Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T09:20:23.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dosimetry of X-Ray Beams: The Measure of The Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Ted de Castro*
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California Berkeley, California
Get access

Extract

While x-ray dosimetry is most definitely a "Measure of the Problem" in Analytical X-Ray Safety, there are additional factors which further enlarge the problem and are equally major considerations which must be taken into account when deciding upon the degree of action appropriate to prevent this problem.

Certainly, some idea of the nature of the typical levels of natural and man-made sources of radiation which surround us daily is useful to give us a perspective on the magnitude of radiation levels from analytical x-ray equipment. It is also important to know what levels of radiation exposure are considered unacceptable, either by regulatory limits or because of the potential for physiological damage.

The consequences of an exposure to radiation from analytical x-ray machines will often go beyond a report of an overexposure and investigation, or painful and lasting physiological damage. There are times when the matter will come before our courts in order to fix responsibility and decide compensation for injuries suffered.

Type
XI. Analytical X-Ray Safety (Workshop Presentations)
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lindell, B., “Occupational Hazards in X-Ray Analytical Work”, Health Physics Vol. 15, pp. 481486 (1968).Google Scholar
2. Jenkins, R. and Haas, D.J., “Incidence, Detection and Monitoring of Radiation from X-Ray Analytical Instrumentation, 1 X-Ray Spectrometry Vol. 4. pp. 33 to 42 (1975)Google Scholar