Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T08:24:35.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II.C.3 - Beans, Peas, and Lentils

from II.C - Important Vegetable Supplements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Kenneth F. Kiple
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

The Names

On Sunday, November 4, 1492, three weeks after his first landing in the New World, Christopher Columbus saw lands planted with “faxones and fabas very diverse and different from ours [those of Spain]and two days afterward, following the north coast of Cuba,” he again found “land well cultivated with these fexoes and habas much unlike ours” (Hedrick 1931: 3).

In a transcription (Dunn and Kelley 1989: 132) from Columbus’s diary, the Spanish phrase faxones y favas has been translated as “beans and kidney beans” (Morrison and Jane-Vigneras, cited by Dunn and Kelley 1989: 133). But considering what Columbus might have seen in the markets or kitchens of the fifteenth-century Iberian–Mediterranean world, faxone probably refers to the African–Asian cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), and fava surely means the fava (= faba), or broad bean (Vicia faba), long known in Europe and the Mediterranean–Asian world. Columbus’s brief record presaged the long confusion and debate over the names and origins of some important food grain legumes. Had herbalists and botanical authors of the succeeding three centuries taken account of Columbus’s recognition that these New World legumes were different from those of Europe, some of the confusion might have been avoided.

The beans, peas, and lentils (pulses, or food grain legumes) discussed in this chapter are legumes, treated in technical botanical literature as members of the very large family Fabaceae (= Leguminosae), subfamily Papilionoideae (having butterflylike flowers), although some taxonomists accord this group family status (Papilionaceae). The names of the species, however, are not changed by the differing positions taken by plant taxonomists on family nomenclature. The flowers of papilionaceous legumes have five petals consisting of one broad standard, two lateral wings, and two keel petals that clasp the 10 stamens and single ovary (which becomes the pod).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aykroyd, W. R., and Doughty, J.. 1964. Legumes in human nutrition. FAO. Rome.Google Scholar
Beals, R. L. 1932. The comparative ethnology of northern Mexico before 1750. Ibero-Americana 2.Google Scholar
Bendremer, J. C. M., Kellogg, E. A., and Largy, T. B.. 1991. A grass-lined maize storage pit and early maize horticulture in central Connecticut. North American Archaeologist 12.Google Scholar
Blumler, M. A. 1991. Modeling the origin of legume domestication and cultivation. Economic Botany 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R. H., Kaplan, L., Cutler, H. C., and Whitaker, T. H.. 1962. Plant material from a cave on the Rio Zape, Durango, Mexico. American Antiquity 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, A. 1989. Cryptic anatomical characters as evidence of early cultivation in the grain legumes. In Foraging and farming, the evolution of plant exploitation, ed. Harris, David R. and Hillman, Gordon C.. London.Google Scholar
Candolle, Alphonse. [1886]1964. Origin of cultivated plants. Second edition. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castetter, E. F., and Bell, W. H.. 1942. Pima and Papago Indian agriculture. Albuquerque, N. Mex.Google Scholar
Darby, William J., Ghalioungui, Paul, and Grivetti, Louisa. 1977. Food: The gift of Osiris. 2 vols. London.Google Scholar
Delgado Salinas, Alfonso. 1988. Otra interpretacíon en torno a la domesticacíon de Phaseolus. In Estudios sobre las revoluciones neolitica y urbana, ed. Manzanilla, L.. Mexico.Google Scholar
Duke, J. A. 1981. Handbook of legumes of world economic importance. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, O., and Kelley, J. E. Jr. 1989. The Diario of Christopher Columbus’s first voyage to America 1492–1493. Norman, Okla.Google Scholar
Franquemont, C., Franquemont, E., Davis, W., et al. 1990. The ethnobotany of Chinchero, an Andean community of southern Peru. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Fieldiana, Publication No. 1408.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. F. 1912. Southwestern beans and teparies. Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 68. Phoenix.Google Scholar
Gepts, P. A. 1988. Genetic resources of Phaseolus beans. Dordrecht, Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. 1992. Franchthi cave and the beginnings of agriculture in Greece and the Aegean. In Préhistoire de l'agriculture: Novelles approches expérimentales et ethnographiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Hedrick, U. P. 1931. The vegetables of New York, Vol. 1, Part 2, Beans of New York. Albany, N.Y.Google Scholar
Hedrick, U. P. ed. [1919]1972. Sturtevant’s notes on edible plants. New York.Google Scholar
Heiser, C. B. Jr. 1965. Cultivated plants and cultural diffusion in nuclear America. American Anthropologist 67.Google Scholar
Hendry, G. W. 1934. Bean cultivation in California. California Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 294.Google Scholar
Herklots, G. A. C. 1972. Vegetables in Southeast Asia. London.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L. 1967. Archeological Phaseolus from Tehuacan. In The prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley, ed. Byers, Douglas S.. Austin, Tex.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L. 1970. Plant remains from the Blain Site. In Blain Village and the Fort Ancient tradition in Ohio, ed. Prufer, Olaf H. and Shane, Orrin C. III. Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L. 1981. What is the origin of the common bean?Economic Botany 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, L. 1986. Preceramic Phaseolus from Guila' Naquitz. In Guila' Naquitz: Archaic foraging and early agriculture in Oxaca, ed. Flannery, Kent. Orlando, Fla.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L. 1994. Accelerator Mass Spectrometry date and the antiquity of Phaseolus cultivation. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 37.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L. 1995. Accelerator dates and the prehistory of Phaseolus. Paper contributed to the Annual Meeting, Society for American Archaeology, May 5, 1995, Minneapolis, Minn.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L., Lynch, T. F., and Smith, C. E. Jr. 1973. Early cultivated beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) from an intermontane Peruvian valley. Science 179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, L., and MacNeish, R. S.. 1960. Prehistoric bean remains from caves in the Ocampo region of Tamaulipas, Mexico. Botanical Museum Leaflets (Harvard University) 19.Google Scholar
Kislev, M. E. 1985. Early Neolithic horsebean from Yiftah'pel, Israel. Science 228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladizinsky, G. 1975. On the origin of the broad bean, Vicia faba L. Israel Journal of Botany 24.Google Scholar
Ladizinsky, G. 1979. Seed dispersal in relation to the domestication of Middle East legumes. Economic Botany 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladizinsky, G. 1987. Pulse domestication before cultivation.Economic Botany 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladizinsky, G. 1989. Origin and domestication of the southwest Asian grain legumes. In Foraging and farming, the evolution of plant exploitation, ed. Harris, David R. and Hillman, Gordon C.. London.Google Scholar
Ladizinsky, G. 1993. Lentil domestication: On the quality of evidence and arguments. Economic Botany 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladizinsky, G., Braun, D., Goshen, D., and Muehlbauer, F. J.. 1984. The biological species of the genus Lens. Botanical Gazette 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larco Hoyle, Rafael. 1943. La escritura Mochica sobre pallares. Revista Geogràfica Americana 20.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. F., Gillespie, R., Gowlette, J. A., and Hedges, R. E. M.. 1985. Chronology of Guitarrero Cave, Peru. Science 229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulsifer, D., ed. 1861. Records of the Colony of New Plymouth in New England, 1623–1682, Vol. 1. Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
Purseglove, J. W. 1968. Tropical crops: Dicotyledons. 2 vols. New York.Google Scholar
Schmit, V., and Debouck, D. G.. 1991. Observations on the origin of Phaseolus polyanthus Greenman. Economic Botany 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simoons, F. J. 1991. Food in China, a cultural and historical inquiry. Boca Raton, Fla.Google Scholar
Singh, U. and Singh, B.. 1992. Tropical grain legumes as important human foods. Economic Botany 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smartt, J. 1990. Grain legumes, evolution and genetic resources. Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolov, Raymond. 1984. Broad bean universe. Natural History 12.Google Scholar
Spencer, R. F., Jennings, J. D., et al. 1965. The Native Americans: Prehistory and ethnology of the North American Indians. New York.Google Scholar
Strickberger, M. W. 1985. Genetics. Third edition. New York.Google Scholar
Tournefort, J. P. 1730. The compleat herbal, or the botanical institutions of Monsr. Tournefort, Chief Botanist to the late French King…. 2 vols. London.Google Scholar
Vavilov, N. I. 1992. Origin and geography of cultivated plants, ed. Dorofeyev, V. F., trans. Löve, Doris. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wills, W. H. 1988. Early prehistoric agriculture in the American Southwest. Santa Fe, N. Mex.Google Scholar
Zohary, D. 1977. Comments on the origin of cultivated broad bean. Israel Journal of Botany 26.Google Scholar
Zohary, D. 1989a. Domestication of the southwest Asian Neolithic crop assemblage of cereals, pulses, and flax: The evidence from living plants. In Foraging and farming, the evolution of plant exploitation, ed. Harris, David R. and Hillman, Gordon C.. London.Google Scholar
Zohary, D. 1989b. Pulse domestication and cereal domestication: How different are they?Economic Botany 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohary, D., and Hopf, M.. 1988. Domestication of plants in the Old World. Oxford.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×