Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:40:26.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fisher's theory of evolution of dominance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Atam Vetta
Atam Vetta*
Affiliation:
(Oxford Polytechnic)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1981 , pp. 11 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Charlesworth, B. (1979) Evidence against Fisher's theory of dominance. Nature (London) 278, 848.Google Scholar
Ewens, W. J. (1965a) A note on Fisher's theory of evolution of dominance. Ann. Hum. Genet. (London) 29, 85–88.Google Scholar
Ewens, W. J. (1965b) Further notes on the evolution of dominance. Heredity 20, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1928) The possible modification of the response of wild type to recurrent mutations. Amer. Naturalist 62, 115–126.Google Scholar
Mukai, T., Chigusa, S. I., Metler, L. E. and Corw, J. F. (1972) Genetics 72, 335–355.Google Scholar
Sved, J. A. and Mayo, O. (1970) In Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics, ed. Kojima, Ken-ichi. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1929a) Fisher's theory of dominance. Amer. Naturalist 63, 274–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1929b) The evolution of dominance. Comment on Dr Fisher's reply. Amer. Naturalist 63, 556–561.Google Scholar