Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T11:18:46.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Combined Fundamental Alphas/Curve Fitting Algorithm for Routine XRF Sample Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Dennis J. Kalnicky*
Affiliation:
Princeton Gamma-Tech 1200 State Road Princeton, NJ 08540
Get access

Abstract

Analysis of sample composition and/or thickness in a routine, process-control or monitoring environment generally requires rapid turn-around time with minimal sample handling. X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) is well-suited for these kinds of analyses and has been applied to various bulk and thin sample applications (1-7). This technique is rapid, precise, non-destructive, and requires minimal sample handling.

X-ray Fluorescence is generally considered a secondary analysis technique, that is, instrumentation must be calibrated using known standards before unknown samples may be analyzed (quantitative analysis). Continuing work on standardless approaches, particularly for Energy-Dispersive XRF (EOXRF) systems, relax this requirement for some samples but the large share of XRF analyses still require calibration with standards. A number of mathematical and non-matheraatical techniques have been devised to calibrate XRF measurements for many different sample types (1,2,8,9).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jenkins, R.; “An Introduction toX-Ray Spectrometry”, Heyden and Son Ltd, London, 1976.Google Scholar
2. Bertin, E.P. ; “Principal s and Practfces of X-Ray Spectrometry”, Plenum Press, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
3. Analytical Chemistry Reviews,, published April of each even year.Google Scholar
4. Advances in X-ray Analysis, Vols, 1-27, Plenum, New York, 1957-1983.Google Scholar
5. Dzubay, T.G. ; “X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of Environmental Samples”, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1977.Google Scholar
6. Kalnicky, D.J.; “Application of Energy-Dispersive Techniques for Materials CharacteMzation”, paper No. 86, the Eastern Analytical Symposium, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
7. Katnicky, D.J.; “EDXRF Analysis of Petroleum Products Using a Modified Alphas Approach”, to be published in American Laboratory.Google Scholar
8. Jenkins, R., R.W., Gould, and Gedeke, D. ; l'Quantitative X-ray Spectrometry”, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1981.Google Scholar
9. LaChance, G.R.; “Introduction to Alpha Coefficients”, 1984. Available from Corporation Scientifique Claisse, Inc., 2522, Chemin Sainte-Foy, SAINTE-FOY. Quebec), G1V. T5, Canada: LaChance, G.R. ; “The Family of Alpha Coefficients in X-ray Fluorescence Analysis”, X-ray Spectrometry, (1979), 8, 190.Google Scholar
10. Criss, J.W. ; “Ftinriamental Parameters Calculations on a Laboratory Computer”, Advances in X-ray Analysis, (1980), 23, 93: X-Ray Software Review, No. 2, (1982).Google Scholar
11. Kalnicky, D.J.; “EDXRF Analysis of Thin Films and Coatings Using a Hybrid Alphas Approach”, Denver X-ray Conference, Snow Mass, Colorado, 1985.Google Scholar
12. Tao, G.C. Pella, P. A. and Rousseau, R.M.; “NBSGSC. A FORTRAN Program for Quantitative X-ray Fluorescence Analysis”, National Bureau of Standards Technical Note 1213, U. S. Dept. of Commerce, April, 1985.Google Scholar
13. Frechette, G., et al, ; Analytical Chemistry, (1979), 51, 957. Google Scholar
14. Claisse, F., Thinh, T.P.; Analytical Chemistry, (1979), 51., 954.Google Scholar
15. Miller, R.A., Kalnicky, D.J., and Rizzo, T.V.; “Highly Automated Techniques for On-Line Liquid Analysis with an XRF System”, Denver X-ray Conference, Snow Mass, Colorado, 1985.Google Scholar