Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T16:22:33.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In-flight simulation of wake encounters using deformed vortices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

D. Vechtel
D. Vechtel*
Affiliation:
DLR German Aerospace Center, Institute of Flight Systems, Department of Flight Dynamics and Simulation, Braunschweig, Germany
*
dennis.vechtel@dlr.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the decay process the shape of wake vortices changes significantly which has an influence on the encounter characteristics, hence on the encounter hazard. In order to evaluate the influence of vortex deformation on the wake encounter hazard, in-flight simulations with the DLR research aircraft ATTAS were carried out. For a realistic analysis of wake encounters flow fields of matured vortices were generated with large eddy simulations. These flow fields were used for the determination of histories of induced forces and moments acting on the wake encountering aircraft. The force and moment histories were then fed into the equations of motions of the non-linear six degree-of-freedom in-flight simulation of the DLR research aircraft ATTAS. In order to compare different stages of vortex deformation, encounters were simulated in flight with wavy vortices and vortex rings. The most important benefit of the in-flight-simulation is the realistic environment, which enables a realistic assessment of pilots’ encounter acceptance. The analysed scenario was of a wake encounter during final approach. The encounter conditions correspond to separation distances of about 4nm and 5nm behind an aircraft of the ‘heavy’ category. During the encounters the ATTAS was flown under manual control. Altogether 31 encounters were simulated in flight, 9 with wavy vortices and 22 with vortex rings.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 117 , Issue 1196 , October 2013 , pp. 997 - 1018
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. N.N., In-Flight Separation of Vertical Stabilizer American Airlines Flight 587 Airbus Industrie A300-605R N14053 Belle Harbor New York, USA, 12 November 2001, Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB/AAR-04/04, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.Google Scholar
2. N.N., Procedures for Air Navigation Services, Air Traffic Management, ICAO Doc 4444, 15th ed, 2007.Google Scholar
3. Holzäpfel, F. et al Prediction of Dynamic Pairwise Wake Vortex Separations for Approach and Landing, AIAA Paper 2011-3037, AIAA Atmospheric Space Environments Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 27-30 June 2011.Google Scholar
4. Hahn, K.-U. and Schwarz, C.W. Wake Vortex Avoidance versus Landing Capacity, AIAA Paper 2006-6322, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Keystone, Colorado, USA, 2006.Google Scholar
5. Loucel, R.E. and Crouch, J.D. Flight-Simulator study of airplane encounters with perturbed trailing vortices, AIAA Paper 2004-1074, 42nd AIAA Aeospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA, 2004.Google Scholar
6. Reinke, A. Evaluation of wake encounter flight tests in support of defining safe A380 separations, WakeNet3-Europe, 4th Major Workshop, Langen, Germany, March 2012.Google Scholar
7. Höhne, G., Reinke, A. and Verbeek, M. Wake Vortex Encounter Flight Simulation: Metrics, Hazard Criteria, and Influence of Cockpit Motions, EU-project SWAKE, SWAKE-TN-320-1-v1, October 2002.Google Scholar
8. Amelsberg, S. and Kauertz, S. Piloted Wake Vortex Encounter Simulator Tests for Departure, EU-project CREDOS Deliverable D, 3-4 November 2008.Google Scholar
9. Holzäpfel, F. and Gerz, T. The DLR Project Wirbelschleppe: Detecting, Characterizing, Controlling, Attenuating, Understanding, and Predicting Aircraft Wake Vortices, DLR Research Report 2008-15, ISSN 1434-8454, 2008.Google Scholar
10. Gerz, T. and Schwarz, C. The DLR Project Wetter and Fliegen, DLR Research Report 2012-02, ISSN 1434-8454, 2012.Google Scholar
11. Vechtel, D. Flight simulator study on the influence of vortex curvature on wake encounter hazard using les wind fields, Aeronaut J, March 2012, 116, (177).Google Scholar
12. Hennemann, I. Deformation und Zerfall von Flugzeugwirbelschleppen in turbulenter und stabil geschichteter Atmosphäre (english: Deformation and Decay of Aircraft Wake Vortices in Turbulent and Stratifed Atmosphere), Dissertation, Technical University Munich, 2010.Google Scholar
13. Crow, S.C. Stability theory for a pair of trailing vortices, AIAA J, 1970, 8, (12), pp 2374–2381.Google Scholar
14. Gerz, T., Holzäpfel, F. and Darracq, D. Commercial aircraft wake vortices, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38, pp 181–208.Google Scholar
15. Misaka, T. et al Vortex bursting and tracer transport of a counter-rotating vortex pair, Physics of Fluids, 2012, 24, (2), pp 25104–1 – 25104-21.Google Scholar
16. Hennemann, I. Large-Eddy Simulation of Aircraft Wake Vortex Deformation and Topology, Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers, J Aerospace Engineering, 2011, 225, Part G.Google Scholar
17. Kolmogorov, A.N. The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers, Dokl. AN SSSR, 1941, 30, (4), pp 299–303.Google Scholar
18. Lamb, H. Hydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press, pp 590–592, Cambridge, UK, 1932.Google Scholar
19. Frech, M. et al High-resolution weather database for the terminal area of Frankfurt Airport, J Applied Meteorology and Climatology, November 2006, (46).Google Scholar
20. Schwarz, C.W. and Hahn, K.-U. Subjective Wake Vortex Encounter Evaluation, DLR Internal report IB 111-2011/46, Braunschweig, Germany, 2011.Google Scholar
21. Sammonds, R.I. and jrStinnet, G.W. Hazard Criteria for Wake Vortex Encounters, NASA Technical Memorandum, NASA-TM-X-62473, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA, 1975.Google Scholar
22. Hahn, K.-U. and Schwarz, C.W. Safe Limits for Wake Penetration, AIAA Paper 2007-6871, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Hilton Head, South Carolina, 2007.Google Scholar
23. Schwarz, C.W. and Vechtel, D. Wake Vortex Encounter Severity Criteria, WakeNet3-Europe Specifc Workshop on Wake Vortex Encounter Severity Criteria, Braunschweig, 7 February 2012.Google Scholar
24. Van der Geest, P. Wake Vortex Severity Criteria – The Search for a Single Metric, WakeNet3-Europe 4th Major Workshop on Wake Turbulence in Current Operations and Beyond, Langen, 28 February 2012.Google Scholar
25. Hahn, K.-U. Coping with Wake Vortex, 23rd International Congress of Aeronautical Sciences Proceedings, p 732.1-732.14, 2002.Google Scholar
26. Schwarz, C.W. and Hahn, K.-U. Full-flight simulator study for wake vortex hazard area investigation, Aerospace Science and Technology, 10, pp 136–143, DOI 10.1016/j.ast.2005.09.005, 2006.Google Scholar
27. Gestwa, M., Leissling, D. and Bauschat, J.-M. The Software Development Environment of the Flying Test-bed ATTAS, AIAA Paper 2005-6211, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, California, USA, 15-18 August, 2005.Google Scholar
28. Leissling, D., Gestwa, M. and Bauschat, J.-M. In-Flight Simulation in Support of an Aircraft Certifcation Process, AIAA Paper 2003-5532, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, Austin, Texas, USA, 11-14 August, 2003.Google Scholar
29. Hanke, D. et al. In-Flight Simulator ATTAS – System Design and Capabilities, DGLR Congress, Paper No. DGLR 1991-05-02, 1991.Google Scholar
30. Fischenberg, D. A method to validate wake vortex encounter models from flight test data, ICAS 2010, 27th International congress of the aeronautical sciences, Nice, France, 2010.Google Scholar
31. Barrows, T.M. Simplified Methods of Predicting Aircraft Rolling Moments due to Vortex Encounters, AIAA Paper 76-61, AIAA 14th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Washington DC, USA, 1976.Google Scholar
32. de Bruin, A. WAVENC, Wake Vortex Evolution and Wake Vortex Encounter, Publishable Synthesis Report, National Aerospace Lab, NLR-TR-2000-079, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000.Google Scholar
33. Fischenberg, D. Results of Flight Test Data Analysis, EU-project SWAKE, SWAKE-TN-222_1, 2002.Google Scholar
34. Jategaonkar, R., Fischenberg, D. and Gruenhagen, W.V. Aerodynamic Modelling and System Identifcation from Flight Data – Recent Applications at DLR, J Aircr, 41, (4), p 687, 2004.Google Scholar