Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T19:24:02.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A General Method of Blank Subtraction for Quantitative X-Ray Fluorescence Intensity Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Alan P. Quinn*
Affiliation:
Corning Glass Works, Research and Development Laboratories, Corning, New York 14830
Get access

Abstract

Residual analyte intensity exists in a spectrometer when, for example, the x-ray source is contaminated with the analyte. A blank specimen, identical to the sample but devoid of the analyte, may be used to determine this residual analyte intensity, and, thereby, allow quantification of that intensity due to analyte in the sample. It is generally considered that a single pure material could serve as a blank for many analytes in many matrices. In practice, at least for low average atomic number matrices such as glasses, the reflectivity of similar samples may differ substantially, rendering inaccurate this simple blank subtraction. In such cases a blank is needed for each sample, where the reflectivity of the blank is matched to that of the sample. In order to eliminate the need for generation of blanks to match each of the samples, a general method to quantify the net residual analyte intensity as a function of specimen reflectivity by measurement of two pure material blanks is proposed herein.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lachance, G.R., X-Ray Spectrometry 8, 190 (1979).Google Scholar
2. Criss, J.W., Birks, L.S., and Gilfrich, J.V., Analytical Chemistry 50, 33 (1978).Google Scholar
3. Data Reduction by CORRAL Computer Program, Quinn, A.P., Advances in X-Ray Analysis, 22: 293 (1979).Google Scholar