Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T04:28:56.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of Position Sensitive Detectors for Neutron Diffraction Texture Analysis of Hematite Ore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

G. Will
Affiliation:
Mineralogical Institute, University Bonn, Poppelsdorfer SchloB D-5300 Bonn, West Germany
P. Merz
Affiliation:
Mineralogical Institute, University Bonn, Poppelsdorfer SchloB D-5300 Bonn, West Germany
W. Schäfer
Affiliation:
Mineralogical Institute, University Bonn, Poppelsdorfer SchloB D-5300 Bonn, West Germany
M. Dahms
Affiliation:
Forschungszentrum Geesthacht, D-2054 Geesthaclit, West Germany
Get access

Extract

Texture means the orientation distribution of the many crystallites in a polycrystalline sample with respect to a reference system on the sample, for example the rolling direction in steel. Texture has to be distinguished from preferred orientation observed in laboratory-made powder samples. Preferred orientation is just a nuissance in the experiment and must be corrected in the ensuing analysis, for example by the formula given by March and published by Dollase Preferred orientation we find commonly in samples containing plate-like crystal flakes. This is again to be distinguished from a non-random particle distribution in the powder samples prepared for diffraction experiments. This effect is always present, also for example in NBS silicon, even if only to a. very small degree (see for example Will et. al). It must and can easily be corrected for in the final least-squares calculation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. March, A., “Mathematische Theorie der Regelung nach der Korngestalt bei Affiner Deformation”, Z. Krist, 31: 285 (1932).Google Scholar
2. Dollase, W. A., “Correction of Intensities for Preferred Orientation in Powder Diffractometry: Application of the March-Modell”, J. Appl. Cryst, 19: 267 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Will, G., Beflotto, M., Parrish, W. and Hart, M., “Crystal Structures of Quarz and Magnesium Germanate by Profile Analysis of Synchrotron-Radiation High-Resolution Powder Data”, J. Appl. Cryst, 21: 182 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Will, G., Schäfer, W. and Merz, P., “Texture Analysis by Neutron Diffraction Using a Linear Position Sensitive Detector”, Textures and Microstructures, 1989, in printGoogle Scholar
5. Wenk, H. R., Kern, H., Schäfer, W. and Will, G., “Comparison of Neutron and X-Ray Diffraction in Texture Analysis of Deformed Carbonate Rocks,” J.Struct.Geology, 6: 687 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Schäfer, W., Jansen, E., Elf, F. and Will, G., “A Linear Position Sensitive Scintillation Detector for Neutron Powder Diffractometry,” J.Appl.Cryst., 17: 159 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Jansen, E., Schäfer, W. and Will, G., 1986, Applications of Profile Analysis Methods in Texture Measurements Using Position Sensitive Detectors, in “Experimental Techniques of Texture Analysis,” Bunge, H. J., ed. Oberursel DGM Informationsgesellschaft Verlag.Google Scholar
8. Jansen, E., Schäfer, W. and Will, G., “Profile Fitting and the Two-Stage Method in Neutron Powder Diffractometry for Structure and Texture Analysis,” J.Appl.Cryst., 21: 228 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Will, G., “POWLS: A Powder Least Scuares Program”, J.Appl. Cryst., 12: 483 (1979).Google Scholar
10. Will, G., Jansen, E. and Schäfer, W., “POWLS-80. A Program for Refinement of Powder Diffraction Data,” KFA-Report Jül-1867 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Matheis, S., Wenk, H. R. and Vinel, G. W., “Some Basic Concepts of Texture Analysis and Comparision of three Methods to Calculate Orientation Distributions from Pole Figures”, J.Appl. Cryst., 21: 285 (1988).Google Scholar