Element contents
The Kantian Federation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 May 2022
Summary
This Element introduces the reader to Kant's theory of peace and to its place in the broader context of the critical philosophy. It also delves into one aspect of the model that has generated much debate among interpreters, given Kant's changing thoughts on the matter. This aspect relates to the nature and powers of the international federation. Defending the idea that national sovereignty is indissolubly linked to states' full autonomy regarding the use of military power, this Element offers an interpretation and defense of the Kantian federation that, in many regards, departs from the mainstream reading. Special emphasis is placed on the problematic coexistence of two conflicting theoretical desiderata: on the one hand, the necessity of establishing an international institution with coercive powers for securing peace; on the other hand, the necessity of avoiding the risk of an excessive erosion of states' sovereignty.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009037013Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 23 June 2022
References
Anderson-Gold, S. (2006). Cosmopolitan Right Kant’s Key to Perpetual Peace. In Caranti, L., ed., Kant’s Perpetual Peace: New Interpretative Essays. Rome: Luiss University Press, pp. 137–47.Google Scholar
Archibugi, D. (1995). Immanuel Kant, Cosmopolitan Law, and Peace. European Journal of International Relations, 1(4), 429–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibugi, D. (2008). The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Archibugi, D. & Beetham, D. (1998). Diritti umani e democrazia cosmopolita. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Axinn, S. (1989). Kant on World Government. In Funcke, G. and Seebohm, T. M., eds., Proceedings: Sixth International Kant Congress: Washington, DC: University Press of America, pp. 243–51.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (2005). Introduzione. In Kant, I, ed., Per la pace perpetua. Rome: Editori Riuniti, pp. x–xxv.Google Scholar
Brito Vieira, M. (2017). Introduction. In Brito Vieira, M, ed., Reclaiming Representation. London: Routledge, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. W. (2005). State Sovereignty, Federation and Kantian Cosmopolitanism. European Journal of International Relations, 11(4), 495–522. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105057898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. W. (2009). Grounding Cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, B. S. & Hruschka, J. (2010). Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caranti, L. (2006). Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace? Reflections on the Realist Critique of Kant’s Project. Journal of Human Rights, 18(3), 23–45.Google Scholar
Caranti., L. (2012). Kant’s Theory of Human Rights. In Cushman, T., ed., Handbook of Human Rights. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 35–44.Google Scholar
Caranti, L. (2014). The Guarantee of Perpetual Peace: Three Concerns. In Goldman, A, Patrone, T.TT, & Formosa, P, eds., Politics and Teleology in Kant. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, pp. 145–62.Google Scholar
Caranti, L. (2016). Kantian Peace and Liberal Peace: Three Concerns. Journal of Political Philosophy, 24(4), 446–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caranti, L. (2017a). Kant’s Politics Today: Human Rights, Peace, Progress. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Caranti, L. (2017b). How Cosmopolitanism Reduces Conflict: Narrow and Broad Readings of Kant’s Third Ingredient for Peace. Journal of International Political Theory, 14(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Caranti, L. (2018). The Kantian Federation: Two Hermeneutical Problems. In Klemme, H. & Falduto, A., eds., Kant und seine Kritiker. Hildesheim: Olms Weidemann, pp. 347–62.Google Scholar
Caranti, L. (2022). Kant via Rousseau against Democracy. In Caranti, L. & Pinzani, A., eds., Kant and the Problem of Politics in the Contemporary World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Thomas L. (1988). Perpetual Peace. What Kant Should Have Said. Social Theory and Practice 14(2) (Summer), 173–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallar, G. (2002). The Rights of Strangers: Theories of International Hospitality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cavallar, G. (2015). Kant’s Embedded Cosmopolitanism: History, Philosophy and Education for World Citizens. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cavallar, G. (2020). Kant and the Theory and Practice of International Right. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Cheneval, F. (2002). Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Bedeutung: Über die Entstehung und die Philosophischen Grundlagen des Supranationalen und Kosmopolitischen Denkens der Moderne. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Christiano, T. (2015). Self-Determination and the Human Right to Democracy. In Cruft, R., Liao, M. S., & Renzo, M., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 459–80.Google Scholar
Covell, C. (1998). Kant and the Law of Peace: A Study in the Philosophy of Law and International Relations, Houndmills: Macmillan-Saint Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, M. W. (1983a). Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs (Part I). Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12(3), 205–35.Google Scholar
Doyle, M. W. (1983b). Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs (Part II). Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12(4), 323–53.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, J. (1968). Kants Lehre vom ewigen Frieden und die Kriegsschuldfrage. In Ebbinghaus, J, Gesammelte Aufsätze, Vorträge und Reden. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Eberl, O. & Niesen, P. (2011). Immanuel Kant: Zum ewigen Frieden und Auszüge aus der Rechtslehre: Kommentar. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Ferrara, A. & Michelman, F. I. (2022). Legitimation by Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1845–6). Zum Ewigen Frieden: Ein Philosophischer Entwurf von Immanuel Kant. In Fichte, I. H., ed., Sämmtliche Werke, 4 vols. Berlin: Veit & Comp.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (1996). Values behind the Market: Kant’s Response to the Wealth of Nations. History of Political Thought, 57, 379–407.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, K. (2010). Kant’s Sovereignty Dilemma: A Contemporary Analysis. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(4), 469–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. (1948). Inevitable Peace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, W. B. (1978). Philosophers of Peace and War: Kant, Clausewitz, Marx, Engels and Tolstoy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geismann, G. (1996). Kant on Eternal Peace. In Ballestrem, K. G., Gerhardt, V., Ottmann, H., and Thompson, M. P., eds., Politisches Denken Jahrbuch 1995/96. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03633-9_11.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, V. (1995). Immanuel Kants Entwurf “Zum Ewigen Frieden.” Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. & Page, B. I. (2017). Democracy in America? What Has Gone Wrong and What We Can Do About It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. (2006). The Possibility of Perpetual Peace. In Caranti, L., ed., Kant’s Perpetual Peace: New Interpretative Essays. Rome: Luiss University Press, pp. 161–82.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. (2019). Luigi Caranti’s Kant’s Political Legacy. Kantian Review, 24(2), 275–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1998). The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hinsley, F. H. (1963). Power and Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations between the States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Höffe, O. (2004). Völkerbund oder Weltrepublik? In Höffe, O.. ed., Immanuel Kant: Zum Ewigen Frieden. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 109–32.Google Scholar
Höffe, O. (2006). Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hueglin, T.O. & Fenna, A. (2015). Comparative Federalism. A Systematic Inquiry. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). (2001). The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre for ICISS.Google Scholar
Kersting, W. (1996). Weltfriedensordnung und globale Verteilungsgerechtigkeit: Kants Konzeption eines vollständigen Rechtsfriedens und diegegenwärtige politische Philosophie der internationalen Beziehungen. In Merkel, R. and Wittmann, R., eds., Zum ewigen Frieden: Grundlagen, Aktualität und Aussichten einer Idee von Immanuel Kant. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 172–212.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, P. (2006). Kant’s Argument’s for the League of States. In Caranti, L., ed., Kant’s Perpetual Peace: New Interpretative Essays. Rome: Luiss University Press, pp. 55–74.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, P. (2011). Kant and Cosmopolitanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Losurdo, D. (1983). Autocensura e Compromesso nel Pensiero Politico di Kant. Naples: Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Ludwig, B. (2006). Condemned to Peace: What Does Nature Guarantee in Kant’s Treatise of Eternal Peace? In Caranti, L. (ed.), Kant’s Perpetual Peace: New Interpretative Essays. Rome: Luiss University Press, pp. 183–95.Google Scholar
Lutz-Bachmann, M. (1997). Kant’s Idea of Peace and the Philosophical Conception of a World Republic. In Bohman, J. & Lutz-Bachman, M., eds., Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press, pp. 59–77.Google Scholar
MacMillan, J. (1995). A Kantian Protest Against the Peculiar Discourse of Inter-Liberal State Peace. Millennium, 24(3), 549–62.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (2009). Europe As the Would-Be World Power: The EU at Fifty. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marini, G. (1998). Il diritto cosmopolitico nel progetto kantiano per la pace perpetua con particolare riferimento al secondo articolo definitivo. In Marini, G, Tre studi sul cosmopolitismo. Pisa: Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar
Marini, G. (2001). Per una repubblica federale mondiale. In Chiodi, G. M., Gatti, R., and Marini, G., eds., La filosofia politica di Kant: Seminarioperugino per lo studio dei classici. Milan: Angeli, pp. 19–34.Google Scholar
Mikalsen, K. K. (2019). Kantian Republicanism in the International Sphere: Equal Sovereignty As a Condition of Global Justice. In G. Brown, Wallace & Telegdi-Csetri, Á, eds., Kant’s Cosmopolitics: Contemporary Issues and Global Debates. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
Mori, M. (2008). La Pace e la Ragione: Kant e le Relazioni Internazionali. Politica, Diritto, Storia. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Mulholland, L. A. (1987). Kant on War and International Justice. Kant Studien, 78, 25–41.Google Scholar
Nida-Rümelin, J. (1996). Ewiger Friede zwischen Moralismus und Hobbesianismus. In Merkel, R. & Wittmann, R., eds., Zum Ewiger Frieden: Grundlagen, Aktualität und Aussichten einer Idee von Immanuel Kant. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 239–55.Google Scholar
Philonenko, A. (1988). Kant et le problème de la paix. In Philonenko, A. (ed.), Essais sur la philosophie de la guerre. Paris: Vrin, pp. 26–42.Google Scholar
Pinzani, A. (2008). Representation in Kant’s Political Theory. In Joerden, J., Byrd, S., & Hruschka, J., eds., Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 16. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 203–26.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (2006). Kant’s Vision, Europe, and a Global Federation. In Caranti, L., ed., Kant’s Perpetual Peace: New Interpretative Essays. Rome: LUISS University Press, pp. 75–96.Google Scholar
Ripstein, A. (2016). Just War, Regular War, and Perpetual Peace. Kant-Studien, 107(1), 179–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2016-0009Google Scholar
Ripstein, A. (2021). Rules for Wrongdoers: Law, Morality, War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roff, H. M. (2015). Global Justice, Kant and the Responsibility to Protect: A Provisional Duty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosato, S. (2011). Europe’s Troubles: Power Politics and the State of the European Project. International Security, 35(4), 45–86.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. E. (2004). A Closer Look at Cheney and Halliburton. The New York Times, September 28. www.nytimes.com/2004/09/28/us/a-closer-look-at-cheney-and-halliburton.htmlGoogle Scholar
Russett, B. (2005). Bushwhacking the Democratic Peace. International Studies Perspectives, 6(4), 395–408.Google Scholar
Ruyssen, T. (1924). Les origines kantiennes de la société Des nations. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 31(2), 355–71.Google Scholar
Taraborrelli, A. (2006). Reflections on Kant’s Third Definitive Article of “Perpetual Peace.” In Caranti, L., ed., Kant’s Perpetual Peace: New Interpretative Essays. Rome: LUISS University Press, pp. 133–42.Google Scholar
Tesòn, F. (1992). The Kantian Theory of International Law. Columbia Law Review, 53, 53–102.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. (2008). Sovereignty, hospitality, and commerce: Kant and cosmopolitan right. Jahrbuch fur Recht und Ethik 16, 305–19.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2000). Representation as Advocacy: A Study of Democratic Deliberation. Political Theory, 28(6), 758–86.Google Scholar
Williams, H. (1992). Kant’s Optimism in his Social and Political Theory. In Williams, H., ed., Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2000) What is Cosmopolitan? Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2), 227–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. (1995). Kant’s Project for Perpetual Peace. In Robinson, H, ed., Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress, Vol. 1. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar