Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T11:08:53.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical simulation of circulation control turbine cascade with Coanda jet and counter-flow blowing at high Mach numbers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2017

Y. Feng ,
Y. Song  and
F. Chen
Y. Feng*
Affiliation:
School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
Y. Song
Affiliation:
School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
F. Chen
Affiliation:
School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
*
fengyanyanhit@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The performance of a circulation-control inlet guide vane that makes use of the Coanda effect was studied numerically in a high Mach number turbine cascade. The effect of different shapes (elliptic and circular) of the Coanda surface at the blade trailing edge was investigated by implementing both a Coanda jet and a counter-flow blowing. Under high subsonic flow conditions, with a total blowing ratio of 3% of the mainstream, the circulation control cascade can reach the same performance as the reference stator with a 13.5% reduction in the axial chord length, with minimal increase of the energy loss coefficient. The Coanda surfaces with small curvature are more efficient in entraining the mainstream flow, and they achieve better aerodynamic performance. The wall attachment of the Coanda jet is improved by employing counter-flow blowing, resulting in a slight increase of both the exit flow angle and the expansion ratio. Under supersonic flow conditions at the cascade exit, it is more difficult for the circulation control cascade to reach the appropriate flow turning due to a premature shock wave, which is absent in the original cascade until the very end of the suction surface.

Keywords

Coanda effectgas turbine cascadecirculation controlMach numberCoanda jetcounter-flow blowing
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 121 , Issue 1243 , September 2017 , pp. 1239 - 1260
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Englar, R.J. Circulation control pneumatic aerodynamics-blown force and moment augmentation and modification; past, present and future, AIAA Fluids Conference and Exhibit, 19–22 June 2000, Denver, CO, US, AIAA Paper 2000-2541.Google Scholar
2. Kweder, J., Panther, C.C. and Smith, J.E. Applications of circulation control, yesterday and today, Int J Engineering, 2010, 4, (5), pp 411-429.Google Scholar
3. Jones, G.S., Viken, S.A., Washburn, A.E., Jenkins, L.N. and Cagle, C.M. An active flow circulation controlled flap concept for general aviation aircraft applications, Proceedings of 1st AIAA Flow Control Conference, 24–26 June 2002, St. Louis, Minnesota, US, AIAA Paper 2002-3157.Google Scholar
4. Cook, M.V., Buonanno, A. and Erbsloh, S.D. A circulation control actuator for flapless flight control, Aeronaut J, August 2008, 112, (1134), pp 483-489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Liu, Y. and Sankar, L.N. Computational evaluation of controlling flap edge vortex and tip vortex effects with circulation control technique, Proceedings of 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 8–11 January 2007, Reno, Nevada, US, AIAA Paper 2007-473.Google Scholar
6. Kanistras, K., Rutherford, M.J., Vitzilaios, N. and Valavanis, K.P. Experimental study of circulation control wings at low Reynolds numbers, Proceedings of 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 16–20 June 2014, Atlanta, Georgia, US, AIAA Paper 2014-2307.Google Scholar
7. Abramson, J. and Rogers, E.O. High- speed characteristics of circulation control airfoils, Proceedings of 21st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 10–13 January 1983, Reno, Nevada, US, AIAA Paper 1983-0265.Google Scholar
8. Schlecht, R. and Anders, S. Parametric evaluation of thin, transonic circulation control airfoils, Proceedings of 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 8–11 January 2007, Reno, Nevada, US, AIAA Paper 2007-272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Zeune, C.H. An overview of the Air Force's speed agile concept demonstration program, Proceedings of 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 7–10 January 2013, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas, US, AIAA Paper 2013-1097.Google Scholar
10. Wick, A.T., Hooker, J.R., Barberie, F.J. and Zeune, C.H. Powered lift CFD predictions of a transonic cruising STOL military transport, Proceedings of 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 7–10 January 2013, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas, US, AIAA Paper 2013-1098.Google Scholar
11. Barberie, F.J., Hooker, J.R. and Zeune, C.H. Low speed powered lift testing of a transonic cruise efficient STOL military transport, Proceedings of 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 07–10 January 2013, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas, US, AIAA Paper 2013-1099.Google Scholar
12. Hooker, J.R., Wick, A.T., Zeune, C.H., Jones, G. and Milholen, W. Design and transonic wind tunnel testing of a cruise efficient STOL military transport, Proceedings of 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 7–10 January 2013, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas, US, AIAA Paper 2013-1100.Google Scholar
13. Jones, G.S., Lin, J.C., Allan, B.G., Milholen, W.E., Rumsey, C.L. and Swanson, R.C. Overview of CFD validation experiments for circulation control applications at NASA, RAES-566-8A1, International Powered Lift Conference, July 2008, London, UK.Google Scholar
14. Milholen, W.E., Jones, G.S., Chan, D.T. and Goodliff, S.L. Enhancements to the FAST-MAC circulation control model and recent high-Reynolds number testing in the national transonic facility, Proceedings of 31st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 24–27 June 2013, San Diego, CA, US, AIAA Paper 2013-2794.Google Scholar
15. Chan, D.T., Milholen, W.E., Jones, G.S. and Goodliff, S.L. Thrust removal methodology for the FAST-MAC circulation control model tested in the national transonic facility, 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 2014-2402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Forster, M. and Steijl, R. Numerical simulation of transonic circulation control, 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 5–9 January 2015, Kissimmee, Florida, US, AIAA Paper 2015-1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Forster, M., Biava, M. and Steijl, R. Multipoint optimisation of Coanda surfaces for transonic circulation control using the adjoint method, 8th AIAA Flow Control Conference, AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and Exposition, 13–17 June 2016, Washington, DC, US, AIAA Paper 2016-3773.Google Scholar
18. Diskin, B., Thomas, J.L., Rumsey, C.L. and Schwoppe, A. Grid-convergence of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes solutions for benchmarck flows in two dimensions, AIAA J, 2016, 54, (9), pp 2563-2588.Google Scholar
19. Kruger, R.A., Marsh, H. and Horlock, J.H. The performance of a cascade fitted with blown flaps, CP-526, Aeronautical Research Council, Great Britain, 1961.Google Scholar
20. Lord, W.K., Macmartin, D.G. and Tillman, G. Flow control opportunities in gas turbine engines, AIAA Fluids Conference and Exhibit, 19–22 June 2000, Denver, CO, US, AIAA Paper 2000-2234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Hill, H.E., Ng, W.F., Vlachos, P.P., Guillot, S.A. and Car, D. 2D parametric study using CFD of a circulation control inlet guide vane, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo Power for Land, Sea and Air, 14–17 May 2007, Montreal, Canada, GT2007-28058.Google Scholar
22. Guendogdu, Y., Vorreiter, A. and Seume, J.R. Design of a low solidity flow-controlled station with Coanda surface in a high speed compressor, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo Power for Land, Sea and Air, 9–13 June 2008, Berlin, Germany, GT2008-51180.Google Scholar
23. Fischer, S., Saathoff, H. and Radespiel, R. Numerical and experimental investigation on a low-speed compressor cascade with circulation control, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo Power for Land, Sea and Air, 9–13 June 2008, Berlin, Germany, GT2008-50302.Google Scholar
24. Fischer, S., Muller, L., Saathoff, H. and Kozulovic, D. Three-dimensional flow through a compressor cascade with circulation control, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, 11–15 June 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark, GT2012-68593.Google Scholar
25. Harff, M.R., Wolff, J.M. and Copenhaver, W.W. A CFD investigation of IGV flow vectoring by counter flow, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo Power for Land, Sea and Air, 14–17 June 2004, Vienna, Austria, GT2004-53941.Google Scholar
26. Song, Y., Li, Y., Chen, H. and Chen, F. Two-dimensional simulation of circulation control turbine cascade, Proceedings of the Institution of Mech Engineers, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering, 2011, 225, (7), pp 761-767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. ANSYS CFX 12.0, ANSYS, Inc., www.ansys.com.Google Scholar
28. ANSYS ICEM 12.0, ANSYS, Inc., www.ansys.com.Google Scholar
29. Novak, C.J., Cornelius, K.C. and Roads, R.K. Experimental investigations of the circular wall jet on a circulation control airfoil, Proceedings of 25th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 12–25 January 1987, Reno, Nevada, US, AIAA Paper 1987-0155.Google Scholar