![](http://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:book:9781846156380/resource/name/9781846156380i.jpg)
- Publisher:
- Boydell & Brewer
- Online publication date:
- September 2012
- Print publication year:
- 2008
- Online ISBN:
- 9781846156380
- Subjects:
- East Asian History, Area Studies, Asian Studies, History
22 August 2024: Due to technical disruption, we are experiencing some delays to publication. We are working to restore services and apologise for the inconvenience. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/about-us/news-and-blogs/cambridge-university-press-publishing-update-following-technical-disruption
The 'Crimean War' was much more than a series of battles in the Crimea. One of the most neglected aspects has been the naval campaign in the Pacific Ocean - as highlighted in this full-scale survey, which brings out the involvement of China and Japan. The campaign took a joint British and French squadron from Chile to Kamchatka, to be defeated in battle at Petropavlovsk - where the British Admiral committed suicide. Despite their victory, the Russians withdrew from all their Pacific coastal settlements, and the British and French concentrated on searching for the mouth of the Amur River, thought to be a Russian base. The Russians in turn also concentrated there, in order to build a base, sending repeated expeditions along the river. Both China, who claimed to rule along the Amur, and Japan, only just `opened up' by Commodore Perry's expedition, were involved - indeed, the British used a Japanese port as their advanced base. The United States had only recently reached the Pacific coast and several Americans had their eyes on Russian Alaska and Hawaii as territories for future acquisitions. All this meant the Allies had to tread very delicately in Pacific waters. The war in Europe ended before a decisive action could take place in the Pacific. Ironically, having lost in the fighting, the Russians ended with a great advance in their territory.
[Grainger] writes in a provocative and engrossing style and orders and arranges his account in a way that makes sense out of what was a confusing and complex situation. His command of the available sources is excellent. [The book] is an exceptional study worthy of the widest readership. It will enlighten not only all those interested in the naval, imperial, and diplomatic history of the mid-nineteenth-century but also should be read by those interested in the wider Pacific region and why it is the way it is now.'
Source: Victorian Studies
[Does] a good job examining this neglected aspect of the Crimean War. This fine book should be in the library of everyone interested in the Crimean War, or British or Russian naval history'
Source: Nautical Research Journal
An original, fresh look at an aspect of the Crimean War that is too often overlooked or deliberately ignored by historians. A very useful study not only for those interested in a detailed account of the Royal Navy's Pacific campaign, but also for anyone interested in the wider context and consequences of the unfortunately named "Crimean" War.'
Source: Journal of British Studies
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.
Usage data cannot currently be displayed.