Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T03:22:09.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Provision, Suitability and Stability of Standards for Quantitative Powder Diffractometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Ron Jenkins
Ron Jenkins*
Affiliation:
Philips Electronic Instruments, Mount Vernon, New York 10550
Get access

Extract

Standards required for quantitative powder diffractometry are essentially of three types as shown in Table 1 - external instrument standards for the initial and long term check of instrument alignment (i.e., an “instrument” standard), external analytical standards, which are similar in composition to the specimens to be analysed, for the preparation of calibration curves for “in-type“ analysis; and internal analytical standards for the minimization of problems due to variations in specimen absorption.

The ideal equipment alignment standard should be free from preferred orientation, stable and available in large quantities, since it should serve the dual role of providing a continuing indication of the performance of a given diffractometer, as well as allowing absolute intensity comparisons to be made between different diffractometers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 17: Twenty-Second Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 22-24, 1973 , 1973 , pp. 32 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Burns, J.H., and Bredig, M.A., J. Chem. Phys., 25 (1956) 1281 Google Scholar
2. Schrader, R., and Hoffman, Br., Z. Chem., 6. (1966) 388 Google Scholar
3. Dandurand, J-L., C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. D (1970) 881 Google Scholar
4. Gregg, S.J., Chein. Ind., 11 (1968) 611 Google Scholar
5. Northwood, D.O., and Lewis, D., Amer. Miner., 53 (1968)2089Google Scholar
6. Lewis, D., Northwood, D.O., and Reeve, R.C., J. Appl. Cryst., 2 (1969) 156 Google Scholar
7. Senna, M. and Kuno, H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 54 (1971) 259 Google Scholar
8. Dachille, F. and Roy, R., Nature, 186 (1960) 34 Google Scholar
9. Takahashi, H., 6th Nat. Conf. Clays and Clay Minerals, Pergamon: New York Vol. 2 (1959) 279 Google Scholar
10. Panis, A.C.R. Acad. Sei. Paris, Ser. D (1970) 1057 Google Scholar
11. Vegard, L. and Hauge, Th., Z. Physik, 42 (1927) 1 Google Scholar
12. Dandurand, J-L., C.R. Paris, Acad. Sci., Ser. D (1970) 808 Google Scholar
13. Lin, I.J., Israel J. Earth Sci., 20 (1971) 41 Google Scholar
14. Burton, T.G., Trans. Inst. Chem. Engrs., 44 (1966) 37 Google Scholar
15. Bloch, J.M., Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., (1950) 774.Google Scholar
16. Tomashevskii, E.E., Soviet Physics-Solid State, 12 (1971) 2588 Google Scholar
17. Snow, R.H., Powder Tech., 5 (1971/2) 351 Google Scholar
18. Silk, S.T. and Lewin, S.Z., Advances in X-Ray Analysis, 14 (1970) 29 Google Scholar
19. Squirrell, D.C.M., private commnunication.Google Scholar