Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T06:29:58.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acoustic startle responses of rats with cerebral developmental abnormalities: implications for schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

L.M. Talamini*
Affiliation:
Dept. Psychonomics, University of Amsterdam
B. Ellenbroek
Affiliation:
Dept. Biological Psychiatry, University Hospital of Groningen
T. Koch
Affiliation:
Dept. Psychonomics, University of Amsterdam
J. Korf
Affiliation:
Dept. Psychonomics, University of Amsterdam
*
University of Amsterdam, Dept. Psychonomics, Roeterstraat 15, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Summary

Mounting evidence suggests involvement of prenatal factors in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. The objective of the present study was to provide evidence for the hypothesis on schizophrenia that abnormal fetal brain development leads to impaired sensorimotor gating of acoustic startle stimuli. To this purpose, pregnant rats were treated with methylazoxymethanol acetate on one of four subsequent days of gestation, from E9 to E12. These procedures inhibit early stages of cortical proliferation in the foetuses, resulting in adult brain abnormalities that were mainly found in the entorhinal region. At the adult age, habituation andprepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle responses to acoustic stimuli were investigated. Our results show impaired habituation and PPI in rats treated at embryonic days 10 and 11. It is concluded that sensorimotor gating deficits can result from a developmental abnormality involving the entorhinal region, supporting the hypothesis that similar deficits, often observed in schizophrenic subjects, may be the result of entorhinal cortex dysfunction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature

1.Cadenhead, KS, Geyer, MA, Braff, DL. Impaired startle prepulse inhibition and habituation in patients with schizotypal personality disorder. Am J Psychiat 1993; 150: 1862–67.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Geyer, MA, Braff, DL. Habituation of the blink reflex in normals and schizophrenic patients. Psychophysiol 1982; 19: 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Braff, DL, Stone, C, Callaway, E, et al.Prestimulus effects on human startle reflex in normals and schizophrenics. Psychophysiol 1978; 15:339–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Braff, DL. Attention, habituation and information processing in psychiatric disorders. In: Michels, Ret al, eds. Psychiatry Vol 3. Philadelphia: Lippincott Company, 1985: 112.Google Scholar
5.Koch, M, Schnitzler, HU. The acoustic startle response in ratscircuits mediating evocation, inhibition and potentiation. Behav Brain Res 1997; 89: 3549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Lipska, BK, Swerdlow, NR, Geyer, MA, et al.Neonatal excitotoxic hippocampal damage in rats causes post-pubertal changes in prepulse inhibition of startle and its disruption by apomorphine. Psychopharmacol 1995; 122: 3543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Ellenbroek, BA, Geyer, MA, Cools, AR. The behavior of APO-SUS rats in animal models with construct validity for schizophrenia. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 7604–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Arnold, SE, Hyman, BT, Van Hoesen, GV, et al.Some cytoarchitec-tural abnormalities of the entorhinal cortex in schizophrenia. Arch gen Psychiat 1991; 48: 625632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Akbarian, S, Bunney, WE, Potkin, SG, et al.Altered distribution of nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate-diaphorase cells implies disturbances of cortical development. Arch gen Psychiat 1993; 50: 169–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Talamini, LM, Louwerens, JW, Sloof, CJ, et al.PET versus postmortem studies in schizophrenia research: Significance for the pathogenesis and pharmacotherapy. In: Den Boer, JA, Westenberg, HGM, Van Praag, HM, eds. Advances in the neurobiology of schizophrenia. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1994; 157–88.Google Scholar
11.Sham, PC, O'Callaghan, E, Takei, N, et al.Schizophrenia following pre-natal exposure to influenza epidemics between 1939 and 1960. Br J Psychiat 1992; 160: 461–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Davis, JO, Phelps, JA, Bracha, HS. Prenatal development of monozygotic twins and concordance for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1995;21:357–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Weinberger, DR. Implications of normal brain development for pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Arch gen Psychiat 1987; 44: 660–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Roberts, GW. Schizophrenia a neuropathological perspective. Br J Psychiat 199; 1158: 817.Google Scholar
15.Bracha, HS. Etiology of structural asymmetry in schizophrenia: an alternative hypothesis. Schizophrenia Bull 1991; 17: 551–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Talamini, LM, Koch, T, Ter Horst, G, et al.Methylazoxymethanol acetate-induced abnormalities in the entorhinal cortex of the rat; parallels with morphological findings in schizophrenia. Brain Res 1998; 789: 293306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Spatz, M, Laquer, GL. Transplacental induced microencephaly in two strains of rats. Proc Soc exp Biol NY 1986; 129: 705–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Witter, MP, Groenewegen, HJ, Lopez, DaSilva, FH, et al.Functional organization of the extrinsic and intrinsic circuitry of the parahip-pocampal region. Progress Neurobiol 1989; 33: 161253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed