Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T02:35:16.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electroconvulsive therapy versus transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a review with recommendations for future research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

Keith G. Rasmussen
Keith G. Rasmussen*
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Rochester, MN, USA
*
Keith G. Rasmussen, Mayo Clinic Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. Tel: 507-284-3789; Fax: 507-284-4158; E-mail: rasmussen.keith@mayo.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To review the literature comparing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for major depression.

Methods:

Data from the six randomised, prospective studies were agglutinated into one data set. Special attention was given to the methods of both TMS and ECT as well as data pertaining to differential outcomes in subgroups such as psychotic depressives and the elderly.

Results:

There is a highly significant advantage for ECT in the prospective, randomised trials. The two non-randomised, retrospective comparative trials found the treatments to be equal in one study and superior for ECT in another. However, sample sizes are small in these studies, and both TMS and ECT may have been used suboptimally. Furthermore, the possibilities of differential efficacy of ECT or TMS for psychotic depressives or as a function of age have yet to be fully explored.

Conclusions:

The data to date do not support the contention that TMS is equivalent in efficacy to ECT. It is recommended that a large-scale trial be undertaken using aggressive forms of both TMS and ECT with sample sizes sufficiently large to detect effects of moderating variables such as age and psychosis status.

Keywords

electroconvulsive therapymajor depressiontranscranial magnetic stimulation
Type
Review article
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 20 , Issue 6 , December 2008 , pp. 291 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burt, T, Lisanby, SH, Sackeim, HA. Neuropsychiatric applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation: a meta-analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2002;5:73–103. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pridmore, S, Bruno, R, Turnier-Shea, Y, Reid, P, Rybak, M. Comparison of unlimited numbers of rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and ECT treatment sessions in major depressive episode. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2000;3:129–134. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grunhaus, L, Dannon, PN, Schreiber, S, Dolberg, OH, Amiaz, R, Lefkifker, E. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is as effective as electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of nondelusional major depressive disorder: an open study. Biol Psychiatry 2000;47:314–324. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janicak, PG, Dowd, SM, Martis, Bet al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: preliminary results of a randomized trial. Biol Psychiatry 2002;51:659–667. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dannon, PN, Dolberg, OT, Schreiber, S, Grunhaus, L. Three and six-month outcome following courses of either ECT or rTMS in a population of severely depressed individuals – preliminary report. Biol Psychiatry 2002;51:687–690. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grunhaus, L, Schreiber, S, Dolberg, OT, Polak, D, Dannon, PN. A randomized controlled comparison of electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in severe and resistant nonpsychotic major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2003;53:324–331. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connor, M, Brenninkmeyer, C, Morgan, Aet al. Relative effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy on mood and memory: a neurocognitive risk-benefit analysis. Cogn Behav Neurol 2003;16:118–127. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulze-Rauschenbach, SC, Harms, U, Schlaepfer, TE, Maier, W, Falkai, P, Wagner, M. Distinctive neurocognitive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy in major depression. Br J Psychiatry 2005;186:410–416. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosa, MA, Gattaz, WF, Pascual-Leone, Aet al. Comparison of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy in unipolar non-psychotic refractory depression: a randomized, single-blind study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2006;9:667–676. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eranti, S, Mogg, A, Pluck, Get al. A randomized, controlled trial with 6-month follow up of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy for severe depression. Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:73–81. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Reardon, JP, Solvason, HB, Janicak, PGet al. Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry 2007;62:1208–1216. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrides, G, Fink, M, Husain, MMet al. ECT remission rates in psychotic versus nonpsychotic depressed patients: a report from CORE. J ECT 2001;17:244–253. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, MK, Knapp, R, Husain, Met al. The influence of age on the response of major depression to electroconvulsive therapy: a C.O.R.E. report. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001;9:382–390. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, R. Electroconvulsive therapy, 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janicak, PG, Dowd, S, Rado, Jet al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy: efficacy of treatment in nonpsychotic patients with depression (letter). Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:1118. CrossRefGoogle Scholar