Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:27:15.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extreme short take–off and landing regional jets – economic motivation and technological challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

C. Gologan ,
C. Kelders ,
A. Kuhlmann  and
J. Seifert
C. Gologan
Affiliation:
Corin.gologan@bauhaus-luftfahrt.net
C. Kelders
Affiliation:
Bauhaus Luftfahrt, Munich, Germany
A. Kuhlmann
Affiliation:
Bauhaus Luftfahrt, Munich, Germany
J. Seifert
Affiliation:
Bauhaus Luftfahrt, Munich, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A predominant problem in the US as well as in Europe is the imminent capacity shortage of major hub airports: Air traffic is assumed to increase significantly worldwide, while further runway extensions of airports are difficult because of residents’ resistance and limited land space availability. However, the increasing market size also provides a potential for new aircraft concepts. What type of aircraft will meet best the future market requirements is a question arising.

We show that currently discussed solutions to airport capacity problems are mostly not in line with market requirements and have therefore not the potential to alleviate the increasing capacity problems. We analyse to what extend an aeroplane with extreme short takeoff and landing (ESTOL) capability might be able to overcome these capacity problems and discuss resulting technical requirements. Subsequently we present some of the current technological challenges in this area of research and give an overview on ESTOL regional jet concepts that are currently investigated at Bauhaus Luftfahrt.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 113 , Issue 1147 , September 2009 , pp. 563 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Capacity Needs in the National Airspace System 2007-2025, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Washington, 2007.Google Scholar
2. Eurocontrol. Challenges of Growth 2004.Google Scholar
3. Eurocontrol. Challenges of Growth 2008.Google Scholar
4. Heymann, E., Just, T., Löwik, L. and Väth, M., 450 bn Reasons to Invest in India’s Infrastructure, Deutsche Bank Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2007.Google Scholar
5. Swan, W.M., Misunderstandings about airline growth, J Air Transport Management, 2007, 13, (1), pp 3–8.Google Scholar
6. Swan, W.M. and Adler, N., Aircraft trip cost parameters: A function of stage length and seat capacity, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2006, 42, (2), pp 105–115.Google Scholar
7. Forsyth, P., The impacts of emerging aviation trends on airport infrastructure, J Air Transport Management, 2007, 13, (1), pp 45–52.Google Scholar
8. Burghouwt, G., Airline Network Development in Europe and its Implications for Airport Planning, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK, 2007.Google Scholar
9. Doganis, R., The Airline Business, Routledge, New York, USA, 2006.Google Scholar
10. Morrell, P., Airline Finance, Ashgate, Hampshire, 2007.Google Scholar
11. Czemy, A.I., Forsyth, P., Gillen, D. and Niemeier, H.-M., Airport Slots, International Experiences and Options for Reform, Ashgate, Adelshot, Hampshire, UK, 2008.Google Scholar
12. Energy & Transport in Figures 2005, European Union/Eurostat, Brussels, Belgium, 2005.Google Scholar
13. Raumordnungsunterlagen 3. Start- und Landebahn, Intraplan Consult GmbH, Flughafen Muenchen GmbH, 2006.Google Scholar
14. European Energy and Transport Scenarios on Key Drivers, European Commision, Luxembourg, 2004.Google Scholar
15. Passenger Traffic Study 2010/2020, Intraplan Consult GmbH and International Union of Railways (UIC), 2003.Google Scholar
16. Doganis, R., Flying off Course, Routledge, New York, USA, 2002.Google Scholar
17. Gologan, C., Heister, C., Kelders, C., Kuhlmann, A. and Seifert, J., Perspectives of Vertical/Short Take off and Landing in Commercial Aviation, 1st CEAS European Air and Space Conference, Berlin, Germany, 2007.Google Scholar
18. Phleps, P., Boeck, P., Gologan, C. and Kuhlmann, A., Impact of ESTOL Capability on Runway Capacity – An Analytical Approach, 8th Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operation Conference, Anchorage, USA, 2008, AIAA-2008-8933.Google Scholar
19. Zuk, J. and Wardwell, D., Summary of NASA’s Extreme Short Take-Off and Landing (ESTOL) Vehicle Sector Activities, AeroTech Congress and Exibition, Grapevine, Texas, USA, 2005, SAE-Paper 2005-01-3145.Google Scholar
20. Couluris, G.J., Hange, C.E., Wardwell, D.A., Signor, D. and Phillips, J., A potential impact analysis of ESTOL aircraft on Newark airport operations, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, Hilton Head, South Carolina, USA, 2007, AIAA 2007-6700.Google Scholar
21. Hange, C., Trajectory kinematics of a simultaneous son-interfering landing approach, and the impact on ESTOL regional transport performance and flight control, 3rd Annual Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Forum, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2003, AIAA 2003-6857.Google Scholar
22. Margason, R., Comparison of Five STOL Concepts for Runway Independent Aircraft, 2002 Biennial International Powered Lift Conference and Exhibit, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA, 2002.Google Scholar
23. Brown, D.G., Case for V/Stol Aircraft in Short-Haul Transportation, Hawker Siddeley Aviation, 1970.Google Scholar
24. Bevilaqua, P., Future application of the JSF variable cycle, AIAA International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition: The Next 100 Years, Dayton, Ohio, USA, 2003, AIAA-2003-2614.Google Scholar
25. Kurzke, J., GasTurb, Dachau, 2007.Google Scholar
26. Thouault, N., Breitsamter, C., Adams, N.A., Gologan, C. and Seifert, J., Experimental investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of generic fan-in-wing configurations, Aeronaut J, 2009, 113, (1139).Google Scholar
27. Thouault, N., Breitsamter, C. and Adams, N.A., Numerical and experimental analysis of a generic fan-in-wing Configuration, J Aircraft, 2009, 46, (2), pp 656–666.Google Scholar
28. Hange, C., Overview of the CESTOL Partnership in NASA’s Subsonic Fixed Wing Project, International Powered Lift Conference, London, UK, 2008.Google Scholar
29. Lindemann, U., Methodische Entwicklung technischer Produkte – Methoden flexibel und situationsgerecht anwenden. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006.Google Scholar
30. Kirby, M.R., Raczynski, C. and Mavris, D., An approach for strategic planning of future technology, 6th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference (ATIO), Wichita, Kansas, USA, 2006, AIAA-2006-7788.Google Scholar
31. Gologan, C., Conceptual Design of a STOL Regional-Jet with Hybrid Propulsion System, 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Anchorage, USA, 2008.Google Scholar