Migration Transitions in an Era of Liquid Migration: Reflections on Fassmann and Reeger
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 February 2021
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 Transition from Emigration to Immigration: Is it the Destiny of Modern European Countries?
- 2 Early Starters and Latecomers: Comparing Countries of Immigration and Immigration Regimes in Europe
- 3 ‘Old’ Immigration Countries in Europe: The Concept and Empirical Examples
- 4 Migration Transitions in an Era of Liquid Migration: Reflections on Fassmann and Reeger
- 5 Immigrants, Markets and Policies in Southern Europe: The Making of an Immigration Model?
- 6 The Southern European ‘Model of Immigration’: A Sceptical View
- 7 Framing the Iberian Model of Labour Migration: Employment Exploitation, De Facto Deregulation and Formal Compensation
- 8 Patterns of Immigration in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland: A Comparative Perspective
- 9 An Uncertain Future of Immigration in Europe: Insights from Expert-Based Stochastic Forecasts for Selected Countries
- 10 Comments on ‘An Uncertain Future of Immigration in Europe’ by Wiśniowski et al.
- 11 Migration Policy Matters: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Recommendations
- 12 The Evolving Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: Taking Stock and Thinking Ahead
- Europe, a Continent of Immigrants: A conclusion
- Contributors
- Other IMISCOE Titles
Summary
Introduction
It is a pleasure to have the opportunity to respond to the compelling contribution of Heinz Fassmann and Ursula Reeger. Their work demonstrates their ability to reduce the complexity of international systems in a very elegant way. Their conceptual model of a migration cycle offers an important heuristic device for analysing migration history. To further illustrate its applicability, I will apply it to my country, the Netherlands. However, this sort of application and a closer look at current migration flows to ‘old’ immigration countries will necessarily provoke one major question. This question is related to the emphasis given in their chapter to historical context and its effects on emigration and immigration. This includes, for example, a colonial past or certain labour recruitment policies in the 1950s and 1960s. The question is whether such a historical, ‘path-dependent’ approach offers an adequate explanation for contemporary, rather unexpected labour migration flows from Central European Countries (CEE) to Western Europe. The European Union enlargements of 2004 and 2007 have generated substantial labour migration from CEE through the successive lifting of restrictions to the majority of labour markets from the old EU member states. Hundreds of thousands of migrants from Poland, Romania and Bulgaria went to Western European countries as a consequence (Black, Engbersen, Okólski & Panţîru 2010). This issue, which is related to labour migration, does not do justice to the full complexity of the analysis by Fassman and Reeger. However, I think it is relevant to analyse whether the nature of contemporary labour migration differs from labour migration flows in the past.
Path dependency versus new pathways of migration
For decades, the Netherlands was – like Germany and Austria – a ‘reluctant country of immigration’ (Cornelius, Tsuda, Martin & Hollifield 2004; Muus 2004). Although the Netherlands has had a positive immigration surplus since the early 1960s, successive governments have continued to officially deny that the Netherlands was a country of immigration. It was not until 1998 that the Dutch government officially acknowledged the fact that the Netherlands had become an immigration country. The different stages in a ‘migration cycle’, as proposed by Fassmann and Reeger, can be applied to the Netherlands (Engbersen, Van der Leun & De Boom 2007).
Preliminary phase
After World War II, the Netherlands was a country of emigration. Many Dutch citizens emigrated to immigration countries such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand and, to a lesser extent, Brazil and South Africa. Between 1946 and 1969, nearly 500,000 Dutch citizens left the Netherlands.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- European ImmigrationsTrends, Structures and Policy Implications, pp. 91 - 106Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2012
- 5
- Cited by