Element contents
Epistemology of Experimental Physics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2021
Summary
This Element introduces major issues in the epistemology of experimental physics through discussion of canonical physics experiments and some that have not yet received much philosophical attention. The primary challenge is to make sense of how physicists justify crucial decisions made in the course of empirical research. Judging a result as epistemically significant or as calling for further technical scrutiny of the equipment is one important context of such decisions. Judging whether the instrument has been calibrated, and which data should be included in the analysis are others. To what extent is it possible to offer philosophical analysis, systematization, and prescriptions regarding such decisions? To what extent can there be explicit epistemic justification for them? The primary aim of this Element is to show how a nuanced understanding of science in practice informs an epistemology of experimental physics that avoids strong social constructivism.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108885676Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 02 December 2021
References
Ackermann, R. J. (1985). Data, Instruments, and Theory. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aker, M., Altenmüller, K., Arenz et al., M. (2019). Improved Upper Limit on the Neutrino Mass from a Direct Kinematic Method by KATRIN. Physical Review Letters, 123, 221802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aker, M., Altenmüller, K., Arenz, M. et al. (2020). First Operation of the KATRIN Experiment with Tritium. European Physical Journal C, 80, 264.Google Scholar
Angrik, J., Armbrust, T., Beglarian, A. et al. (2005). KATRIN Design Report 2004, FZKA Scientific Report 7090. Germany.Google Scholar
Anstey, P. R. (2014). Philosophy of Experiment in Early Modern England: The Case of Bacon, Boyle and Hooke. Early Science and Medicine, 19, 103–132.Google Scholar
Arenz, M., Babutzka, M., Bahr, M. et al. (2016). Commissioning of the vacuum system of the KATRIN Main Spectrometer. Journal of Instrumentation, 11, P04011.Google Scholar
Bacon, F. (2000/1620). The New Organon. Edited by Jardine, L. and Silverthorne, M.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, N. M. (2017). Franklin’s Field Guide to Scientific Experiments. Philosophy of Science, 84, 586–594.Google Scholar
Boyd, N. M. (2018a). “Scientific Progress at the Boundaries of Experience”. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/33843.Google Scholar
Boyle, R. (1999/1661). Two Essays, Concerning the Unsuccessfulness of Experiments. In Hunter, M., and Davis, E. B., eds., The Works of Robert Boyle, Vol. 2: The Sceptical in Chymist and Other Publications of 1661. Oxford Scholarly Editions Online, pp. 35–82. https://www.oxfordscholarlyeditions.com/view/10.1093/actrade/9781138764699.book.1/actrade-9781138764699-div1-10?r-1=1.000&wm-1=1&t-1=contents-tab&p1-1=1&w1-1=1.000Google Scholar
Boyle, R. (1672). Some Observations about Shining Flesh, Made by the Honourable Robert Boyle; Febr. 15. 1671/72. And by Way of Letter Addressed to the Publisher, and Presented to the R. Society. Philosophical Transactions (1665–1678), 7, 5108–5116.Google Scholar
Brush, S. G. (1989). Prediction and Theory Evaluation: The Case of Light Bending. Science, 246, 1124–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brush, S. G. (1999). Why Was Relativity Accepted? Physics in Perspective, 1, 184–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, H. (2004). Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, H. (2007). Scientific Progress: Beyond Foundationalism and Coherentism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 61, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. (1992/1985). Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H., and Pinch, T.. (1993). The Golem: What Everyone Needs to Know about Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1991/1954). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dumitru, C. (2013). Crucial Instances and Crucial Experiments in Bacon, Boyle, and Hooke. Society and Politics, 7(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
Earman, J., and Glymour, C.. (1980). Relativity and Eclipses: The British Eclipse Expeditions of 1919 and Their Predecessors. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 11(1), 49–85.Google Scholar
Feest, U. (2016). The Experimenters’ Regress Reconsidered: Replication, Tacit Knowledge, and the Dynamics of Knowledge Generation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 58, 34–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, A. (1993). The Rise and Fall of the Fifth Force: Discover, Pursuit, and Justification in Modern Physics. American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Franklin, A. (2002). Selectivity and Discord: Two Problems of Experiment. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, A. (2013). Shifting Standards: Experiments in Particle Physics in the Twentieth Century. University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, A. (2016). What Makes a Good Experiment? Reasons and Roles in Science. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, A., and Collins, H. M.. (2016). Two Kinds of Case Study and a New Agreement. In Sauer, T., and Scholl, R., eds., The Philosophy of Historical Case Studies. Springer, pp. 95–121.Google Scholar
Franklin, A., and Perović, S.. (2019). Experiment in Physics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physics-experimentGoogle Scholar
Fraser, H., Parker, T., Nakagawa, S., Barnett, A., and Fidler, F. (2018). Questionable Research Practices in Ecology and Evolution. PLoS ONE, 13(7), e0200303.Google Scholar
Galison, P. (1995). Context and Constraints. In Buchwald, J. Z., ed., Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics. University of Chicago Press, pp. 13–41.Google Scholar
Galison, P. (1997). Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Girard, G. (1990). The Washing and Cleaning of Kilogram Prototypes at the BIPM, Bureau International Des Poids Et Mesures.Google Scholar
Grauf, E. (2012). Commissioning of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs). In Alonso, A., ed., Infrastructure and Methodologies for the Justification of Nuclear Power Programmes. Woodhead, pp. 741–772.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1989). Extragalactic Reality: The Case of Gravitational Lensing. Philosophy of Science, 56(4), 555–581.Google Scholar
Hills, R. (2009). ALMA Commissioning and Scientific Verification: Summary and Status. ALMA Scientific Advisory Committee (ASAC) Face-to-Face Presentation. https://safe.nrao.edu/wiki/pub/ALMA/ASAC13Oct09Agenda/Commissioning_ASAC.pdfGoogle Scholar
Holton, G. (1969). Einstein, Michelson, and the “Crucial” Experiment. Isis, 60(2), 132–197.Google Scholar
Kennefick, D. (2009). Testing Relativity from the 1919 Eclipse: A Question of Bias. Physics Today, 62(3), 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennefick, D. (2012). Not Only Because of Theory: Dyson, Eddington, and the Competing Myths of the 1919 Eclipse Expedition. In Lehner, C., Renn, J., and Schemmel, M., eds., Einstein and the Changing Worldview of Physics. Einstein Studies, vol 12. Birkhäuser Boston, pp. 201–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennefick, D. (2019). No Shadow of a Doubt: The 1919 Eclipse That Confirmed Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kheirandish, E. (2009). Footprints of “Experiment” in Early Arabic Optics. Early Science and Medicine, 14, 79–104.Google Scholar
Mayo, D. (1991). Novel Evidence and Severe Tests. Philosophy of Science, 58(4), 523–552.Google Scholar
Nauenberg, M. (2015). Solution to the Long-Standing Puzzle of Huygens’ “Anomalous Suspension.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 69(3), 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penzias, A. A., and Wilson, R. W.. (1965). A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s. Astrophysical Journal, 142, 419–421.Google Scholar
Perović, S. (2017). Experimenters’ Regress Argument, Empiricism, and the Calibration of the Large Hadron Collider. Synthese, 194, 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, V. C., and Jr.Ford, W. K. (1970). Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions. Astrophysical Journal, 159, 379–403.Google Scholar
Sargent, R. (1994). Learning from Experience: Boyle’s Construction of an Experimental Philosophy. In Hunter, M., ed., Robert Boyle Reconsidered. Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–78.Google Scholar
Sargent, R. (1995). The Diffident Naturalist: Robert Boyle and the Philosophy of Experiment. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, S., and Shaffer, S.. (2011/1985). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tal, E. (2016a). How Does Measuring Generate Evidence? The Problem of Observational Grounding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 772, 012001.Google Scholar
Tal, E. (2016b). Making Time: A Study in the Epistemology of Measurement. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67, 297–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tal, E. (2017a). A Model-Based Epistemology of Measurement. In Mößner, N., and Nordmann, A., eds., Reasoning in Measurement. Routledge, pp. 233–253.Google Scholar
Tal, E. (2017b). Calibration: Modelling the Measurement Process. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 65–66, 33–45.Google Scholar
Worrall, J. (1989). Fresnel, Poisson and the White Spot: The Role of Successful Predictions in the Acceptance of Scientific Theories. In Gooding, D., Pinch, T., and Schaffer, S., eds., The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences. Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–157.Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by