Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 142
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
June 2012
Print publication year:
2008
Online ISBN:
9780511810077

Book description

Legislatures are the core representative institutions in modern democracies. Citizens want legislatures to be decisive, and they want accountability, but they are frequently disillusioned with the representation legislators deliver. Political parties can provide decisiveness in legislatures, and they may provide collective accountability, but citizens and political reformers frequently demand another type of accountability from legislators – at the individual level. Can legislatures provide both kinds of accountability? This book considers what collective and individual accountability require and provides the most extensive cross-national analysis of legislative voting undertaken to date. It illustrates the balance between individualistic and collective representation in democracies, and how party unity in legislative voting shapes that balance. In addition to quantitative analysis of voting patterns, the book draws on extensive field and archival research to provide an extensive assessment of legislative transparency throughout the Americas.

Reviews

'Legislative accountability is a core question in any democratic polity. Carey writes insightfully, analytically, and with technical virtuosity and pertinent evidence, about presidents, parliaments, parties, and politicians, and their complex relationships with voters. He illuminates topics of broad comparative concern and sets a new standard of excellence for the study of legislatures and legislators in Latin American countries.'

Jorge I. Domínguez - Harvard University

'Until now, our understanding of how different democracies work has been based mainly on the analysis of aggregate phenomena, such as how proportional different parliaments are, how many parties different parliaments have, and so on. By analysing individual roll-call votes in 19 countries, this book has changed that. As a result of Carey's analysis, a new research agenda has been launched in comparative political science: on how representative democracy works at a micro-level, inside political parties, inside legislatures, and between voters and their elected representatives.'

Simon Hix - London School of Economics

'Political representation can occur through the actions of individualistic legislators who care little about the desires of party leaders, or it can occur through the actions of cohesive political parties, where individual legislators toe the party line. Legislative voting and accountability is the first study to demonstrate empirically the circumstances under which these two forms of representation occur. It is a path breaking book, one with a compelling story about institutional design that should be read by anyone interested in the comparative study of democracy.'

John Huber - Columbia University

'With his new book, John Carey renews his claim as one of the world's leading authorities in comparative legislative studies. Legislative Voting and Accountability makes a theoretical contribution by carefully examining the tradeoff between collective and individual accountability of legislator to principals. Empirically, Carey presents a wealth of new data about unity in legislative voting in Latin America, and he provides a cogent explanation of cross-national and cross-party differences in unity.'

Scott Mainwaring - Notre Dame University

'This is a wonderful work of great intelligence and originality. Carey investigates public voting or ‘transparency’ in legislative bodies and relates it to political accountability. An obvious contribution to comparative politics, the book is must reading for students of American politics also since it frames U.S. politics in a novel and creative way.'

David Mayhew - Yale University

'Carey's book expands our understanding of democratic representation by probing, both theoretically and empirically, citizens' ability to use legislatures as instruments of accountability. His approach is distinctive in its focus on the actions and votes of individual legislators. Most of his rich evidence comes from Latin American democracies, but anyone interested in representation and accountability will want to read and reflect on this seminalstudy.'

Susan Stokes - Yale University

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References
Adserá, Alicia, Boix, Carles, and Payne, Mark. 2003. “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2): 445–90.
Alcántara, Manuel. 1994–2000. Proyecto Elites Latinoamericanos (PELA). Salamanca, Spain: Instituto Interuniversitario de Iberoamérica (Universidad de Salamanca).
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aleman, Eduardo, and Tsebelis, George. 2005. “Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in Latin America.” World Politics 57(3): 396–420.
Altman, David. 2005. “De un sistema paralelo a un compensatorio (proporcional personalizado).” Santiago, Chile: Instituto de Ciencia Politica, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile.
,American Political Science Association. 1950. Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System. New York: Rinehart.
Ames, Barry. 1995. “Electoral Strategy under Open List Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 39(2): 406–33.
Ames, Barry. 2002. “Party Discipline in the Chamber of Deputies.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito, 185–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2002. “Presidential Cabinets, Electoral Cycles, and Coalition Discipline in Brazil.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito, 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2006. Presidencialismo e governabilidade nas Americas. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fundacion Getulio Vargas.
Amorim Neto, Octavio, Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2003. “Agenda Power in Brazil's Camara dos Deputados, 1989–98.” World Politics 55(4): 550–78.
,Asamblea Nacional de Panamá. 2005. http://www.asamblea.gob.pa/.
,Associación de Derechos Civiles. 2004. “Ley de Reforma Laboral: Falencias de su votación.” Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Austen-Smith, David. 1994. “Strategic Transmission of Costly Information.” Econometrica 62: 955–64.
Bagehot, Walter. 1867. The English Constitution. Reprint, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1963.
Baldez, Lisa A., and Carey, John M.. 1999. “Presidential Agenda Control and Spending Policy: Lessons from General Pinochet's Constitution.” American Journal of Political Science 43(1): 29–55.
Barczak, Monica. 2001. “Representation by Consultation? The Rise of Direct Democracy in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 43(3): 37–60.
Bianco, William T., Spence, David B., and Wilkerson, John D.. 1996. “The Electoral Connection in the Early Congress: The Case of the Compensation Act of 1816.” American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 145–71.
Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Katz, Richard S.. 1999. “Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, ed. Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Katz, Richard S., 3–22. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Brady, David W., Cooper, Joseph, and Hurley, Patricia A.. 1977. “The Electoral Basis of Party Voting: Patterns and Trends in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In The Impact of the Electoral Process, ed. Misel, Louis and Cooper, Joseph, 133–65. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William R., and Golder, Matthew. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis.” Political Analysis 14: 63–82.
Brennan, Geoffrey, and Pettit, Philip. 1990. “Unveiling the Vote.” British Journal of Political Science 20(3): 311–33.
Burke, Edmund. 1774. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. London: Henry G. Bohn.
Burns, John F., and Ives, Nat. 2005. “Shiites Win Most Votes in Iraq, Election Results Show.” New York Times, February 13, International sec., 1–22.
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Calvo, Ernesto. 2007. “The Responsive Legislature: Public Opinion and Discipline in a Highly Disciplined Legislature.” British Journal of Political Science 37: 263–80.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W., and Cogan, John F.. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 127–40.
Carey, John M. 2002. “Parties and Coalitions in Chile in the 1990s.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito, 222–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carey, John M. 2003. “Discipline, Accountability, and Legislative Voting in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 35(2): 191–211.
Carey, John M. 2007. “Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 92–107.
Carey, John M., and Reinhardt, Gina Yanitell. 2004. “State-Level Institutional Effects on Legislative Coalition Unity in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(1): 23–47.
Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–39.
Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1998. “Calling Out the Tanks, or Filling Out the Forms?” In Executive Decree Authority, ed. Carey, John M. and Shugart, Matthew Soberg, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, Royce, Cox, Gary W., and Pachon, Monica. 2006. “How Political Parties Create Democracy, Chapter 2.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31(2): 153–74.
,Centro de Estudios Públicos. 2007. Estudio nacional de opinion pública. Santiago, Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos.
Cevasco Piedra, José. 2000. El Congreso del Perú: Un modelo de modernización. Lima: Ediciones del Congreso del Perú.
Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Democracy, Elections, and Accountability for Economic Outcomes.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C., 222–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheibub, José Antonio, Przeworski, Adam, and Saiegh, Sebastian M.. 2004. “Government Coalitions and Legislative Effectiveness under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism.” British Journal of Political Science 34: 565–87.
Chhibber, Pradeep, and Kollman, Ken. 1998. “Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States.” American Political Science Review 92(2): 329–42.
Clarín, . 2004a. “La justicia resolvera si debe quedar registrado como vota cada diputado porteno.” Buenos Aires, Argentina. February 17. www.clarin.com.
Clarín, . 2004b. “Otra forma de votar las leyes.” Buenos Aires, Argentina. February 18. www.clarin.com.
Cleary, Matthew R., and Stokes, Susan C.. 2006. Democracy and the Culture of Skepticism: Political Trust in Argentina and Mexico. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Colomer, Josep M. 2001. Political Institutions: Democracy and Social Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Condorcet, Marquis. 1785. Essay on the Application of Analysis to the Probability of Majority Decisions (Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilté des decisions rendues a la pluralité des voix). Paris: De l'Imprimerie royale.
,Congreso del Perú. 1998. Diario de los debates. Primera Legislatura Ordinaria de 1998, 11a Sesión, 24 de setiembre.
Coppedge, Michael J. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidentialism, Partyarchy, and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Coppedge, Michael J. 1998. “The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems.” Party Politics 4(4): 547–68.
Corrado, Anthony. 2002. “A History of Federal Campaign Finance Law.” In The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook, ed. Corrado, Anthony, Mann, Thomas, Ortiz, Daniel, and Potter, Trevor. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. http://www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/gs/cf/sourcebk01/HistoryChap.pdf.
Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W. 1990. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 34(4): 903–35.
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W. 2006a. “The Organization of Democratic Legislatures.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, ed. Weingast, Barry and Wittman, Donald, 141–61. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cox, Gary W. 2006b. “Evaluating Electoral Systems.” Revista de Ciencia Politica 26(1): 212–15.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W., Masuyama, Mikitaka, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2000. “Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 1(1): 1–12.
Cox, Gary W., and Poole, Keith T.. 2004. “On Measuring Partisanship in Roll-Call Voting: The US House of Representatives, 1877–1999.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 477–89.
Cox, Gary W., and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1995. “In the Absence of Vote Pooling: Nomination and Vote Allocation Errors in Colombia.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 441–60.
Cox, Gary W., and Thies, Michael F.. 1998. “The Cost of Intraparty Competition: The Single, Nontransferable Vote and Money Politics in Japan.” Comparative Political Studies 31(3): 267–91.
Crisp, Brian F., and Ingall, Rachel E.. 2002. “Institutional Engineering and the Nature of Representation: Mapping the Effects of Electoral Reform in Colombia.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 733–48.
Crisp, Brian, and Rey, Juan Carlos. 2001. “The Causes of Electoral Reform in Venezuela.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P., 173–93. New York: Oxford University Press.
Culver, William W., and Ferrufino, Alfonso. 2000. “Diputados uninominales: La participacion politica en Bolivia.” Contribuciones 1: 1–28.
,Dallas Morning News. 2003a. “Editorial: Let the Sun Shine – Legislature Needs to Get Online with Records.” Dallas Morning News Online, April 1. http://www.dallasnews.com/.
,Dallas Morning News. 2003b. “Editorial: Let the Sun Shine – Excuses for Not Recording Votes Are Flimsy.” Dallas Morning News Online, March 31. http://www.dallasnews.com/.
Dawisha, Adeed, and Diamond, Larry. 2006. “Iraq's Year of Voting Dangerously.” Journal of Democracy 17(2): 89–103.
Desposato, Scott. 2004a. “Going Negative in Comparative Perspective: The Impact of Electoral Rules on Campaign Strategy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 30–September 3.
Desposato, Scott. 2004b. “The Impact of Federalism on National Party Cohesion in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(2): 259–85.
Desposato, Scott. 2005. “Correcting for Small-Group Cohesion in Roll Call Cohesion Scores.” British Journal of Political Science 35(4): 731–44.
Desposato, Scott. 2006a. “Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party-Switching in Brazil's Chamber of Deputies.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 62–80.
Desposato, Scott. 2006b. “Brazilian Political Reform: What Needs Fixing and How to Fix It.” Paper presented at the Center for Brazilian Studies, Oxford University, June 5.
Diermeier, Daniel, and Feddersen, Timothy J.. 1998. “Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure.” American Political Science Review 92(3): 611–22.
Diez Canseco, Javier. 2001. “Impondra el Congreso mano blanda y lucro cesante?La Republica, May 6, p. 24.
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties, Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.
,El Tiempo. 2002. “Alvaro Uribe Velez radico proyecto de referendo en su primer acto de gobierno.” August 7. http://www.eltiempo.com/.
Erickson, Robert S. 1971. “The Electoral Impact of Congressional Roll Call Voting.” American Political Science Review 65: 1018–32.
Farrell, David M., and McAllister, Ian. 2004. “Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential Voting in Candidate-Centered Systems Make a Difference?” Paper presented at the University of California, Irvine. Posted in eScholarship Repository: http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/04-04.
Fearon, James D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C., 55–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C., 131–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Figueiredo, Argelina Cheibub, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32(2): 151–70.
Fleischer, David. 2004. “The Politics of the Lula PT-led Coalition.” Paper prepared for the conference of the Latin American Studies Association, Las Vegas, NV, November 4–6.
Frye, Timothy. 1997. “A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies.” Comparative Political Studies 30(5): 523–52.
Gallagher, Michael. 1991. “Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 10: 33–51.
Garman, Christopher, Haggard, Stephan, and Willis, Eliza. 2001. “Fiscal Decentralization: A Political Theory with Latin American Cases.” World Politics 53(2): 205–36.
Gerring, John, and Thacker, Strom C.. 2008. A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gerring, John, Thacker, Strom C., and Moreno, C.. 2005. “Centripetal Democratic Governance: A Theory and Global Inquiry.” American Political Science Review 99(4): 567–81.
Golden, Miriam A., and Chang, Eric C.C.. 2001. “Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy.” World Politics 53(4): 588–622. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/world_politics/ v053/53.4golden.pdf.
Gonzalez Bertomeu, Juan F. 2004. Cada voto con su nombre: Votaciones nominales en el Poder Legislativo. Buenos Aires: Asociación por los Derechos Civiles.
Gunson, Phil. 2006. “Chavez's Venezuela.” Current History 105(688): 58–63.
Hallerberg, Mark, and Mairer, Patrik. 2004. “Executive Authority, the Personal Vote, and Budget Discipline in Latin American and Caribbean Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 571–87.
Haspel, Moshe, Remington, Thomas, and Smith, Steven S.. 1998. “Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma.” Journal of Politics 60(2): 417–39.
Hellwig, Timothy, and Samuels, David. 2007. “Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 65–90.
Hix, Simon. 2002. “Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals: Preferences, Parties, and Voting in the European Parliament.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 688–98.
Hix, Simon. 2004. “Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior – Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament.” World Politics 56(2): 194–223.
Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul, and Roland, Gerard. 2006. “Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament.” American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 494–511.
Huber, John D. 1996. “The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Political Science Review 90(2): 269–82.
Huber, John D., and Bingham Powell, G.. 1994. “Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy.” World Politics 46: 291–326.
Huneeus, Carlos. “Binominalismo y calidad democratica.” La Tercera, Santiago, Chile, August 8, 2006, Opinion sec.
,International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. 1997. Handbook of Electoral Systems. Stockholm, Sweden: IDEA.
Jenkins, Jeffrey A. 1999. “Examining the Bonding Effects of Party: A Comparative Analysis of Roll-Call Voting in the US and Confederate Houses.” American Journal of Political Science 43(4): 1144–65.
Jenkins, Jeffrey A. 2000. “Examining the Robustness of Ideological Voting: Evidence from the Confederate House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 811–22.
Jenkins, Jeffrey A., and Stewart III, Charles. 2003. “Out in the Open: The Emergence of Viva Voce Voting in House Speakership Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(4): 481–508.
Johnson, Chris, Maley, William, Thier, Alexander, and Wardak, Ali. 2003. Afghanistan's Political and Constitutional Development. London: Overseas Development Institute and U.K. Department for International Development.
Johnson, Gregg, and Crisp, Brian F.. 2003. “Mandates, Powers, and Policies.” American Journal of Political Science 47(1): 127–41.
Jones, Mark P., and Hwang, W.. 2005. “Party Government in Presidential Democracies: Extending Cartel Theory beyond the US Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 267–82.
Katz, Richard S. 1994. “The 1993 Parliamentary Electoral Reform.” In Italian Politics, ed. Mershon, Carol and Pasquino, Gianfranco, 93–112. 9th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Kile, Orville M. 1948. The Farm Bureau through Three Decades. Baltimore: Waverly Press.
King, David C., and Zeckhauser, Richard J.. 2003. “Congressional Vote Options.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(3): 387–411.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Krehbiel, Keith. 2000. “Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 212–27.
Kulischeck, Michael, and Crisp, Brian F.. 2001. “The Consequences of Electoral Reform in Venezuela.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P., 404–31. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kunicová, Jana, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2005. “Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption.” British Journal of Political Science 35(4): 573–606.
,La Gaceta. 2001. “Congresistas que votaron y en contra de la revocatoria.” La Gaceta, 6 May, sec. 2.
Raja, Raymond J. 2003. “Why Soft Money Has Strengthened Parties.” In Inside the Campaign Finance Battle: Court Testimony on the New Reforms, ed. Corrado, Anthony, Mann, Thomas E., and Potter, Trevor, 69–98. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–27.
Lanfranchi, Prisca, and Luthi, Ruth. 1999. “Cohesion of Party Groups and Interparty Conflict in the Swiss Parliament: Roll Call Voting in the National Council.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, ed. Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Katz, Richard S., 99–120. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
,Latin America Data Base. 2001. “Nicaragua: Governing Party and Sandinistas Nominate Presidential Candidates.” NotiCen: Central American & Caribbean Political & Economic Affairs 6(3).
,Latinobarómetro. 2003 Summary Report: Democracy and Economy. http://www.latinobarometro.org.
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of 27 Democracies, 1945–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidentialism or Parliamentarism: Does It Make a Difference?” In The Failure of Presidential Democracy, ed. Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo, 3–90. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Londregan, John. 2001. Legislative Institutions and Ideology in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lowry, W. R., and Shipan, C. R.. 2002. “Party Differentiation in Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(1): 33–60.
Luna, Juan P., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2005. “Political Representation in Latin America: A Study of Elite-Mass Congruence in Nine Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 38(4): 388–416.
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott P. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott P., and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 1997. “Party Discipline in the Brazilian Constitutional Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(4): 453–83.
Mainwaring, Scott P., and Scully, Timothy R.. 1995. “Party Systems in Latin America.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R., 1–36. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C.. 1999. “Elections and Representation.” In Elections, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C., 29–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mann, Thomas E. 2003. “Linking Knowledge and Action: Political Science and Campaign Finance Reform.” Perspective on Politics 17(1): 69–83.
Marlowe, Ann. 2007. “Life of the Parties.” Wall Street Journal, January 29, A17.
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mayorga, Rene. 2001. “Electoral Reform in Bolivia: Origins of the Mixed-Member Proportional System.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P., 194–208. New York: Oxford University Press.
McCoy, J. L. 1999. “Chavez and the End of ‘Partyarchy’ in Venezuela.” Journal of Democracy 105(3): 64–77.
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Rosenbluth, Frances McCall. 1995. “Party Provision for Personal Politics: Dividing the Vote in Japan.” In Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States, ed. Cowhey, Peter F. and McCubbins, Mathew D., 35–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McKelvey, Richard. 1976. “Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models: Some Implications for Agenda Control.” Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472–82.
Moe, Terry M., and Caldwell, Michael. 1994. “The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems.” Journal of Institutional Theoretical Economics 150(1): 171–95.
Molinar Horcacitas, Juan, and Weldon, Jeffrey. 2001. “Reforming Electoral Systems in Mexico.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P., 209–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, Jana, Espinal, Rosario, and Seligson, Mitchell A.. 2006. The Political Culture of the Dominican Republic in 2006. Nashville, TN: Latin American Public Opinion Project.
Morgenstern, Scott. 2003. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll Call Voting in Latin America and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morone, James A. 1990. The Democratic Wish: Popular Participation and the Limits of American Government. New York: Basic Books.
Nicolau, Jairo Marconi. 2007. “O Sistema Eleitoral De Lista Aberta no Brasil.” In Instituições representativas no Brasil: Balanço e reforma, ed. Marconi Nicolau, Jairo and Power, Timothy J., 97–122. Rio de Janeiro: IUPERJ.
Odegard, Peter H. 1928. Pressure Politics: The Story of the Anti-Saloon League. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2007. Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Persson, Torsten, Roland, Gerard, and Tabellini, Guido. 1997. “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1163–1202.
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2003. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Persson, Torsten, Tabellini, Guido, and Trebbi, F.. 2003. “Electoral Rules and Corruption.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 958–89.
Pharr, Susan J., Putnam, Robert D., and Dalton, Russell J.. 2000. “A Quarter-Century of Declining Confidence.” Journal of Democracy 11(2): 500–25.
Poole, Keith T. 1998. “Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales.” American Journal of Political Science 42(3): 954–93.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 29(2): 357–84.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. “D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress; A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26(1): 5–30.
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Powell, G. Bingham, and Vanberg, Georg. 2000. “Election Laws, Disproportionality and Median Correspondence: Implications for Two Visions of Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 30(3): 383–411.
Powell, G. Bingham, and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 391–414.
,Proyecto Élites Parlamentarias Latinoamericanas. 2006. Boletín n°6: Disciplina de voto y lealtad partidista. Salamanca, Spain: Instituto Interuniversitario de Iberoamérica (Universidad de Salamanca).
Przeworski, Adam. 2007. “Is the Science of Comparative Politics Possible?” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan C., 117–39. New York: Oxford University Press.
Quinn, Kevin M., Monroe, Burt L., Colaresi, Michael, Crespin, Michael H., and Radev, Dragomir R.. 2006. “An Automated Method of Topic-Coding Legislative Speech over Time with Application to the 105th–108th U.S. Senate.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, September 2.
Rachadell, Manuel. 1991. “El sistema electoral y la reforma de los partidos.” In Venezuela, democracia y futuro: Los partidos politicos en la decada de los 90. Reflexiones para un cambio neceario, ed. Blanco, Carlos and Pisani, Edgar Paredes, 203–10. Caracas: Comision Presidencial para la Reforma del Estado.
Rasch, Bjorn E. 2000. “Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(1): 3–23.
Reynolds, Andrew. 2006. “The Curious Case of Afghanistan.” Journal of Democracy 17(2): 104–17.
Rice, Stuart A. 1925. “The Behavior of Legislative Groups.” Political Science Quarterly 40: 60–72.
Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Roberts, Kenneth, and Wibbels, Erik. 1999. “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 575–90.
Rosas, Guillermo. 2005. “The Ideological Organization of Latin American Legislative Parties: An Empirical Analysis of Elite Policy Preferences.” Comparative Political Studies 7(824): 849.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenthal, Howard, and Voeten, Erik. 2004. “Analyzing Roll Calls with Perfect Spatial Voting: France 1946–1958.” American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 620–32.
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1763. “Voting.” In On the Social Contract, book IV, ch. XX. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1978.
Rubin, Barnett R. “The Wrong Voting System.” International Herald Tribune, March 16, International section.
Samuels, David. 2000. “Ambition and Competition: Explaining Legislative Turnover in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(3): 481–97.
Samuels, David. 2004. “Presidentialism and Accountability for the Economy in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 98(3): 425–36.
Samuels, David, and Shugart, Matthew S.. 2003. “Presidentialism, Elections, and Representation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(1): 33–60.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scarrow, Susan E. 2001a. “Direct Democracy and Institutional Change: A Comparative Investigation.” Comparative Political Studies 34(688): 651–65.
Scarrow, Susan E. 2001b. “Germany: The Mixed-Member System as a Political Compromise.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P., 55–69. New York: Oxford University Press.
Seligson, Mitchell A., Cordova, Abby B., Donoso, Juan Carlos, Morales, Daniel Moreno, Orces, Diana, and Blum, Vivian Schwarz. 2007. Democracy Audit: Bolivia 2006 Report. Nashville, TN: Latin American Public Opinion Project.
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1991. Models of Multiparty Electoral Competition. New York: Harwood Academic.
Shugart, Matthew S. 1998. “The Inverse Relationship between Party Strength and Executive Strength: A Theory of Politicians' Constitutional Choices.” British Journal of Political Science 28(1): 1–29.
Shugart, Matthew S., and Carey, John M.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shugart, Matthew S., Moreno, Erika, and Fajardo, Luis E.. 2006. “Deepening Democracy by Renovating Political Practices: The Struggle for Electoral Reform in Colombia.” In Peace, Democracy, and Human Rights in Colombia, ed. Welna, Christopher and Gallon, Gustavo, 202–66. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
Shugart, Matthew S., Valdini, Melody E., and Suominen, K.. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 437–49.
Shugart, Matthew S., and Wattenberg, Martin P., eds. 2001. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?New York: Oxford University Press.
Siavelis, Peter. 2000. The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Sieberer, Ulrich. 2006. “Party Unity in Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Legislative Studies 12(2): 150–78.
Singer, Judith D. 1998. “Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 24(4): 323–55.
Skeen, C. Edward. 1986. “Vox Populi, Vox Dei: The Compensation Act of 1816 and the Rise of Popular Politics.” Journal of the Early Republic 6(253): 274.
Smith, Steven S. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Snyder, James M., and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 193–211.
Snyder, James M., and Ting, Michael M.. 2005. “Why Roll Calls? A Model of Position Taking in Legislative Voting and Elections.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 21(1): 153–78.
Steenbergen, Marco R., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 218–237.
Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sundquist, James L. 1981. The Decline and Resurgence of Congress. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew Sobert. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tapia G., Sady. 2004. “Legisladores ‘huyen’ del voto electrónico.” La Prensa, March 25. La Prensa Web, http://www.prensa.com/.
,Texas State Legislature. 2005. “Texas Legislature Online.” http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlo/legislation/voteinfo.htm.
Thames, Francis C. 2007. “Searching for the Electoral Connection: Parliamentary Party Switching in the Ukrainian Rada, 1998–2002.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(2): 223–56.
Tsebelis, George. 1999. “Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 591–608.
Ungar Bleier, Elisabeth. 2002. “Consideraciones sobre la reforma politica.” Testimony before the Comisión Primera Constitucional del Senado de la República. Bogotá.
,United States Supreme Court. 1958. Majority Decision in NAACP v. Alabama Ex Rel. Patterson, Attorney General. No. 91 Supreme Court of the United States 357 U.S. 449; 78 S. Ct. 1163.
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1994. “Party Politics and the Crisis of Presidentialism in Chile: A Proposal for a Parliamentary Form of Government.” In The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America, vol. 2, ed. Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo, 91–150. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
,VoteWorld. 2008. VoteWorld: The International Legislative Roll-Call Voting Website. http://ucdata.berkeley.edu:7101/new_web/VoteWorld/voteworld/.
Wallack, Jessica S., Gaviria, A., Panizza, Ugo, and Stein, Eduardo. 2003. “Particularism around the World.” World Bank Economic Review 17(1): 133–43.
Weldon, Jeffrey. 1997. “Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Mainwaring, Scott P., 225–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weldon, Jeffrey. 2001. “The Consequences of Mexico's Mixed-Member Electoral System, 1988–1997.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P., 447–74. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weyland, Kurt. 1996. Democracy without Equity: Failures of Reform in Brazil. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
White, Leonard D. 1951. The Jeffersonians: A Study in Administrative History, 1801–1829. New York: Macmillan.
Whiteley, Paul F., and Seyd, Patrick. 1999. “Discipline in the British Conservative Party: The Attitudes of Party Activists toward the Role of Their Members of Parliament.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, ed. Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Katz, Richard S., 53–71. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.