Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T16:18:38.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anomalous Residual Stresses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

R. E. Ricklefs  and
W. P. Evans
R. E. Ricklefs
Affiliation:
Caterpillar Tractor Company Peoria, Illinois
W. P. Evans
Affiliation:
Caterpillar Tractor Company Peoria, Illinois
Get access

Abstract

Residual stresses were measured in hardened and tempered specimens after unidirectional plastic extension. X-ray and strain gage-layer removal methods were compared. Anomalous residual stresses were found in extended samples at hardnesses of Rc 32–35. The X-ray method indicated compressive residual stresses of nearly constant magnitude through ⅓ the thickness of flat samples, while the strain gagelayer removal method indicated that no macrostress existed. A constant anomalous residual stress was also seen by X-ray through ⅗ the thickness of a cylindrical specimen deformed uniformly in tension. Little or no anomalous stress was found in an extended specimen at Re 55 or in a specimen at Rc 44 after uniform bending.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 10: Fifteenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 10-12, 1966 , 1966 , pp. 273 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Donachie, M. J. Jr., and Norton, J. T., “Lattice Strains and X-Ray Stress Measurement,” Trans, Met. Soc. AIME 221: 962, 1961.Google Scholar
2. Taira, S. and Yoshioka, Y., “X-Ray Investigation on the Residual Stress of Metallic Materials (On the Residual Stress of Stretched Carbon. Steel),” in: T. Nishihara et ah, Proceedings of the Seventh Japan Congress on Testing Materials, The Society of Materials Science, Japan, 1964, p. 31.Google Scholar
3. Hyler, W. S. and Jackson, L. R., “Precautions to be Used in the Measurement and Interpretation of Residual Stresses by X-Ray Technique,” in: W. R. Osgood (éd.), Residual Stresses in Metals and Metal Construction, Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York, 1954, p. 297.Google Scholar
4. Macherauch, E., private communication, to be published.Google Scholar
5. Macherauch, E., “X-Ray Stress Analysis,” Exp. Mech. 6: 140, 1966.Google Scholar
6. Martin, D. E., “Evaluation of Methods for Measurement of Residual Stress,” SAE Technical Report 147, SAE, Inc., New York, 1957.Google Scholar
7. Christenson, A. L. (ed,), Koistinen, D. P., Marburger, R. E., Semchyshen, M., and Evans, W.P., “The Measurement of Stress by X-Ray,” SAE Technical Report 182, SAE, Inc., New York, 1960.Google Scholar
8. Leeser, D. O. and Daane, R. A., “Residual Stresses in a Strip in Terms of Strain Gages During Electropolishing,” Proc. SESA 12: 203, 1954.Google Scholar
9. Cullity, B. D., “Residual Stresses After Plastic Elongation and Magnetic Losses in Silicon Steel,” Trans. Met. Soc. AIME 227: 356, 1963.Google Scholar
10. Cullity, B. D., “Sources of Error in X-Ray Measurements of Residual Stress,” J. Appl Phys. 35: 1915, 1964.Google Scholar
11. Cullity, B. D. and Puri, O. P., “Magnetostriction and Residual Stress in Nickel After Plastic Elongation,” Trans. Met. Soc. AIME 227: 359, 1963.Google Scholar
12. Garrod, R. I. and Hawkes, G. A., “X-Ray Stress Analysis on Plastically Deformed Metals,” Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 14: 422, 1963.Google Scholar
13. Taira, S. and Yoshioka, Y., “X-Ray Investigation on the Residual Stress of Metallic Materials (On The Residual Stresses of the Quenched and the Plastically Deformed Carbon Steels),” in: T. Nishihara et al., Proceedings of the Eighth Japan Congress on Testing Materials, The Society of Materials Science, Japan, 1965, p. 1.Google Scholar