Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 408
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
June 2012
Print publication year:
2009
Online ISBN:
9780511818271

Book description

Relations between the public and holders of political authority are in a period of transformative flux. On the one side, new expectations and meanings of citizenship are being entertained and occasionally acted upon. On the other, an inexorable impoverishment of mainstream political communication is taking place. This book argues that the Internet has the potential to improve public communications and enrich democracy, a project that requires imaginative policy-making. This argument is developed through three stages: first exploring the theoretical foundations for renewing democratic citizenship, then examining practical case studies of e-democracy, and finally, reviewing the limitations of recent policies designed to promote e-democracy and setting out a radical, but practical proposal for an online civic commons: a trusted public space where the dispersed energies, self-articulations and aspirations of citizens can be rehearsed, in public, within a process of ongoing feedback to the various levels and centers of governance: local, national and transnational.

Reviews

'The potential for the Internet to support democracy is substantial, but as yet unrealized. The authors - two world-leading scholars of political communication - provide a penetrating synthesis of theory and research to explain the limitation of contemporary approaches to using the Internet and related media to enhance the communicative power of citizens. Their analysis leads to a bold prescription for creating a new civic commons 2.0 that will enable ‘more deliberative democracy’. This is an excellent scholarly book that will stimulate and inform public debate in a vital area of communication research. It is must reading not only for students of the iternet, but also for anyone interested in the vitality of democratic institutions and processes.'

William H. Dutton - Director, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford

'A refreshingly new and exciting conceptualization of Democratic Citizenship and the potential of the Internet as a public sphere. Coleman and Blumler have written an inspiring, not-to-be-missed book that provides clear and sensible guidelines for creating a Civic Commons in cyberspace.'

Doris A. Graber - University of Illinois at Chicago

'In this authoritative review of current practice and debates in e-democracy Stephen Coleman and Jay Blumer combine a powerful theoretical frame work with a hard-headed analysis of what works and what doesn’t. Carefully avoiding technological determinism, they argue convincingly that the ‘vulnerable potential’ of the internet as a democratic tool will only be fulfilled through the establishment of an independent agency to develop, promote and oversee online deliberation.'

Matthew Taylor - Chief Executive, Royal Society for the Encouragement of the Arts

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography
Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J. (2004) Deliberation Day, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Agar, J. (2004) The Government Machine: A Revolutionary History of the Computer, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Akkerman, T., Hajer, M. and Grin, J. (2005) ‘The Interactive State: Democratisation from Above?’, Political Studies, 52(1): 82–95.
Albrecht, S. (2006) ‘Whose Voice Is Heard in Online Deliberation? A Study of Participation and Representation in Political Debates on the Internet’, Information, Communication & Society, 9(1): 62–82.
Allen, J. (2003) Lost Geographies of Power, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Almond, A. and Verba, S. (1963) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Amna, E., Munck, I. and Zetterberg, P. (2004) ‘Meaningful Participation? Political Efficacy of Adolescents in 24 Countries’, paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Uppsala, Sweden.
Angell, I. (2000) The New Barbarian Manifesto: How to Survive the Information Age, London: Kogan Page.
Arendt, H. (1970) On Violence, New York: Harcourt Brace.
Arendt, H. (1998) The Human Condition, 2nd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arrow, K. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: Wiley.
Arrow, K. (1978) ‘Extended Sympathy and the Possibility of Social Choice’, Philosophia, 7(2): 223–37.
Ashley, J. (2006) ‘Labour's Young MPs Want to Do Politics Differently’, Guardian, 4 September.
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T. and McBurney, P. (2006) ‘Computational Representation of Practical Argument’, Synthese, 152(2): 157–206.
Bach, J. and Stark, D. (2004) ‘Link, Search, Interact: The Co-evolution of NGOs and Interactive Technology’, Theory, Culture & Society, 21(3): 101–17.
Bachrach, P. (1967) The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique, Boston: Little Brown.
Baldwin, J. and McConville, M. (1979) Jury Trials, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Balibar, E. (2002) Politics and the Other Scene, London: Verso.
Barabas, J. (2004) ‘Virtual Deliberation: Knowledge from Online Interaction versus Ordinary Discussion’ in Shane, P. (ed.) Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet, New York: Routledge, 239–52.
Barbalet, J. (1988) Citizenship: Rights, Struggle and Class Inequality, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Barry, A. (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society, London: Athlone Press.
Barry, A., Osborne, T. and Rose, N. (eds.) (1996) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism, and Rationalities of Government, London: Taylor & Francis.
Bauman, Z. (1999) In Search of Politics, Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity, Cambridge: Polity.
Baym, N. (2000) Tune in, Log on: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
,BBC (2004) Building Public Value: Renewing the BBC for a Digital World, London: BBC.
Beck, P. (1991) ‘Voters’ Intermediation Environments in the 1988 Presidential Contest', Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(3): 371–94.
Becker, T. and Slaton, C. (2000) The Future of Teledemocracy, Westport, CT:Praeger.
Beniger, J. (1986) The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
Benkler, Y. (2000) ‘From Consumers to Users: Shifting the Deeper Structures of Regulation toward Sustainable Commons and User Access’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 53(3): 561–80.
Bennett, W. L. (2003a) ‘New Media Power: The Internet and Global Activism’ in Couldry, N. and Curran, J. (eds.) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 17–37.
Bennett, W. L. (2003b) ‘Communicating Global Activism’, Information, Communication & Society, 6(2): 143–68.
Bennett, W. L. (2007) ‘Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age’ in Bennett, W. L. (ed.) Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–24.
Bennett, W. L. and Entman, R. (2001) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bennett, W. L. and Manheim, J. B. (2001) ‘The Big Spin: Strategic Communication and the Transformation of Pluralist Democracy’ in Bennett and Entman (2001), 279–98.
Bhabba, H. (2004) The Location of Culture, London: Routledge.
Billig, M. (1995) Banal Nationalism, London: Sage.
Bimber, B. (2003) Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bird, E. and Wagner, G. (1997) ‘Sport as a Common Property Resource: A Solution to the Dilemmas of Doping’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(6): 749–66.
Blainey, G. (1968) The Tyranny of Distance: How Distance Shaped Australia's History, Melbourne: St Martin's Press.
Blaug, R. (1999) ‘The Tyranny of the Visible: Problems in the Evaluation of Anti-Institutional Radicalism’, Organization, 6(1): 33–56.
Blaug, R. (2002) ‘Engineering Democracy’, Political Studies, 50(1): 102–16.
Blumler, J. G. (1990) ‘Elections, the Media and the Modern Publicity Process’ in Ferguson, M. (ed.) Public Communication: The New Imperatives – Future Directions for Media Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 101–13.
Blumler, J. G. (1998) ‘Wrestling with the Public Interest in Organized Communications’ in Brants, K., Hermes, J. and Zoonen, L. (eds.) The Media in Question: Popular Cultures and Public Interests, London: Sage, 51–63.
Blumler, J. G. (1999) ‘The Third Age of Political Communication’, Journal of Public Affairs, 1(3): 201–9.
Blumler, J. G. and Coleman, S. (2001) Realising Democracy Online: A Civic Commons in Cyberspace, London: Institute of Public Policy Research.
Blumler, J. G. and Gurevitch, M. (1995) The Crisis of Public Communication, London: Routledge.
Blumler, J. G. and Gurevitch, M. (2002a) ‘The New Media and Our Political Communication Discontents: Democratizing Cyberspace’, Information, Communication & Society, 4(1): 1–13.
Blumler, J. G. and Gurevitch, M. (2002b) ‘Public Service in Transition? Campaign Journalism at the BBC’ in Bartle, J., Atkinson, S. and Mortimore, R. (eds.) Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 2001, London: Frank Cass, 215–35.
Blumler, J. and Kavanagh, D. (1999) ‘The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features’, Political Communication, 16(3): 209–30
Boal, I. (1998) ‘The Campus and the Commons’, Common Property Resource Digest, 46: 1–4.
Bohman, J. (1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bohman, J. (2004) ‘Expanding Dialogue: The Internet, the Public Sphere and Prospects for Transnational Democracy’, Sociological Review, 52(1): 131–55.
Bora, A., Furchner, I., Hausendorf, H. and Munte, P. (2001) ‘State of the Art Report: Currents of Thought on the Main Issues of the PARADYS Project’, IWT, Bielefeld University.
Born, G. (2004) Uncertain Vision: Birt, Dyke and the Reinvention of the BBC, London: Secker and Warburg.
Born, G. (2005) ‘Digitising Democracy’, Political Quarterly, 76(1): 102–23.
Bourriaud, N. (2002) Relational Aesthetics, Dijon: Les Presses du Réel.
Bowker, N. and Tuffin, K. (2002) ‘Disability Discourses for Online Identities’, Disability & Society, 17(3): 327–44.
Bowlby, J. (1969) Attachment and Loss, New York: Basic Books.
Bowler, S., Donovan, T. and Karp, J. (2003) ‘Popular Attitudes towards Direct Democracy’, paper presented at the American Political Science Association meeting, Philadelphia.
Brants, K. (1998) ‘Who's Afraid of Infotainment?’, European Journal of Communication, 13(3): 315–35.
Brubaker, R. (1992) Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brunner, E. (1998) ‘Free Riders or Easy Riders? An Examination of the Voluntary Provision of Public Radio’, Public Choice, 97(4): 587–604.
Bruns, A. (2006) Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production, New York: Lang.
Bruns, A. (2007a) ‘Produsage, Generation C, and Their Effects on the Democratic Process’ in Proceedings Media in Transition 5, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bruns, A. (2007b) ‘Methodologies for Mapping the Political Blogosphere: An Exploration Using the IssueCrawler Research Tool’, First Monday, 12(5).
Buckingham-Shum, S. (2003) The Roots of Computer Supported Argument Visualization, Berlin: Springer.
Burchell, G., Foucault, M. and Gordon, C. (1991) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burke, E. (1871) The Works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke, 4th edition, Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
Butler, D. and Kavanagh, D. (1997) The British General Election of 1997, New York: St. Martin's Press.
Butler, D. and Kavanagh, D. (2002) The British General Election of 2001, New York: St. Martin's Press.
,Cabinet Office (UK) (2002) In the Service of Democracy, London: HMSO.
Cammaerts, B. (2007) ‘Jamming the Political: Beyond Counter-hegemonic Practices’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 21(1): 67–86.
Campbell, A. (2005) How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Citizen Activism and the American Welfare State, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cappella, J., Price, V. and Nir, L. (2002) ‘Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality: Electronic Dialogue during Campaign 2000’, Political Communication, 19(1): 73–94.
Cartwright, D. and Atkinson, K. (2008) ‘Political Engagement through Tools for Argumentation’ in Hunter, A. (ed.) Computational Models of Argument, Proceedings of COMMA '08, Toulouse, France, 28–30 May.
Castells, M. (1996) The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture: The Rise of the Network Society (Vol. I), Oxford: Blackwell.
Chadwick, A. (2007) ‘Digital Network Repertoires and Organizational Hybridity’, Political Communication, 24(3): 283–301.
Chase, M. and Mulvenon, J. (2002) You've Got Dissent! Chinese Dissident Use of the Internet Beijing's Counter-Strategies, Washington: Rand Corporation.
Citrine, W. (1952) ABC of Chairmanship, London: NCLC Publications Society.
Cleaver, H. (1998) ‘The Zapatista Effect: The Internet and the Rise of an Alternative Political Fabric’, Journal of International Affairs, 26(2): 621–40.
Coleman, S. (2004) ‘From Service to Commons: Re-inventing a Space for Public Communication’ in Tambini, D. and Cowling, J. (eds.) Public Service Communications, London: IPPR.
Coleman, S. (2005a) ‘The Lonely Citizen: Indirect Representation in an Age of Networks’, Political Communication, 22(2): 197–214.
Coleman, S. (2005b) E-democracy from the Ground Up: An Evaluation of Projects in the National Project for Local E-Democracy, London: National Project for Local eDemocracy.
Coleman, S. (2006) ‘Whose Conversation: Engaging the Public in Authentic Polylogue’, Political Quarterly, 75(2): 112–20.
Coleman, S. (2007a) ‘Doing IT for Themselves: Management versus Autonomy in Youth E-Citizenship’ in Bennett, W. L. (ed.) Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 189–206.
Coleman, S. (2007b) ‘How The Other Half Votes: Big Brother Viewers and the 2005 British General Election Campaign’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(4): 457–80.
Coleman, S. (2007c) ‘E-Democracy: The History and Future of an Idea’ in Quah, D., Silverstone, R., Mansell, R. and Avgerou, C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 362–82.
Coleman, S. (2007d) ‘From Big Brother to Big Brother: Two Faces of Interactive Engagement’ in Dahlgren, P. (ed.) Young Citizens and New Media: Learning for Democratic Participation, New York: Routledge, 165–82.
Coleman, S., Morrison, D. and Svennevig, M. (2008) ‘New Media and Political Efficacy’, International Journal of Communication, in press.
Coleman, S. and Moss, G. (2008) ‘Governing at a Distance: Politicians in the Blogosphere’, Information Polity, 13(1/2): 7–20.
Coleman, S. and Ross, K. (2009) Them and Us: How the Media Frame the Public, Oxford: Blackwell.
Coleman, S. and Spiller, J. (2005) ‘Exploring New Media Effects on Representative Democracy’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 9(3): 1–16.
,Congress Online (2001a) ‘E-mail Overload in Congress: Managing a Communication Crisis’, downloaded from http://www.cmfweb.org/storage/cmfweb/documents/CMF_Pubs/e-mailoverload.pdf.
,Congress Online (2001b) ‘Constituents and Your Web Site: What Citizens Want to See on Congressional Web Sites’, downloaded from http://www.cmfweb.org/storage/cmfweb/documents/CMF_Pubs/constituentsandwebsites.pdf.
Connolly, W. (1974) The Terms of Political Discourse, Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Cook, R. (2002) Speech to yougov conference, Reviving Democracy, Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, London, 10 April.
Coote, A. and Lenaghan, J. (1997) Citizens' Juries: Theory into Practice, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
Couldry, N. and Curran, J. (2003) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Crosby, N. (1999) ‘Using the Citizens Jury Process for Environmental Decision-Making’ in Sexton, K., Marcis, A., Easter, K. and Burkhardt, T. (eds.) Better Environmental Decisions: Strategies for Governments, Businesses and Communities, Washington, DC: Island Press, 401–18.
Cruikshank, B. (1999) The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Dalton, R. (1996) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, New York: Chatham House.
Davis, R. (1999) The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System, New York: Oxford University Press.
Deacon, D., Golding, P. and Billig, M. (2001) ‘Press and Broadcasting’ in Norris, P. (ed.) Britain Votes 2001, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 666–78.
Dean, M. (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, London: Sage.
Cindio, F. and Schuler, D. (2007) ‘Deliberation and Community Networks: A Strong Link Waiting to Be Forged’ in Proceedings of CIRN Conference: Communities and Action, Prato, Italy, 5–7 November.
Deibert, R. (2000) ‘International Plug ‘n Play? Citizen Activism, the Internet, and Global Public Policy’, International Studies Perspectives, 1(3): 255–72.
Delakorda, S. (2007) ‘Internet Technology and Deliberative Democratic Constitutionalisation of the EU: Case Study of the Citizens’ Forum', paper presented at the conference The Future of the European Union: Democratic Constitutionalisation of the EU and the Role of States, Solevenia Political Science and CEPSA annual conference, Portorož, Slovenia.
Dellarocas, C. (2003) ‘The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms’, Management Science, 49(10): 1407–24.
,Department of Justice (2007) Digital Dialogues 2, London: Department of Justice.
Derakhshan, H. (2003) Blog: Editor Myself, downloaded from http://hoder.com/weblog/archives/2003_03_01_index.html.
Dewey, J. (1927) The Public and Its Problems, New York: George Allen & Unwin.
Diani, M. (2000) ‘Social Movement Networks Virtual and Real’, Information, Communication & Society, 3(3): 386–401.
Dimock, M., A. and Popkin, S. L. (1999) ‘Political Knowledge and Citizen Competence’ in Elkin, S. and Soltan, K. (eds.) Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 117–46.
Dionne, E. (1991) Why Americans Hate Politics, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Donath, J. (2002) ‘A Semantic Approach to Visualizing Online Conversations’, Communications of the ACM, 45(4): 45–50.
Downing, J. (2003) ‘The Independent Media Center Movement and the Anarchist Socialist Tradition’ in Couldry, N. and Curran, J. (eds.) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 243–55.
Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.
Dryzek, J. and List, C. (2003) ‘Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation’, British Journal of Political Science, 33: 1–28.
Dutton, W. (1996) ‘Network Rules of Order: Regulating Speech in Public Electronic Fora’, New Media & Society, 18(2): 269–90.
Dutton, W. (2007) ‘Through the Network (of Networks) – the Fifth Estate’, inaugural lecture, University of Oxford, 15 October, downloaded from http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/dutton/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/5th-estate-lecture-text.pdf.
Dutton, W., Elberse, A. and Hale, M. (1999) ‘A Case Study of a Netizen's Guide to Elections’, Communications of the ACM, 42(12): 48–54.
Ebo, B. (1998) Cyberghetto or Cybertopia: Race, Class and Gender on the Internet, Westport, CT: Praeger.
Edwards, A. (2004) ‘The Moderator in Government-Initiated Internet Discussions: Facilitator or Source of Bias?’ in Malkia, M., Anttiroiko, A. and Savolainen, R. (eds.) eTransformation in Governance: New Directions in Government and Politics, Hershey, PA: Idea Group, 150–63.
Eisinger, P. (1973) ‘The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities’, American Political Science Review, 67(1): 11–28.
,Electoral Commission (2001) Public Opinion and the 2001 General Election, London: Electoral Commission.
,Electoral Commission (2007a) Audit of Political Engagement, London: Electoral Commission.
,Electoral Commission (2007b) Electronic Voting, London: Electoral Commission.
Eliasoph, N. (1998) Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, J. (1997) ‘The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory’ in Elster, J. and Rehg, W. (eds.) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 103–32.
Erbring, L., Goldenberg, E. and Miller, A. (1980) ‘Front-page news and real-world cues: a new look at agenda-setting by the media’, American Journal of Political Science, 24: 16–49.
Esser, F., Reinemann, C. and Fan, D. (2000) ‘Spin Doctoring in British and German Election Campaigns’, European Journal of Communication, 15(2): 209–39.
Etzioni, A. (1992) Teledemocracy. The Atlantic (October), 34–39.
Fairclough, N. (1998) ‘Democracy and the Public Sphere in Critical Research on Discourse’, unpublished paper given at conference Discourse, Politics and Identity in Europe, Vienna, April.
Fischer, F. (2003) Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fishkin, J. (1997) The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fishkin, J. and Luskin, R. (2005) ‘Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion’, Acta Politica, 40(3): 284–98.
Fourniau, J. (2001) ‘Information, Access to Decision-Making and Public Debate in France: The Growing Demand for Deliberative Democracy’, Science and Public Policy, 28(6): 441–52.
Fraser, N. (2007) ‘Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Postwestphalian World’, Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4).
French, S. (2005) ‘Web-Enabled Strategic GDSS, e-Democracy and Arrow's Theorem: A Bayesian Perspective’, Decision Support Systems, 43(4): 1476–84.
Gamson, W. (1992) Talking Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garbe, D. (1986) ‘Planning Cell and Citizen Report: A Report on German Experiences with New Participation Instruments’, European Journal of Political Research, 14(1/2): 221–36.
Gardam, T. (2005) ‘What's Good on Television?’, Political Quarterly, 76(1): 46–57.
Gavin, N. and Sanders, D. (1997) ‘The Economy and Voting’, Parliamentary Affairs, 50: 631–40.
Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.
Gibson, R., Ward, S. and Nixon, P. (eds.) (2003) Net Gain? Political Parties and the Impact of the New Information Communication Technologies, London: Routledge.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1999) Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives, London: Profile.
Goddard, P., Scammell, M. and Semetko, H. (1998) ‘Too Much of a Good Thing: Television in the 1997 Election Campaign’ in Crewe, I., Gosschalk, B. and Bartle, J. (eds.) Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1997, London: Frank Cass, 49–68.
Goffman, E. (1963) Behavior in Public Places, New York: Free Press.
Goggin, G. and Newell, C. (2003) Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Gold, H. (2002) ‘Third-Party Voting in Gubernatorial Elections: A Study of Angus King of Maine and Jesse Ventura of Minnesota’, Polity, 35(2): 265–82.
Goodin, R. (2003) Reflective Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gore, A. (1994) Speech to the International Telecommunications Union, downloaded from http://vlib.iue.it/history/internet/algorespeech.html.
Goss, S. (1999) Managing Working with the Public, London: Kogan Page.
Gould, P. (2002) ‘Power to the People’, The Spectator, 18 May.
Graber, D. (1998) ‘Whither Televised Election News? Lessons from the 1996 Campaign’, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 3: 112–20.
Graham, M. and Khosravi, S. (2002) ‘Reordering Public and Private in Iranian Cyberspace: Identity, Politics, and Mobilization’, Identities: Global Studies in Power and Culture, 9(2): 219–46.
Graham, T. and Witschge, T. (2003) ‘In Search of Online Deliberation: Towards a New Method for Discussing the Quality of Online Discussions’, Communications: the European Journal of Communication Research, 28(2): 173–204.
Gregory, R., Fischoff, B. and McDaniels, T. (2005) ‘Acceptable Input: Using Decision Analysis to Guide Public Policy Deliberations’, Decision Analysis, 2(1): 4–16.
Griswold, E. (1963) Dean's Report, Harvard Law School.
Gustafsson, P. (2002) ‘The Order of E-Democracy: Internet and Democracy in Swedish Local Governments’, e-Service Journal, 2(1): 114–32.
Haas, T. (2005) ‘From “Public Journalism” to the “Public's Journalism”? Rhetoric and Reality in the Discourse on Weblogs’, Journalism Studies, 6(3): 387–96.
Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hain, P. (2003) Transcript of speech to Parliamentary Press Gallery, 16 September.
Hajer, M. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hajer, M. (2003) ‘Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void’, Policy Sciences, 36(2): 175–95.
Hallin, D. (1992) ‘Sound Bite News: Television Coverage of Elections, 1968–1988’, Journal of Communication, 42(2): 5–24.
,Hansard Society (2001) None of the Above: Non-Voters and the 2001 Election, London: Hansard Society.
Harrison, M. (2001) ‘Politics on the Air’ in Butler, D. and Kavanagh, D. (eds.) The British General Election of 2001, London: Palgrave, 652–58.
Hay, C. (2007) Why We Hate Politics, Cambridge: Polity.
Healy, R. (1994) ‘The “Common Pool” Problem in Tourism Landscapes’, Annals of Tourism Research, 21(3): 596–610.
Heater, D. (2004) Citizenship: The Civic Ideal in World History, Politics, and Education, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Heclo, H. (1979) A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Heller, F. (2003) ‘Participation and Power: A Critical Assessment’, Applied Psychology, 52(1): 144–63.
Heng, M. and Moor, A. (2003) ‘From Habermas's Communicative Theory to Practice on the Internet’, Information Systems Journal, 13(4): 331–52.
Herbst, S. (1995) Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Herring, S. (2003) ‘Gender and Power in Online Communication’ in Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (eds.) The Handbook of Language and Gender, Oxford: Blackwell, 202–28.
Hertsgaard, M. (1988) On Bended Knee: The Press and the Reagan Presidency, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Hess, C. (1999) ‘A Comprehensive Bibliography of Common Pool Resources’, CD-ROM, Bloomington: Indiana University, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis.
Hill, K. and Hughes, J. (1998) Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Hill, M. (1993) The Policy Process: A Reader, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Ho, Ho Yeon (2004). Speech to World Association of Newspapers Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 31 May.
Honig, B. (2001) Democracy and the Foreigner, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Horrigan, J., Garrett, G. and Resnick, P. (2001) ‘The Internet and Democratic Debate: Pew Research Center’, downloaded from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Political_Info_Report.pdf.
,House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee (2001a) Sixth Report, in Public Participation: Issues and Innovations, London: HMSO.
,House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee (2001b) Minutes of Evidence and Appendices to the Sixth Report of the House of Commons Public Administration Committee, in Public Participation: Issues and Innovations, London: HMSO.
Huckfeldt, R. and Sprague, J. (1995) Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Isin, E. (2002) Being Political: Genealogies of Citizenship, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ito, M. (2003) ‘Weblogs and Emergent Democracy’, downloaded from http://joi.ito.com/static/emergentdemocracy.html.
Jamieson, K. (1992) Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jankowski, N. and Os, R. (2002) ‘Internet-Based Political Discourse: A Case Study of Electronic Democracy in the City of Hoogeveen’, paper presented at the conference Prospects for Electronic Democracy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 20–22 September, downloaded from http://insitesinfo.org/Paper/jankowski.pdf.
Jankowski, N. and Selm, M. (2000) ‘The Promise and Practice of Public Debate in Cyberspace’ in Hacker, K. and Dijk, J. (eds.) Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice, London: Sage.
Janssen, J. and Kies, R. (2005) ‘Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy’, Acta Politica, 40(3): 317–35.
Jessop, B. (2000) ‘Governance Failure’ in Stoker, G. (ed.) The New Politics of British Local Governance, London: St. Martin's Press, 11–32.
Johnson, T. and Kaye, B. (1998) ‘A Vehicle for Engagement or a Haven for the Disaffected: Internet Use, Political Alienation and Voter Participation’ in Johnson, T., Hays, C. and Hays, S. (eds.) Engaging the Public: How Government and the Media Can Reinvigorate American Democracy, New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 123–35.
Jones, N. (2002) The Control Freaks: How New Labour Gets Its Own Way, London: Politico's Publishing.
Jordan, G. (1990) ‘Policy Community Realism versus ‘New’ Institutionalist Ambiguity’, Political Studies, 38(3): 470–84.
Jordan, T. (2007) ‘Online Direct Action: Hacktivism and Radical Democracy’ in Dahlberg, L. and Siapera, E. (eds.) Radical Democracy and the Internet: Interrogating Theory and Practice, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 73–88.
Juris, J. (2005) ‘The New Digital Media and Activist Networking within Anti-Corporate Globalization Movements’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597(1): 189–208.
Kahn, R. and Kellner, D. (2004) ‘New Media and Internet Activism: From the “Battle of Seattle” to Blogging’, New Media & Society, 6: 87–95.
Kalathil, S. and Boas, T. (2006) Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Kalven, H. (1964) The Dignity of the Civil Jury, Cambridge, MA: Roscoe Pound.
Kalven, H. and Zeisel, H. (1971) The American Jury, Boston: Little Brown.
Katz, E. (1996) ‘Viewers Work’ in Hay, J., Grossberg, L. and Wartella, E. (eds.) The Audience and Its Landscape, Boulder: Westview Press, 9–21.
Kavada, N. (2005) ‘Exploring the Role of the Internet in the Movement for Alternative Globalization: The Case of the Paris 2003 European Social Forum’, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, downloaded from http://www.wmin.ac.uk/mad/pdf/Kavada.pdf.
Kavanagh, D. (1995) Election Campaigning: The New Marketing of Politics, Oxford: Blackwell.
Kaye, B. and Johnson, T. (2004) ‘Online and in the Know: Uses and Gratifications of the Web for Political Information’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 46(1): 54–71.
Keane, J. (1991) The Media and Democracy, London: Polity.
Kelly, J., Fisher, D. and Smith, M. (2005) ‘Debate, Division and Diversity: Political Discourse Networks in USENET Groups’, paper presented to the Online Deliberation conference, Stanford University, downloaded from http://www.coi.columbia.edu/pdf/kelly_fisher_smith_ddd.pdf.
Kendall, K. (1993) Communication in the Presidential Primaries: Candidates and the Media, 1912–2000, Westport, CT: Praeger.
Kenny, W., Swee, D., Lim, C. and Benjamin, H. (2007) ‘The Impact of Language Variety and Expertise on Perceptions of Online Political Discussions’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1): 76–99.
Kernell, S. (1997) Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership, Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Kingdon, J. (2002) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, New York: Longman.
Klijn, E. and Koppenjan, J. (2000) ‘Politicians and Interactive Decision Making: Institutional Spoilsports or Playmakers’, Public Administration, 78(2): 365–87.
Kooiman, J. (2003) Governing as Governance, London: Sage.
Koopmans, R. (1999) ‘Political Opportunity Structure: Some Splitting to Balance the Lumping’, Sociological Forum, 14(1): 61–74.
Krueger, B. (2002) ‘Assessing the Potential of Internet Participation in the United States: A Resource Approach’, American Politics Research, 30(5): 476–98.
Kubey, R. (1996) ‘On Not Finding Media Effects: Conceptual Problems in the Notion of an “Active” Audience (with a reply to Elihu Katz)’ in Hay, J., Grossberg, L. and Wartella, E. (eds.) The Audience and Its Landscape, Boulder: Westview Press, 187–205.
Kymlicka, W. and Norman, W. (1994) ‘Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory’, Ethics, 104: 352–81.
Lampe, C. (2006) ‘Ratings Use in an Online Discussion System: The Slashdot Case’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Michigan, downloaded from http://sambuca.umdl.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/39369.
Lane, R. (1959) Political Life: Why People Get Involved in Politics, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Lasn, K. (1999) Culture Jam – The Uncooling of America, New York: Eagle Brook.
Lasswell, H. (1935) Politics: Who Gets What, When, How, New York: Whittlesey House.
Lawrence, R. (2000) ‘Game-Framing the Issues: Tracking the Strategy Frame in Public Policy News’, Political Communication, 17(2): 93–114.
Lefebre, H. (1991) The Production of Space, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Lefort, C. (2000) Writing: The Political Test, Ames Curtis, David (trans. and ed.), Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Lessig, L. (2004) Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity, New York: Penguin Press.
Lichter, S. (2001) ‘A Plague on Both Parties: Substance and Fairness in TV Election News’, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(3): 8–30.
Liffman, L., Coleman, S. and Ward, S. (2007) ‘Only Joking? Online Humour in the 2005 UK General Election’, Information, Communication & Society, 10(4): 465–87.
Lin, W. and Dutton, W. (2003) ‘The “Net” Effect in Politics: The “Stop the Overlay” Campaign in Los Angeles’, Party Politics, 9(1): 124–36.
Lippmann, W. (1922) Public Opinion, New York: Macmillan.
Livingstone, S. (2005) ‘On the Relation between Audiences and Publics’ in Livingstone, S. (ed.) Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere, Bristol: Intellect Books, 17–42.
Lloyd, J. (2005) What the Media Are Doing to Our Politics, London: Constable.
Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View, London: Macmillan.
Lupia, A. and McCubbins, M. (1998) The Democratic Dilemma Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mancini, C. and Buckingham-Shum, S. (2006) ‘Modelling Discourse in Contested Domains: A Semiotic and Cognitive Framework’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(11): 1154–71.
Manin, B. (1996) The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Margolis, M. and Resnick, D. (2000) Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace ‘Revolution’, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Marquand, D. (2004) Decline of the Public: The Hollowing Out of Citizenship, Cambridge: Polity.
Marsh, D. (1998) ‘The Development of the Policy Network Approach’ in Marsh, D. (ed.) Comparing Policy Networks, Buckingham: Open University Press, 3–17.
Marshall, T. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, I., Edelenbos, J. and Monikhof, R. (2005) ‘Interactive Policy Development: Undermining or Sustaining Democracy?’, Public Administration, 83(1): 179–99.
Mayfield, R. (2005) ‘Social Network Dynamics and Participatory Politics’ in Lebkowsky, K. and Ratcliffe, M. (ed.) Extreme Democracy, lulu.com, 154–75.
Mazzoleni, G. and Schulz, W. (1999) ‘Mediatization of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?’, Political Communication, 16(3): 247–62.
McCabe, S. and Purves, R. (1972) By-passing the Jury: A Study of Changes of Plea and Directed Acquittals in Higher Courts, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
McCann, A. (2001) ‘All That Is Not Given Is Lost: Irish Traditional Music, Copyright and Common Property’, Ethnomusicology, 45(1): 89–106.
McCluskey, M., Deshpande, S., Shah, D. and McLeod, J. (2004) ‘The Efficacy Gap and Political Participation: When Political Influence Fails to Meet Expectations’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(4): 437–55.
McCombs, M. and Reynolds, A. (1999) The Poll with a Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication, Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
McKenna, K. and Bargh, J. (2000) ‘Plan 9 from Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4: 57–75.
McNair, B. (2000) Journalism and Democracy: An Evaluation of the Political Public Sphere, London: Routledge.
McQuail, D. (2003) Media Accountability and Freedom of Publication, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meikle, G. (2002) Future Active: Media Activism and the Internet, London: Routledge.
Merelman, R. (1998) ‘The Mundane Experience of Political Culture’, Political Communication, 15(4): 515–35.
Merriam, C. (1931) The Making of Citizens: A Comparative Study of Methods of Civic Training, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mettler, S. and Soss, J. (2004) ‘The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics’, Perspectives on Politics, 2(1): 55–74.
Michels, R. (1968) Political Parties, New York: Free Press.
Mill, J. S. (1859; 1975) On Liberty, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Miller, D. (1998) Technologies of Truth: Cultural Citizenship and the Popular Media, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Monnoyer-Smith, L. (2007) ‘The Public Debate Enacted: A French Learning Process’, Hermes 47: 21–8.
Moor, A. and Weigand, H. (2006) ‘Effective Communication in Virtual Adversarial Collaborative Communities’, Journal of Community Informatics, 2(2): 116–34.
Morris, D. (2001) ‘Direct Democracy and the Internet’, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 34(3): 1033–53.
Mortensen, T. and Walker, J. (2002) ‘Blogging Thoughts: Personal Publication as an Online Research Tool’, downloaded from http://www.intermedia.uio.no/konferanser/skikt-02/docs/Researching_ICTs_in_context-Ch11-Mortensen-Walker.pdf.
Moss, G. and O'Loughlin, B. (2005) ‘New Labour's Information Age Policy Programme: An Ideology Analysis’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 10(2): 165–83.
Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political, London: Routledge.
Muhlberger, P. (1995) ‘Defining and Measuring Deliberative Participation and Potential: A Theoretical Analysis and Operationalization’, paper presented at the International Society of Political Psychology Twenty-third Annual Scientific Meeting, Washington, DC, July.
Muhlberger, P. and Weber, L. (2005) ‘Lessons from the Virtual Agora Project: A Research Design for Studying Democratic Deliberation’, Journal of Public Deliberation, 1(1), http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol2/iss1/art6.
Musser, J. and O'Reilly, T. (2007) Web 2.0: Principles and Best Practices, Sebastapol CA: O'Reilly Media.
Nathanson, I. (1997) ‘Showdown at the Domain Name Corral: Property Rights and Personal Jurisdiction over Squatters, Poachers and Other Parasites’, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 58(4): 911–90.
Newman, S. (2004) ‘The Place of Power in Political Discourse’, International Political Science Review, 25(2): 139–57.
Nichols, B. (1991) Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Noam, E. (2002) ‘Why the Internet Is Bad for Democracy’, Communications of the ACM, 48(10): 57–8.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993) The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion – Our Social Skin, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Noonan, D. (1998) ‘Internet Decentralization, Feedback and Self-Organization’ in Baden, J. and Noonan, D. (eds.) Managing the Commons, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 188–94.
Norris, C. and Armstrong, G. (1999) The Maximum Surveillance Society: The Rise of CCTV, Oxford: Berg.
Norris, P. (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norris, P. (2000) A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2002) Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ober, J. (1989) Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Odugbemi, S. and Jacobson, T. (eds.) (2008) Governance Reform under Real World Conditions, Washington, DC: World Bank.
Offe, C. (1996) Modernity and the State: East, West, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Oppenheimer, B. (1937) ‘Trial by Jury’, University of Cincinnati Law Review, 11: 141–7.
O'Riordan, K. (2005) ‘From Usenet to Gaydar: A Comment on Queer Online Community’, ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, 25(2): 28–32.
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ostrom, E. (1996) ‘Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy and Development’, World Development, 24(6): 1073–87.
Ostrom, E. (1999) ‘Coping with Tragedies of the Commons’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 493–535.
Page, B. (1996) Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Papacharissi, Z. (2004) ‘The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere’, New Media & Society, 4(1): 9–28.
Parry-Giles, T. and Parry-Giles, S. (2001) ‘Reassessing the State of Political Communication in the United States’, Argumentation & Advocacy, 37(3): 158–72.
Pasquet, D. (1925) An Essay on the Origins of the House of Commons, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Patterson, T. (1980) The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President, New York: Praeger.
Patterson, T. (1993) Out of Order, New York: Alfred Knopf.
Patterson, T. (2002) The Vanishing Voter: Public Involvement in an Age of Uncertainty, New York: Alfred Knopf.
Pattie, C., Seyd, P. and Whiteley, P. (2003) ‘Civic Attitudes and Engagement in Modern Britain’, Parliamentary Affairs, 56(4): 616–33.
Pharr, S. and Putnam, D. (2000) Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pickard, V. (2006) ‘United Yet Autonomous: Indymedia and the Struggle to Sustain a Radical Democratic Network’, Media, Culture & Society, 28(3): 315–36.
Pierson, P. (1993) ‘When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Policy Change’, World Politics, 45: 595–628.
Pitkin, H. (1967) The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Plant, R. (2004) ‘Online Communities’, Technology in Society, 26: 51–65.
Plasser, F. and Plasser, G. (2002) Global Political Campaigning: A Worldwide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and Their Practices, Westport, CT: Praeger.
Platon, S. and Deuze, M. (2003) ‘Indymedia Journalism: A Radical Way of Making, Selecting and Sharing News?’, Journalism, 4(3): 336–55.
Polanyi, K. (1944) The Great Transformation, New York: Rinehart.
Pollard, A. and Court, J. (2005) How Civil Society Organisations Use Evidence to Influence Policy Processes, ODI Working Paper 249, London: ODI.
Poor, N. (2005) ‘Mechanisms of an Online Public Sphere: The Website Slashdot’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2).
Prettenthaler, F. and Steininger, K. (1999) ‘From Ownership to Service Use Lifestyle: The Potential of Car Sharing’, Ecological Economics, 28(3): 443–53.
Price, V. and Cappella, J. (2002) ‘Online Deliberation and Its Influence: The Electronic Dialogue Project in Campaign 2000’, IT & Society, 1(1): 303–29.
Price, V. and Neijens, N. (1997) ‘Opinion Quality in Public Opinion Research’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9(4): 336–60.
,Public Administration Committee (2007) Putting People First, London: House of Commons.
,Public Administration Committee (2008) Minutes of Evidence, meeting of 8 March 2007, London: House of Commons.
Putnam, D. (2000) Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rafaeli, S. (1988) ‘Interactivity: From New Media to Communication’ in Hawkins, R., Wiemann, J. and Pingree, S. (eds.) Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science, 16: 110–34.
Raymond, D. (2006) Make Poverty History New Media Review, London: FairSay.
Reilly, R. (1997) ‘Transforming the Paradigm for Creating Acceptable Use Policy: Managing the Electronic Commons’, unpublished PhD thesis, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Renn, O., Webler, T. and Widemann, P. (1995) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Renton, A. and Macintosh, A. (2007) ‘Computer Supported Argument Maps as a Policy Memory’, Information Society, 23(2): 125–33.
Reschenthaler, G. and Thompson, F. (1996) ‘The Information Revolution and the New Public Management’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1): 125–44.
Resnick, P. (2004) ‘Impersonal Sociotechnical Capital, ICTs and Collective Action among Strangers’ in Dutton, W., Kahin, B., O'Callaghan, R. and Wyckoff, A. (eds.) Transforming Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rheingold, H. (1999) Speech to BBC Communities Day, personal copy.
Rheingold, H. (2006) Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
Rhodes, R. (1998) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Rider, R. (1998) ‘Hangin’ Ten: The Common-Pool Resource Problem of Surfing', Public Choice, 97(1/2): 49–64.
Riker, W. (1986) The Art of Political Manipulation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Riker, W. and Sened, I. (1991) ‘A Political Theory of the Origin of Property Rights: Airport Slots’, American Journal of Political Science, 35(4): 951–69.
Roche, M. (1992) Rethinking Citizenship: Welfare, Ideology, and Change in Modern Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rogers, R. (2004) Information Politics on the Web, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. and Miller, P. (1992) ‘Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government’, British Journal of Sociology, 43(2): 173–205.
Rosen, J. (1993) ‘Politics, Vision and the Press: Toward a Public Agenda for Journalism’ in Rosen, J. and Taylor, P. (eds.) The News versus the Old News: Press and Politics in the 1990s, New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 3–37.
Rowe, G., Marsh, R., Reynolds, C. and Frewer, L. (2001) Public Participation Methods: Evolving and Operationalising an Evaluation Framework, Report to the Department of Health and Health and Safety Executive, Norwich: Institute of Food Research.
Routledge, P. (2003) ‘Convergence Space: Process Geographies of Grassroots Globalization Networks’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(3): 333–49.
Rushkoff, D. (2003) Open Source Democracy: How Online Communication Is Changing Offline Politics, London: Demos.
Sack, W. (2000) ‘Conversation Map: An Interface for Very-Large-Scale Conversations’, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3): 73–92.
Salmon, G. (2000) E-moderating: The Key to Online Teaching and Learning, London: Routledge.
Sanders, L. (1996) ‘Against Deliberation’. Political Theory, 25(3): 347–76.
Sassen, S. (2002) ‘The Repositioning of Citizenship: Emergent Subjects and Spaces for Politics’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 46: 4–26.
Sax, J. (1999) Playing Darts with a Rembrandt: Public and Private Rights in Cultural Treasures, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Scammell, M. (2000) ‘Spinning Political Communication’, Parliamentary Affairs, 53(2): 381–83.
Scharpf, F. (1997) Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder: Westview Press.
Scharpf, F. (2006) ‘The Joint-Decision Trap Revisired’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4): 845–64.
Schattschneider, E. (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Schlesinger, P. (2004) ‘Do Institutions Matter for Public Service Broadcasting?’, downloaded from http://www.ofcom.org.uk.
Schneider, S. (1996) ‘Creating a Democratic Public Sphere through Political Discussion: A Case Study of Abortion Conversation on the Internet’, Social Science Computer Review, 14(4): 373–93.
Schudson, M. (1995) The Power of News, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schudson, M. (2006) ‘The Varieties of Civic Experience’, Citizenship Studies, 10(5): 591–606.
Schultz, T. (2000) ‘Mass Media and the Concept of Interactivity: An Exploratory Study of Online Forums and Reader Email’, Media, Culture & Society, 22(2): 205–22.
Schulz, W. (1997) ‘Changes of the Mass Media and the Public Sphere’, Javnost/The Public, 4(2): 57–70.
Schumpeter, J. (1976) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 5th ed., London: Allen and Unwin.
Scott, J. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Selwyn, N. (2004) ‘Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the “Digital Divide”’, New Media & Society, 6(3): 341–62.
Semetko, H., Blumler, J., Gurevitch, M. and Weaver, D. (1991) The Formation of Campaign Agendas: A Comparative Analysis of Party and Media Roles in Recent American and British Elections, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Semetko, H. and Krasnoboka, N. (2003) ‘The Political Role of the Internet in Societies in Transition: Russia and Ukraine Compared’, Party Politics, 9(1): 77–104.
Sennett, R. (1977) The Fall of Public Man, New York: Alfred Knopf.
Sennett, R. (2003) Respect in a World of Inequality, New York: W. W. Norton.
Seyd, P. (2001) ‘The Labour Campaign’ in Norris, P. (ed.) Britain Votes, 2001, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 607–23.
Seyd, P. and Whiteley, P. (1995) ‘Labour and Conservative Party Members: Change Over Time’, Parliamentary Affairs, 48(3): 457–70.
Seymour-Ure, C. (1987) ‘Leaders’ in Seaton, J. and Pimlott, B. (eds.) The Media in British Politics, Hants: Avebury, 3–24.
Shah, D., Kwak, N. and Holbert, L. (2001) ‘Connecting and Disconnecting with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital’, Political Communication, 18: 141–62.
Shepsle, K. (1983) The Failure of Congressional Budgeting, St. Louis: Center for the Study of American Business.
Shulman, S. (2006) ‘Whither Deliberation? Mass e-Mail Campaigns and U.S. Regulatory Rulemaking’, Journal of E-Government, 3(3): 41–64.
Silverstone, R. (2007) Media and Morality: On the Rise of the Mediapolis, Cambridge: Polity.
Skelton, T. and Valentine, G. (2003) ‘Political Participation, Political Action and Political Identities: Young D/deaf People's Perspectives’, Space & Polity, 7(2): 117–34.
Smith, G. and Wales, C. (2000) ‘Citizens’ Juries and Deliberative Democracy', Political Studies, 48(1): 51–65.
Smith, S. and Ingram, H. (2002) ‘Rethinking Policy Analysis: Citizens, Community, and the Restructuring of Public Services’, Good Society, 11(1): 55–60.
Soon, C. and Kluver, R. (2007) ‘The Internet and Online Political Communities in Singapore’, Asian Journal of Communication, 17(3): 246–65.
Stewart, J., Kendall, E. and Coote, A. (1994) Citizens' Juries, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
Stolle, D. and Micheletti, M. (2005) ‘The Expansion of Political Action Repertoires: Theoretical Reflections on Results from the Nike Email Exchange Campaign’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
Stromer-Galley, J. (2002) ‘New Voices in the Public Sphere: Political Conversation in the Internet Age’, PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Sunstein, C. (2001) Republic.com, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Swanson, D. and Mancini, P. (1996) Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, Westport, CT: Praeger.
Tarrow, S. (1994) Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarrow, S. (2005) The New Transnational Activism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tassin, E. (1992) ‘Europe: A Political Community?’ in Mouffe, C. (ed.) Dimensions of Radical Democracy, London: Verso, 169–92.
Teitelbaum, J. (2002) ‘Dueling for Da'Wa: State V. Society on the Saudi Internet’, Middle East Journal, 56(2): 222–39.
Thatcher, M. (1998) ‘The Development of Policy Network Analyses: From Modest Origins to Overarching Frameworks’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4): 389–416.
Thompson, J. B. (2005) ‘The New Visibility’, Theory, Culture & Society, 22(6): 31–52.
Toffler, A. (1981) The Third Wave, London: Pan.
Toynbee, P. (2003) ‘Breaking News’, The Guardian, 5 September.
Trippi, J. (2004) The Revolution Will Not Be Televised, New York: Regan Books.
Turner, B. (1990) ‘Outline of a Theory of Citizenship’, Sociology, 24(2): 189–217.
Turner, B. (2006) ‘Citizenship and the Crisis of Multiculturalism’, Citizenship Studies, 10(5): 607–18.
Underwood, D. (2001) ‘Reporting and the Push for Market-Oriented Journalism: Media Organizations as Businesses; in Bennett, W. L. and Entman, R. (eds.) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press, 99–116.
Uricchio, W. (2004) ‘Cultural Citizenship in the Age of P2P Networks’ in Bondjeberg, I. and Golding, P. (eds.) European Culture and the Media, Bristol: Intellect Books, 139–63.
Aelst, P. (2002) ‘New Media, New Movements? The Role of the Internet in Shaping the “Anti-Globalisation” Movement’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, downloaded from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/6/6/3/0/p66308_index.htm.
Vugt, M. (1996) ‘Social Dilemmas and Transportation Decisions’, unpublished PhD thesis, Maastrict, University of Limburg.
Zoonen, L. (2005) Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Vergez, C. and Caddy, J. (2001) Citizens as Partners, Paris: OECD.
Verheij, B. (2005) Virtual Arguments: On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Viegas, F. and Smith, M. (2004) ‘Newsgroup Crowds and AuthorLines: Visualizing the Activity of Individuals in Cyberspaces’, downloaded from http://research.microsoft.com/~masmith/Newsgroup%20Crowds%20and%20Author%20Lines.pdf.
Walters, L., Aydelotte, J. and Miller, J. (2000) ‘Putting More Public in Policy Analysis’, Public Administration Review, 60(4): 349–59.
Watson, T. (2008) ‘The Power of Information’, speech given at the Tower 08 Conference, 10 March.
West, W. (2004) ‘Formal Procedures, Informal Processes, Accountability, and Responsiveness in Bureaucratic Policy Making: An Institutional Policy Analysis’, Public Administration Review, 64(1): 66–80.
Wheeler, D. (2005) The Internet in the Middle East: Global Expectations and Local Imaginations in Kuwait, Albany: State University of New York Press.
White, C., Lewis, G. and Elam, J. (1999) Citizens' Juries: An Appraisal of Their Role, London: Cabinet Office.
Wiener, N. (1948) Cybernetics, or Communication and Control in the Animal and the Machine, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wilhelm, A. (2000) Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace, New York: Routledge.
Wilke, J. and Reinemann, C. (2001) ‘Do the Candidates Matter? Long-Term Trends of Campaign Coverage – A Study of the German Press since 1949’, European Journal of Communication, 16(3): 291–314.
Wolf, G. (2004) ‘How the Internet Invented Howard Dean’, downloaded from http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~comp300/documents/HowtheInternetInventedDean.pdf.
Wright, S. (2006) ‘Government-Run Online Discussion Fora: Moderation, Censorship and the Shadow of Control’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 8(4): 550–68.
Wright, S. (2008) ‘Read My Day? Communication, Campaigning and Councillors’ Blogs', Information Polity, 13(1/2).
Wright, S. and Street, J. (2007) ‘Democracy, Deliberation and Design: The Case of Online Discussion Forums’, New Media & Society, 9(5): 849–69.
Wyatt, R., Katz, E. and Kim, J. (2000) ‘Bridging the Spheres: Political and Personal Conversation in Public and Private Spaces’, Journal of Communication, 50(1): 71–92.
Yates, S. (1997) ‘Gender, Identity and CMC’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(4): 281–90.
Young, I. M. (2000) Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zaller, J. (2001) A Theory of Media Politics: How the Interests of Politicians Journalists and the Citizens Shape the News, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zittrain, J. and Edelman, B. (2003) ‘Internet Filtering in China’, Internet Computing IEEE, 7(2): 70–7.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.