Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
2009.
BOOKS RECEIVED.
Church History,
Vol. 78,
Issue. 3,
p.
723.
2012.
A Cultural History of the Atlantic World, 1250–1820.
p.
397.
2012.
Inequality.
p.
381.
Archer, Dawn
2012.
The Oxford Handbook of the History of English.
p.
145.
2012.
Cotton Mather als Aufklärer.
p.
269.
Kytö, Merja
2012.
Introduction.
Studia Neophilologica,
Vol. 84,
Issue. sup1,
p.
1.
Keister, Lisa A.
and
Southgate, Darby E.
2012.
Inequality.
Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena
2012.
“I am a Gosple Woman”: On Language in the Courtroom Discourse during the Salem Witch Trials, with Special Reference to Female Examinees.
Studia Neophilologica,
Vol. 84,
Issue. sup1,
p.
55.
Rissanen, Matti
2012.
Power and Changing Roles in Salem Witch Trials: The Case of George Jacobs, Sr..
Studia Neophilologica,
Vol. 84,
Issue. sup1,
p.
119.
Meurman‐Solin, Anneli
2012.
The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics.
p.
465.
Grund, Peter J.
2012.
The Nature of Knowledge: Evidence and Evidentiality in the Witness Depositions from the Salem Witch Trials.
American Speech,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 1,
p.
7.
Peikola, Matti
2012.
Supplicatory Voices: Genre Properties of the 1692 Petitions in the Salem Witch-Trials1.
Studia Neophilologica,
Vol. 84,
Issue. sup1,
p.
106.
2013.
A Dictionary of Varieties of English.
p.
363.
Geisler, Christer
2013.
Non-native 17th-century English.
Studia Neophilologica,
Vol. 85,
Issue. 2,
p.
174.
Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Marta María
2016.
Reescrituras de los procesos por brujería de Salem en la literatura popular actual.
El Futuro del Pasado,
Vol. 7,
Issue. ,
p.
85.
Hickey, Raymond
2017.
The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics.
p.
270.
Doty, Kathleen L.
2018.
Legal Pragmatics.
Vol. 288,
Issue. ,
p.
21.
2020.
Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts.
Vol. 97,
Issue. ,
Grund, Peter J.
2020.
A Companion to American Literature.
p.
73.
Grund, Peter J.
Peikola, Matti
Rastas, Johanna
and
Xin, Wen
2021.
The <u> and <v> Alternation in the History of English.
American Speech,
Vol. 96,
Issue. 2,
p.
127.