Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:24:43.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Key lessons learnt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2013

P. Perrier-Cornet
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR MOISA (Marches, Organisations, Institutions et strategies d'acteurs), 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier Cedex 2, France
E. Rossier
Affiliation:
Institute for Horse and Horse Riding, 83-85, Bd Vincent Auriol, 75013 Paris, France
C. Jez*
Affiliation:
INRA, Department of Scientific Expertise, Foresight and Advanced Studies, 147 Rue de l'Université, 75338 Paris, France
Get access

Abstract

The four scenarios lead to differences in the size of the equine population: maybe twice as many horses as today, in the ‘Everybody on Horseback’ scenario, or half as much in the ‘High-Society Horse’ scenario. Businesses, facilities, as well as the types of employment would also be very different (cf. those in ‘The civic horse’ scenario). Likewise, the location of horses in the French regions or the categories of rural areas would differ to a great extent… They all raise shared concerns in terms of (i) the relationship between man and horse, (ii) economic efficiency, (iii) environmental issues, (iv) the preservation of breeds and pressure on surfaces and (v) health, welfare and caring for animals up to and beyond death. These questions call for research development in the fields of animal behaviour, economic and social sciences, breeding and genetic improvement. They also emphasize the need to enhance knowledge and innovation transfer.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Martin-Rosset, W 2012. Nutrition et alimentation des chevaux. QUAE-Haras Nationaux. QUAE, Versailles.Google Scholar