Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T07:52:07.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polynomial series expansion for optimisation of wing plane structures in idealised critical flutter conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

S. Tizzi
S. Tizzi*
Affiliation:
Aerospace and Astronautics Engineering Department, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A numerical procedure, which utilises polynomial power series expansions for the optimisation of multipanel wing structures in idealised critical flutter conditions, is introduced and developed. It arises from the Rayleigh-Ritz method and employes trial polynomial describing functions both for the flexural displacement and for the thickness variation over the multipanel surface. An idealised structural plate model, according to the Kirchhoff’s theory, together with a linearised supersonic aerodynamic approach, are supposed. The classical Euler-Lagrange optimality criterion, based on variational principles, has been utilised for the optimisation operations, where by imposing the stationary conditions of the Lagrangian functional expression, a nonlinear algebraic equations system is obtained, whose solution is found by an appropriate algorithm. By utilising an iterative process it is possible to reach the reference structure critical conditions, with an optimised thickness distribution throughout the multipanel surface. The final part of the work consists in searching the minimum weight of the multipanel planform wing structure with optimised thickness profile vs the flutter frequency, considered as a variable imput parameter, for fixed flutter speed and equal to the critical one of the reference uniform structure.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 109 , Issue 1091 , January 2005 , pp. 23 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Weisshaar, T.A.. Aeroelastic optimization of a panel in high mach number supersonic flow, AIAA J Aircr, September 1972, 9, (9), pp 611–617.Google Scholar
2. Pierson, B.L.. Discrete variable approximation to minimum weight panels with fixed flutter speed, AIAA J Aircr, September 1972, 10, (9), pp 1147–1148.Google Scholar
3. Santini, P., Balis-Crema, L. and Peroni, I.. Structural optimization in aeroelastic conditions, l’Aerotecnica Missili e Spazio, February-April 1976, 55, (1/2), pp 83–93.Google Scholar
4. Gasparo, M.G., Macconi, M. and Pasquali, A., Risoluzione Numerica di Problemi ai Limiti per Equazioni Differenziali Ordinarie mediante Problemi ai Valori Iniziali, 1979, Pitagora Editrice, Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar
5. Roberts, S.M. and Shipman, J.S.. Continuation in shooting methods for two-points boundary value problems, J Math Anal Appl, 1967, 18, (1), pp 45–58.Google Scholar
6. Santini, P. and Barboni, R.. Structural optimization under constraints of whatever kind, August 1974, Ninth Congress ICAS, ICAS Paper No 74, Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
7. Librescu, L. and Beiner, L.. Weight minimization of orthotropic flat panels subjected to a flutter speed constraint, AIAA J Aircr, June 1986, 24, (6), pp 991–997.Google Scholar
8. Santini, P., Matematica Applicata all Ingegneria, 1967, Vol I, pp 274–325, Etas Kompass, Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
9. Tizzi, S.. The frequency considered as a control parameter in the panel flutter optimization problems, 1991, Atti del XI Congresso Nazional AIDAA, Forli, Italy, October 14-18 1991, Vol II, pp 1453–1468.Google Scholar
10. Tizzi, S.. Optimisation techniques for a unidimensional structure in idealised critical flutter conditions, Aeronaut J, March 1996, 100, (993), pp 91–98.Google Scholar
11. Lillico, M., Butler, R., Guo, S. and Banerjee, J.R.. Aeroelastic optimisation of composite wings using the dynamic stiffness method, Aeronaut J, February 1997, 101, (1002), pp 77–86.Google Scholar
12. Taylor, J.M., Butler, R. and Harrison, C.. Optimisation of composite wind-tunnel wing models, for frequency, flutter and divergence, Aeronaut J, February 1999, 103, (1020), pp 105–111.Google Scholar
13. Santini, P., Introduzione alla Teoria delle Strutture, Tamburini Editore, Milano, IT, pp 315–318.Google Scholar
14. Bislinghoff, R.L. and Ashley, H., Principles of Aeroelasticity, 1962, pp 418–437, Dover Publications, New York, USA.Google Scholar
15. Tizzi, S.. A numerical procedure for the analysis of a vibrating panel in critical flutter conditions, Comp & Struct, February 1994, 50, (3), pp 299–316.Google Scholar
16. Tizzi, S.. Application of a numerical procedure for the dynamic analysis of plane aeronautical structures, J Sound Vibration, June 1996, 193, (5), pp 957–983.Google Scholar
17. Tizzi, S.. Numerical procedure for the dynamic analysis of three-dimensional aeronautical structures, AIAA J Aircr, January-February 1997, 34, (1), pp 120–130.Google Scholar
18. Mikhlin, S.G., Variational Methods in Mathematical Physics, 1964, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 74–125.Google Scholar
19. Reddy, J.N., Applied Functional Analysis and Variational Methods in Engineering, 1986, pp 258–285, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.Google Scholar
20. Taylor, J.E. and Bendsoe, M.P.. A mutual energy formulation for optimal structural design, Struct Optim, September 2001, 22, (2), pp 95–101.Google Scholar
21. Abolbashari, M.H.. Optimality conditions for maximizing the tip velocity of a cantilever beam, Struct Optim, October 2001, 22, (3), pp 253–257.Google Scholar
22. The NAG Fortran Library Manual, 1995, Mark 17, Natural Algorithms Group, Downers Grove, IL.Google Scholar
23. Powell, M.J.D., A hybrid method for nonlinear algebraic equations. In: Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Algebraic Equations, 1970, Rabinowitz, P. (Ed), Gordon and Breach, London, UK.Google Scholar
24. Knot, N.S., Zweber, J.V., Sanders, B. and Eeastep, F.E.. Structural design modifications of a composite wing for improved flutter speeds, 5-7 June 2001, IFASD 2001, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
25. Klimmek, T. and Schwochow, J.. Geometric and structural sensivity analysis of aeroelastic characteristics of wings, 5-7 June 2001, IFASD 2001, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
26. Giles, G.L.. Equivalent plate analysis of aircraft wing box structures with general planform geometry, AIAA J Aircr, November 1986, 23, (11), pp 859–864.Google Scholar
27. Giles, G.L.. Further generalization of an equivalent plate representation for aircraft structure analysis, AIAA J Aircr, January 1989, 26, (1), pp 67–74.Google Scholar
28. Livne, E., Sels, R.A. and Bhatia, K.G.. Lessons from application of equivalent structural modeling to an HSCT wing, AIAA J Aircr, July-August 1994, 31, (4), pp 953–960.Google Scholar
29. Livne, E.. Analytical sensitivities for shape optimization in equivalent plate structural wing models, AIAA J Aircr, July-August 1994, 31, (4), pp 961–969.Google Scholar