Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T20:20:19.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Advances in Electron-Probe Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

J. V. P. Long
J. V. P. Long*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge Cambridge, England
Get access

Abstract

The electron-pro be analyzer has been developed in a period of thirteen years to a point where several different instruments are commercially available and about one hundred are already in use. At the present time it is possible to analyze volumes of about 1 μ3 at the surface of a specimen for elements above sodium in the periodic table with a concentration sensitivity of the order of 0.1-0.01%. New developments in the field include efforts to extend the range of Z to lower atomic numbers and to increase the spatial resolution of the method so that smaller volumes niay be analyzed. Progress in the analysis of the light elements centers at present mainly on the use of nondispersive detectors and. computer techniques for the resolution of overlapping pulse-height distributions. With such methods qualitative detection of elements down to beryllium has been achieved in the presence of their near neighbors. Efforts to increase the spatial resolution of the probe have led to the use of thin specimens which are partially transparent to electrons. Partly as a consequence of this approach, apparatus has been developed in which an electron microscope with facilities for selected area diffraction has been combined with an electron-probe analyser. The ever-widening range of application of the electron-pro be technique has inevitably disclosed problems in the interpretation of quantitative data, and it is clear that at the present time more information on the process of X-ray production by electrons is required before semi-empirical methods can be entirely eliminated. Examples of the use of the method in metallurgical and mineralogical studies illustrate some of the current trends in the refinement of measurement technique and interpretation of experimental data.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 6: Eleventh Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 8-10, 1962 , 1962 , pp. 276 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Castaing, R. and Guinier, A., Proceedings of Conference on Electron Microscopy, Delft, 1949.Google Scholar
2. Castaing, R., Thesis, University of Paris, O.N.E.R.A. Publ. No. 55, 1951.Google Scholar
3. Cosslett, V. E. and Duncumb, P., Nature 177: 1172, 1956.Google Scholar
4. Duncumb, P., Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 10: 420, 1959.Google Scholar
5. Springer, G., and Long, J. V. P., Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on X-ray Optics and Microanalysis, 1962, Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1963.Google Scholar
6. Long, J. V. P., Proceedings of the ht International Symposium on X-ray Microscopy and Microradiography, Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1957, p. 435.Google Scholar
7. Hendee, C. F. and Fine, S., Phys. Rev. 95: 281, 1954.Google Scholar
8. Dolby, R., Brit, J. Appl. Phys. 11 : 64, 1960.Google Scholar
9. Cosslett, V. E., X-ray Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1960, p. 436.Google Scholar
10. Melford, D. A. and Duncumb, P., Metallurgies 61: 205, 1960.Google Scholar
11. Dolby, R. M.. Ptoc. Phys. Soe. (London) 73: 81, 1959.Google Scholar
12. Dolby, R. M. and Cosslett, V. E., X-ray Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis, Elsevier, Amsterdam., 1960, p. 436.Google Scholar
13. Dolby, R. M., Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1961 (see also ref. 5) (to be published).Google Scholar
14. Andrews, C. L., Rev. Sci. Instr. 11 : 111, 1940.Google Scholar
15. Lindstrom, B., Acta Radial. Suppl. 125: 150, 1955.Google Scholar
16. Philibert, J., J. Inst. Metals 90: 241, 1962.Google Scholar
17 Chollet, P., Grosse, L., and Philibert, J., Compt. rend. 252: 728, 1961.Google Scholar
18 Guy, A. and Philibert, J., Tram, Met. Soc. AIME (to be published).Google Scholar
19 Adda, Y., Beycier, M., Kirianenko, A., and Pemot, B., Mem. Sci. Rev. Meto. 57: 423, 1960.Google Scholar
20 Austin, A. E. and Richard, N. A., J. Appl. Phys. 32: 1462, 1961.Google Scholar
21 Seebold, R. E. and Birks, L. S., Anal. Chem, 31: 112, 1962.Google Scholar
22. Melford, D. A., J. Iron and Steel fast. 200: 290, 1962.Google Scholar
23. Reed, S. J. P. and Long, J. V. P., Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on X-ray’ Optics and Microanalysis, 1962, Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1963.Google Scholar
24. Binrts, R. A., Long, J. V. P., and Reed, S. J. B. (Unpublished work).Google Scholar
25. Long, J. V. P. and Iredale, A. (Unpublished work).Google Scholar
26. Long, J. V. P. (Unpublished work).Google Scholar
27. Melford, D. A., J. Inst. Metals 90: 217, 1962.Google Scholar
28. Wood, G. C. and Melford, D. A., J. Iron Steel Inst. 198: 142, 1961.Google Scholar
29. Nixon, W. C., Eur. Reg., De Nederlaudse Vereeniging voor Electronen Microscopic, Delft, 1961.Google Scholar
30. Duncumb, P., Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on X-ray Optics and Micro* analysis, 1962, Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1963.Google Scholar
31. Birks, L. S.,J. Appl Phys. 32: 387, 1961.Google Scholar
32. Birks, L. S., J. Appl. Phys. 1962 (in press).Google Scholar
33. Castaing, R., in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol. 13, Academic Press, New York, 1960, p. 317.Google Scholar