Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 10
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
September 2013
Print publication year:
2013
Online ISBN:
9781139382847

Book description

Tracing the path from Troy's destruction to Rome's foundation, the Aeneid explores the transition between past and future. As the Trojans struggle to found a new city and the narrator sings of his audience's often-painful history, memory becomes intertwined with a crucial leitmotif: the challenge of being part of a group that survives violence and destruction only to face the daunting task of remembering what was lost. This book offers a new reading of the Aeneid that engages with critical work on memory and questions the prevailing view that Aeneas must forget his disastrous history in order to escape from a cycle of loss. Considering crucial scenes such as Aeneas' reconstruction of Celaeno's prophecy and his slaying of Turnus, this book demonstrates that memory in the Aeneid is a reconstructive and dynamic process, one that offers a social and narrative mechanism for integrating a traumatic past with an uncertain future.

Reviews

'… the book is well-researched, and scholars and students seeking a primer on critical work in memory studies would be well-advised to consult Seider’s bibliography, especially the expansive footnotes in the introduction.'

Matthew P. Loar Source: Bryn Mawr Classical Review

'… the strong aspect in Seider’s approach is that he writes not so much about memory, but more about the ‘thematization’ of memory within the narrative. This way, his book enables us to see at a glance the enormous importance of remembering, revisiting, and forgetting in the epic plot and in the actions and emotions of characters and narrators alike.'

Alessandro Barchiesi Source: Histos

‘… this book … deploys excellent detailed [analysis] alongside persuasive theoretical ideas, and is beautifully written; we should be most grateful to its author for a thoughtful and challenging treatment of its crucial topic, and for a subtle and balanced interpretation of the poem as a whole.’

Stephen Harrison Source: De Novis Libris Iudicia

'Seider’s book is a welcome addition to the recent scholarly work on the Aeneid and makes a convincing case for the importance of analyzing the concept of memory as shaping history and identity in the poem … If the reviewer may appear to have more questions than answers, it is thanks to the rich and stimulating discussions found throughout the book. Seider’s work tackles a fruitful line of inquity that will surely stimulate more research on the problem of memory and identity in Roman literature.'

Vassiliki Panoussi Source: New England Classical Journal

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography

Abbreviations of ancient and modern works follow the conventions set out in L’Année Philologique, the Oxford Latin Dictionary, and Liddell and Scott's Greek-English Lexicon.

Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore.
Alcock, S. E. 2002. Archaeologies of the Greek Past: Landscape, Monuments, and Memories. Cambridge.
Anderson, W. S. 1957. “Vergil's Second Iliad,” TAPA 88: 17–30. Reprinted in Hardie 1999: 3: 74–86.
Armstrong, R. 2002. “Crete in the Aeneid: Recurring Trauma and Alternative Fate,” CQ 52: 321–40.
Arthur, M. 1981. “The Divided World of Iliad vi,” in H. P. Foley, ed. 1981: Reflections on Women in Antiquity. Philadelphia. 19–44. Reprint of 1981, Women's Studies 8: 21–46.
Assmann, A. 2011. Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Arts of Memory. Cambridge.
Assmann, J. 1992. Das Kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und Politische Identität in Frühen Hochkulturen. Munich.
Assmann, J.2006. Religion and Cultural Memory: Ten Studies. Trans. R. Livingstone. Stanford University Press.
Austin, R. G. 1955. Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Oxford.
Austin, R. G.1964. Aeneidos Liber Secundus. Oxford.
Austin, R. G.1971. Aeneidos Liber Primus. Oxford.
Austin, R. G.1977. Aeneidos Liber Sextus. Oxford.
Bakhtin, M. 1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin.
Bakhtin, M.1984Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Ed. and trans. C. Emerson. Minneapolis.
Bakker, E. J. 2008. “Epic Remembering,” in E. A. Mackay, ed. Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World. Leiden. 65–77.
Bal, M. 1997. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto.
Bal, M.1999. “Introduction,” in M. Bal, J. Crewe, and L. Spitzer, eds. Acts of Memory: Cultural Recall in the Present. London. vii–xvii.
Bandera, C. 1981. “Sacrificial Levels in Virgil's Aeneid,” Arethusa 14: 217–39.
Baraz, Y. 2009. “Euripides’ Corinthian Princess in the Aeneid,” CP 104: 317–30.
Barchiesi, A. 1984. La Traccia del Modello: Effeti Omerici nella Narrazione Virgiliana. Pisa.
Barchiesi, A.1997. “Virgilian Narrative: Ekphrasis,” in Martindale 1997: 271–81.
Barchiesi, A.1999. “Suffering and Interpretation in the Aeneid,” in P. Hardie: 3: 324–44. Reprint of 1995, “Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell’Eneide,” A&A 40: 109–24
Barchiesi, A.2001. Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. Ed. and trans. M. Fox and S. Marchesi. London.
Barchiesi, A.2002. “Martial Arts: Mars Ultor in the Forum Augustum,” in G. Herbert-Brown, ed. Ovid's Fasti: Historical Readings at Its Bimillennium. Oxford. 1–22.
Bartlett, F. C. 1932. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge.
Bartsch, S. 1998. “Ars and the Man: The Politics of Art in Virgil's Aeneid,” CP 93: 322–42.
Bassi, K. 2005. “Things of the Past: Objects and Time in Greek Narrative,” Arethusa 38: 1–32.
Beard, M. 2007. The Roman Triumph. Cambridge, MA.
Behr, F. D. 2005. “The Narrator's Voice: A Narratological Reappraisal of Apostrophe in Virgil's Aeneid,” Arethusa 38: 189–221.
Behr, F. D.2007. Feeling History: Lucan, Stoicism, and the Poetics of Passion. Columbus, OH.
Bergmann, B. 1994. “The Roman House as Memory Theater: The House of the Tragic Poet in Pompeii,” The Art Bulletin 76: 225–56.
Berlin, N. 1998. “War and Remembrance: Aeneid 12.554–60 and Aeneas’ Memory of Troy,” AJP 119: 11–41.
Berres, T. 1982. Die Entstehung der “Aeneis.” Wiesbaden.
Bettini, M. 1997. “Ghosts of Exile: Doubles and Nostalgia in Vergil's parva Troia (Aeneid 3.294ff.),” CA 16: 8–33.
Bews, J. P. 1987. “Philosophical Revelation and Its Function in Aeneid 6,” in B. Anthony, ed. Laurea Corona: Studies in Honour of Edward Coleiro. Amsterdam. 91–8.
Beye, C. R. 2006. Ancient Epic Poetry: Homer, Apollonius, Virgil, with a Chapter on the Gilgamesh Poems. 2nd edn. Wauconda.
Biow, D. 1994. “Epic Performance on Trial: Virgil's Aeneid and the Power of Eros in Song,” Arethusa 27: 223–46.
Block, E. 1981. The Effects of Divine Manifestation on the Reader's Perspective in Vergil's “Aeneid.” New York.
Block, E.1982. “The Narrator Speaks: Apostrophe in Homer and Vergil,” TAPA 112: 7–22.
Blum, H. 1969. Die Antike Mnemotechnik. Hildesheim.
Booth, W. C. 1961. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago.
Borges, J. L. 1964. “Funes the Memorious,” in D. A. Yates, ed., and J. E. Irby, trans. Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings. New York. 59–66.
Bowie, A. M. 2008. “Aeneas Narrator,” PVS 26: 41–51.
Bowra, C. M. 1945. From Virgil to Milton. London.
Braund, D. and C. Gill. 2003. Eds. Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter.
Braund, S. M. 1997. “Virgil and the Cosmos: Religious and Philosophical Ideas,” in Martindale 1997: 204–21.
Braund, S. M. and C. Gill. 1997. Eds. The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge.
Bright, D. F. 1981. “Aeneas’ Other Nekyia,” Vergilius 27: 40–7.
Brockmeier, J. 2001. “From the End to the Beginning: Retrospective Teleology in Autobiography,” in J. Brockmeier and D. A. Carbaugh, eds. Narrative and Identity: Studies in Autobiography, Self and Culture. Amsterdam. 247–80.
Buchheit, V. 1963. Vergil über die Sendung Roms. Untersuchungen zum Bellum Poenicum und zur AeneisHeidelberg.
Burnett, A. P. 1983. Three Archaic Poets: Archilochus, Alcaeus, Sappho. Cambridge, MA.
Cairns, F. 1989. Virgil's Augustan Epic. Cambridge.
Casali, S. 2004. “Nisus and Euryalus: Exploiting the Contradictions in Virgil's ‘Doloneia’,” HSCP 102: 319–54.
Casali, S.2008. “The King of Pain: Aeneas, Achates and ἄχος in Aeneid 1,” CQ 58: 181–9.
Casey, E. S. 1987. Remembering: A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington.
Catto, B. A. 1989. “Vergilian Inversion of Lucretius in Anchises’ Exposition of the Soul,” Vergilius 35: 60–9.
Ceauşescu, P. 1976. “Altera Roma: Histoire d'une Folie Politique,” Historia 25: 79–108.
Chatman, S. B. 1978. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca.
Clausen, W. 1964. “An Interpretation of the Aeneid,” HSCP 68: 139–47.
Clausen, W 1994. A Commentary on Virgil, “Eclogues.” Oxford.
Clay, D. 1988. “The Archaeology of the Temple to Juno in Carthage (1.446–93),” CP 83: 195–205.
Coleman, R. 1977. Vergil: “Eclogues.” Cambridge.
Commager, S. 1981. “Fateful Words: Some Conversations in Aeneid 4,” Arethusa 14: 101–14.
Confino, A. 1997. “Collective Memory and Cultural History: Problems of Method.” American Historical Review 102: 1386–404.
Conington, J. 1884. P. Vergili Maronis Opera: The Works of Virgil with a Commentary. 4th edn. 3 vols. Revised by H. Nettleship. London. Reprinted with introduction by P. Hardie. 6 vols. Exeter. 2007–8.
Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. C. Segal, ed. and intro. Ithaca.
Conte, G. B 1992. “Proems in the Middle,” YCS 29: 147–59.
Conte, G. B 2007. The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic. Oxford.
Conway, M. A. 1995. Flashbulb Memories. Hillsdale.
Culler, J. 1977. “Apostrophe,” Diacritics 7: 59–69.
Culler, J.1980. “Fabula and Sjuzhet in the Analysis of Narrative: Some American Discussions,” Poetics Today 1: 27–37.
Currie, H. M. 1962–3. “The Sense of the Past in Virgil,” PVS 2: 17–32.
Detienne, M. 1996. The Masters of Truth in Archaic Greece, J. Lloyd, trans. New York.
Davis, N. Z. and R. Starn. 1989. “Introduction,” Representations 26: 1–6.
Dougherty, C. 2001. The Raft of Odysseus: The Ethnographic Imagination of Homer's Odyssey. Oxford.
DuBois, P. 1982. History, Rhetorical Description, and the Epic. Cambridge.
Duckworth, G. E. 1938. “The Chronology of Aeneid viii–x,” in AJP 59: 135–44.
Dyson, J. T. 1997. “Fluctus Irarum, Fluctus Curarum: Lucretian religio in the Aeneid,” AJP 118: 449–57.
Dyson, J. T 2001. King of the Wood: The Sacrificial Victor in Virgil's Aeneid. Norman.
Earl, D. C. 1961. The Political Thought of Sallust. Cambridge.
Eco, U. 1988. “An Ars Oblivionalis? Forget It!” Trans. M. Migiel. Proceedings of the Modern Language Association 103: 254–61.
Edmunds, L. 2005. “Critical Divergences: New Directions in the Study and Teaching of Roman Literature,” TAPA 135: 1–13.
Edwards, C. 1996. Writing Rome: Textual Approaches to the City. Cambridge.
Elsner, J. 1995. Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge.
Erll, A. and A. Nünning. 2010. Eds. A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin.
Ernout, A. and A. Meillet. 1932. Dictionnaire Étymologique de la Langue Latine: Histoire des Mots. Paris.
Erskine, A. 2001. Troy between Greece and Rome: Local Tradition and Imperial Power. Oxford.
Falkner, T. M. 1990. “The Politics and Poetics of Time in Solon's ‘Ten Ages’,” CJ 86: 1–15.
Fantham, E. 1999. “The Role of Lament in the Growth and Eclipse of the Roman Epic,” in M. Beissinger, J. Tylus, and S. Wofford, eds. Epic Traditions in the Contemporary World: The Poetics of Community. Berkeley. 221–34.
Fantuzzi, M. and R. Hunter. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.
Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil's “Georgics” and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford.
Farrell, J 1997. “The Phenomenology of Memory in Roman Culture,” CJ 92.4: 373–83.
Faulkner, A. 2008. The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Oxford.
Favro, D. 1996. The Urban Image of Augustan Rome. Cambridge.
Feeney D. 1983. “The Taciturnity of Aeneas,” CQ 33: 204–19.
Feeney D 1984. “The Reconciliations of Juno,” CQ 34: 179–94.
Feeney D 1986. “History and Revelation in Vergil's Underworld,” PCPS 212: 1–24.
Feeney D 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.
Feeney D 1997. “‘Shall I Compare Thee…?’ Catullus 68B and the Limits of Analogy,” in J. H. Gaisser, ed. Catullus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. New York. 429–46.
Feeney D 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.
Feeney D 2007. Caesar's Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley.
Feldherr, A. 1995. “Ships of State: Aeneid 5 and Augustan Circus Spectacle,” CA 14: 245–65.
Feldherr, A 2000. “Non Inter Nota Sepulcra: Catullus 101 and Roman Funerary Ritual.” CA 19: 209–31.
Fentress, J. and C. Wickham. 1992. Social Memory. Oxford.
Fernandez, J. W. 1972. “Persuasions and Performances: Of the Beast in Every Body…and the Metaphors of Everyman,” Daedalus 101: 39–60.
Fisher, P. 2002. The Vehement Passions. Princeton.
Fitzgerald, W. 1984. “Aeneas, Daedalus, and the Labyrinth,” Arethusa 17: 51–65.
Fivush, R., Bohanek, J. G., Marin, K. and J. M. Sales. 2009. “Emotional Memory and Memory for Emotions,” In O. Luminet and A. Curci, eds. Flashbulb Memories: New Issues and New Perspectives. New York. 163–84.
Flower, H. I. 2006. The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.
Fludernik, M. 2009. An Introduction to Narratology. New York.
Fordyce, C. J. 1961. Catullus: A Commentary. Oxford.
Fordyce, C. J 1977. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos, Libri vii–viii. Bristol.
Fowler, D. 1997a. “Epicurean Anger,” in S. M. Braund and C. Gill, eds. The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge. 16–35.
Fowler, D 1997b. “Virgilian Narrative: Story-telling,” in Martindale 1997: 259–70.
Fowler, D 2000. Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford.
Fowler, D. and P. Fowler. 1996. “Literary Theory and Classical Studies,” S. Hornblower and A. Spawforth, eds. The Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford. 871–5.
Fraenkel, E. 1945. “Some Aspects of the Structure of Aeneid 7,” JRS 35: 1–14.
Fraenkel, E 1950. Agamemnon: Edited with a Commentary. Oxford.
Fratantuono, L. 2009. A Commentary on Virgil, Aeneid xi. Brussels.
Freeman, M. 2010. Hindsight: The Promise and Peril of Looking Backward. Oxford.
Gale, M. R. 2003. “Poetry and the Backward Glance in Virgil's Georgics and Aeneid,” TAPA 133: 323–52.
Galinsky, K. 1988. “The Anger of Aeneas,” AJP 109: 321–48.
Galinsky, K.1996. Augustan Culture. Princeton.
Galinsky, K.2003. “Greek and Roman Drama and the Aeneid,” in D. Braund and C. Gill 2003: 275–94.
Gasti, H. 2006. “Narratological Aspects of Vergil's Aeneid,” Acta Classica 49: 113–20.
Gedi, N. and Y. Elam. 1996. “Collective Memory – What Is It?,” History and Memory 8: 30–50.
Genette, G. 1980. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Trans. J. E. Lewin. Ithaca.
Gill, C. 1997a. “The Emotions in Greco-Roman Philosophy,” in S. M. Braund and C. Gill 1997: 5–15.
Gill, C 1997b. “Passion as Madness in Roman Poetry,” in S. M. Braund and C. Gill 1997: 213–41.
Gill, C 2006. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.
Gillis, D. 1983. Eros and Death in the Aeneid. Rome.
Gillis, J. R. 1994. “Memory and Identity: The History of a Relationship,” in J. R. Gillis, ed. Commemorations: Politics of National Identity. Princeton. 3–26.
Gotoff, H. C. 1985. “The Difficulty of the Ascent from Avernus,” CP 80: 35–40.
Goud, T. E. and J. C. Yardley. 1988. “Dido's Burning Effigy: Aeneid 4.508,” Rheinisches Museum 131: 386–8.
Gove, P. B. 1993. Ed. Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged. Springfield.
Gowing, A. M. 2000. “Memory and Silence in Cicero's Brutus,” Eranos 98: 39–64.
Gowing, A. M.2005. Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge.
Grabes, H. 2005. Ed. Literature, Literary History, and Cultural Memory. Vol. 21. Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature. Tübingen.
Gransden, K. W. 1976. Virgil: Aeneid Book viii. Cambridge.
Greene, T. M. 1999. “The Natural Tears of Epic,” in M. Beissinger, J. Tylus, and S. Wofford, eds. Epic Traditions in the Contemporary World: The Poetics of Community. Berkeley. 189–202.
Grillo, L. 2010. “Leaving Troy and Creusa: Reflections on Aeneas’ Flight,” CJ 106: 43–68.
Grimm, R. E. 1967. “Aeneas and Andromache in Aeneid III,” AJP 88: 151–62.
Gross, N. P. 2003/4. “Mantles Woven with Gold: Pallas’ Shroud and the End of the Aeneid,” CJ 99: 135–56.
Gutting, E. 2006. “Marriage in the Aeneid: Venus, Vulcan, and Dido,” CP 101: 263–79.
Halbwachs, M. 1992. On Collective Memory. L. A. Coser, ed. and trans. Chicago.
Hamilton, C. I. M. 1993. “Dido, Tityos and Prometheus,” CQ 43: 249–54.
Hardie, A. 2007. “Juno, Hercules, and the Muses at Rome,” AJP 128: 551–92.
Hardie, P. 1986. Virgil's “Aeneid:” Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.
Hardie, P 1990. “Forsan et Haec Olim Meminisse Iuvabit.” Review of E. Henry 1989. CR 40: 263–4.
Hardie, P 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge.
Hardie, P 1994. Virgil: Aeneid Book ix. Cambridge.
Hardie, P 1997. “Closure in Latin Epic,” in D. H. Roberts, F. M. Dunn, and D. Fowler, eds. Classical Closure: Reading the End in Latin Literature. Princeton. 139–62.
Hardie, P 1998. Virgil. Oxford.
Hardie, P 1999. Ed. Virgil: Critical Assessments of Classical Authors. 4 vols. New York.
Hardie, P 2012. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge.
Hardy, R. B. 1991. “The Uses of Memory in the Poetry of Vergil,” unpublished PhD dissertation, Brown University.
Harrison, E. L. 1972–3. “Why Did Venus Wear Boots?,” PVS 12: 10–25. Reprinted in P. Hardie 1999: 4: 59–75.
Harrison, E. L.1984. “The Aeneid and Carthage,” in Woodman and West 1984: 95–115.
Harrison, E. L.1986. “Foundation Prodigies in the Aeneid,” PLLS 5: 131–64.
Harrison, E. L.1989. “The Tragedy of Dido,” EMC 33: 1–21.
Harrison, S. J. 1991. Aeneid 10: Vergil. Oxford.
Harrison, S. J 1998. “The Sword-Belt of Pallas: Moral Symbolism and Political Ideology. Aeneid 10.495–505,” in H.-P. Stahl ed., Vergil's Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. London.
Häusle, H. 1980. Das Denkmal als Garant des Nachruhms: Eine Studie zu einem Motiv in lateinischen Inschriften. München.
Heinze, R. 1993. Vergil's Epic Technique. Trans. H. and D. Harvey and F. Robertson. Berkeley.
Hejduk, J. 2009. “Jupiter's Aeneid: Fama and Imperium,” CA 28: 279–327.
Henry, E. 1989. The Vigour of Prophecy: A Study of Vergil's “Aeneid.” Carbondale, IL.
Henry, J. 1873. Aeneidea. 4 vol. London.
Hershkowitz, D. 1991. “The Aeneid in Aeneid 3,” Vergilius 37: 69–76.
Herzog, R. 1993. “Aeneas’ Episches Vergessen – Zur Poetik der memoria,” in A. Haverkamp and R. Lachmann, eds. Memoria: Vergessen und Erinnern. Munich. 81–116.
Heubeck, A., S. West, and J. B. Hainsworth. 1990. A Commentary on Homer's Odyssey. Vol. 1. Oxford.
Hexter, R. 1990a. “What Was the Trojan Horse Made of? Interpreting Vergil's Aeneid,” Yale Journal of Criticism 3: 109–31.
Hexter, R.1990b. “Sidonian Dido,” in R. Hexter and D. Selden, eds. Innovations of Antiquity. New York: 332–84.
HexterR. and D. Selden. 1992. Eds. Innovations of Antiquity. New York.
Highet, G. 1974. “Speech and Narrative in the Aeneid,” HSCP 78: 189–229.
Hill, T. 2004. Ambitiosa Mors: Suicide and Self in Roman Thought and Literature. New York.
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.
Hirsch, M. 1999. “Projected Memory: Holocaust Photographs in Personal and Public Fantasy,” in M. Bal, J. Crewe, and L. Spitzer, eds. Acts of Memory: Cultural Recall in the Present. London. 3–23.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2006. “History and Collective Memory in the Middle Republic,” in N. Rosenstein and R. Morstein-Marx, eds. A Companion to the Roman Republic. Oxford. 478–95.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and E. Stein-Hölkeskam. 2006. Eds. Erinnerungsorte der Antike: die Römische Welt. Munich.
Hölscher, T. 2006. “The Transformation of Victory into Power: From Event to Structure,” in S. Dillon and K. E. Welch, eds. Representations of War in Ancient Rome. Cambridge. 27–48.
Holt, P. 1979/1980. “Aeneid 5: Past and Future,” CJ 75: 110–21.
Hoppál, M. 1981. “Narration and Memory,” Fabula 22: 281–9.
Horsfall, N. 1981. “Virgil and the Conquest of Chaos,” Antichthon 15: 141–50.
Horsfall, N.1986. “The Aeneas Legend and the Aeneid,” Vergilius 32: 8–17. Reprinted in P. Hardie 1999. 3: 265–77.
Horsfall, N.1987. “The Aeneas Legend from Homer to Vergil,” in J. N. Bremmer and N. M. Horsfall, eds. Roman Myth and Mythography. London. 12–24.
Horsfall, N.1989. “Aeneas the Colonist,” Vergilius 35: 8–26.
Horsfall, N.1991. “Virgil and the Poetry of Explanations,” G&R 38: 203–11. Reprinted in P. Hardie 1999: 3: 278–86.
Horsfall, N.1995. “Virgil: His Life and Times,” in N. Horsfall, ed. A Companion to the Study of Virgil. Leiden. 1–25.
Horsfall, N.2000. Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. Leiden.
Horsfall, N.2003. Virgil, Aeneid 11: A Commentary. Leiden.
Horsfall, N.2006. Virgil, Aeneid 3: A Commentary. Leiden.
Horsfall, N.2008. Virgil, Aeneid 2: A Commentary. Leiden.
Hubbard, T. K. 1998. The Pipes of Pan: Intertextuality and Literary Filiation in the Pastoral Tradition from Theocritus to Milton. Ann Arbor.
Hunter, R. 1993. The “Argonautica” of Apollonius: Literary Studies. New York.
Irwin-Zarecka, I. 1994. Frames of Remembrance: The Dynamics of Collective Memory New Brunswick, NJ.
Jaeger, M. 1997. Livy's Written Rome. Ann Arbor.
James, S. 1995. “Establishing Rome with the Sword: Condere in the Aeneid,” AJP 116: 623–37.
Jenkyns, R. 1998. Virgil's Experience: Nature and History: Times, Names, and Places. Oxford.
Johnson, W. R. 1976. Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil's Aeneid. Berkeley.
Johnson, W. R.2005. “Introduction,” in S. Lombardo, trans. Virgil: Aeneid. Indianapolis. xv–lxxi.
Joseph, T. 2010. “Tacitus’ Repetition of Virgil's Wars at Histories 3.26–34,” in J. F. Miller and J. Woodman, eds. Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions. Leiden. 155–69.
Keith, A. 2000. Engendering Rome: Woman in Latin Epic. Cambridge.
Kent, R. G. 1938. Varro on the Latin Language. Cambridge, MA.
Kepple, L. R. 1976. “Arruns and the Death of Aeneas,” AJP 97: 344–60.
Kirk, A. 2005. “Social and Cultural Memory,” in A. Kirk and T. Thatcher, eds. Memory, Tradition and Text: Uses of the Past in Early Christianity. Atlanta. 1–24.
Kirk, G. S. 1985. The Iliad: A Commentary, Volume i: Books 1–4. Cambridge.
Kirk, G. S.1990. The Iliad: A Commentary, Volume ii: Books 5–8. Cambridge.
Knape, J. 1997. “Memoria in der älteren rhetoriktheoretischen Tradition,” Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistic 27: 6–21.
Knapp, S. 1989. “Collective Memory and the Actual Past,” Representations 26: 123–49.
Knauer, G. N. 1964a. Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur Poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. Göttingen.
Knauer, G. N.1964b. “Vergil's Aeneid and Homer,” GRBS 5: 61–84.
Knox, P. E. 1997. “Savagery in the Aeneid and Virgil's Ancient Commentators,” CJ 92: 225–33.
Kristol, S. S. 1990. “Labor” and “Fortuna” in Virgil's “Aeneid.” New York.
Küchler, S. and W. Melion. 1991. “Introduction,” in S. Küchler and W. Melion, eds. Images of Memory: On Remembering and Representation. 1–46.
Kyriakidis, S. 1998. Narrative Structure and Poetics in the Aeneid: The Frame of Book 6. Bari.
Larmour, D. H. J. and D. Spencer. 2007. Eds. The Sites of Rome: Time, Space, Memory. Oxford.
Lee, M. O. 1979. Fathers and Sons in Vergil's Aeneid: Tum Genitor Natum. Albany.
Lefkowitz, M. R. 1991. The Lives of the Greek Poets. Baltimore.
Levi, P. 1988. The Drowned and the Saved. Trans. R. Rosenthal. London.
Lewis, C. S. 1949. A Preface to “Paradise Lost.” Oxford.
Lincoln, B. 1982. “Waters of Memory, Waters of Forgetfulness,” Fabula 23: 19–34.
Lloyd, C. 1995. “The Evander-Anchises Connection: Fathers, Sons, and Homoerotic Desire in Vergil's Aeneid,” Vergilius 45: 3–21.
Lloyd, R. B. 1957. “Aeneid 3: A New Approach,” AJP 78: 133–51.
Lombardo, S. 2005. Virgil: Aeneid. Indianapolis.
Lowenstam, S. 1993. “The Pictures on Juno's Temple in the Aeneid,” CW 87: 37–49.
Lowrie, M. 2009. Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.
Luminet, O. and A. Curci. 2009. Eds. Flashbulb Memories: New Issues and New Perspectives. New York.
Luria, A. R. 1968. The Mind of a Mnemonist: A Little Book about a Vast Memory. Trans. L. Solotaroff. New York.
Lynch, J. P. 1980. “Laocoon and Sinon: Virgil, Aeneid 2, 40–198,” G&R 27: 170–9.
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1987. Further Voices in Vergil's “Aeneid.” Oxford.
Lyne, R. O. A. M.1989. Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil's Aeneid. Oxford.
MacDonald, R. 1987. The Burial Places of Memory: Epic Underworlds in Vergil, Dante, and Milton. Amherst.
Mack, S. 1978. Patterns of Time in Vergil. Hamden.
MacKay, L. A. 1957. “Achilles as Model for Aeneas,” TAPA 88: 11–6. Reprinted in P. Hardie 1999: 3: 87–92.
Mackie, C. J. 1990. “Quisquis in arma vocas: Turnus and Jupiter in the Aeneid,” Antichthon 24: 79–85.
MacLeod, C. W. 1982. Homer: Iliad Book xxiv. Cambridge.
Maltby, R. 1991. A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. Leeds.
Martin, R. P. 1989. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the “Iliad.” Ithaca.
Martindale, C. Ed. 1997. The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge.
Meadows, A. and J. Williams. 2001. “Moneta and the Monuments: Coinage and Politics in Republican Rome,” JRS 91: 27–49.
Meban, D. 2009. “Virgil's Eclogues and Social Memory,” AJP 130: 99–130.
Miller, J. 1993. “Ovidian Allusion and the Vocabulary of Memory,” M&D 30: 153–64.
Miller, J.2009. Apollo, Augustus, and the Poets. Cambridge.
Miller, P. A. 1995. “The Minotaur Within: Fire, the Labyrinth, and Strategies of Containment in Aeneid 5 and 6,” CP 90: 225–40.
Mitchell-Boyask, R. 1996. “Sine Fine: Vergil's Masterplot.” AJP 117: 289–307.
Möller, M. 2009. “attentio, intentio, contentio. Ciceros Rhetorik als Theorie der Aufmerksamkeit.” Habilitationsschrift, Heidelberg University.
Most, G. W. 2001. “Memory and Forgetting in the Aeneid,” Vergilius 47: 148–70.
Murnaghan, S. 1987. Disguise and Recognition in the Odyssey. Princeton.
Mynors, R. 1969. Ed. P. Vergili Maronis Opera. Oxford.
Nagy, G. 1979. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore.
Nagy, G 2007. “Homer and Greek Myth,” in R. D. Woodard, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology. Cambridge. 52–82.
Nappa, C. J. 2007. “Unmarried Dido: Aeneid 4.550–52,” Hermes 135: 301–13.
Nappa, C. J. 2010. “Catallus and Vergil,” in M. Skinner, ed. A Companion to Catallus. Malden. 377–98.
Nelis, D. 2001. Vergil's Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Leeds.
Nora, P. 1989. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire,” Representations 26: 7–24.
Norden, E. 1970. P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis Buch VI. 5th edn. Stuttgart.
Norden, E.1901. “Vergils Aeneis im Lichte ihrer Zeit,” Neue Jahrbücher für das Klassische Altertum. 7: 249–82, 313–34. Reprinted as “Virgil's Aeneid in the Light of Its Own Time,” in P. Hardie 1999: 3: 114–72. Trans. H. Harvey.
Novara, A. 1986. Poésie Virgilienne de la Mémoire: Questions sur L’Histoire dans L’Énéide 8. Paris.
Nugent, S. G. 1992. “Vergil's ‘Voice of the Women’ in Aeneid 5,” Arethusa 25: 255–92.
Nussbaum, M. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton.
Oakley, S. P. 2005. A Commentary on Livy Books vi–x: Volume 3, Book ix. Oxford.
Ogilvie, R. M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy Book 1–5. Oxford.
O’Hara, J. J. 1990. Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil's Aeneid. Princeton.
O’Hara, J. J 1996. True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay. Ann Arbor.
O’Hara, J. J 2007. Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. Cambridge.
Olick, J. K. 1999. “Collective Memory: Two Cultures,” Sociological Theory 17: 338–48.
Olick, J. K., V. Vinitzky-Seroussi, and D. Levy. 2011. Eds. The Collective Memory Reader. Oxford.
Oliensis, E. 2009. Freud's Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Poetry. Cambridge.
Onega, S. and J. A. G. Landa. 1996. “Introduction,” in S. Onega and J. A. G. Landa, eds. Narratology: An Introduction. London. 1–44.
Orlin, E. 2007. “Augustan Religion and the Reshaping of Roman Memory,” Arethusa 40: 73–92.
O’Sullivan, T. M. 2009. “Death ante ora parentum in Virgil's Aeneid,” TAPA 139: 447–86.
Otis, B. 1964. Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry. Oxford.
Page, T. E. 1893. “Review: Translations of the Aeneid by Rhoades and Sergeaunt,” CR 7: 415–8.
Papaioannou, S. 2003. “Founder, Civilizer, and Leader – Vergil's Evander and His Role in the Origins of Rome,” Mnemosyne 56: 680–702.
Parry, A. 1963. “The Two Voices of Virgil's Aeneid,” Arion 2: 66–80.
Paschalis, M. 1986. “The Unifying Theme of Daedalus’ Sculptures on the Temple of Apollo Cumanus (6.20–33),” Vergilius 32: 33–41.
Paschalis, M.1997. Virgil's Aeneid: Semantic Relations and Proper Names. Oxford.
Pavlovskis, Z. 1976. “Aeneid V: The Old and the Young,” CJ 71: 193–205.
Perkell, C. 1997. “The Lament of Juturna: Pathos and Interpretation in the Aeneid,” TAPA 127: 257–86.
Perkell, C 1999. “Aeneid 1: An Epic Programme,” in C. Perkell, ed. Reading Vergil's Aeneid: An Interpretative Guide. Norman, OK. 29–49.
Port, W. 1962. Sayings of Rammikar. Chicago.
Pöschl, V. 1970. The Art of Vergil: Image and Symbol in the Aeneid. Trans. G. Seligson. Ann Arbor.
Pöschl, V.1975. “Die Templetüren des Dädalus in der Aeneid,” WJA 1: 119–33.
Primmer, A. 1994/95. “Das Tischprodigium im Rahmen der Aeneis,” WS 107/8: 397–416.
Purcell, N. 2003. “Becoming Historical: The Roman Case,” in D. Braund and C. Gill 2003: 12–40.
Putnam, M. C. J. 1966. The Poetry of the “Aeneid”: Four Studies in Imaginative Unity and Design. Cambridge, MA.
Putnam, M. C. J 1981. “Pius Aeneas and the Metamorphosis of Lausus,” Arethusa 14: 139–56
Putnam, M. C. J 1990. “Anger, Blindness and Insight in Virgil's Aeneid,” in M. C. Nussbaum, ed. The Poetics of Therapy: Hellenistic Ethics in Its Rhetorical and Literary Context. Edmonton. 7–40.
Putnam, M. C. J 1995. Virgil's Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence.
Putnam, M. C. J 1998. Virgil's Epic Designs. New Haven.
Quint, D. 1982. “Painful Memories: Aeneid 3 and the Problem of the Past,” CJ 78: 30–8.
Quint, D.1989. “Repetition and Ideology in the Aeneid,” MD 24: 9–54. Reprinted in P. Hardie 1999: 4: 117–57.
Quint, D.1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Vergil to Milton. Princeton.
Quint, D.2010. “Aeacidae Pyrrhi: Myth and History in Aeneid 1–6,” in B. Breed and C. Damon, eds. Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford. 133–44.
Rea, J. A. 2007. Legendary Rome: Myth, Monuments and Memory on the Palatine and Capitoline. London.
Reckford, K. J. 1995/6. “Recognizing Venus. I, Aeneas Meets His Mother,” Arion 3: 1–42.
Redfield, J. M. 1994. Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector. Expanded edn. Durham.
Reed, J. D. 2007. Vergil's Gaze: Nation and Poetry in the Aeneid. Princeton.
Rodgers, R. H. 1992. “Quique Sui Memores Alios Fecere Merendo: The Roman Reward for Public Service,” NECN 19: 24–7.
Rogerson, A. 2012. “Vegio's Ascanius: Problems in the Continuation of the Aeneid,” Classical Receptions Journal 4: 1–20.
Roller, M. B. 2004. “Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia,” CP 99: 1–56.
Ross, D. O. 2007. Virgil's Aeneid: A Reader's Guide. Malden.
Russo, J., M. Fernández-Galiano, and A. Heubeck. 1992. A Commentary on Homer's Odyssey: Volume iii, Books xvii–xxiv. Oxford.
Rutledge, H. C. 1967. “Vergil's Daedalus,” CJ 62: 309–11.
Rutledge, H. C.1971–72. “The Opening of Aeneid 6,” CJ 67: 110–15.
Saylor, C. F. 1970. “Toy Troy: The New Perspective of the Backward Glance,” Vergilius 16: 26–8.
Scafoglio, G. 2008. “Sinon in Roman Drama,” CJ 104: 11–8.
Scarth, E. 2008. Mnemotechnics and Virgil: The Art of Memory and Remembering. Saarbrücken.
Scodel, R. 2002. “Homeric Signs and Flashbulb Memory,” in I. Worthington, and J. M. Foley, eds. Epea and Grammata: Oral and Written Communication in Ancient Greece. Leiden. 99–116.
Scodel, R.2008. “Social Memory in Aeschylus’ Oresteia,” in E. A. Mackay, ed. Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World. Leiden. 115–41.
Segal, C. 1981. “Art and the Hero: Participation, Detachment, and Narrative Point of View in Aeneid 1,” Arethusa 14: 67–83.
Simpson, J. and E. Weiner. 2009. Eds. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford.
Shils, E. 1981. Tradition. Chicago.
Short, W. M. 2012. “A Roman Folk Model of the Mind,” Arethusa 45: 109–47.
Skutsch, O. 1985. The Annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford.
Small, J. P. 1997. Wax Tablets of the Mind: Cognitive Studies of Memory and Literacy in Classical Antiquity. London.
Small, J. P. and J. Tatum. 1995. “Memory and the Study of Classical Antiquity: Introduction,” Helios 22: 149–50.
Smith, A. 1997. Poetic Allusion and Poetic Embrace in Ovid and Virgil. Ann Arbor.
Smith, A.2005. The Primacy of Vision in Virgil's Aeneid. Austin.
Spence, S. 1988. Rhetorics of Reason and Desire: Vergil, Augustine, and the Troubadours. Ithaca.
Spence, S.1991. “Clinching the Text: The Danaids and the End of the Aeneid,” Vergilius 37: 11–9.
Stahl, H.-P. 1981. “Aeneas – an ‘(Un)heroic’ Hero?,” Arethusa 41: 157–77.
Stahl, H-P.1990. “The Death of Turnus: Augustan Vergil and the Political Rival,” in K. A. Raaflaub and M. Toher, eds. Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate. Berkeley 174–211.
Stanford, W. B. 1962. Homer: Odyssey xiii–xxiv. 2nd edn. Bristol.
Stem, R. 2007. “The Exemplary Lessons of Livy's Romulus,” TAPA 137: 435–71.
Sumi, G. S. 2009. “Monuments and Memory: The Aedes Castoris in the Formation of Augustan Ideology,” CQ 59: 167–86.
Syed, Y. 2005. Vergil's “Aeneid” and the Roman Self: Subject and Nation in Literary Discourse. Ann Arbor.
Tarrant, R. 2004. “The Last Book of the Aeneid,” SyllClass 15: 103–29.
Tarrant, R. 2012. Virgil Aeneid Book xii. Cambridge.
Tatum, J. 1995. “Aunt Elvie's Quilt on the Bed of Odysseus: The Role of Artifacts in Natural Memory,” Helios 22: 167–74.
Tatum, J.2003. The Mourner's Song: War and Remembrance from the Iliad to Vietnam. Chicago.
Theodorakopoulos, E. 2004. “The Name of the Game: The Troia, and History and Spectacle in Aeneid 5,” PVS 25: 63–72.
ThomasR. 1992. Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece. Cambridge.
Thomas, R. F. 1986. “From recusatio to Commitment,” PLLS 5: 61–73.
Thomas, R. F 1988. Georgics: Virgil. Vol. 1. Cambridge.
Thomas, R. F 1999. “The Old Man Revisited: Memory, Reference, and Genre in Virg. Georg 4, 116–48,” in R. F. Thomas, ed. Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. 173–205. Reprint of 1992, MD 29: 35–70.
Toll, K. 1991. “The Aeneid as an Epic of National Identity: Italiam Laeto Socii Clamore Salutant,” Helios 18: 3–14.
Toll, K.1997. “Making Roman-ness and the Aeneid,” CA 16: 34–56.
Trahman, C. R. 1952. “Odysseus’ Lies (Odyssey, Books 13–19),” TAPA 6: 31–43.
Vance, E. 1973. “Warfare and the Structure of Thought in Virgil's Aeneid,” QUCC 15: 111–61.
Van Dyke, R. M. and S. E. Alcock. 2003. Archaeologies of Memory. Malden.
Vernant, J. 1991. Mortals and Immortals: Collected Essays. F. I. Zeitlin, ed. Princeton.
Vervliet, R. and A. Estor. 2000. Eds. Methods for the Study of Literature as Cultural Memory: Leiden 16–22 August 1997. Amsterdam.
Wacht, M. 1996. Ed. Concordantia Vergiliana. Hildesheim.
Walter, U. 2004Memoria und Res Publica: zur Geschichtskultur im Republikanischen Rom. Frankfurt am Main.
Watkins, C. 1990. “What Is Philology?,” Comparative Literature Studies 27: 21–5.
Weinrich, H. 2004. Lethe: The Art and Critique of Forgetting. Trans. S. Rendall. Ithaca.
Welzer, H. 2007. Ed. Der Krieg der Erinnerung : Holocaust, Kollaboration und Widerstand im Europäischen Gedächtnis. Frankfurt am Main.
West, D. 1974. “The Deaths of Hector and Turnus,” G&R 21: 21–31. Reprinted in P. Hardie 1999: 4: 381–91.
West, G. 1983. “Andromache and Dido,” AJP 104: 257–67.
West, M. L. 1966. Ed. Hesiod: Theogony. Oxford.
West, S. 1983. “Notes on the Text of Lycophron,” CQ 33: 114–35.
Wharton, D. 2008. “Sunt Lacrimae Rerum: An Exploration in Meaning,” CJ 103: 259–79.
Wheeler, S. M. 1999. A Discourse of Wonders: Audience and Performance in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Philadelphia.
White, P. 1993. Promised Verse: Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome. Cambridge, MA.
Williams, G. 1983. Techniques and Ideas in the Aeneid. New Haven.
WilliamsR. D. 1960. “The Pictures on Dido's Temple,” CQ 10: 145–51.
WilliamsR. D 1971. “Dido's Reply to Aeneas (4.362–387),” H. Bardon and R. Verdière, eds. Vergiliana. Leiden. 422–8.
WilliamsR. D 1972. The Aeneid of Virgil. Vol. 2. London.
Wiltshire, S. F. 1988. Public and Private in the “Aeneid.” Amherst.
Wiseman, T. P. 1984. “Cybele, Virgil, and Augustus,” in Woodman and West 1984: 117–28.
Woodman, T. and D. West. 1984. Eds. Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. Cambridge.
Wray, D. 2001. Catullus and the Poetics of Roman Manhood. Cambridge.
Wright, M. R. 1997. “Ferox Virtus: Anger in Virgil's Aeneid,” in S. M. Braund and C. Gill 1997: 169–84.
Yates, F. A. 1974. The Art of Memory. Chicago.
Yerushalmi, Y. H. 1982. Zakhor: Jewish History and Jewish Memory. Seattle.
Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Trans. A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor.
Zarker, J. W. 1967. “Aeneas and Theseus in Aeneid 6,” CJ 62: 220–26.
Zerubavel, E. 1996. “Social Memories: Steps to a Sociology of the Past,” Qualitative Sociology 19: 283–99.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1989. “Romane Memento: Justice and Judgment in Aeneid 6,” TAPA 119: 263–84.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.