Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-30T21:23:05.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fatigue properties of the Alclad Al-Cu-Mg-Si-Mn alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. A. Sova  and
T. R. G. Williams
J. A. Sova
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Southampton
T. R. G. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Southampton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Despite the wide use of Alclad aluminium alloy sheets in the aircraft industry, information on the effect of cladding on the mechanical strength of the strong alloy core is mainly limited to comparative fatigue testing of clad and unclad sheets, tested as plain specimens and subjected to constant-amplitude loadings. S/N curves obtained under such conditions were published by Smith, Brueggeman and Harwell for 24S-T3 material and by Shabalin for the D16T alloy (Russian specification). Both sets of data show that the soft cladding had a detrimental effect upon the fatigue strength of the strong alloy. Forrest has presented several comparative S/N curves which also show a reduction in the fatigue strength of the Alclad unnotched specimens compared with the bare alloy. Karlashov and Batov investigated the behaviour of cyclically-strained D16AT alloy (Russian specification), with particular reference to the nature of the mechanism of protection offered by pure aluminium. Although the core was electrochemi-cally protected against corrosion, intense damage occurred in the cladding layer.

Type
Technical Notes
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 78 , Issue 764 , August 1974 , pp. 375 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1974 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Now at the School of Applied Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton.

References

1. Smith, F. C. et al. NACA TN 2231, 1950.Google Scholar
2. Shabalin, V. I. Metal Ind., p 94, Vol 11, 1959.Google Scholar
3. Forrest, G. The fatigue of metals, p 40, Claxton (Printers) Ltd, 1955.Google Scholar
4. Karlashov, A. V. and Batov, A. P. Fiziko-Khimiches-kaya Mekhanika Materialov, Vol 4, No 4, p 482, 1968.Google Scholar
5. Williams, T. R. G. and Sova, J. A. Corrosion Fatigue, p 506. Nace 2400 West Loop South, Houston, Texas 77027, 1972.Google Scholar
6. White, D. J. and Lewszuk, J. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, Vol 11, No 6, p 598, 1969.Google Scholar
7. Sova, J. A. PhD Thesis, Southampton University, 1972.Google Scholar
8. Edwards, P. R. RAE Tech Report 69 237, 1969.Google Scholar
9. Crews, J. H. Jr. and Hardrath, H. F. Exp. Mechanics, Vol 6, No 6, p 313, 1966.Google Scholar
10. Crews, J. H. Jr. NASA TN D-5253. 1969.Google Scholar