Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T08:11:17.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The certification of composite airframe structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

P. R. Guyett  and
A. W. Cardrick
P. R. Guyett
Affiliation:
Airworthiness Division, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough
A. W. Cardrick
Affiliation:
Airworthiness Division, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Structural integrity is a key ingredient of aircraft design. It takes its place alongside flight performance, operational effectiveness, reliability, maintainability and economy in determining, or contributing in very large measure to, the success of a project in service.

What is expected from the contractor for a new project in respect of these qualities is set down by the customer in a specification which includes reference to a set of mandatory design requirements. Thus, flight performance parameters such as speed, range and payload, are defined in the specification : there too is to be found a description of the sorties to be flown, numbers and types of manoeuvres and their severity (conventionally including the levels of normal acceleration) and the regions in which the aircraft is required to operate. Sufficient detail is given to establish, as the process of design evolves, the loading and environmental conditions to which the structure will be subjected.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 84 , Issue 834 , July 1980 , pp. 188 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1980 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ripley, E. L. and Cardrick, A. W. The UK approach to the certification of composite components for military aeroplanes and helicopters. AGARD Report No 660, April 1977.Google Scholar
2. Factors of safety. AGARD Report No 661, November 1977.Google Scholar
3. Heath, W. G. The changing scene of structural airworthiness. Presented at the 14th International Aeronautical Congress organised by the AAAF, Paris, 6th June 1979.Google Scholar
4. Pugsley, A. G. The safety of structures. Edward Arnold, London, 1966.Google Scholar
5. Snell, M. B. Initial buckling performance of some CFRP structures and the validity of classical plate theory predictions. RAE Technical Report 79128, (1979).Google Scholar
6. Ewins, P. D. and Potter, R. T. Some observations on the nature of fibre reinforced plastics and the implications for structural design. Phil Trans R Soc, London A294, pp 507–517, (1980).Google Scholar
7. Potter, R. T. Private communication.Google Scholar
8. Cook, C. V. Requirements and uses of new materials in helicopters. Lecture presented to the Royal Aeronautical Society, 11th February 1976.Google Scholar
9. Heath-Smith, J. R. Fatigue of structural elements in carbon fibre composite—present indications and future research. RAE Technical Report 79085, (1979).Google Scholar
10. Atkinson, R. J. Derivation of test factors and permissible design values. RAE Technical Note Structures 15, (1948), (no longer available).Google Scholar
11. Bullen, N. I. A note on test factors. R and M 3166, (1956).Google Scholar
12. Stagg, A. M. The philosophy of test factors. RAE Technical Report 76113, (1976).Google Scholar