Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T15:56:29.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrated design of flight simulator motion cueing systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

R. Hosman
Affiliation:
Aerospace Man-Machine Systems Consulting BV, Delfgauw, The Netherlands
S. Advani
Affiliation:
Simulation & Training, Aircraft Development & Systems Engineering BV, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
N. Haeck
Affiliation:
Mathematics and Motion Control Specialist, Hellevoetsluis, The Netherlands

Abstract

An advanced design process applicable to the specification of flight simulator cueing systems is presented in this paper. This process is based on the analysis of the pilot-vehicle control loop by using a pilot model incorporating both visual and vestibular feedback, and the aircraft dynamics. After substituting the model for the simulated aircraft, the analysis tools are used to adjust the washout filter parameters with the goal of restoring pilot control behaviour. This process allows the specification of the motion cueing algorithm. Then, based on flight files representative of the operational flight envelope, the required motion system space is determined. The motion-base geometry is established based on practical limitations, as well as criteria for the stability of the platform with respect to singular conditions. With this process the characteristics of the aircraft, the tasks to be simulated, and the missions themselves are taken into account in defining the simulator motion cueing system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Teunissen, R.. The Future of simulation and training. Proceedings of the Royal Aeronautical Society Flight Simulation Conference, Can flight simulation do everything. London, 19-20 May 1999.Google Scholar
2. Advani, S.K. and Hosman, R.J.A.W., Integrated motion cueing algorithm and motion-base design for flight simulation. proceeding of the conference on: Flight simulation – The next decade. Royal Aeronautical Society, London, 10-12 May, 2000.Google Scholar
3. Advani, S.K., Giovannetti, D. and Blum, M., Design of a hexapod motion cueing system for the NASA Ames Vertical motion simulator. To be presented at the AIAA Modeling & Simulation Technologies Conference, Monterey, CA, USA August 2002.Google Scholar
4. Hosman, R., Are criteria for motion cues and time delays possible? AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference. Portland, Oregon, USA, 9-11 August, 1999. AIAA CP-99–4028.Google Scholar
5. Rasmussen, J.. Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, May/June 1983, SMC-13, (3).Google Scholar
6. Hess, R.A.. A Model for the human’s use of motion cues in vehicular Control. J of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 1990, 13, (2), pp 476482.Google Scholar
7. Hosman, R.J.A.W.. Pilots Perception and Control of Aircraft Motion. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, November 1996. ISBN 90-407-1384-7.Google Scholar
8. Hosman, R. and Stassen, H.. Pilot’s perception in the control of aircraft motions. Control Engineering Practices, 1999, 7, (11), pp 14211428.Google Scholar
9. McRuer, D.T. and Jex, H.R., A review of quasi-linear pilot models. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, September 1967, HFE-8, (3).Google Scholar
10. Bos, J.E., Bles, W. and Hosman, R.J.A.W.. Modeling human Spatial orientation and Motion Perception. AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference. Montreal, 6-9 August, 2001. AIAA 20014248.Google Scholar
11. Advani, S.K.. The Kinematic Design of Flight Simulator Motion-Bases. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology. Delft University Press, 1998. ISBN 90-407-1672-2.Google Scholar
12. Advani, S.K., Nahon, M. and Haeck, N.. Optimisation of six-degrees-of-freedom flight simulator motion systems. AIAA J. Aircr, September-October 1999, 36, (5).Google Scholar
13. Stewart, D.. A Platform with six-degrees-of-freedom, Proc Inst of Mechanical Engineers, 1965-1966, 180, part 1, (5), pp. 371386.Google Scholar