Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 16
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
December 2012
Print publication year:
2012
Online ISBN:
9780511997969

Book description

The period from Plato's birth to Aristotle's death (427–322 BC) is one of the most influential and formative in the history of Western philosophy. The developments of logic, metaphysics, epistemology, ethics and science in this period have been investigated, controversies have arisen and many new theories have been produced. But this is the first book to give detailed scholarly attention to the development of dialectic during this decisive period. It includes chapters on topics such as: dialectic as interpersonal debate between a questioner and a respondent; dialectic and the dialogue form; dialectical methodology; the dialectical context of certain forms of arguments; the role of the respondent in guaranteeing good argument; dialectic and presentation of knowledge; the interrelations between written dialogues and spoken dialectic; and definition, induction and refutation from Plato to Aristotle. The book contributes to the history of philosophy and also to the contemporary debate about what philosophy is.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography

Ackrill, J. (1997) Essays on Plato and Aristotle, Oxford.
Adam, J. (1902) The Republic of Plato, Cambridge.
Allen, R. E. (1970) Plato’s Euthyphro and the Earlier Theory of Forms, London/New York.
Ando, T. (1971) Aristotle’s Theory of Practical Cognition, 3rd edn, The Hague.
Apelt, E. F. (1854) Die Theorie der Induction, Leipzig.
Apelt, O. (1916) Platon. Der Staat, Leipzig.
Arieti, J. A. (1991) Interpreting Plato. The Dialogues as Drama, New York.
Arieti, J. A. (1993) ‘Plato’s Philosophical Antiope: The Gorgias’, in: Plato’s Dialogues. New Studies and Interpretations (ed. G. A. Press), Lanham (MD), 197–214.
Armstrong, J. M. (1998) ‘Aristotle on the Philosophical Nature of Poetry’, Classical Quarterly 48, 447–55.
Asper, M. (2007) Griechische Wissenschaftstexte, (Philosophie der Antike 25), Stuttgart.
Ast, F. (1814) Platonis Politia sive de re publica, Leipzig.
Ast, F. (1835) Lexicon Platonicum, Leipzig.
Ausland, H. (2002) ‘Forensic Characteristics of Socratic Argumentation’, in: Does Socrates Have a Method? (ed. G. A. Scott), Pennsylvania, 36–60.
Ausland, H. (2005) ‘On a Curious Platonic Dialogue’, Ancient Philosophy 25, 403–25.
Ausland, H. (2006) ‘Socrates’ Definitional Inquiries and the History of Philosophy’, in: A Companion to Socrates (eds. S. Ahbel-Rappe and R. Kamtekar), Oxford, 493–510.
Ausland, H. (2007) ‘Socratic Induction – The Rhetorical and Poetic Background’, Norsk filosofisk tidskrift 42, 8–23.
Austin, C. and OlsonS. D. (2004), (eds.) Aristophanes. Thesmophoriazusae, Oxford.
Bailey, D. T. J. (2006) ‘Plato and Aristotle on the Unhypothetical’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy xxx, 101–26.
Baltzly, D. C. (1999) ‘Aristotle and Platonic Dialectic in Metaphysics Γ 4’, Apeiron 32, 171–202.
Barnes, J. (1969) ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstration’, Phronesis 14, 123–52.
Barnes, J. (1980) ‘Aristotle and the Method of Ethics’, Revue internationale de philosophie 34, 490–511.
Barnes, J. (1981) ‘Proof and the Syllogism’, in: Aristotle on Science. The Posterior Analytics (ed. E. Berti), Studia Aristotelica 9, Padua, 17–59.
Barnes, J. (1984) (ed.) The Complete Works of Aristotle, Vol. i and ii, Princeton (NJ).
Barnes, J. (1993) Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, translated with a commentary, 2nd edn, Oxford.
Barnes, J. (1997) Logic and the Imperial Stoa, Leiden.
Barnes, J. (2003) ‘Argument in Ancient Philosophy’, in: The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy (ed. D. Sedley), Cambridge, 20–41.
Bayer, G. (1997) ‘Coming to Know Principles in Posterior Analytics ii 19’, Apeiron 30, 109–42.
Beierwaltes, W. (1965) Proklos. Grundzüge seiner Metaphysik, Frankfurt.
Bekker, I. (1826) Platonis Scripta Graece Omnia vi, London.
Bellissima, F. and Pagli, P. (1996) Consequentia Mirabilis. Una regola logica tra matematica e filosofia, Florence.
Bemelmans, R. (2002) ‘Why Does Protagoras Rush Off? Self-Refutation and Haste in Plato, Theaetetus 169a–171d’, Ancient Philosophy 22, 75–86.
Benson, H. H. (2002) ‘Problems with Socratic Method’, in: Does Socrates Have a Method? (ed. G. A. Scott), Pennsylvania, 101–13.
Beriger, A. (1989) Die aristotelische Dialektik. Ihre Darstellung in der ‘Topik’ und in den ‘Sophistischen Widerlegungen’ und ihre Anwendung in der ‘Metaphysik’ M 1–3, Heidelberg.
Berti, E. (1993) ‘Phrónēsis et science politique’, in: Aristote politique. Études sur la Politique d’Aristote (ed. A. Tordesillas), Paris, 435–59.
Berti, E. (1996) ‘Does Aristotle’s Conception of Dialectic Develop?’, in: Aristotle’s Philsophical Development. Problems and Prospects (ed. W. Wians), Maryland/London, 105–30.
Berti, E. (2008) Dialectique, Physique et Métaphysique. Études sur Aristote, Louvain.
Beversluis, J. (2000) Cross-Examining Socrates. A Defence of the Interlocutors in Plato’s Early Dialogues, Cambridge.
Blondell, R. (2002) The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues, Cambridge.
Bluck, R. S. (1975) Plato’s Sophist, Manchester.
Bolton, R. (1990) ‘The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic’, in: Biologie, Logique et Metaphysique chez Aristote (eds. D. Devereux and P. Pellegrin), Paris, 185–236, revised version in: From Puzzles to Principles (ed. M. Sim), Lanham (MD), 1999, 57–105.
Bolton, R. (1991) ‘Aristotle on the Objectivity of Ethics’, in: Aristotle’s Ethics. Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy iv (eds. J. P. Anton and A. Preus), Albany (NY), 7–28.
Bolton, R. (1992) ‘Aristotle’s Solution to the Problem of Socratic elenchus’, in: The Philosophy of Socrates. Elenchus, Ethics and Truth (ed. K. Boudouris), Athens, 40–50.
Bolton, R. (1993) ‘Aristotle’s Account of the Socratic elenchus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy xi, 121–52.
Bolton, R. (1994) ‘The Problem of Dialectical Reasoning [συλλογισμός] in Aristotle’, Ancient Philosophy 14, 99–132.
Bolton, R. (2009) ‘Two Standards for Inquiry in Aristotle’s De Caelo’, in: Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo (eds. A. Bowen and C. Wildberg), Leiden, 51–82.
Bordt, M. (2000) ‘The Unity of Plato’s Lysis’, in: Plato – Euthydemus, Lysis, Charmides. Proceedings of the V Symposium Platonicum (eds. T. M. Robinson and L. Brisson), Sankt Augustin, 157–71.
Bossi, B. (2000) ‘Is the Lysis Really Aporetic’, in: Plato – Euthydemus, Lysis, Charmides. Proceedings of the V Symposium Platonicum (eds. T. M. Robinson and L. Brisson), Sankt Augustin, 172–9.
Bostock, D. (1988) Plato’s Theaetetus, Oxford.
Boutreux, E. (1900) ‘L’Induction chez Socrate et Aristote’, Revue hebdomadaire des cours et conférences 10, 433–41.
Bowe, G. S. (2007) ‘In Defense of Clitophon’, Classical Philology 102, 245–64.
Brandwood, L. (1976) A Word Index to Plato, Leeds.
Brouwer, M. and Polansky, R. (2004) ‘The Logic of Socratic Inquiry: illustrated by Plato’s Charmides’, in: Socrates: 2400 Years Since His Death (ed. V. Karasmanis), Athens, 233–45.
Brown, L. (2010) ‘Definition and Division in Plato’s Sophist’ in: Definition in Greek Philosophy (ed. D. Charles), Oxford, 151–71.
Brunschwig, J. (1964) ‘Dialectique et ontologie chez Aristote’, Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 89, 179–200.
Brunschwig, J. (1967) Aristote. Topiques iiv, Paris.
Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘Aristotle on Arguments without Winners or Losers’, Wissenschaftskolleg 1984/1985, Berlin, 31–40.
Brunschwig, J. (2000) ‘Dialectique et philosophie chez Aristote, à nouveau’, in: Ontologie et dialogue. Mélanges en hommage à P. Aubenque (ed. N. L. Cordero), Paris, 107–30.
Brunschwig, J. (2007) Aristote. Topiques vviii, Paris.
Burnet, J. (1900a) Platonis Opera: Tomus i, tetralogias iii continens, Oxford.
Burnet, J. (1900b) The Ethics of Aristotle, London.
Burnet, J. (1964) Greek Philosophy. Thales to Plato, London [1914].
Burnyeat, M. F. (1976a) ‘Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Later Greek Philosophy’, Philosophical Review 85, 44–69.
Burnyeat, M. F. (1976b) ‘Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Plato’s Theaetetus’, Philosophical Review 85, 172–95.
Burnyeat, M. F. (2002) ‘Plato on How Not to Speak of What is Not: Euthydemus 283a–288a’, in: Le Style de la Pensée (eds. P. Pellegrin and M. Canto-Sperber), Paris, 40–66.
Campbell, L. (1883) The Theaetetus of Plato, 2nd edn, Oxford.
Capra, A. (2003) ‘Dialoghi narrati e dialoghi drammatici in Platone’, in: Platone e la tradizione Platonica (eds. Bonazzi, M. and Trabattoni, F.), Quaderni di Acme 58, Milano, 3–30.
Carpenter, M. and Polansky, R. M. (2002) ‘Variety of Socratic Elenchi’, in: Does Socrates Have a Method? (ed. G. A. Scott), Pennsylvania, 89–100.
CassinB. and NarcyM. (1989) La décision du sense. Le livre Gamma de la Métaphysique d’Aristote, Paris.
Castagnoli, L. (2000) ‘Self-bracketing Pyrrhonism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy xviii, 263–328.
Castagnoli, L. (2004a) ‘Protagoras Refuted: How Clever is Socrates’ “Most Clever” Argument at Theaetetus 171a–c?’, Topoi 23, 3–32.
Castagnoli, L. (2004b) ‘Il condizionale crisippeo e le sue interpretazioni moderne’, Elenchos 25, 353–95.
Castagnoli, L. (2007) ‘“Everything is True”, “Everything is False”. Self-refutation arguments from Democritus to Augustine’, Antiquorum Philosophia 1, 11–74.
Castagnoli, L. (2009) ‘Συνάρτησις crisippea e tesi di Aristotele’, in: La logica nel pensiero antico (eds. M. Alessandrelli, and M. Nasti De Vincentis), Naples, 105–63.
Castagnoli, L. (2010) Ancient Self-Refutation. The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine, Cambridge.
Caujolle-Zaslawsky, F. (1990) ‘Note sur l’Epagoge dans le Sophiste. A propos de Diogène Laërce iii 53–55’ in: Études sur le Sophiste de Platon (ed. P. Aubenque), Naples.
Chappell, T. D. J. (2006) ‘Reading the περιτροπή. Theaetetus 170c–171c’, Phronesis 51, 109–39.
Charles, D. (2000) Aristotle on Meaning and Essence, Oxford.
Charles, D. (2006) ‘Types of Definition in the Meno’, in: Remembering Socrates (eds. L. Judson and V. Karasmanis), Oxford, 110–28.
Charles, D. (2010) ‘The Paradox in the Meno and Aristotle’s Attempts to Resolve it’, in: Definition in Greek Philosophy (ed. D. Charles), Oxford, 115–50.
Cherniss, H. (1944) Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy i, Baltimore (MD).
Chroust, A. H. (1964) Aristotle: Protrepticus - A Reconstruction, Notre Dame (IN).
Chroust, A. H. (1973) Aristotle: New Light on His Life and on Some of His Lost Works, 2 vols., London.
Clay, D. (1994) ‘The Origins of the Socratic Dialogue’, in: The Socratic Movement (ed. P. A. Vander Waerdt), Ithaca/London, 23–47.
Cohen, L. J. (1989) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Induction and Probability, Oxford.
Cohen, S. M. (1973) ‘The Method of Division’, in: Patterns in Plato’s Thought (ed. J. M. E. Moravcsik), Dordrecht, 181–91.
Consbruch, M. (1892) ‘Epagoge und Theorie der Induction bei Aristoteles’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 5, 303–21.
Cooper, G. L. (1998) Attic Greek Prose Syntax, after K. W. Krüger, 2 vols., Ann Arbor (MI).
Cooper, J. M. (1997), (ed.) Plato. Complete Works, Indianapolis.
Cope, E. M. (1867) An Introduction to Aristotle’s Rhetoric with Analysis Notes and Appendices, London etc.
Cornford, F. M. (1973) Plato’s Theory of Knowledge, London [1935].
Crivelli, P. (2004a): Aristotle on Truth, Cambridge.
Crivelli, P. (2004b) ‘Socratic Refutation and Platonic Refutation’, in: Socrates: 2400 Years Since His Death (ed. V. Karasmanis), Athens, 247–8.
D’Agostini, F. (2002) Disavventure della verità, Turin.
Dancy, R. M. (1975) Sense and Contradiction. A Study in Aristotle, Dordrecht.
Dancy, R. M. (2004) Plato’s Introduction of Forms, Cambridge.
Davies, J. L. and Vaughn, D. J. (1866) The Republic of Plato, 3rd edn, London [1858].
Deman, Th. (1942) Le témoignage d’Aristote sur Socrate, Paris.
Detel, W. (1993) Aristoteles, Analytica Posteriora, volume i (Aristoteles Werke 3.ii.1), Berlin.
Devereux, D. T. (1990): ‘Comments on Robert Bolton’s The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic’, in: Biologie, Logique et Metaphysique chez Aristote (eds. D. Devereux and P. Pellegrin), Paris, 263–86.
Devereux, D. T. (1992) ‘The Unity of the Virtue in Plato’s Protagoras and Laches’, Philosophical Review 101, 765–89.
Diès, A. (1924) Platon. Oeuvres complètes, Tome viii – 2e Partie: Théétète, Paris.
Diès, A. (1925) Platon. Oeuvres complètes, Tome viii – 3e Partie: Sophiste, Paris.
Dillon, J. (1977) The Middle Platonists, Ithaca (NY).
Dirlmeier, F. (1939) ‘Die Zeit der grossen Ethik’, Rheinisches Museum 88, 214–43.
Dirlmeier, F. (1958) Aristoteles Magna Moralia, Darmstadt.
Dirlmeier, F. (1962a) Merkwürdige Zitate in der Eudemischen Ethik des Aristoteles, Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, 2. Abh., Heidelberg.
Dirlmeier, F. (1962b) Aristoteles. Eudemische Ethik (Aristoteles Werke 7), Berlin.
Dixsaut, M. (2001) Métamorphoses de la dialectique dans les dialogues de Platon, Paris.
Dixsaut, M. (2004) ‘Aristote parricide. Note sur la dialectique chez Platon et Aristote’, in: Platon et Aristote, Dialectique et Métaphysique (ed. I. Tsimbidaros), Paris, 71–99.
Dodds, E. R. (2001) Plato. Gorgias: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, Oxford [1959].
Dorion, L.-A. (1990) ‘La subversion de l’elenchos juridique dans l’Apologie de Socrate’, Revue philosophique de Louvain 88, 311–44.
Dorion, L.-A. (1995) Aristote. Les réfutations sophistiques, Introduction, traduction et commentaire, Paris.
Dorion, L.-A. (2002) ‘Aristote et l’invention de la dialectique’ in: Le style de la pensée (eds. M. Canto-Sperber and P. Pellegrin), Paris, 182–220.
Dorion, L.-A. (2004) Platon. Charmide/Lysis, Paris.
Dorion, L.-A. (2007) ‘Elenchos dialectique et elenchos rhétorique dans la défense de Socrate’, Antiquorum Philosophia 1, 75–90.
Dreschler, J. (1935) Die Erkenntnistheoretischen Grundlagen und Prinzipien der Aristotelischen Didaktik, Berlin.
Duke, E. A.et al. (1995) Platonis Opera. Tomus i, tetralogias i-ii continens, Oxford.
Düring, I. (1961) Aristotle’s Protrepticus. An Attempt at Reconstruction, Stockholm/Gothenburg/Uppsala.
Emilsson, E. K. (1994) ‘Plato’s Self-Refutation Argument in Theatetus 171A-C Revisited’, Phronesis 39, 136–49.
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1979) ‘More On Aristotelian Epagoge’, Phronesis 24, 301–19.
Erler, M. (1987) Der Sinn der Aporien in den Dialogen Platons, (Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte 25), Berlin.
Eucken, R. (1872) Die Methode der aristotelischen Forschung in ihrem Zusammenhang mit den philosophischen Grundprinzipien des Aristoteles, Berlin.
Evans, J. D. G. (1975) ‘The Codification of False Refutations in Aristotle’s De Sophisticis Elenchis’, Proceedings of The Cambridge Philological Society 201 (NS 21), 42–52.
Evans, J. D. G. (1977) Aristotle’s Concept of Dialectic, Cambridge.
Fait, P. (2007) Aristotele. Le confutazioni sofistiche, Introduzione, traduzione e commento, Rome/Bari.
Fine, G. (1998) ‘Plato’s Refutation of Protagoras in the Theaetetus’, Apeiron 31, 201–34.
Fink, J. (2009) Aristotle on Communication of Knowledge, unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Copenhagen.
Flashar, H. (1995) ‘Die Platonkritik’, in: Aristoteles. Die Nikomachische Ethik (ed. O. Höffe), Berlin, 63–82 [1965].
Flashar, H. (2002) ‘Einblick in eine aristotelische Dialogsituation’, Hyperboreus 8, 240–3.
Flashar, H. (2008) ‘Aristoteles im Dialog’, in: Pragmata [Festschrift K. Oehler], (eds. K.-M. Hingst and M. Liatsi), Tübingen, 23–33.
Flashar, H., Dubielzig, U., Breitenbach, B. (2006) Aristoteles. Fragmente zu Philosophie, Rhetorik, Poetik, Dichtung (Aristoteles Werke 20.i), Berlin.
Föllinger, S. (1993) ‘Mündlichkeit in der Schriftlichkeit als Ausdruck wissenschaftlicher Methode bei Aristoteles’, in: Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur (eds. W. Kullmann and J. Althoff), ScriptOralia 61, Tübingen, 263–80.
Föllinger, S. (2005) ‘Dialogische Elemente in der antiken Fachliteratur’ in: Antike Fachtexte/Ancient Technical Texts (ed. T. Fögen), Berlin/New York, 221–34.
Forster, E. S. (1955) Aristotle, On Sophistical Refutations, Cambridge (MA)/London.
Fossheim, H. (2008) ‘The Limits of Rational Discourse. A Critical Analysis of the Practices of Plato’s Socrates’, The European Legacy Vol. 13/7, 851–62.
Fossheim, H. (forthcoming) ‘Method in the Philebus’, in: The Philebus: Proceedings of the viii Symposium of the International Plato Society (eds. L. Brisson and J. Dillon), Sankt Augustin.
Frede, M. (1992) ‘Plato’s Arguments and the Dialogue Form’, in: Methods of Interpreting Plato and his Dialogues (eds. J. C. Klagge and N. D. Smith), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume, 201–19.
Friedländer, P. (1930) Platon II. Die platonischen Schriften, Berlin/Leipzig.
Fritz, K. von (1964) ‘Die epagoge bei Aristoteles’ SB d. Bayr. Akad. d. Wiss. Philos.-hist. Kl. 1964 H. 3 [reprinted with original pagination noted in: id., Grundprobleme der Geschichte der antiken Wissenschaft, Berlin 1971, 623–76].
Gadamer, H.-G. (1999) Platos dialektische Ethik, Gesammelte Werke 5, Tübingen, 3–163.
Gaiser, K. (1959) Protreptik und Paränese bei Platon (Tübinger Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 40), Stuttgart.
Galston, M. (1982): ‘Aristotle’s Dialectic, Refutation, and Inquiry’, Dialogue 21, 79–93.
Garver, E. (1994) Aristotle’s Rhetoric. An Art of Character, Chicago.
Geach, P. (1966) ‘Plato’s Euthyphro: An Analysis and Commentary’, The Monist 50, 369–82.
Gentzler, J. (ed.) (1998) Method in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford.
Gerson, L. P. (2005) Aristotle and Other Platonists, Ithaca/London.
Gigon, O. (1987) Librorum Deperditorum Fragmenta, Aristotelis Opera iii, Berlin/New York.
Gill, C. (2002) ‘Dialectic and the Dialogue Form’, with comments by K. Morgan, in: New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient (eds. J. Annas and C. Rowe), Center for Hellenic Studies Colloquia 6, Cambridge (MA), 145–87.
Gill, C. and McCabe, M. M. (eds.), (1996) Form and Argument in Late Plato, Oxford.
Gohlke, P. (1936) Die Entstehung der aristotelischen Logik, Berlin.
Goldschmidt, V. (1945–47) Le paradigme dans la dialectique platonicienne, Paris.
Gomez-Lobo, A. (1977) ‘Plato’s Description of Dialectic in the Sophist 253d1-e2’, Phronesis 22, 29–47.
Gottleber, I. C. (1771) Animadversiones ad Platonis Phaedonem et Alcibiadem Secundum, Leipzig.
Grote, G. (1872) Aristotle ii (eds. A. Bain and G. C. Robertson), London.
Guggenheim, M. (1887) ‘Zur Geschichte des Induktionsbegriffs’, Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie 17, 52–61.
Gulley, N. (1968) The Philosophy of Socrates, New York.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1975) A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. iv, Cambridge.
Hadot, P. (1980) ‘Philosophie, dialectique, rhétorique dans l’Antiquité’, Studia Philosophica 39, 139–66.
Halliwell, S. (ed.) (1995) Aristotle. Poetics, Cambridge (MA)/London.
Halper, E. (2004) ‘Dialog und Argument in Platons Protagoras’, in: Platon verstehen (ed. M. van Ackeren), Darmstadt, 39–56.
Halper, E. (2007, unpublished) ‘The Philebus’ Two Methods’ (presented at the IPS conference in Dublin, 23 July, 2007).
Hambruch, E. (1904) ‘Logische Regeln der platonischen Schule in der aristotelischen Topik’, Wissenschaftliche Beilage zum Jahresbericht des Askanischen Gymnasiums zu Berlin, Berlin, 3–33.
Hamilton, W. (1866 i) Lectures on Logic, volume i, Edinburgh etc.
Hamilton, W. (1866 ii) Lectures on Logic, volume ii, Edinburgh etc.
Hamlyn, D. W. (1976) ‘Aristotelian Epagoge’, Phronesis 21, 167–84.
Hardie, W. F. R (1980) Aristotle’s Ethical Theory, 2nd edn, Oxford, [1968].
Hardy, E. G. (1882) The Republic of Plato, Book i, London.
Hardy, J. (2004) ‘Was wissen Sokrates und seine Gesprächspartner?’, in: Platon verstehen (ed. M. van Ackeren), Darmstadt, 236–62.
Haslam, M. W. (1972) ‘Plato, Sophron, and the Dramatic Dialogue’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 19, 17–38.
Hawtrey, R. S. W. (1981) Commentary on Plato’sEuthydemus, Ann Arbor (MI).
Heath, M. (1987) ‘Euripides’ Telephus’, Classical Quarterly 37, 272–80.
Heath, T. H. (1949) Mathematics in Aristotle, Oxford.
Heitsch, E. (2004) Platon und die Anfänge seines dialektischen Philosophierens, Göttingen.
Herrmann, F.-G. (1995) ‘Wrestling Metaphors in Plato’s Theaetetus’, Nikephoros 8, 77–109.
Heusde, Ph. G. Van, (1842) Initia Philosophiae Platonicae, 2nd edn, Leiden [1829–36].
Heusde, Ph. G. Van, (1839) Characterismi Principum Philosophorum Veterum Socratis Platonis Aristotelis, Amsterdam.
Hintikka, J. (1980) ‘Aristotelian Induction’, Revue internationale de philosophie 34, 422–39.
Hirzel, R. (1895) Der Dialog. Ein Literarhistorischer Versuch, Leipzig.
Hoerber, R. G. (1968) ‘Plato’s Laches’, Classical Philology 63, 95–105.
Huby, P. M. (1962) ‘The Date of Aristotle’s Topics and Its Treatment of The Theory of Ideas’, Classical Quarterly 12 (n.s.), 72–80.
Hutchinson, D. S. and Johnson, M. R. (2005) ‘Authenticating Aristotle’s Protrepticus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy xxix, 193–294.
Irwin, T. (1978) ‘First Principles in Aristotle’s Ethics’, in: Studies in Ethical Theory (eds. P. A. Frenchet al.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy iii, Morris, 252–72.
Irwin, T. (1979) Plato. Gorgias: Translated with Notes by Terence Irwin, Oxford.
Irwin, T. (1981) ‘Aristotle’s Methods of Ethics’, in: Studies in Aristotle (ed. D. J. O’Meara), Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 9, Washington, 193–223.
Irwin, T. (1985) Plato’s Moral Theory. The Early and Middle Dialogues, Oxford.
Irwin, T. (1987) ‘Ways to First Principles. Aristotle’s Methods of Discovery’, Philosophical Topics 15, 109–34.
Irwin, T. (1988) Aristotle’s First Principles, Oxford.
Jaeger, W. (1955) Aristoteles. Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung, 2nd edn, Berlin [1923].
Joseph, H. W. B. (1916) An Introduction to Logic, 2nd edn, Oxford [1906].
Joseph, H. W. B. (1935) (ed.) ‘Plato’s Republic. The Argument with Thrasymachus’, in: Essays in Ancient and Modern Philosophy, Oxford.
Jost, K. (1935) ‘Das Beispiel und Vorbild der Vorfahren bei der attischen Rednern und Geschichtschreibern bis Demosthenes’ (Rhetorische Studien 19), Paderborn.
Jowett, B. and Campbell, L. (1894) Plato’s Republic, Oxford.
Judson, L. and Karasmanis, V. (eds.), (2006) Remembering Socrates, Oxford.
Kahn, C. (1981) ‘Did Plato Write Socratic Dialogues?’, Classical Quarterly 31, 305–20.
Kahn, C. (1986) ‘Plato’s Methodology in the “Laches”’, Revue internationale de philosophie 40, 7–21.
Kahn, C. (1996) Plato and the Socratic Dialogue. The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form, Cambridge.
Kahn, C. (2000) ‘Some Puzzles in the Euthydemus’, in: Plato – Euthydemus, Lysis, Charmides. Proceedings of the V Symposium Platonicum, (eds. T. M. Robinson and L. Brisson), Sankt Augustin, 88–97.
Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M.-L. (2005) ‘The Relevance of Dialectical Skills to Philosophical Inquiry in Aristotle’, Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, ii/1, 31–74.
Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M.-L. and Tuominen, M. (forthcoming) ‘Aristotle on the Role of the Predicables in Dialectical Disputations’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 43, 55–81.
Kapp, E. (1931) ‘Syllogistik’, RE iv A, Sp. 1046–1967.
Kapp, E. (1942) Greek Foundations of Traditional Logic, New York.
Karamanolis, G. E. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?, Oxford.
Karasmanis, V. (2004) ‘Dialectic and the Good in Plato’s Republic’, in: Platon et Aristote. Dialectique et Métaphysique, (ed. I. Tsimbidaros), Paris, 31–50.
Kerferd, G. B. (1954) ‘Plato’s Noble Art of Sophistry (Sophist 226a–231b)’, Classical Quarterly 48, 84–90.
Kerferd, G. B. (1981) The Sophistic Movement, Cambridge.
Klagge, J. C. (1992) ‘Editor’s Prologue’, in: Methods of Interpreting Plato and his Dialogues (eds. J. C. Klagge and N. D. Smith), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume, Oxford, 1–12.
Klein, J. (1977) Plato’s Trilogy. Theaetetus, the Sophist, and the Statesman, Chicago.
Klein, J. (1998) ‘Exemplum’, in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, vol. 4 (ed. K. Ueding, ), Tübingen, 60–70.
Kneale, W. (1957) ‘Aristotle and the Consequentia Mirabilis’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 77, 62–6.
Kneale, W. and M. (1962) The Development of Logic, Oxford.
Knuutilla, S. (1993) ‘Remarks on Induction in Aristotle’s Dialectic and Rhetoric’, Revue internationale de philosophie 47, 78–88.
Kosman, A. (1992) ‘Silence and Imitation in the Platonic Dialogues’ in: Methods of Interpreting Plato and his Dialogues (eds. J. C. Klagge and N. D. Smith), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume, Oxford, 73–92.
Kraut, R. (1983) ‘Comments on Gregory Vlastos’ “The Socratic elenchus”’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy i, 59–70.
Krischer, T. (1974) ‘Die logischen Formen der Priamel’, Grazer Beiträge 2, 79–91.
Kühner, R. and Gerth, B. (1904) Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache, 2. Teil. Satzlehre, Hanover/Leipzig.
Kullmann, W. (1974) Wissenschaft und Methode. Interpretationen zur aristotelischen Theorie der Naturwissenschaft, Berlin.
Kullmann, W. (1980, 1991) ‘Der Mensch als politisches Lebewesen bei Aristoteles’, Hermes 108, 419–443 [= ‘Man as a political animal in Aristotle’, in: A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics (eds. D. Keyt and F. D. Miller, Jr.), Oxford, 94–117].
Kullmann, W. (1981) ‘Die Funktion der mathematischen Beispiele in den Analytica posteriora’, in: Aristotle on Science. The Posterior Analytics (ed. E. Berti), Studia Aristotelica 9, Padua, 245–70.
Kullmann, W. (1998) Aristoteles und die moderne Wissenschaft (Philosophie der Antike 5), Stuttgart.
Kullmann, W. (2007) Aristoteles. Über die Teile der Lebewesen (Aristoteles Werke 17/i), Berlin.
Lamb, W. R. M. (1952) Plato. Euthydemus, Cambridge (Mass.)/London.
Lasserre, F. (1966) Die Fragmente des Eudoxos von Knidos, Berlin.
Lausberg, H. (1960) Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik [2nd edn 1973; English tr. by Matthew T. Blisset al. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric. A Foundation for Literary Study, Leiden, 1998].
Le Blond, J. M. (1970) Logique et méthode chez Aristote, Paris [1939].
Lee, E. N. (1973) ‘Hoist With his Own Petard. Ironic and Comic Elements in Plato’s Critique of Protagoras (Tht. 161–171)’, in: Exegesis and Argument. Studies in Greek Philosophy presented to Gregory Vlastos (eds. E. N. Lee, et al.), Assen, 225–61.
Lee, M.-K. (2005) Epistemology After Protagoras. Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus, Oxford.
Lengen, R. (2002) Form und Funktion der aristotelischen Pragmatie. Die Kommunikation mit dem Rezipienten (Philosophie der Antike 16), Stuttgart.
Lesher, J. H. (1984) ‘Parmenides’ Critique of Thinking. The poluderis elenchos of Fragment 7’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy ii, 1–30.
Lesher, J. H. (1987) ‘Socrates’ Disavowal of Knowledge’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 25, 275–88.
Lloyd, A. C. (1952) ‘Plato’s Description of Division’, Classical Quarterly 2, 105–12.
Lloyd, A. C. (1955) ‘Neoplatonic Logic and Aristotelian Logic’, Phronesis 1, 58–72.
Lloyd, A. C. (1962) ‘Genus, Species and Ordered Series in Aristotle’, Phronesis 7, 67–90.
Lloyd, A. C. (1967) ‘The Later Neoplatonists’ in: The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy (ed. A. H. Armstrong), Cambridge, 269–325.
Lloyd, A. C. (1990) The Anatomy of Neoplatonism, Oxford.
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1999) Magic, Reason and Experience, London [1979].
Long, A. (2004) ‘Refutation and Relativism in Theaetetus 161–171’, Phronesis 49, 24–40.
Lucas, D. W. (1968) Aristotle. Poetics, Introduction, Commentary and Appendixes, Oxford.
Łukasiewicz, J. (1957) Aristotle’s Syllogistic. From the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic, 2nd edn, Oxford.
Lycos, K. (1987) Plato on Justice and Power. Reading Book i of Plato’s Republic, London.
Mackie, J. L. (1964) ‘Self-Refutation – A Formal Analysis’, Philosophical Quarterly 14, 193–203 [reprinted in J. L. Mackie and P. Mackie (eds.), Logic and Knowledge, Oxford, 1985, 54–67].
Maier, H. (1913) Sokrates, Tübingen.
Mann, W.-R. (2006) ‘Was kann man von Euthydemos und seinem Bruder lernen?’, in: Wissen und Bildung in der antiken Philosophie (eds. C. Rapp and T. Wagner), Stuttgart, 103–26.
Manuwald, B. (2000) ‘Die Schlussaporie in Platons Laches’, Rheinisches Museum 143, 179–91.
Martin, J. (1974) Antike Rhetorik. Technik und Methode, Munich.
Matthiae, A. (1832) A Copious Greek Grammar, tr. E. V. Blomfield, London.
McCabe, M. M. (1994) Plato’s Individuals, Princeton (NJ).
McCabe, M. M. (1998) ‘Silencing the Sophists. The Drama of the Euthydemus’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 14, 139–68.
McCabe, M. M. (2000) Plato and His Predecessors. The Dramatisation of Reason, Cambridge.
McCall, S. (1966) ‘Connexive Implication’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 31, 415–33.
McDowell, J. (1973) Plato. Theaetetus, Oxford.
McGinnis, J. (2003) ‘Scientific Methodologies in Medieval Islam’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 41, 307–27.
McKirahan, R. D. (1983) ‘Aristotelian Epagoge in Prior Analytics 2.21 and Posterior Analytics 1.1’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 21, 1–13.
Menn, S. (2002) ‘Plato and the Method of AnalysisPhronesis 47, 193–223.
Meyer, M. F. (2006) ‘Einleitung’, in: Zur Geschichte des Dialogs (ed. M. F. Meyer), Darmstadt, 8–14.
Michelini, A. N. (2000) ‘Plato’s Laches. An Introduction to Socrates’, Rheinisches Museum 143, 60–75.
Mignucci, M. (1969) Aristotele. Analitici Primi, Naples.
Milton, J. R. (1987) ‘Induction Before Hume’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38, 49–74.
Mittelstrass, J. (1996) ‘Die Dialektik und ihre wissenschaftlichen Vorübungen’, in: Platon. Politeia, (ed. O. Höffe), Berlin, 229–49.
Moraux, P. (1968) ‘La joute dialectique d’après le huitième livre des Topiques’, in: Aristotle on Dialectic. The Topics (ed. G. E. L. Owen), Oxford, 277–311.
Moravcsik, J. M. E. (1973) ‘Plato’s Method of Division’, in: Patterns in Plato’s Thought (ed. Moravcsik), Dordrecht, 158–80.
Moreau, J. (1968) ‘Aristote et la dialectique platonicienne’, in: Aristotle on Dialectic. the Topics (ed. G. E. L. Owen), Clarendon, Oxford, 80–90.
Morrow, G. R. (1960) ‘Aristotle’s Comments on Plato’s Laws’, in: Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century (eds. I. Düring and G. E. L. Owen), Gothenburg, 145–62.
Moulinier, L. (1967) ‘Platon, République 349B–350C’, Revue des Études Grecques 80, 227–33.
Mueller, I. (1982) ‘Aristotle and the Quadrature of the Circle’, in: Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought (ed. N. Kretzmann), Ithaca, 146–64.
Nails, D. (1995) Agora, Academy, and the Conduct of Philosophy, Dordrecht.
Nails, D. (2002) The People of Plato. A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics, Cambridge.
Narcy, M. (1989) ‘Platon revu et corrigé’, in: La décision du sens. Le livre Gamma de la Métaphysique d’Aristote (eds. B. Cassin and M. Narcy), Paris, 61–110.
Narcy, M. (1995) Platon. Théétète, 2nd edn, Paris.
Narcy, M. (2000) ‘La dialectique entre Platon et Aristote’, in: Ontologie et dialogue, Mélanges en hommage à P. Aubenque (ed. N. L. Cordero), Paris, 69–89.
Nasti De Vincentis, M. (2002) Logiche della connessività, Bern.
Nettleship, R. L. (1901) Lectures on the Republic of Plato (ed. G. R. Benson), London/New York [= id., Philosophical Lectures and Remains ii (eds. A. C. Bradley and G. R. Benson), London and New York, 1897].
Notomi, N. (1999) The Unity of Plato’s Sophist, Cambridge.
Nuchelmans, G. (1973) Theories of the Proposition. Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity, Amsterdam/London.
Nuchelmans, G. (1991) Dilemmatic Arguments. Towards a History of their Logic and Rhetoric, Amsterdam/Oxford.
Olsen, A.-M. E. (2003) Platons Symposion, Copenhagen.
Ostenfeld, E. N. (2003) ‘The Socratic Elenchus Reconsidered – Once More’, in: For Particular Reasons [Festschrift J. Blomqvist], (eds. A. Piltz, et al.), Lund, 231–45.
Owen, G. E. L. (1960) ‘Logic and Metaphysics in Some Earlier Works of Aristotle’, in: Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century (eds. I. Düring and G. E. L. Owen), Gothenburg, 163–90.
Owen, G. E. L. (1961) ‘τιθέναι τὰ φαινόμενα’, in: Aristote et les problèmes de méthode (ed. S. Mansion), Louvain/Paris, 83–103.
Owen, G. E. L. (ed.), (1968) Aristotle on Dialectic. The Topics, Oxford.
Pater, W. A. De (1965) Les Topiques d’Aristote et la dialectique platonicienne, Fribourg.
Patzig, G. (1959) ‘Aristotle and Syllogisms from False Premisses’, Mind 68, 186–92.
Penner, T. and Rowe, C. (2005). (eds.) Plato’s Lysis, Cambridge.
Pickard-Cambridge, W. A. (1928) Topica and De Sophisticis elenchis, Oxford.
Places, É. des (1964) Platon. Lexique, Paris.
Pleger, W. (2006) ‘Sokrates und der Beginn des philosophischen Dialogs’, in: Zur Geschichte des Dialogs (ed. M. F. Meyer), Darmstadt, 15–26.
Polansky, R. M. (1992) Philosophy and Knowledge. A Commentary on Plato’sTheaetetus, Lewisburg (PA)/London.
Politis, V. (2006) ‘Aporia and Searching in the Early Plato’, in: Remembering Socrates (eds. L. Judson and V. Karasmanis), Oxford, 88–109.
Politis, V. (2007) ‘Is Socrates Paralyzed by his State of Aporia? Meno 79e7–80d4’, in: Gorgias-Meno (eds. M. Erler and L. Brisson), Sankt Augustin, 268–72.
Politis, V. (2008) ‘The Place of Aporia in Plato’s Charmides’, Phronesis 53, 1–34.
Prantl, C. (1855) ‘Über die Entwicklung der Aristotelischen Logik aus der Platonischen Philosophie’, Abhandlungen der philosophisch-philologischen Classe der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, vol. 7, 1855 [repr. Darmstadt, 1968].
Prantl, C. (1855–70) Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande, vol. i, Leipzig.
PreiserC. (2000) Euripides. Telephos, Einleitung, Text, Kommentar, (Spudasmata 78), Zürich.
Press, G. A. (ed.), (1993) Plato’s Dialogues. New Studies and Interpretations, Lanham (MD).
Press, G. A., (ed.), (2000) Who Speaks for Plato? Studies in Platonic Anonymity, Lanham (MD).
Primavesi, O. (1996) Die Aristotelische Topik. Ein Interpretationsmodell und seine Erprobung am Beispiel von Topik B (Zetemata 94), Munich.
Primavesi, O. (1998) ‘Topik, Topos’, in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie vol. 10 (eds. J. Ritter and K. Gründer), Basle, 1263–69.
Primavesi, O. (2010) ‘Dialektik und Gespräch bei Aristoteles’, in: Der Dialog im Diskursfeld seiner Zeit. Von der Antike bis zur Aufklärung (eds. K. Hempfer and A. Traninger), Stuttgart, 47–73.
Prior, A. N. (1958) ‘Epimenides the Cretan’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 23, 261–6.
Prior, W. J, (1998) ‘Plato and the Socratic Fallacy’, Phronesis 43, 97–113.
Rabinowitz, W. G. (1957) Aristotle’s Protrepticus and the Sources of its Reconstruction (University of California Publications in Classical Philology), Berkeley/Los Angeles.
Rankin, H. D. (1981): ‘Οὐκ ἔστιν ἀντιλέγειν’, in: The Sophists and Their Legacy (ed. G. B. Kerferd), Wiesbaden, 25–37.
Rapp, C. and Wagner, T. (2004) Aristoteles. Topik, Stuttgart.
Reeve, C. D. C. (1998) ‘Dialectic and Philosophy’, in: Method in Ancient Philosophy (ed. J. Gentzler), Oxford, 227–52.
Reinhard, F. V. (1808) ‘De Veterum Inductione’, in: Opuscula Academica i, Leipzig, 210–33 [1780].
Rhunken, D. (1789) Timaei Sophistae Lexicon Vocum Platonicarum, 2nd edn, Leiden [1754].
Ritter, C. (1909) Platons Staat. Darstellung des Inhalts, Stuttgart.
Ritter, H. and Preller, L. (1857) Historia Philosophiae Graeco-Romanae, 2nd edn, Gotha [1838].
Robinson, R. (1931) ‘The Historical Background of Aristotle’s Topics viii’, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Philosophy (ed. G. Ryle), Oxford, 437–42.
Robinson, R. (1953) Plato’s Earlier Dialectic, 2nd edn, Oxford [1941].
Robinson, R. (1969) ‘Plato’s Consciousness of Fallacy’ in: Essays in Greek Philosophy, Oxford, 16–38.
Rohatyn, D. (1977) ‘The Protreptic Argument’, International Logic Review 8, 192–204.
Rolfes, W. (1922) Aristoteles. Topik. 2nd edn, (Neu übers. und mit einer Einl. und erkl. Anm. Versehen), Leipzig.
Ross, W. D. (1924I) Aristotle’s Metaphysics, volume 1, Oxford.
Ross, W. D. (1924II) Aristotle’s Metaphysics, volume 2, Oxford.
Ross, W. D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics, Oxford.
Ross, W. D. (1995) Aristotle, with a New Introduction by J. L. Ackrill, 6th edn, London/New York [1923].
Rowe, C. (1995) Plato. Statesman, Warminster.
Rowe, C. (2000) ‘The Lysis and the Symposium. Aporia and euporia?’, in: Plato – Euthydemus, Lysis, Charmides. Proceedings of the V Symposium Platonicum (eds. T. M. Robinson and L. Brisson), Sankt Augustin, 204–16.
Rowe, C. (2007) Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing, Cambridge.
Ryle, G. (1939) ‘Plato’s “Parmenides” (ii)’, Mind 48, 302–25.
Ryle, G. (1966) Plato’s Progress, Cambridge.
Ryle, G. (1968) ‘Dialectic in the Academy’ in: Aristotle on Dialectic (ed. G. E. L. Owen), Oxford, 69–79.
Sayre, K. M. (2006) Metaphysics and Method in Plato’s Statesman, Cambridge.
Schickert, K. (1977) Die Form der Widerlegung beim frühen Aristoteles, (Zetemata 65), Munich.
Schleiermacher, F. D. E. (1804) ‘Einleitung’, Platons Werke I, 1, Berlin.
Schmid, W. T. (1981) ‘Socrates’ Practice of the elenchus in the Charmides’, Ancient Philosophy 1, 27–58.
Schmid, W. T. (1992) On Manly Courage. A Study of Plato’s Laches, Carbondale (IL).
Schmidt, W. (1974) Theorie der Induktion. Die prinzipielle Bedeutung der Epagoge bei Aristoteles, Munich.
Schneider, C. E. C. (1830) Platonis Opera Graece i, Leipzig.
Schramm, M. (2004) Die Prinzipien der aristotelischen Topik (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 192), Munich/Leipzig.
Schreiber, S. G. (2003) Aristotle on False Reasoning, Albany (NY).
Schulz, W. (1960) ‘Das Problem der Aporie in den Tugenddialogen Platos’, in: Die Gegenwart der Griechen im neueren Denken [Festschrift H-G. Gadamer], Tübingen, 261–75.
Scott, G. A. (ed.) (2002) Does Socrates Have a Method?, Pennsylvania.
Sedley, D. (2002) ‘Socratic Irony in the Platonist Commentators’, in: New Perspectives on Plato. Modern and Ancient (eds. J. Annas and C. Rowe), Cambridge (MA)/London, 37–57.
Sedley, D. (2004) The Midwife of Platonism. Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus, Oxford.
Sherman, N. (1989) The Fabric of Character, Oxford.
Sichirollo, L. (1966) Διαλέγεσθαι-Dialektik. Von Homer bis Aristoteles, Hildesheim.
Sim, M. (1999) ‘Introduction’, in: From Puzzles to Principles? (ed. M. Sim), Lanham (MD), ix–xxv.
Slings, S. (1999) Plato. Clitophon, Edited with Introduction and Commentary, Cambridge.
Slomkowski, P. (1997) Aristotle’s Topics, Leiden.
Smith, R. (1989) Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, Indianapolis.
Smith, R. (1993) ‘Aristotle on the Uses of Dialectic’, Synthese 96, 335–58.
Smith, R. (1994) ‘Dialectic and the Syllogism’, Ancient Philosophy 14, 133–51.
Smith, R. (1997) Aristotle. Topics i and viii, translated with a commentary, Oxford.
Solmsen, F. (1929) Die Entwicklung der aristotelischen Logik und Rhetorik, Berlin.
Sprague, R. K. (1962) Plato’s Use of Fallacy. A Study of the Euthydemus and Some Other Dialogues, London.
Stallbaum, G. (1858) Platonis Opera Omnia iii, i, 2nd edn, Gothae etc. [1829].
Steinhart, K. (1855) Platon’s sämmtliche Werke, Übersetzt von Hieronymus Müller, mit Einleitungen begleitet von Karl Steinhart, vol. 5, Leipzig.
Stemmer, P. (1992) Platons Dialektik. Die früheren und mittleren Dialoge (Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie 31), Berlin.
Stenzel, J. (1931) Studien zur Entwicklung der platonischen Dialektik von Sokrates zu Aristoteles, 2nd edn, Leipzig/Berlin [1917].
Stokes, M. C. (1986) Plato’s Socratic Conversations. Drama and Dialectic in Three Dialogues, Baltimore.
Strycker, É. de (1968) ‘Concept-clés et terminologie dans les livres ii à vii des Topiques’, in: Aristotle on Dialectic. The Topics (ed. G. E. L. Owen), Oxford, 141–63.
Susemihl, F. (1857) Die genetische Entwicklung der platonischen Philosophie, vol. ii.i, Leipzig [Reprint Osnabruck, 1967].
Szlezák, T. A. (1985) Platon und die Schriftlichkeit der Philosophie, Berlin.
Szlezák, T. A. (2004) Das Bild des Dialektikers in Platons späten Dialogen, Berlin.
Tarán, L. (1981) Speusippus of Athens, A Critical Study with a Collection of Related Texts and Commentary, Leiden.
Tarant, H. (1993) Thrasyllan Platonism, Ithaca/London.
Taylor, A. E. (1911) Varia Socratica. First Series, Oxford.
Taylor, C. C. W. (2004) ‘Socrates the Sophist’, in: Socrates. 2400 Years Since His Death (ed. V. Karasmanis), Athens, 211–19.
Teichmüller, G. (1874) Studien zur Geschichte der Begriffe, Berlin.
Teichmüller, G. (1876) ‘Über den Ursprung des Terminus ἐπαγωγη’, Philologus 34, 568–9.
Thesleff, H. (1967) Studies in the Styles of Plato (Acta Philosophica Fennica 20), Helsinki.
Thesleff, H. (1982) Studies in Platonic Chronology (Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 70), Helsinki.
Thesleff, H. (1990) ‘Theaitetos and Theodoros’, Arctos 24, 147–59.
Thesleff, H. (1993) ‘Looking for Clues’, in: Plato’s Dialogues. New Studies and Interpretations (ed. G. A. Press), Lanham (MD), 17–45.
Thesleff, H. (1997) ‘The Early Version of Plato’s Republic’, Arctos 31, 149–74.
Thesleff, H. (1999) Studies in Plato’s Two-Level Model (Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 113), Helsinki.
Thesleff, H. (2002) ‘Plato and his Public’, in: Noctes Atticae [Festschrift J. Mejer], (eds. B. Amdenet al.), Copenhagen, 289–301.
Thesleff, H. (2007) ‘The Gorgias re-written – why?’, in: Gorgias – Menon. Selected Papers from the Seventh Symposium Platonicum (eds. M. Erler, and L. Brisson,), Sankt Augustin, 78–82.
Thesleff, H. (2009) Platonic Patterns. A Collection of Studies, Las Vegas, Zurich, Athens [containing Thesleff 1967, 1982, 1990, 1997, 1999, 2002 inter alia].
Trendelenburg, F. A. (1845) Elementa Logices Aristotelicae, 3rd edn, Berlin [1836].
Trevaskis, J. R. (1955) ‘The Sophistry of Noble Lineage (Plato, Sophistes 230a5–232b9)’, Phronesis 1, 36–49.
Tsouyopoulos, N. (1974) ‘Die induktive Methode und das Induktionsproblem in der griechischen Philosophie’, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie v/1, 94–122.
Tucker, T. G. (1900) The Proem to the Ideal Commonwealth of Plato, London.
Upton, T. V. (1981) ‘Infinity and Perfect Induction in Aristotle’, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 55, 149–57.
Vailati, G. (1904) ‘A proposito di un passo del Teeteto e di una dimostrazione di Euclide’, Rivista di filosofia e scienze affini 6, 5–15.
Versenyi, L. (1975) ‘Plato’s Lysis’, Phronesis 20, 185–98.
Vlastos, G. (1956) Plato’s Protagoras (ed. with an introduction by G. Vlastos, translation B. Jowett and revised M. Ostwald), New York.
Vlastos, G. (1973a) ‘The Individual as Object of Love in Plato’, in: Platonic Studies, Princeton (NJ), 3–34.
Vlastos, G. (1973b) ‘Is the Lysis a Vehicle of Platonic Doctrine?’, in: Platonic Studies, Princeton (NJ), 35–37.
Vlastos, G. (1983) ‘The Socratic elenchus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy i, 27–58.
Vlastos, G. (1988) ‘Elenchus and Mathematics. A Turning-point in Plato’s Philosophical Development’, American Journal of Philology 109, 362–96.
Vlastos, G. (1991) Socrates. Ironist and Moral Philosopher, Ithaca (NY).
Vlastos, G. (1994) Socratic Studies (ed. M. Burnyeat), Cambridge.
Vuller, I. De (1832) Diatribe in Socraticam Epagogen, praesertim e Xenophontis Memorabilibus ductam, Utrecht.
Wagner, H. (1967) Aristoteles. Physikvorlesung (Aristoteles Werke 11), Berlin.
Waitz, T. (1844) Aristotelis Organon Graece, vol. ii, Leipzig.
Waterlow, S. (1977) ‘Protagoras and Inconsistency. Theaetetus 171a6–c7’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 59, 19–36.
Wedin, M. V. (2000) ‘Some Logical Problems in Metaphysics Γ’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy xix, 113–62.
Wedin, M. V. (2005) ‘Animadversions on Burnyeat’s Theaetetus. On the Logic of the Exquisite Argument’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy xxix, 171–91.
Wells, G. H. (1882) The Republic of Plato: Books i and ii, London.
Whewell, W. (1861) The Platonic Dialogues for English Readers, vol. 3, The Republic and the Timaeus, Cambridge and London.
Wieland, W. (1982) Platon und die Formen des Wissens, Göttingen.
Wieland, W. (1997) ‘Aristoteles über Schlüsse aus widersprüchlichen Prämissen’, in: Beiträge zur antiken Philosophie (eds. H.-Ch. Günther and A. Rengakos), [Festschrift W. Kullmann], Stuttgart, 1997, 167–83.
Wilpert, P. (1956/57) ‘Aristoteles und die Dialektik’, Kant-Studien 48, 247–57.
Wilpert, P. (1960) ‘Review of Rabinowitz (1957)’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42, 101–6.
Witt, C. (1992) ‘Dialectic, Motion, and Perception. De Anima Book i’, in: Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima (eds. M. C. Nussbaum and A. O. Rorty), Oxford, 169–83.
Wohlrab, M. (1891) Platonis Theaetetus, Leipzig.
Wolfsdorf, D. (2005) ‘DYNAMIS in Laches’, Phoenix 59, 324–47.
Wolfsdorf, D. (2008) ‘The Method ex hupotheseôs at Meno 86e1–87d8’, Phronesis 53, 35–64.
Woodruff, P. (1987) ‘The Sceptical Side of Plato’s Method’, Revue internationale de philosophie 156–7, 22–37.
Woolf, R. (2000) ‘Callicles and Socrates. Psychic (Dis)harmony in the Gorgias’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy xviii, 1–40.
Zekl, H. G. (1997) Aristoteles. Topik. Topik, neuntes Buch oder Über die sophistischen Widerlegungsschlüsse (with translation, introduction and notes), Hamburg.
Zeller, E. (1846) Die Philosophie der Griechen. Eine Untersuchung über Charakter, Gang und Hauptmomente ihrer Entwicklung, vol. 2, Tübingen.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.