Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T09:23:48.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wall Effect and Detection Limit of the Proportional Counter Spectrometer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Marja-Leena Järviner
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Outokumpu Oy, Espoo, Finland
Heikki Sipilä
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Outokumpu Oy, Espoo, Finland
Get access

Abstract

The detection limit of the proportional counter spectrometer is determined by the low-energy background caused by the wall effect. The choice of the filling gas of the proportional counter has been studied to minimize the background. Detection limits (3σ) for different elements have been calculated. Theoretical results have been compared with the experimental value obtained with Cd-109 and Am-24l excitation. The results are applied to the analysis of metal concentrations in oil samples and mapping the contents of zinc in the bark of living trees with a portable XRF-analyzer.

Type
IX. Other XRF Applications
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sipila, H. and Kiuru, E., Advances in X-ray analysis, Vol. 20 (1977) 555.Google Scholar
2. Fink, R. W., Chap. 5 in Crasemann, B., Editor, Atomic Inner-Shell Processes, Vol. II, Academic Press (1975).Google Scholar
3. Kocharov, G. E. and Petrov, V. V., Kosm. Luchi, No. 10 (1969) 167 (in Russian),Google Scholar
4. Brown, D. B., “Electron Range and Electron Stopping Power”, in Robinson, J. W., Editor, Handbook of Spectroscopy, Vol. I., p. 249, CRC Press (1974).Google Scholar
5. Kowalevskii, A. L., “Biogeokhimicheskie Poiski Rudnykh Mestorozhdenii”, Moskow 1974, Trans. “Biochemical Exploration for Mineral Deposits” NTIS TT 7652029 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Packer, L., private communications.Google Scholar