Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Representation Reconsidered
  • Cited by 276
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
November 2009
Print publication year:
2007
Online ISBN:
9780511597954
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597954
Subjects:
Life Sciences, Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy
Information

Book description

Cognitive representation is the single most important explanatory notion in the sciences of the mind and has served as the cornerstone for the so-called 'cognitive revolution'. This book critically examines the ways in which philosophers and cognitive scientists appeal to representations in their theories, and argues that there is considerable confusion about the nature of representational states. This has led to an excessive over-application of the notion - especially in many of the fresher theories in computational neuroscience. Representation Reconsidered shows how psychological research is actually moving in a non-representational direction, revealing a radical, though largely unnoticed, shift in our basic understanding of how the mind works.

Reviews

Review of the hardback:'A must read for those interested in the role of representation in cognitive science, and a nice review of the literature along the way that will be appreciated by both students and scholars.'

Robert Cummins - University of Illinois

'… a superb insightful analysis of the notion of mental representation in cognitive science. The book presents an original argument for a bold conclusion: partial eliminativism about mental representation in scientific psychology … I would warmly recommend Ramsey's book to anyone working on representation.'

Mark Sprevak Source: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

'[This] book makes a well-informed, carefully argued and convincing case for its core argument. Everyone who is seriously interested in the philosophy of cognitive science and the status of psychological theorizing should read it.'

Daniel D. Hutto Source: Philosophical Psychology

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
References
References
Adams, F. and Aizawa, K. 1994. “Fodorian semantics,” in Stich, S. and Warfield, T. (eds.), Mental Representation: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 223–242.
Amsel, A. and Rashotte, M. 1984. Mechanisms of Adaptive Behavior: Clark L. Hull's Theoretical Papers, with Commentary. New York: Columbia University Press.
Anderson, J. R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R. 2000. Cognitive Psychology and its Implications: Fifth Edition. New York: Worth Publishing.
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1957. Intention. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Baars, B. 1986. The Cognitive Revolution in Psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
Baker, L. 1987. Saving Belief: A Critique of Physicalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Barlow, H. 1995. “The neuron doctrine in perception,” in Gazzaniga, M. (ed.), The Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 415–435.
Bechtel, W. 1998. “Representations and cognitive explanations,” Cognitive Science 22: 295–318.
Bechtel, W.2001. “Representations: from neural systems to cognitive systems,” in Bechtel, W., Mandik, P., Mundale, J., and Sufflebeam, R. (eds.), Philosophy and the Neurosciences. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 332–348.
Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. 2001. Connectionism and the Mind: Parallel Processing, Dynamics and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Beer, R. D. 1995. “A dynamic systems perspective on agent-environment interaction,” Artificial Intelligence 72: 173–215.
Beer, R.D. and Gallagher, J. C. 1992. “Evolving dynamical neural networks for adaptive behavior,” Adaptive behavior 1 (1): 91–122.
Bickle, J. 2003. Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. New York: Kluwer/Springer Publishing.
Blakemore, R. and Frankel, R. 1981. “Magnetic navigation in bacteria,” Scientific American 245(6): 58–67.
Block, N. 1986. “Advertisement for a semantics for psychology,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10: 615–678.
Block, N.1990. “The computer model of the mind,” in Osherson, D. and Smith, E. (eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Vol. 3: Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Boden, M. 1977. Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man. New York: Basic Books.
Brachman, R. and Levesque, H. 2004. Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
Brooks, R. 1991. “Intelligence without representation,” Artificial Intelligence 47: 139–159. Reprinted in Haugeland, 1997.
Chemero, A. 2000. “Anti-representationalism and the dynamical stance,” Philosophy of Science 67(4): 625–647.
Churchland, P. M. 1981. “Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes,” Journal of Philosophy 78: 67–90.
Churchland, P. M. 1989. A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Churchland, P. S. 1986. Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Churchland, P. S., Koch, C., and Sejnowski, T. 1990. “What is computational neuroscience?” in Schwartz, E. (ed.), Computational Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Churchland, P. S. and Sejnowski, T. 1989. “Neural representation and neural computation,” in Nadel, L., Cooper, L. A., Culicover, P., and Harnish, R. (eds.), Neural Connections, Mental Computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 15–48.
Churchland, P. S. and Sejnowski, T. 1992. The Computational Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clapin, H. 2002. The Philosophy of Mental Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. 1991. “In defense of explicit rules,” in Ramsey, W., Stich, S., and Rumelhart, D. (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Clark, A. 1993. Associative Engines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, A. 1997. “The dynamical challenge,” Cognitive Science 21 (4): 461–481.
Clark, A. 2001. Mindware. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. and Toribio, J. 1994. “Doing without representing?” Synthese 101: 401–431.
Collins, A. and Quillian, M. 1972. “Experiments on semantic memory and language comprehension,” in Gregg, L. (ed.), Cognition in Learning and Memory. New York: Wiley, pp. 117–137.
Copeland, J. 1993. Artificial Intelligence: A Philosophical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Copeland, J. 1996. “What is computation?” Synthese 108: 335–359.
Crane, T. 2003. The Mechanical Mind. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Crowe, M. 2001. Theories of the World from Antiquity to the Copernican Revolution: Revised Edition. New York: Dover Publications.
Cummins, R. 1975. “Functional analysis,” Journal of Philosophy, 72 (20): 741–756.
Cummins, R. 1983. The Nature of Psychological Explanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cummins, R.1986. “Inexplicit information,” in Brand, M. and Harnish, R. (eds.), The Representation of Knowledge and Belief. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, pp. 116–126.
Cummins, R. 1989. Meaning and Mental Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cummins, R.1991. “The role of representation in connectionist explanations of cognitive capacities,” in Ramsey, W., Stich, S., and Rumelhart, D. (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 91–114.
Cummins, R. 1996. Representations, Targets and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Charms, R. C. and Zador, A. 2000. “Neural representation and the cortical code,” The Annual Review of Neuroscience 23: 613–647.
Delaney, C. F. 1993. Science, Knowledge, and Mind: A Study in the Philosophy of C.S. Peirce. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
Dennett, D. 1978. Brainstorms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dennett, D. 1982. “Styles of mental representation,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, n.s. 83: 213–226. Reprinted in Dennett, 1987.
Dennett, D. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dennett, D.1990. “The myth of original intentionality,” in Said, K. A. Mohyeldin, Newton-Smith, W. H., Viale, R., and Wilkes, K. V. (eds.), Modelling the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 43–62.
Dennett, D.1991a. “Two contrasts: folk craft versus folk science, and belief versus opinion,” in Greenwood, J. D. (ed.), The Future of Folk Psychology: Intentionality and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–148.
Dennett, D. 1991b. Consciousness Explained. London: Penguin.
Dennett, D. and Haugeland, J. 1987. “Intentionality,” in Gregory, R. L. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 383–386.
Donahue, W. H. 1981. The Dissolution of the Celestial Spheres. Manchester, NH: Ayer Co Publishing.
Dretske, F. 1988. Explaining Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Elliffe, M. 1999. “Performance measurement based on usable information,” in Baddeley, R., Hancock, P., and Foldiak, P. (eds.), Information Theory and the Brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Field, H. 1978. “Mental representation,” Erkenntnis 13: 9–61.
Fodor, J. 1968. Psychological Explanations: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Psychology. New York: Random House.
Fodor, J. 1980. “Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive science,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1): 63–73. Reprinted in Fodor, 1981.
Fodor, J. 1981. RePresentations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. 1985. “Fodor's guide to mental representation,” Mind 94: 76–100.
Fodor, J. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. 1990. A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. 1992. “The big idea: can there be a science of mind?” Times Literary Supplement July 3, pp. 5–7.
Fodor, J and Pylyshyn, Z. 1988. “Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis,” Cognition 28: 3–71.
Forster, M. and Saidel, E. 1994. “Connectionism and the fate of folk psychology: a reply to Ramsey, Stich and Garon,” Philosophical Psychology 7 (4): 437–452.
Frankish, K. 2004. Mind and Supermind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, W. and Skarda, C. 1990. “Representations: who needs them?” in McGaugh, J., Weinberger, N., and Lynch, G. (eds.), Brain Organization and Memory: Cells, Systems and Circuits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 375–380.
Gallistel, C. R. 1998. “Symbolic processes in the brain: the case of insect navigation,” in Scarborough, D. and Sternberg, S. (eds.), Methods, Models and Conceptual Issues: Vol. 4, of An Invitation to Cognitive Science, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–51.
Goldman, A. 1992. “In defense of simulation theory,” Mind and Language 7: 104–119.
Gopnik, A. and Wellman, H. 1992. “Why the child's theory of mind really is a theory,” Mind and Language 7: 145–171.
Gordon, R. 1986. “Folk psychology as simulation,” Mind and Language 1: 158–171.
Gorman, R. and Sejnowski, T. 1988. “Analysis of the hidden units in a layered network trained to classify sonar targets,” Neural Networks 1: 75–89.
Grice, P. 1957. “Meaning,” Philosophical Review 66: 377–388.
Griffiths, P. E. 2001. “Genetic information: a metaphor in search of a theory?” Philosophy of Science 68: 394–412.
Grush, R. 1997. “The architecture of representation,” Philosophical Psychology 10 (1): 5–25.
Grush, R. 2004. “The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3): 377–396.
Haldane, J. 1993. “Understanding folk,” in Christensen, S. and Turner, D. (eds.), Folk Psychology and the Philosophy of Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 263–287.
Harnish, R. 2002. Minds, Brains, and Computers. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Haugeland, J. 1978. “The nature and plausibility of cognitivism,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2: 215–260. Reprinted in Haugeland, 1981.
Haugeland, J. 1981. Mind Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Haugeland, J. 1985. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Haugeland, J.1991. “Representational genera,” in Ramsey, W., Stich, S., and Rumelhart, D. (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 61–89.
Haugeland, J. 1997. Mind Design II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Haybron, D. 2000. “The causal and explanatory role of information stored in connectionist networks,” Minds and Machines 10 (3): 361–380.
Heil, J. 1991. “Being indiscrete” in Greenwood, J. D. (ed.), The Future of Folk Psychology: Intentionality and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 120–134.
Homme, L. E. 1965. “Control of coverants, the operants of the mind. Perspectives in psychology, 24”, The Psychological Record 15: 501–511.
Horgan, T. 1989. “Mental quasation,” in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 3: 47–76.
Horgan, T.1994. “Computation and mental representation,” in Stich, S. and Warfield, T. (eds.), Mental Representation: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 302–311.
Hubel, D. and Wiesel, T. 1962. “Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex,” Journal of Physiology 160: 106–154.
Hubel, D. and Wiesel, T. 1968. “Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex,” Journal of Physiology 195: 215–243.
Hull, C. L. 1930. “Knowledge and purpose as habit mechanisms,” Psychological Review 37: 511–525.
Hull, C. L. 1931. “Goal attraction and directing ideas conceived as habit phenomena,” Psychological Review 38: 487–506.
Hull, C. L. 1932. “The goal gradient hypothesis and maze learning,” Psychological Review 39: 25–43.
Jaynes, J. 1976. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Wilmington, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Johnson-Laird, P. 1983. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kendler, H. H. 1971. “Environmental and cognitive control of behavior,” American Psychologist 26 (11): 962–973.
Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kirsh, D. 1990. “When is information explicitly represented?” The Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, vol. 1: 340–365.
Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lashley, K. 1960. “In search of the engram,” in Beach, F., Hebb, D., Morgan, C., and Nissen, H (eds.), The Neuropsychology of Lashley, Selected Papers. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 478–505.
Leibniz, G. W. 1956. Philosophical Papers and Letters. Loemkar, L. (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lettvin, J., Maturana, H., McCulloch, W., and Pitts, W. 1959. “What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain,” Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 47: 1940–1951.
Lloyd, D. 1995. “Consciousness: a connectionist manifesto,” Minds and Machines 5 (2): 161–185.
Lycan, W. 1986. “Tacit belief,” in Bogdan, R. J. (ed.), Belief. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 61–82.
Marr, D. 1982. Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Maynard-Smith, J. 2000. “The concept of information in biology,” Philosophy of Science 67 (2): 177–194.
McNaughton, B. L. 1989. “Neural mechanisms for spatial computation and information storage,” in Nadel, L. A., Cooper, P., Culicover, P., and Harnish, R. (eds.), Neural Connections and Mental Computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 285–349.
Melden, A. I. 1961. Free Action. New York: Humanities Press.
Millikan, R. 1984. Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Millikan, R. 1993. White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Millikan, R.1996. “Pushmi-pullyu representations,” in Tomberlin, J. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives IX: AI, Connectionism, and Philosophical Psychology. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing, pp. 185–200.
Mumford, S. 1998. Dispositions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Newell, A. 1980. “Physical symbol systems,” Cognitive Science 4: 135–183.
Newell, A. 1990. Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newell, A. and Simon, H. 1976. “Computer science as empirical inquiry,” Communications of the ACM 19 (3): 113–126. Reprinted in Haugeland, 1981.
Nisbett, R. and Wilson, T. 1977. “Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes,” Psychological Review 84: 231–259.
O' Brien, G. and Opie, J. 1999. “A connectionist theory of phenomenal experience,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 127–148.
Osgood, C. E. 1956. “Behavior theory and the social sciences,” Behavioral Sciences 1: 167–185.
O' Reilly, R. C. and Munakata, Y. 2000. Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Palmer, S. 1978. “Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation,” in Rosch, E. and Lloyd, E. (eds.), Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 259–303.
Papideau, D. 1984. “Representation and explanation,” Philosophy of Science 51 (4): 550–572.
Peirce, C. S. 1931–58. The Collected Papers of C.S. Peirce, vols. 1–8. Burks, A., Hartshorne, C., and Weiss, P. (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Pylyshyn, Z. 1984. Computation and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ramsey, W. 1991. “Where does the self-refutation objection take us?” Inquiry 33: 453–465.
Ramsey, W. 1995. “Rethinking distributed representation,” Acta Analytica 14: 9–25.
Ramsey, W. 1996. “Investigating commonsense psychology,” Communication and Cognition 29 (1): 91–120.
Ramsey, W. 1997. “Do connectionist representations earn their explanatory keep?” Mind and Language 12: 34–66.
Ramsey, W.2003. “Eliminative materialism,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. E. N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu.archives/fall2003/entries/materialism-eliminativism/.
Ramsey, W., Stich, S., and Garon, J. 1990. “Connectionism, eliminativism and the future of folk psychology,” Philosophical Perspectives 4. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing: 499–533. Reprinted in Ramsey, Stich, and Rumelhart, 1991.
Ramsey, W., Stich, S., and Rumelhart, D. 1991. Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Reike, F., Warland, D., Ruyter van Steveninck, R., and Bialek, W. 1997. Spikes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Robinson, W. 1992. Computers, Minds and Robots. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Rogers, T. and McClelland, J. 2004. Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roitblat, H. L. 1982. “The meaning of representation in animal memory,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, 353–406.
Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. B. 1975. “Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories,” Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605.
Rumelhart, D. 1990. “Brain style computation: learning and generalization,” in Zornetzer, S., Davis, J., and Lau, C. (eds.), An Introduction to Neural and Electronic Networks. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 405–420.
Rumelhart, D. and McClelland, J. 1986a. Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rumelhart, D. and McClelland, J. 1986b. Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ryder, D. 2004. “SINBAD neurosemantics: a theory of mental representation,” Mind and Language 19 (2): 211–240.
Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Searle, J. 1980. “Minds, brains and programs,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 417–424. Reprinted in Haugeland, 1997.
Searle, J. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. 1984. Minds, Brains and Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Searle, J. 1990. “Is the brain a digital computer?” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 64: 21–37.
Searle, J. 1991. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sejnowski, T. J. and Rosenberg, C. R. 1987. “Parallel networks that learn to pronounce English text,” Complex Systems 1: 145–168.
Shank, R. and Abelson, R. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Shapiro, M. and Eichenbaum, H. 1997. “Learning and memory: computational principles and neural mechanisms,” in Rugg, M. D. (ed.), Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Singer, P. 1972. “Famine, affluence and morality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–243.
Skinner, B. F. 1976. About Behaviorism. New York: Vintage Books.
Smith, E. and Medin, D. 1981. Categories and Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Smolensky, P. 1988. “On the proper treatment of connectionism,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11: 1–23.
Smolensky, P.1991. “Connectionism, constituency, and the language of thought,” in Loewer, B. and Rey, G. (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and his Critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 201–227.
Snyder, L., Batista, A., and Anderson, R. A. 1997. “Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex,” Nature 386: 167–170.
Stalnaker, R. 1984. Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sterelney, K. 2003. Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Stich, S. 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stich, S. 1992. “What is a theory of mental representation?” Mind 101: 243–261. Reprinted in S. Stich and T. Warfield (eds.), 1994.
Stich, S. 1996. Deconstructing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stich, S. and Nichols, S. 1993. “Folk psychology: simulation or tacit theory?” Mind and Language 7: 35–71.
Stich, S. and Warfield, T. (eds.) 1994. Mental Representation: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Swoyer, C. 1991. “Structural representation and surrogative reasoning,” Synthese 87: 449–508.
Thelan, E. and Smith, L. 1994. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Unger, P. 1996. Living High and Letting Die. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Gelder, T. 1991. “What is the ‘D’ in ‘PDP’?, a survey of the concept of distribution,” in Ramsey, W., Stich, S., and Rumelhart, D. (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 33–59.
Gelder, T. 1995. “What might cognition be, if not computation?” The Journal of Philosophy 91: 345–381.
Eckardt, B. 1993. What is Cognitive Science?Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Warfield, T. 1998. “Commentary on John Searle,” Notre Dame Perspectives Lecture.
Watson, J. B. 1930. Behaviorism (revised edn.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
White, P. A. 1988. “Knowing more than we can tell: ‘introspective access’ and causal report accuracy ten years later,” British Journal of Psychology 79 (1): 13–45.
Winograd, T. 1972. Understanding Natural Language. New York: Academic Press.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.