Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T07:20:02.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of Cumulative Fatigue Damage by X-Ray Double-Crystal and Scanning Diffraction Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

R. N. Pangborn ,
S. Weissmann  and
L. R. Kramer
R. N. Pangborn
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
S. Weissmann
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, P. O. Box 909, Piscataway, NJ
L. R. Kramer
Affiliation:
David W. Taylor Naval Ship R & D Center, Annapolis, MD
Get access

Extract

The ability to predict fatigue failure has long eluded scientists and engineers. Because they can be applied nondestructively, X-ray diffraction methods have been employed to measure fatigue induced lattice misorientation, lattice strain, residual stress and subgrain formation. The changes in the X-ray patterns, however, were found to be restricted principally to the very early and late fractions of the fatigue life. Their invariance during the intermediate portion of the life has hampered the evaluation of cumulative fatigue damage and prediction of ultimate failure.

The primary difference between previous investigations and our recent X-ray diffraction studies is the emphasis we placed on characterizing both the surface and subsurface response to fatigue. By evaluating the prefracture damage with depth from the specimen surface a more reliable procedure for failure estimation emerged.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 24: Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 4-8, 1980 , 1980 , pp. 203 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Taira, S. and Hayashi, K., X-ray investigation on fatigue fracture of notched steel specimen, Bull. JSME 9:627 (1966).Google Scholar
2. Taira, S., Goto, T. and Nakano, Y., X-ray investigation of Low-cycle fatigue of low carbon steel, in “Proc. 12th Jap. Congr. on Mat. Res.,” The Society of Materials Science, Kyoto, 8 (1969).Google Scholar
3. Pangborn, R. N., Weissinann, S. and Kramer, I. R., Work hardening in the surface layer and bulk during fatigue, Scripta Met. 12:129 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Pangborn, R. N., Weissinann, S. and Kramer, I. R., Fatigue failure prediction by double crystal diffractometry and topography, in: “Strength of Metals and Alloys,” Pergamon Press, NY, 1279 (1979).Google Scholar
5. Weissmann, S. and Evans, D. L., An X-ray study of the substructure of fine-grained aluminum, Acta Cryst. 7:733 (1954).Google Scholar
6. Miner, M. A., Cumulative damage in fatigue, J. Appl. Mech. 12: A-159 (1945).Google Scholar
7. Kramer, I. R., Prediction of fatigue damage, in: “Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Mech, Behavior of Materials,” Boston, 1812 (1976).Google Scholar