A close examination of an understudied European Union member state such as Romania reveals that, since 1989, post-Communist state and non-state actors have adopted a wide range of methods, processes and practices of working through the Communist past. Both the timing and the sequencing of these transitional justice methods prove to be significant in determining the efficacy of addressing and redressing the crimes of 1945 to 1989. In addition, there is evidence that some of these methods have directly facilitated the democratization process, while the absence of other methods has undermined the rule of law. This is the first volume to overview the complex Romanian transitional justice effort by accessing secret archives and investigating court trials of former Communist perpetrators, lustration, compensation and rehabilitation, property restitution, the truth commission, the rewriting of history books, and unofficial truth projects.

'Not only does this book expose many of the grimmer realities of Communist times in Romania but it also chronicles the ingenuity and brazenness of post-1989 decision-makers keen to indefinitely postpone a reckoning with their collective past. The rigour shown in analysing the laggardly response to transitional justice is sure to enable Lavinia Stan’s book to be an important benchmark in the scholarly approach to the subject. … Very comprehensive in its scope, this is an impressive analysis of the range of responses, official and non-official, to coercive and cruel aspects of the recent past in Romania.'

Tom Gallagher Source: Slavonic and East European Review

'In her masterly written monograph Stan convincingly shows why the real challenge for TJ students and scholars alike is … to comprehend why so many attempts to enact TJ measures in the region failed to deliver a long lasting reconciliation of the CEE countries with their totalitarian pasts … I believe that Stan’s excellent analysis, which alternates highly theoretical considerations with countless examples of post-communist Romania’s TJ measures, makes this book a work of reference for TJ scholars, political theorists or historians. It is not hard to see that the model provided by Stan in this book will be emulated, or why the book is bound to become a major source of inspiration for any scholar attempting to investigate the politics of memory in post-communist Europe.'

Liviu Damsa Source: Europe-Asia Studies

'Stan provides a detailed, authoritative account of the various ways that Romania has tried to deal with its Communist past in the two decades since 1989 … Recommended.'

Peter Rutland Source: Choice

'Stan applies many academic insights to the case of Romania to ascertain the impact of the transitional justice measures on the quality of post-Communist democracy. She convincingly argues that 'the assumption that the absence of radical lustration is more democratic than its presence does not seem to hold in the case of Romania' … Lavinia Stan’s book is an excellent work, the first comprehensive study of transitional justice methods and actions in post-1989 Romania.'

Cristian Vasile Source: Nationalities Papers

'Lavinia Stan examines thoroughly the need to overcome partisan limitations in the effort to blend the moral and scholarly perspectives in a persuasive strategy meant to generate a community of democratic memory. I share her conviction that in the absence of such a strategy, Romanian democracy (and other ones as well) remains vulnerable to onslaughts from new or not so new illiberal, populist attacks. Altogether, Lavinia Stan’s book is a tour de force in documenting and assessing both the achievements and the delays, and even failure, in Romania’s efforts to right the wrongs of the past.'

Vladimir Tismaneanu Source: International Affairs

'Over recent years, the study of transitional justice in newly democratic countries has turned towards much more comprehensive accounts of the ensemble of measures and controversies that societies can adopt to deal with a repressive past. Lavinia Stan’s book is a fine example of this turn in the discipline, as she attempts to systematise the broad range of issues and policies that Romania has engaged with in its past two decades of democratic change.'

Vello Pettai Source: East European Politics